They want to divide us and subject us to all kinds of "emergencies."
For me, the big thing that's happening now is RFK Jr's campaign for president, which he'll very likely win unless people wake up (we'll slowly see acceptance of "mistakes were made" so then maybe RFK isn't such nutcase after all; the left will…
Kennedy is a dangerous climate fanatic and WILL use every government power to stop a non-existent crisis, the very crisis that underlies the WEF agenda and necessitates a one-world-government "for the greater good." Yet look how supposedly aware, enlightened people (on our side!) are lapping this up like the man will be the Savior of the Free World.
So now we get further division of the movement with people like Malone and Nass and Midwestern Doctor championing the new messiah, and others of us asking, "what in holy God's name is going on with this?"
He’s pro “gun control” too. That is a contemptible euphemism, “gun control.” Anyone who thinks disarming decent people will make them safe is delusional. Violent criminals don’t obey the laws. So how will passing more laws stop them? Our 2nd amendment might be the only reason why we weren’t shuffled into “quarantine camps” but Australians and Chinese citizens were.
Andrew Klavan made an interesting point about 2A on the Megyn Kelly podcast last week. He said the right are engaging in the wrong arguments re 2A...
He said that the left is arguing that there would be less gun violence if the state removed all weapons. The right tries to rebut that with various types of arguments, but would be better off conceding that it's almost certainly true - if you take away hundreds of millions of guns, probably shootings would drop, yes.
But the reason there is a 2nd Amendment in the Constitution is to ensure the citizenry have the ability to keep their *government* from going tyrannical, and respond to rectify that situation if they do. So that's the framing of the issue we should be pushing for. Some of the left-wing arguments may be true, but are irrelevant.
He's quite right I think. The Republic cannot maintain it's integrity without the ability to keep govt power in check (2A; the backstop/safety valve). All the other points are downstream arguments; this one is the *central matter*.
So, it would be helpful to articulate that arguing to amend or abolish 2A actually means arguing to overhaul America and turn it into something other than the Republic it was founded to be. It's therefore an argument as radical as seeking to declare America a communist country, or a dictatorship. It's in essence an argument for binning the entirety of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, as these things require the safety valves of 1 and 2A in order to be upheld. Very often the right allow the left to set the parameters of the conversation, and then try to bicker ineffectively within those. It would make more sense to zoom out to the big picture, and put forth these parameters, drawing the left's arguments into this battlefield and seeking to let the public hear these 'high level' arguments, and aired on fairer terms?
Neither of the 2 parties want to acknowledge the role of mind altering drugs in gun violence that would end their income from the patent medicine pushers.
At this point it is not cars, it is the total thermodynamic footprint if all humans. The WEF leaders want to get our numbers down to about 800 million which Earth could handle. We are in the positive feedback part of global warming. We entered it over 30 years ago. They are too late.
We must go beyond "just having guns". We must expand and fortify States Rights, Nullification of unconstitutional federal overreach laws and expansion of heavily-armed state defense forces/militias.
We all know that it will come down to this. Sooner or later, we're going to have to use them for the 2nd Amendment's "intended purpose" - rectifying the current state of our Government's over-arching tyranny. How long do we wait? How much worse do we let it get? Those are the real questions.
I don't claim to have the answers. But I will observe that the longer one lets a gangrenous wound fester, the larger the body part will be that will have to be amputated for the patient to continue living. And once it gets past a certain point, you can't cut off enough and the entire system is so poisoned that the patient will die with no recourse. How much more do we want to have to cut off? We're getting mighty damn close to the systemic failure point too....
Concerned Conservatives must step up locally and become leaders and organizers. NO one is coming to, " save us."
We MUST get involved with local, city AND state-level politics. The large Democrat-controlled cities are lost, but we can save and maintain the suburbs and rural areas. If you read history then you know armed conflict is inevitable. Authoritarian Global-Marxist /Socialists will never rest until they completely dominate everyone else. Keeping your head down and maintaining a, " low profile" will NOT protect you. What can you do? Start with like-minded family, friends, and neighbors. Have every member of your group read, " Resistance to Tyranny " by Col Joseph Martino. Good luck!
Another benefit of reframing the 2A argument is that people may notice that we actually have a tyrannical government right now that we may need to keep in check with our guns. And I’m not saying we should be violent. Just us having guns will keep them from treating us like the other 5 eye countries treated their citizens after they disarmed them.
I don't mind saying, I just bought a second gun yesterday. We live in a different world now. As the rule of law diminishes, one's insistence on personal freedom must become more forceful.
NOTE to any paid turncoats who may be monitoring this conversation. Just ask and I will be happy to elaborate.
And if we allow ourselves to be disarmed, then we deserve the loss of sovereignty and subsequent slavery coming by way of the new WHO global pandemic authority.
If Biden signs the new WHO treaty then Texas should leave the union again. It should be easier this time. The Union now has a woke, jabbed army led by Biden and Lloyd Austin instead of Lincoln and Grant. And most of its weapons were left in Afghanistan or sent to the corrupt Zelensky cabal.
RFK Jr is a great choice for Prez! He ticks all the boxes. Ex druggie - all the hip, young thangs will think he's a "way cool" grand daddy-o! Multiple marriages - that'll ease the consciences of those who trashed their "till death do we part" vows. Ditching your wife can't be too bad if Bobby Jr did it. Right? One of his sons went to fight in Ukraine for Ukraine - that's some great virtue-signalling-by-proxy! He's against the vaxx - that draws in a diverse crowd from the religious right to the defiant anti-establishment left. "Environmental warrior" - step right up and join the party, liberals! Deep Hollywood associations - surely vapid, starstruck fans will be impressed? Yes, Bobby is a man-for-many-seasons.
"Kennedy is a dangerous climate fanatic and WILL use every government power to stop a non-existent crisis, the very crisis that underlies the WEF agenda and necessitates a one-world-government "for the greater good.""
I think you're jumping to a conclusion. I don't agree with RFK JR on climate change narrative either, but there is nothing about him that suggests 'fanatic' to me. And importantly, just as everyone else who's paying attention, has begun to grasp the extent of Psyops over the last three years, I would suggest Kennedy is more than capable of stepping back and wondering if he was snookered by the CC data and will likely moderate his position. He knows better than most how the vaxx narrative data has been manipulated, and now, post covid, I can't imagine he isn't questioning his earlier assumptions. Time will tell.
So you think that once president, RFK Jr won't use every power he has to save the planet?
The man is a climate fanatic. He's spoken of censoring or even jailing climate dissenters. OK, so then we get a new "Alien and Sedition Act" because we're at war and people who turn against our great country and its climate war are treasonous? He wouldn't do that? Yet he's expressed sentiments of silencing dangerous climate dissenters before.
The climate scam is obvious. It makes the Covid scam look like a walk in the park. Yet this perceptive, intelligent man doesn't get it, and published a book in 2020 warning us of the great crisis that he of course will solve as president?
I see this as a perfect set-up. The right will vote for him because he'll clean things up, and the left because he'll save the planet (and by then we'll all understand that "mistakes were made" and RFK Jr was pretty much right about the vaccine.)
Tyranny is coming in through the back door of medical necessity, and since global warming is a health emergency, all "necessary" actions can be unleashed to flatten the curve for three years, or for thirty years. RFK Jr has given zero indication as of yet that he's for anything but the global climate crisis requiring urgent action.
its HIGHLY unlikely that RFK jr will even get on the dem ballot, let alone win so your narrow minded panic is pretty irrelevant. 90% of the die-hard left will NEVER vote for him. no. matter. what.
Perhaps you haven't noticed that Newsweek recently ran a piece by Dr. Atlas telling us that so much of Covid was lies? Can't you see a movement that might unfold wherein slowly the left sees that RFK Jr was right about Fauci and the vaccines after all (mistakes were made) and his climate stance trumps all?
I do not have narrow-minded panic. I have a desire for freedom, and freedom requires vigilance, and vigilance requires imagination. That is, the imagination to foresee what MIGHT happen if we're not careful.
I intentionally don't pay attention to mainstream media because its been a psyop for many years already. (but am aware of the tiny cracks in the narrative. they're tiny and the true believers will not be swayed.)
and no sorry, having been following RFK jr for many years, through his activism for the autism community (and taking hit after hit even though he has no 'skin in the game') I do not and cannot see the unfolding of any movement where he will all of a sudden be accepted by any mainstream liberals. not ever. he is WAY too dangerous to their power games.
I think its obvious that HE has an intense desire for freedom and defending the Constitution, regardless of his views on climate. I can't see him EVER promoting a climate 'agenda' that infringes on our basic freedoms. he has said over & over for years, that corporate polluters and corporate corruption is the #1 enemy of our democracy.
we can agree to disagree on science, because that's what science is all about but those positions are only a fraction of one's system of beliefs.
its perfectly okay and even desirable to have vigilance and imagination; I was just pointing out the unlikeliness of RFK doing any more than using the platform to get more truthful information in the public sphere. that's literally ALL that will be accomplished.
And is climate catastrophe "truthful information"?
RFK Jr has expressed belief that climate dissenters should be silenced, even jailed.
If RFK Jr had to take drastic measures to save the planet, you don't believe he would take them even if it meant surveillance of citizens for three years-- or three decades-- to monitor carbon consumption and flatten the curve? To save the very planet for future generations and all life on earth?
honestly, I have never heard him say any such thing. and no, surveillance of everyday citizens is something he has spoke out strongly against. I am not at all sure what you are basing your statements on. 'dissenters silenced or jailed'??? from a man who has railed against censorship for years? does NOT sound like anything he would actually say. do you have original source documentation on that? something out of context maybe, because I can't see that we are talking about the same person here. I've read just about everything he's ever written and listened to numerous podcasts. never heard anything remotely like what you are stating.
environmental catastrophe is truthful. we are being poisoned. its about way more than just climate. and the Gates of the world are messing with geoengineering, which is a topic RFK has been diving into.
he's talking about corporate polluters, not individual citizens. he's been a environmental activist and environmental lawyer for decades. he wants to hold polluters accountable. these are billionaires who give not two shits about what their corporations and industries are doing.
corporations potentially engaging in illegal practices and the captured agencies that are supposed to be holding them accountable are vastly different advisories than the opinions of average joe & jane.
I see nothing here that says he believes even scientists with differing opinions, let alone private citizens, be 'silenced or jailed' so your comment is out of context.
For God's sake, listen to the man! Yes, we should stop pollution of the atmosphere but CO2 isn't a pollutant; it's necessary for life and that isn't the definition of a pollutant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41yJTxrPFhM&t=37s
He wishes there were a law you could punish climate-denying politicians under. Listen to him! Is that OK?
He's a climate fanatic and I will never vote for a fanatic, especially a fanatic for a non-existent crisis.
He "wishes" there were a law one could punish denying politicians under. Well maybe when he's president there will be. Maybe then politicians will only spout approved narratives.
What on earth do you suppose he thinks of climate-denying scientists? They're contemptible human beings, that much is clear. Because they don't swallow the narrative? Because they know what the real science is and he wants us to go through this same "stay safe" crap based on bogus science again?
No, thank you. I'm tired of that shit. Way, way tired, and I'm tired of RFK Jr opening his self-righteous mouth and telling the rest of us how we're supporting the Koch brothers because we don't believe in pseudoscience.
Holy crap. "As reported at Climate Depot, when Climate Depot Director Marc Morano asked Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about the Koch brothers, Kennedy called them “treasonous.” They have become billionaires “by impoverishing the rest of us” and should be in jail, “enjoying three hots and a cot at The Hague with all the other war criminals,” Kennedy said."
Okay, RFK is an abominable piece of crap. Thanks for linking this. I didn't like him before this, but now I really see he's probably worse than Biden
Except the narrow minded far left are dying, becoming ill and disabled. As are their friends and family and colleagues. There is still time to get their attention.
And if Bobby looks like he might get the nomination the CIA will take him out. They are grooming a MAGA patsy right now to blame his assassination on. And then Biden will appoint Hunter and Hillary and Inspector Clouseau to head up the commission to investigate the murder.
the autism community has feared for his safety for years now. we've always worried that it was Big Pharma that will take him out. so add more to the list of 'suspects'.
The goal with the left pushing someone who notes that "mistakes were made" about the "vaccine" (but does nothing to change it for the future) is so the people don't have any issue they can rally behind. No cause of their own. No symbols of their own. Any "leader" of the people is selected so as to pay weak lip service to some causes, and yield to the system when one more step in the implementation of neofeudalism is taken.
The first and second laws if thermodynamics were inspired by the observation in the early 1800s that there is not as much difference between surface temperature between day and night on Earth as the moon. It was noted that the atmosphere acted as the glass of a greenhouse to keep the surface warmer at night than it would otherwise be. In 1856, Eunice Foote demonstrated that CO2 and water vapor were the main greenhouse gases. She then postulated that if we continued to burn fossil fuels, coal then, we would eventually warm Earth enough to cause crop failure and mass starvation and a reduction in our numbers.
Why does the atmosphere retain heat? Is it because of radiative effects or it it merely because of mass, since anything that has mass can be warmed? Is the greenhouse effects mainly due to the mass of the atmosphere? This mass causes 14.7 psi of pressure at the surface, which doesn't seem like a lot until we consider that it translates to 2,117 pounds/square foot, which is huge. Nikolov and Zeller looked at planetary atmospheres and determined that atmospheric pressure and distance from sun determined surface temperature, without regard for atmospheric content.
The atmosphere does NOT act like the glass of a greenhouse, which inhibits convection.
We have have thousands, if not tens of thousands, of sets of balloon data starting from around 1965 or so, for weather balloons launched at the same time twice each day from all over the world. This data is graphically displayed in "skew-T diagrams" that show pressure/temperature relationships, among other things. The pressure/temperature relationships are graphed as lapse rates on these diagrams, and although CO2 should be distorting the lapse rate, particularly in the tropical troposphere, it is not.
If you wonder why climate alarmists always use models and never balloon data to sound the alarm, this is why.
Kennedy is very aware of the threat posed by the "military-pharma-intelligence cloud of the global technocrats." (Abstract) of: PLANNED SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL BY GLOBAL TECHNOCRATS: A BIG PICTURE LOOK AT THE CURRENT PANDEMIC BENIFICIARIES, International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 1 (2), January, 2021 P. 143. This document is authored by the Children's Health Defense Team headed by Kennedy.
Yes. People still covet for a hero. And still believe two party politics is anything but a distraction. I don’t know how corrupted the legal system is, I am open to all avenues of resistance proposed, but my personal opinion is the system is rigged by the corrupt honchos and we are wasting time in there.
So this is why I believe that the fight has not to so much to do with government corruption-- which is vast and a nearly insurmountable job to fix-- but simply to ensure that the government has as little control over our lives as possible.
Restore individual self-determination within the broad confines of the law. We've seen how "we're from the government and we're here to help" is a very, very slippery slope and we need to just say no. We'll fix whatever it is ourselves; thanks anyhow.
And this is what the cdbc’s are all about. Ensuring we have to depend on the Government. I totally agree re self determination though I sense it will need to be collaborative with our community. Putting all inter biases aside like Jessica suggests. The global agenda has been planned since 1913. And the individualism of people from family life etc is part of their alienation tactics. But they have also fostered a mass dependency and I utterly agree to cut ties with the Government wherever we can. Understanding how informed their psy op has been. From cultivating addiction ( on purpose), to big pharma to internet and mobile phones to grocery shopping to pensions etc etc
We can do our best AND I think a collaborative uprising is required
I respectfully disagree as that would provide lots of clickbait! The world is useless right now. The media would love to report that another Kennedy was killed. The anti-vaxxer candidate got killed by an "activist protester" is a perfect headline. The government kills all the time and makes it look like an accident or due to excess crime. I fully expect them to threaten him to stop his campaign or face the consequences.
If the Deep State could kill Epstein in prison and blow up the Nord Stream pipeline nearly 300 feet below the surface of the Baltic Sea, they will find a way to remove Bobby. The CIA is grooming a MAGA patsy to blame the assassination on. Hunter and Hillary will head up the commission to investigate.
If RFK, Jr is controlled opposition, and I think he is, who knows how he is being controlled? The perpetrators running this massive operation are flexible, and most certainly there are Plans A-Z, depending on how events unfold. He could be the introducer of the NWO, or he could be murdered, if necessary.
They will happily blame on Trump supporters, and flood the airwaves with this phony accusation forever. The fact Bobby is a democrat and a Kennedy means nothing to that pack of psychopaths. The end justifies the means.
Why would they want to take him out when he supports a key pillar of the Great Reset?
Bait and switch: OK, pandemic thing didn't work out so well but the climate gig is the mother of all emergencies. Everyone will be cheering: hurrah, hurrah we're cleaning up pharma! Sadly, in 2026 we get bombarded with 24/7 media coverage of the climate emergency (sound familiar? Meanwhile pharma and CDC, FDA had only superficial reforms, business goes on pretty much as usual) and everyone is on board the "do something now" train and RFK Jr will "do something now" to flatten the curve temporarily, for three years or more.
I have no doubt that RFK Jr is a good man. But if he believes in climate catastrophe, he can be useful to those whose wish a new world order whose moral logic is based on climate catastrophe. And why does he believe that nonsense, anyhow?
He's perfect. Clean up all the bad pharma people, reform CDC, and meanwhile the EPA and IPCC are given free reign to sell us the "real" science. Out goes medical tyranny, in comes planetary tyranny: they track and trace all of us (out of necessity to stop bad carbon emissions) and we end up with a collectivist "stay safe" government. Curiously, pharma will still be OK because "a warming world is leading to more pathogens" (!) and the stuff they have to spray into the sky to block the sun is making people sick. But the EPA will deny all of it! And RFK Jr is OK with it because, well, we have to save the planet, don't we?
It was to be expected that controlled opposition would be inserted into the medical freedom movement. The tendency of people to let others do their thinking for them, then blindly follow the latest “hero” is what makes it easy to divert the partially political aware into the next dead end, or worse yet, ambush.
Pretty darn good! Thank you.
They want to divide us and subject us to all kinds of "emergencies."
For me, the big thing that's happening now is RFK Jr's campaign for president, which he'll very likely win unless people wake up (we'll slowly see acceptance of "mistakes were made" so then maybe RFK isn't such nutcase after all; the left will forgive him because after all, climate is the big issue.) RFK Jr is a climate fanatic, and if you think there's no such thing as "unwarranted government emergency powers," wait until the man who wants to save the world from global catastrophe gets in. https://www.amazon.com/Climate-Crisis-Causing-Fighting-Reverse/dp/1510760563/ref=sr_1_2?crid=29K3NP6REFWZN&keywords=RFK+Jr+climate&qid=1681648209&sprefix=rfk+jr+climate%2Caps%2C148&sr=8-2 That's published in 2020, folks.
Kennedy is a dangerous climate fanatic and WILL use every government power to stop a non-existent crisis, the very crisis that underlies the WEF agenda and necessitates a one-world-government "for the greater good." Yet look how supposedly aware, enlightened people (on our side!) are lapping this up like the man will be the Savior of the Free World.
So now we get further division of the movement with people like Malone and Nass and Midwestern Doctor championing the new messiah, and others of us asking, "what in holy God's name is going on with this?"
He’s pro “gun control” too. That is a contemptible euphemism, “gun control.” Anyone who thinks disarming decent people will make them safe is delusional. Violent criminals don’t obey the laws. So how will passing more laws stop them? Our 2nd amendment might be the only reason why we weren’t shuffled into “quarantine camps” but Australians and Chinese citizens were.
Andrew Klavan made an interesting point about 2A on the Megyn Kelly podcast last week. He said the right are engaging in the wrong arguments re 2A...
He said that the left is arguing that there would be less gun violence if the state removed all weapons. The right tries to rebut that with various types of arguments, but would be better off conceding that it's almost certainly true - if you take away hundreds of millions of guns, probably shootings would drop, yes.
But the reason there is a 2nd Amendment in the Constitution is to ensure the citizenry have the ability to keep their *government* from going tyrannical, and respond to rectify that situation if they do. So that's the framing of the issue we should be pushing for. Some of the left-wing arguments may be true, but are irrelevant.
He's quite right I think. The Republic cannot maintain it's integrity without the ability to keep govt power in check (2A; the backstop/safety valve). All the other points are downstream arguments; this one is the *central matter*.
So, it would be helpful to articulate that arguing to amend or abolish 2A actually means arguing to overhaul America and turn it into something other than the Republic it was founded to be. It's therefore an argument as radical as seeking to declare America a communist country, or a dictatorship. It's in essence an argument for binning the entirety of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, as these things require the safety valves of 1 and 2A in order to be upheld. Very often the right allow the left to set the parameters of the conversation, and then try to bicker ineffectively within those. It would make more sense to zoom out to the big picture, and put forth these parameters, drawing the left's arguments into this battlefield and seeking to let the public hear these 'high level' arguments, and aired on fairer terms?
The argument that guns are responsible for deaths is similar to the argument that cars are responsible for deaths.
However, the solution proposed is never banning cars.
The banning of guns does however, make you defenceless in your own home both from criminals and government.
The lefties seem to like that.
Neither of the 2 parties want to acknowledge the role of mind altering drugs in gun violence that would end their income from the patent medicine pushers.
But the lefties do want to ban cars to save the climate.
At this point it is not cars, it is the total thermodynamic footprint if all humans. The WEF leaders want to get our numbers down to about 800 million which Earth could handle. We are in the positive feedback part of global warming. We entered it over 30 years ago. They are too late.
We must go beyond "just having guns". We must expand and fortify States Rights, Nullification of unconstitutional federal overreach laws and expansion of heavily-armed state defense forces/militias.
>>We must go beyond "just having guns"
We all know that it will come down to this. Sooner or later, we're going to have to use them for the 2nd Amendment's "intended purpose" - rectifying the current state of our Government's over-arching tyranny. How long do we wait? How much worse do we let it get? Those are the real questions.
I don't claim to have the answers. But I will observe that the longer one lets a gangrenous wound fester, the larger the body part will be that will have to be amputated for the patient to continue living. And once it gets past a certain point, you can't cut off enough and the entire system is so poisoned that the patient will die with no recourse. How much more do we want to have to cut off? We're getting mighty damn close to the systemic failure point too....
Concerned Conservatives must step up locally and become leaders and organizers. NO one is coming to, " save us."
We MUST get involved with local, city AND state-level politics. The large Democrat-controlled cities are lost, but we can save and maintain the suburbs and rural areas. If you read history then you know armed conflict is inevitable. Authoritarian Global-Marxist /Socialists will never rest until they completely dominate everyone else. Keeping your head down and maintaining a, " low profile" will NOT protect you. What can you do? Start with like-minded family, friends, and neighbors. Have every member of your group read, " Resistance to Tyranny " by Col Joseph Martino. Good luck!
Another benefit of reframing the 2A argument is that people may notice that we actually have a tyrannical government right now that we may need to keep in check with our guns. And I’m not saying we should be violent. Just us having guns will keep them from treating us like the other 5 eye countries treated their citizens after they disarmed them.
Cheers. Aussie over here. I’m gonna lynch ‘‘em with fly spray.
Could throw redbacks at them? 😆🕷
hahahha i love you guys. we have camel spiders.
Yes! We could make red back bombs. And stab them with long handled forks 😂
Yes, good call. 💯
And get the tongs, grab some shrimp off the barbie, and poke 'em with the pointy bits!
And breed an army of Tassie Devils to fight on behalf of the resistance [careful handling those!]
These are all genius ideas. I'm starting to think that Australia 🇦🇺 might just be the nation to lead the fightback 😉
That is such a great idea. Those pointy bits hurt!
I will wear dish washing gloves handling the tassies.
We can also slap them with thongs and cricket bats
And if i sing the National Anthem loudly they will likely die standing up. I am tone deaf!
Thankyou for the laughs. Funny
😂😉
I don't mind saying, I just bought a second gun yesterday. We live in a different world now. As the rule of law diminishes, one's insistence on personal freedom must become more forceful.
NOTE to any paid turncoats who may be monitoring this conversation. Just ask and I will be happy to elaborate.
Good, Now practice... practice... practice. And find neighbors of a like mind as well.
And if we allow ourselves to be disarmed, then we deserve the loss of sovereignty and subsequent slavery coming by way of the new WHO global pandemic authority.
If Biden signs the new WHO treaty then Texas should leave the union again. It should be easier this time. The Union now has a woke, jabbed army led by Biden and Lloyd Austin instead of Lincoln and Grant. And most of its weapons were left in Afghanistan or sent to the corrupt Zelensky cabal.
RFK Jr is a great choice for Prez! He ticks all the boxes. Ex druggie - all the hip, young thangs will think he's a "way cool" grand daddy-o! Multiple marriages - that'll ease the consciences of those who trashed their "till death do we part" vows. Ditching your wife can't be too bad if Bobby Jr did it. Right? One of his sons went to fight in Ukraine for Ukraine - that's some great virtue-signalling-by-proxy! He's against the vaxx - that draws in a diverse crowd from the religious right to the defiant anti-establishment left. "Environmental warrior" - step right up and join the party, liberals! Deep Hollywood associations - surely vapid, starstruck fans will be impressed? Yes, Bobby is a man-for-many-seasons.
"Kennedy is a dangerous climate fanatic and WILL use every government power to stop a non-existent crisis, the very crisis that underlies the WEF agenda and necessitates a one-world-government "for the greater good.""
I think you're jumping to a conclusion. I don't agree with RFK JR on climate change narrative either, but there is nothing about him that suggests 'fanatic' to me. And importantly, just as everyone else who's paying attention, has begun to grasp the extent of Psyops over the last three years, I would suggest Kennedy is more than capable of stepping back and wondering if he was snookered by the CC data and will likely moderate his position. He knows better than most how the vaxx narrative data has been manipulated, and now, post covid, I can't imagine he isn't questioning his earlier assumptions. Time will tell.
So you think that once president, RFK Jr won't use every power he has to save the planet?
The man is a climate fanatic. He's spoken of censoring or even jailing climate dissenters. OK, so then we get a new "Alien and Sedition Act" because we're at war and people who turn against our great country and its climate war are treasonous? He wouldn't do that? Yet he's expressed sentiments of silencing dangerous climate dissenters before.
The climate scam is obvious. It makes the Covid scam look like a walk in the park. Yet this perceptive, intelligent man doesn't get it, and published a book in 2020 warning us of the great crisis that he of course will solve as president?
I see this as a perfect set-up. The right will vote for him because he'll clean things up, and the left because he'll save the planet (and by then we'll all understand that "mistakes were made" and RFK Jr was pretty much right about the vaccine.)
Tyranny is coming in through the back door of medical necessity, and since global warming is a health emergency, all "necessary" actions can be unleashed to flatten the curve for three years, or for thirty years. RFK Jr has given zero indication as of yet that he's for anything but the global climate crisis requiring urgent action.
its HIGHLY unlikely that RFK jr will even get on the dem ballot, let alone win so your narrow minded panic is pretty irrelevant. 90% of the die-hard left will NEVER vote for him. no. matter. what.
Perhaps you haven't noticed that Newsweek recently ran a piece by Dr. Atlas telling us that so much of Covid was lies? Can't you see a movement that might unfold wherein slowly the left sees that RFK Jr was right about Fauci and the vaccines after all (mistakes were made) and his climate stance trumps all?
I do not have narrow-minded panic. I have a desire for freedom, and freedom requires vigilance, and vigilance requires imagination. That is, the imagination to foresee what MIGHT happen if we're not careful.
I intentionally don't pay attention to mainstream media because its been a psyop for many years already. (but am aware of the tiny cracks in the narrative. they're tiny and the true believers will not be swayed.)
and no sorry, having been following RFK jr for many years, through his activism for the autism community (and taking hit after hit even though he has no 'skin in the game') I do not and cannot see the unfolding of any movement where he will all of a sudden be accepted by any mainstream liberals. not ever. he is WAY too dangerous to their power games.
I think its obvious that HE has an intense desire for freedom and defending the Constitution, regardless of his views on climate. I can't see him EVER promoting a climate 'agenda' that infringes on our basic freedoms. he has said over & over for years, that corporate polluters and corporate corruption is the #1 enemy of our democracy.
we can agree to disagree on science, because that's what science is all about but those positions are only a fraction of one's system of beliefs.
its perfectly okay and even desirable to have vigilance and imagination; I was just pointing out the unlikeliness of RFK doing any more than using the platform to get more truthful information in the public sphere. that's literally ALL that will be accomplished.
And is climate catastrophe "truthful information"?
RFK Jr has expressed belief that climate dissenters should be silenced, even jailed.
If RFK Jr had to take drastic measures to save the planet, you don't believe he would take them even if it meant surveillance of citizens for three years-- or three decades-- to monitor carbon consumption and flatten the curve? To save the very planet for future generations and all life on earth?
Obviously, I don't trust climate fanatics.
honestly, I have never heard him say any such thing. and no, surveillance of everyday citizens is something he has spoke out strongly against. I am not at all sure what you are basing your statements on. 'dissenters silenced or jailed'??? from a man who has railed against censorship for years? does NOT sound like anything he would actually say. do you have original source documentation on that? something out of context maybe, because I can't see that we are talking about the same person here. I've read just about everything he's ever written and listened to numerous podcasts. never heard anything remotely like what you are stating.
environmental catastrophe is truthful. we are being poisoned. its about way more than just climate. and the Gates of the world are messing with geoengineering, which is a topic RFK has been diving into.
https://heartland.org/opinion/climate-change-deniers-should-be-jailed-rfk-jr/
he's talking about corporate polluters, not individual citizens. he's been a environmental activist and environmental lawyer for decades. he wants to hold polluters accountable. these are billionaires who give not two shits about what their corporations and industries are doing.
corporations potentially engaging in illegal practices and the captured agencies that are supposed to be holding them accountable are vastly different advisories than the opinions of average joe & jane.
I see nothing here that says he believes even scientists with differing opinions, let alone private citizens, be 'silenced or jailed' so your comment is out of context.
For God's sake, listen to the man! Yes, we should stop pollution of the atmosphere but CO2 isn't a pollutant; it's necessary for life and that isn't the definition of a pollutant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41yJTxrPFhM&t=37s
He wishes there were a law you could punish climate-denying politicians under. Listen to him! Is that OK?
He's a climate fanatic and I will never vote for a fanatic, especially a fanatic for a non-existent crisis.
He "wishes" there were a law one could punish denying politicians under. Well maybe when he's president there will be. Maybe then politicians will only spout approved narratives.
What on earth do you suppose he thinks of climate-denying scientists? They're contemptible human beings, that much is clear. Because they don't swallow the narrative? Because they know what the real science is and he wants us to go through this same "stay safe" crap based on bogus science again?
No, thank you. I'm tired of that shit. Way, way tired, and I'm tired of RFK Jr opening his self-righteous mouth and telling the rest of us how we're supporting the Koch brothers because we don't believe in pseudoscience.
Holy crap. "As reported at Climate Depot, when Climate Depot Director Marc Morano asked Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about the Koch brothers, Kennedy called them “treasonous.” They have become billionaires “by impoverishing the rest of us” and should be in jail, “enjoying three hots and a cot at The Hague with all the other war criminals,” Kennedy said."
Okay, RFK is an abominable piece of crap. Thanks for linking this. I didn't like him before this, but now I really see he's probably worse than Biden
Except the narrow minded far left are dying, becoming ill and disabled. As are their friends and family and colleagues. There is still time to get their attention.
You are very naive (or disingenuous), to believe that voting (i.e. honest voting) has anything to do with implementing a narrative.
And if Bobby looks like he might get the nomination the CIA will take him out. They are grooming a MAGA patsy right now to blame his assassination on. And then Biden will appoint Hunter and Hillary and Inspector Clouseau to head up the commission to investigate the murder.
the autism community has feared for his safety for years now. we've always worried that it was Big Pharma that will take him out. so add more to the list of 'suspects'.
The goal with the left pushing someone who notes that "mistakes were made" about the "vaccine" (but does nothing to change it for the future) is so the people don't have any issue they can rally behind. No cause of their own. No symbols of their own. Any "leader" of the people is selected so as to pay weak lip service to some causes, and yield to the system when one more step in the implementation of neofeudalism is taken.
Plenty of time for Bobby to come up with causes. Draining the swamp would work well for installation of a one world government.
The first and second laws if thermodynamics were inspired by the observation in the early 1800s that there is not as much difference between surface temperature between day and night on Earth as the moon. It was noted that the atmosphere acted as the glass of a greenhouse to keep the surface warmer at night than it would otherwise be. In 1856, Eunice Foote demonstrated that CO2 and water vapor were the main greenhouse gases. She then postulated that if we continued to burn fossil fuels, coal then, we would eventually warm Earth enough to cause crop failure and mass starvation and a reduction in our numbers.
Yes, but what if all these postulates are wrong?
Why does the atmosphere retain heat? Is it because of radiative effects or it it merely because of mass, since anything that has mass can be warmed? Is the greenhouse effects mainly due to the mass of the atmosphere? This mass causes 14.7 psi of pressure at the surface, which doesn't seem like a lot until we consider that it translates to 2,117 pounds/square foot, which is huge. Nikolov and Zeller looked at planetary atmospheres and determined that atmospheric pressure and distance from sun determined surface temperature, without regard for atmospheric content.
The atmosphere does NOT act like the glass of a greenhouse, which inhibits convection.
We have have thousands, if not tens of thousands, of sets of balloon data starting from around 1965 or so, for weather balloons launched at the same time twice each day from all over the world. This data is graphically displayed in "skew-T diagrams" that show pressure/temperature relationships, among other things. The pressure/temperature relationships are graphed as lapse rates on these diagrams, and although CO2 should be distorting the lapse rate, particularly in the tropical troposphere, it is not.
If you wonder why climate alarmists always use models and never balloon data to sound the alarm, this is why.
I've written several essays dealing with balloon data and hope to expand this. https://jimreagen.substack.com/p/global-warming
Radiative effects happen but they're overwhelmed by pressure effects.
Kennedy is very aware of the threat posed by the "military-pharma-intelligence cloud of the global technocrats." (Abstract) of: PLANNED SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL BY GLOBAL TECHNOCRATS: A BIG PICTURE LOOK AT THE CURRENT PANDEMIC BENIFICIARIES, International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 1 (2), January, 2021 P. 143. This document is authored by the Children's Health Defense Team headed by Kennedy.
Yes. People still covet for a hero. And still believe two party politics is anything but a distraction. I don’t know how corrupted the legal system is, I am open to all avenues of resistance proposed, but my personal opinion is the system is rigged by the corrupt honchos and we are wasting time in there.
So this is why I believe that the fight has not to so much to do with government corruption-- which is vast and a nearly insurmountable job to fix-- but simply to ensure that the government has as little control over our lives as possible.
Restore individual self-determination within the broad confines of the law. We've seen how "we're from the government and we're here to help" is a very, very slippery slope and we need to just say no. We'll fix whatever it is ourselves; thanks anyhow.
And this is what the cdbc’s are all about. Ensuring we have to depend on the Government. I totally agree re self determination though I sense it will need to be collaborative with our community. Putting all inter biases aside like Jessica suggests. The global agenda has been planned since 1913. And the individualism of people from family life etc is part of their alienation tactics. But they have also fostered a mass dependency and I utterly agree to cut ties with the Government wherever we can. Understanding how informed their psy op has been. From cultivating addiction ( on purpose), to big pharma to internet and mobile phones to grocery shopping to pensions etc etc
We can do our best AND I think a collaborative uprising is required
Thanks for sharing ideas with me. I was listening 🙏☺️
I am a fan of his but he will not win. They will kill him if he gets any traction
No they won't. They can't. The world is watching. They can't have lightning strike twice.
I respectfully disagree as that would provide lots of clickbait! The world is useless right now. The media would love to report that another Kennedy was killed. The anti-vaxxer candidate got killed by an "activist protester" is a perfect headline. The government kills all the time and makes it look like an accident or due to excess crime. I fully expect them to threaten him to stop his campaign or face the consequences.
I respectfully disagree. It has struck twice. JFK and RFK. And Junior will be next in line. It will be covered up and lied about again.
Lightning strike twice? JFK in Nov ‘63, MLK in April, ‘68, and RFK Jr’s dad Bobby exactly 2 months later. Lightning struck thrice.
If the Deep State could kill Epstein in prison and blow up the Nord Stream pipeline nearly 300 feet below the surface of the Baltic Sea, they will find a way to remove Bobby. The CIA is grooming a MAGA patsy to blame the assassination on. Hunter and Hillary will head up the commission to investigate.
BTW, Jessica, thanks for a great summary article. It’s much appreciated as well as all you have been doing.
If RFK, Jr is controlled opposition, and I think he is, who knows how he is being controlled? The perpetrators running this massive operation are flexible, and most certainly there are Plans A-Z, depending on how events unfold. He could be the introducer of the NWO, or he could be murdered, if necessary.
uh, have you read his book about Fauci?
They will happily blame on Trump supporters, and flood the airwaves with this phony accusation forever. The fact Bobby is a democrat and a Kennedy means nothing to that pack of psychopaths. The end justifies the means.
Why would they want to take him out when he supports a key pillar of the Great Reset?
Bait and switch: OK, pandemic thing didn't work out so well but the climate gig is the mother of all emergencies. Everyone will be cheering: hurrah, hurrah we're cleaning up pharma! Sadly, in 2026 we get bombarded with 24/7 media coverage of the climate emergency (sound familiar? Meanwhile pharma and CDC, FDA had only superficial reforms, business goes on pretty much as usual) and everyone is on board the "do something now" train and RFK Jr will "do something now" to flatten the curve temporarily, for three years or more.
I have no doubt that RFK Jr is a good man. But if he believes in climate catastrophe, he can be useful to those whose wish a new world order whose moral logic is based on climate catastrophe. And why does he believe that nonsense, anyhow?
Or even thrice.
CIA is still withholding 515 documents in full and more than 14000 pages partially redacted. They have gotten away with it every time.
Three times.
And...you'd be surprised.
I wish I shared your optimism
Why on earth wouldn't they want him to win?
He's perfect. Clean up all the bad pharma people, reform CDC, and meanwhile the EPA and IPCC are given free reign to sell us the "real" science. Out goes medical tyranny, in comes planetary tyranny: they track and trace all of us (out of necessity to stop bad carbon emissions) and we end up with a collectivist "stay safe" government. Curiously, pharma will still be OK because "a warming world is leading to more pathogens" (!) and the stuff they have to spray into the sky to block the sun is making people sick. But the EPA will deny all of it! And RFK Jr is OK with it because, well, we have to save the planet, don't we?
Wrong about him approving of geoengineering: have you not listened to his interview with Dane Wigington of geoengineering watch? https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/rfkjr/episodes/Are-Chemtrails-Real--with-Dane-Wigington-e1vlp7j
Regardless, belief in climate catastrophe leads to all sorts of dangerous necessities.
I smell the set up already
It was to be expected that controlled opposition would be inserted into the medical freedom movement. The tendency of people to let others do their thinking for them, then blindly follow the latest “hero” is what makes it easy to divert the partially political aware into the next dead end, or worse yet, ambush.
“Whenever the people need a hero, we shall supply him.” – Albert Pike, 33 Degree Mason