its HIGHLY unlikely that RFK jr will even get on the dem ballot, let alone win so your narrow minded panic is pretty irrelevant. 90% of the die-hard left will NEVER vote for him. no. matter. what.
its HIGHLY unlikely that RFK jr will even get on the dem ballot, let alone win so your narrow minded panic is pretty irrelevant. 90% of the die-hard left will NEVER vote for him. no. matter. what.
Perhaps you haven't noticed that Newsweek recently ran a piece by Dr. Atlas telling us that so much of Covid was lies? Can't you see a movement that might unfold wherein slowly the left sees that RFK Jr was right about Fauci and the vaccines after all (mistakes were made) and his climate stance trumps all?
I do not have narrow-minded panic. I have a desire for freedom, and freedom requires vigilance, and vigilance requires imagination. That is, the imagination to foresee what MIGHT happen if we're not careful.
I intentionally don't pay attention to mainstream media because its been a psyop for many years already. (but am aware of the tiny cracks in the narrative. they're tiny and the true believers will not be swayed.)
and no sorry, having been following RFK jr for many years, through his activism for the autism community (and taking hit after hit even though he has no 'skin in the game') I do not and cannot see the unfolding of any movement where he will all of a sudden be accepted by any mainstream liberals. not ever. he is WAY too dangerous to their power games.
I think its obvious that HE has an intense desire for freedom and defending the Constitution, regardless of his views on climate. I can't see him EVER promoting a climate 'agenda' that infringes on our basic freedoms. he has said over & over for years, that corporate polluters and corporate corruption is the #1 enemy of our democracy.
we can agree to disagree on science, because that's what science is all about but those positions are only a fraction of one's system of beliefs.
its perfectly okay and even desirable to have vigilance and imagination; I was just pointing out the unlikeliness of RFK doing any more than using the platform to get more truthful information in the public sphere. that's literally ALL that will be accomplished.
And is climate catastrophe "truthful information"?
RFK Jr has expressed belief that climate dissenters should be silenced, even jailed.
If RFK Jr had to take drastic measures to save the planet, you don't believe he would take them even if it meant surveillance of citizens for three years-- or three decades-- to monitor carbon consumption and flatten the curve? To save the very planet for future generations and all life on earth?
honestly, I have never heard him say any such thing. and no, surveillance of everyday citizens is something he has spoke out strongly against. I am not at all sure what you are basing your statements on. 'dissenters silenced or jailed'??? from a man who has railed against censorship for years? does NOT sound like anything he would actually say. do you have original source documentation on that? something out of context maybe, because I can't see that we are talking about the same person here. I've read just about everything he's ever written and listened to numerous podcasts. never heard anything remotely like what you are stating.
environmental catastrophe is truthful. we are being poisoned. its about way more than just climate. and the Gates of the world are messing with geoengineering, which is a topic RFK has been diving into.
he's talking about corporate polluters, not individual citizens. he's been a environmental activist and environmental lawyer for decades. he wants to hold polluters accountable. these are billionaires who give not two shits about what their corporations and industries are doing.
corporations potentially engaging in illegal practices and the captured agencies that are supposed to be holding them accountable are vastly different advisories than the opinions of average joe & jane.
I see nothing here that says he believes even scientists with differing opinions, let alone private citizens, be 'silenced or jailed' so your comment is out of context.
For God's sake, listen to the man! Yes, we should stop pollution of the atmosphere but CO2 isn't a pollutant; it's necessary for life and that isn't the definition of a pollutant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41yJTxrPFhM&t=37s
He wishes there were a law you could punish climate-denying politicians under. Listen to him! Is that OK?
He's a climate fanatic and I will never vote for a fanatic, especially a fanatic for a non-existent crisis.
He "wishes" there were a law one could punish denying politicians under. Well maybe when he's president there will be. Maybe then politicians will only spout approved narratives.
What on earth do you suppose he thinks of climate-denying scientists? They're contemptible human beings, that much is clear. Because they don't swallow the narrative? Because they know what the real science is and he wants us to go through this same "stay safe" crap based on bogus science again?
No, thank you. I'm tired of that shit. Way, way tired, and I'm tired of RFK Jr opening his self-righteous mouth and telling the rest of us how we're supporting the Koch brothers because we don't believe in pseudoscience.
you're certainly welcome to your opinions of him as a 'fanatic'. and of course your decisions of whom to, or not to, vote for are yours alone.
what he would do or not do as president, we will never know because he doesn't have a chance of getting the nomination. I'll even bet that blue state dems will try to block him getting on the primary ballot.
but you still seem to be claiming to know what's in his mind that he hasn't actually said (he thinks dissenting scientists are contemptible human beings?)
and how is your view 'against', any less 'fanatic' than his? personally, I think there's a LOT of grey area in the science here but like I said, you are absolutely entitled to your views.
There is no CO2 catastrophe. Of course RFK Jr would think dissenting scientists are contemptible: why on earth would he not, if the science were supposedly so settled and irrefutable? In his mind they'd all be paid off, wouldn't they?
Where's the path to a nomination? Easy. Media comes out with more stories about how during Covid "mistakes were made" and the left begins to see that RFK Jr was right; he can be forgiven. He was right about pharma. The left loves him because he's a committed climate warrior.
OK that's the left. The right cheers him on because he's going to expose pharma and clean things up and reform government.
Yes, I've spend years looking at climate science and I've looked at in in some detail, as my substack attests. I used to believe that the ski resorts would have no snow by now: wrong. And I've learned, like so many others, that climate science is bogus science. So yes, I'm a fanatic: climate science is the worst pseudoscientific rubbish ever heaped on humanity. RFK Jr is dead wrong on climate and if you want to know why I believe that, then I invite you to peruse my substack.
I agree that CO2 is not a pollutant. climate issues (way over hyped, that's for sure!) are not the be all, end all. and certainly there's tons of disagreement (but the topic has not been my focus since I've been solidly in the health freedom movement WAY before it was called that). I absolutely disapprove of the 'agenda' that wants to assign 'carbon credits' (its silly and its an obvious con).
I do not agree one bit that the 'left loves him'. all I have heard over the past decade in MSM, is what a anti-vax nut job he is. lefty queen Rachel Madow thru him under the bus for wanting vax safety to be studied (like it was the stupidest thing ever suggested!) even though she said she 'used to' respect him for his work with River Keepers. her tone, and that of others in MSM, has been more of a 'tut, tut. he USED to be respectable'. what about all the hit pieces talking about how members of his own family have denounced him? and even though he has gained some grudging respect from conservatives, many still seem to view him with suspicion.
but we'll see, we'll see, Mr Reagen. ALL would-be politicians' views get 'watered down' when they're actually running for office (well most of the time anyway). its kinda moot though, imho. people are not gonna vote for him, en masse. MSM is already working overtime to smack him down.
Holy crap. "As reported at Climate Depot, when Climate Depot Director Marc Morano asked Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about the Koch brothers, Kennedy called them тАЬtreasonous.тАЭ They have become billionaires тАЬby impoverishing the rest of usтАЭ and should be in jail, тАЬenjoying three hots and a cot at The Hague with all the other war criminals,тАЭ Kennedy said."
Okay, RFK is an abominable piece of crap. Thanks for linking this. I didn't like him before this, but now I really see he's probably worse than Biden
Except the narrow minded far left are dying, becoming ill and disabled. As are their friends and family and colleagues. There is still time to get their attention.
And if Bobby looks like he might get the nomination the CIA will take him out. They are grooming a MAGA patsy right now to blame his assassination on. And then Biden will appoint Hunter and Hillary and Inspector Clouseau to head up the commission to investigate the murder.
the autism community has feared for his safety for years now. we've always worried that it was Big Pharma that will take him out. so add more to the list of 'suspects'.
its HIGHLY unlikely that RFK jr will even get on the dem ballot, let alone win so your narrow minded panic is pretty irrelevant. 90% of the die-hard left will NEVER vote for him. no. matter. what.
Perhaps you haven't noticed that Newsweek recently ran a piece by Dr. Atlas telling us that so much of Covid was lies? Can't you see a movement that might unfold wherein slowly the left sees that RFK Jr was right about Fauci and the vaccines after all (mistakes were made) and his climate stance trumps all?
I do not have narrow-minded panic. I have a desire for freedom, and freedom requires vigilance, and vigilance requires imagination. That is, the imagination to foresee what MIGHT happen if we're not careful.
I intentionally don't pay attention to mainstream media because its been a psyop for many years already. (but am aware of the tiny cracks in the narrative. they're tiny and the true believers will not be swayed.)
and no sorry, having been following RFK jr for many years, through his activism for the autism community (and taking hit after hit even though he has no 'skin in the game') I do not and cannot see the unfolding of any movement where he will all of a sudden be accepted by any mainstream liberals. not ever. he is WAY too dangerous to their power games.
I think its obvious that HE has an intense desire for freedom and defending the Constitution, regardless of his views on climate. I can't see him EVER promoting a climate 'agenda' that infringes on our basic freedoms. he has said over & over for years, that corporate polluters and corporate corruption is the #1 enemy of our democracy.
we can agree to disagree on science, because that's what science is all about but those positions are only a fraction of one's system of beliefs.
its perfectly okay and even desirable to have vigilance and imagination; I was just pointing out the unlikeliness of RFK doing any more than using the platform to get more truthful information in the public sphere. that's literally ALL that will be accomplished.
And is climate catastrophe "truthful information"?
RFK Jr has expressed belief that climate dissenters should be silenced, even jailed.
If RFK Jr had to take drastic measures to save the planet, you don't believe he would take them even if it meant surveillance of citizens for three years-- or three decades-- to monitor carbon consumption and flatten the curve? To save the very planet for future generations and all life on earth?
Obviously, I don't trust climate fanatics.
honestly, I have never heard him say any such thing. and no, surveillance of everyday citizens is something he has spoke out strongly against. I am not at all sure what you are basing your statements on. 'dissenters silenced or jailed'??? from a man who has railed against censorship for years? does NOT sound like anything he would actually say. do you have original source documentation on that? something out of context maybe, because I can't see that we are talking about the same person here. I've read just about everything he's ever written and listened to numerous podcasts. never heard anything remotely like what you are stating.
environmental catastrophe is truthful. we are being poisoned. its about way more than just climate. and the Gates of the world are messing with geoengineering, which is a topic RFK has been diving into.
https://heartland.org/opinion/climate-change-deniers-should-be-jailed-rfk-jr/
he's talking about corporate polluters, not individual citizens. he's been a environmental activist and environmental lawyer for decades. he wants to hold polluters accountable. these are billionaires who give not two shits about what their corporations and industries are doing.
corporations potentially engaging in illegal practices and the captured agencies that are supposed to be holding them accountable are vastly different advisories than the opinions of average joe & jane.
I see nothing here that says he believes even scientists with differing opinions, let alone private citizens, be 'silenced or jailed' so your comment is out of context.
For God's sake, listen to the man! Yes, we should stop pollution of the atmosphere but CO2 isn't a pollutant; it's necessary for life and that isn't the definition of a pollutant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41yJTxrPFhM&t=37s
He wishes there were a law you could punish climate-denying politicians under. Listen to him! Is that OK?
He's a climate fanatic and I will never vote for a fanatic, especially a fanatic for a non-existent crisis.
He "wishes" there were a law one could punish denying politicians under. Well maybe when he's president there will be. Maybe then politicians will only spout approved narratives.
What on earth do you suppose he thinks of climate-denying scientists? They're contemptible human beings, that much is clear. Because they don't swallow the narrative? Because they know what the real science is and he wants us to go through this same "stay safe" crap based on bogus science again?
No, thank you. I'm tired of that shit. Way, way tired, and I'm tired of RFK Jr opening his self-righteous mouth and telling the rest of us how we're supporting the Koch brothers because we don't believe in pseudoscience.
you're certainly welcome to your opinions of him as a 'fanatic'. and of course your decisions of whom to, or not to, vote for are yours alone.
what he would do or not do as president, we will never know because he doesn't have a chance of getting the nomination. I'll even bet that blue state dems will try to block him getting on the primary ballot.
but you still seem to be claiming to know what's in his mind that he hasn't actually said (he thinks dissenting scientists are contemptible human beings?)
and how is your view 'against', any less 'fanatic' than his? personally, I think there's a LOT of grey area in the science here but like I said, you are absolutely entitled to your views.
There is no CO2 catastrophe. Of course RFK Jr would think dissenting scientists are contemptible: why on earth would he not, if the science were supposedly so settled and irrefutable? In his mind they'd all be paid off, wouldn't they?
Where's the path to a nomination? Easy. Media comes out with more stories about how during Covid "mistakes were made" and the left begins to see that RFK Jr was right; he can be forgiven. He was right about pharma. The left loves him because he's a committed climate warrior.
OK that's the left. The right cheers him on because he's going to expose pharma and clean things up and reform government.
Yes, I've spend years looking at climate science and I've looked at in in some detail, as my substack attests. I used to believe that the ski resorts would have no snow by now: wrong. And I've learned, like so many others, that climate science is bogus science. So yes, I'm a fanatic: climate science is the worst pseudoscientific rubbish ever heaped on humanity. RFK Jr is dead wrong on climate and if you want to know why I believe that, then I invite you to peruse my substack.
I agree that CO2 is not a pollutant. climate issues (way over hyped, that's for sure!) are not the be all, end all. and certainly there's tons of disagreement (but the topic has not been my focus since I've been solidly in the health freedom movement WAY before it was called that). I absolutely disapprove of the 'agenda' that wants to assign 'carbon credits' (its silly and its an obvious con).
I do not agree one bit that the 'left loves him'. all I have heard over the past decade in MSM, is what a anti-vax nut job he is. lefty queen Rachel Madow thru him under the bus for wanting vax safety to be studied (like it was the stupidest thing ever suggested!) even though she said she 'used to' respect him for his work with River Keepers. her tone, and that of others in MSM, has been more of a 'tut, tut. he USED to be respectable'. what about all the hit pieces talking about how members of his own family have denounced him? and even though he has gained some grudging respect from conservatives, many still seem to view him with suspicion.
but we'll see, we'll see, Mr Reagen. ALL would-be politicians' views get 'watered down' when they're actually running for office (well most of the time anyway). its kinda moot though, imho. people are not gonna vote for him, en masse. MSM is already working overtime to smack him down.
Holy crap. "As reported at Climate Depot, when Climate Depot Director Marc Morano asked Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about the Koch brothers, Kennedy called them тАЬtreasonous.тАЭ They have become billionaires тАЬby impoverishing the rest of usтАЭ and should be in jail, тАЬenjoying three hots and a cot at The Hague with all the other war criminals,тАЭ Kennedy said."
Okay, RFK is an abominable piece of crap. Thanks for linking this. I didn't like him before this, but now I really see he's probably worse than Biden
Except the narrow minded far left are dying, becoming ill and disabled. As are their friends and family and colleagues. There is still time to get their attention.
You are very naive (or disingenuous), to believe that voting (i.e. honest voting) has anything to do with implementing a narrative.
And if Bobby looks like he might get the nomination the CIA will take him out. They are grooming a MAGA patsy right now to blame his assassination on. And then Biden will appoint Hunter and Hillary and Inspector Clouseau to head up the commission to investigate the murder.
the autism community has feared for his safety for years now. we've always worried that it was Big Pharma that will take him out. so add more to the list of 'suspects'.