Depends really where she's from. My clan know men as kettle boilers. Yep, fit to tend the hearth while women worked. And that was the case late into the 20th Century. Local young women have forgotten this now and keep striving for 'rights' that they already have. 🙏
This „person” thing is really interesting. Until recently, it used to be widely used for legal persons (as if you were illegal) or incorporated entities (and you thought that movies about aliens snatching human bodies were fiction). December 2019 marked the beginning of reframing commonly used concepts. Along with “dying from” and “dying with” new classification of disease vs. not important disease, “asymptomatic” changing the meaning of the a- prefix to “not yet diagnosed with PCR”, persons finally became the eye of the psyclone.
Check the etymology (https://www.etymonline.com/word/per-), and you will find that the prescribed meaning of “pre-“ is “through” or “entirely”. “Son” is obvious, despite weird explanations of language “scientists” turning it into “sound”. Thus, when you weld per and son, you get “through the son”, a concept common in all major tribes, marking the importance of heirdom through the male bloodline. This may have a side meaning of restoring the “natural” order of importance of women in the society, when they had the freedom of taking care of the household (and a huge advantage of being exempt from taxation, a major glitch finally recognized by overlords and corrected with feminism movements which ultimately imposed taxes on women who came to be accepted as employees).
In this context, a pregnant person would mean anyone who comes through the son and has an important role to play (like in “a pregnant statement”). Strange, for sure, but not stranger than “tracking and tracing” innocent people for their pre-crime capacity to spread dis-ease. No wonder that even key persons in the crème de la crème government positions are unable to define what “woman” means.
McCarthyism and blacklisting was a kindergarten play compared to facebookism and xism (formerly tweeterism). The former was largely limited to people of aspirations (as in “removal of liquids” - leading to the leftover of solid matter, not so easy to modify), intending to play social roles. What we have now with personism affects literally every body. Long-term social structure disruption by way of renaming a few concepts is truly amazing.
Nice words; but--sadly--that's true (in physical reality) only to the extent that individuals can enforce their natural freedom. Legal shenanigans get away w/ whatever they like because they're backed up by brute force (funded by our own wildly-regressive tax dollars!).
Which is EXACTLY what Those In Control want us to believe UBI has to be like. Of course, it has to be unconditional. The means-testers have to be fired & sent home to find something less pernicious to do w/ their lives. Poverty causes so many other expensive problems that even having a UBI just high enough to cover everyone's basic needs would be CHEAPER THAN allowing it to continue: https://daviddegraw.org/peak-inequality-the-01-and-the-impoverishment-of-society/
How much time have you spent looking into intentional communities? The "free" ones?
However nice it sounds, with all due respect, we don’t know anything of it. That is the realm of knowing of our Creator(s?). We can only guess, and our guesses always depend on how uncomfortable we are with what we have.
We don’t know what “natural” or “spiritual” means. If we knew, we would never even think about these words. It would be our integral part. But it is not. We differentiate the world into natural and not so natural. We oppose spiritual to various concepts. We play with these terms because we don’t know what they mean. We don’t even know if they have any meaning whatsoever. But we have devised them because they are easy to use to achieve division. Once we divide, we may feel needed to unite or wise to lead others. No humbleness. Is it natural or not natural arrogance?
We don’t know half of Earth’s creatures. How can we say “all”? We do know that even the strongest (that we know) of them are limited, bound, restricted and not free. An elephant or a horse cannot sleep lying. A fish is not free to go for a land trip. A bird is not free to walk on the ground all its life. Limitation seems to be the natural law, not freedom.
It’s all subjective. We need to precisely define what we are talking about. “They” do it. All law is a total aggregate of precise definitions (and some deliberate vague open spaces). Definitions are like a map. Once you have a map, you are free to choose the road. Without it, you are stuck. Which is waste of precious time and energy.
If definitions are like a map, it’s pretty hard to HAVE a map when they change definitions constantly to fit their narrative. It’s up to us to push back when they try to change these definitions. I may not be able to change the CDC when they change the definition of “vaccine” but I can sure ridicule and refuse to go along. Same for pronouns. Not playing their games and you’re either a man or a woman, full stop.
Er, horses do sleep lying down, they need an hour of this per day. They can lock their legs and sleep standing which they do all the time, especially in the wild with predator risk. 🙏
But we sleep in a comfortable horizontal position more than 1/3 of our life - despite predators watching us from all sides 24/7 and actively trying to get hold of our money, property or well-earned benefits. Most of these predators employ our neighbors, friends or even folks from our own family to keep tabs on us. Isn’t it strange?
"Definitions are like a map. Once you have a map, you are free to choose the road."
The map is not the territory. Words are defined in terms of other words. Circular. If you want to know the concrete meaning of a word, look for the referent. If you can't find it, you're dealing with an abstraction that can mean different things to different people. The way out of the trap is to search for the lower level referents that make up the concept behind the word, a referent being something objective that we can all agree upon. If you can't do that, you're basically talking nonsense. Nothing wrong with that, as long as you understand that's what it is.
We talk about things in the context of communication - otherwise we don’t need words or meanings or explanations. Communication means at least two parties exchanging or sharing information. If the intent is to “see eye to eye”, conventional references approximating different experiences are a must, that’s obvious. “What’s the time?” is a question about a map, not the territory, because the territory is a personal translation of the map (like primary school education) into a tangible experience. A fascinating process in itself.
They do control our food, water and fuel, and have a dominance in the means of violence, if not a "monopoly" on it. One can seek Divine Guidance within the "terrain", which is the most-intelligent "map".
Agreed. Supporting empathy within oneself is a "navigational cost" of "Divine-Guidance", in order to use the "smart map". I find myself paying this cost a lot lately, but would have it no other way. The great majority of people cannot live off-grid with their own sources of food, water and fuel, but with Divine Guidance, something can be worked out.
I am hopeful that enough of us who live with compassion can link up in parallel to be able to pull-together, to reach some kind of "critical mass" to be able to adapt the current predatory/parasitic economic paradigms to something more cooperative, something more like the Amazon rainforset.
"Hopeful" also implies "not sure". We are in overall agreement, but just as you examine the patterns of predation as being in full force and dominance, the means of harmony remains accessible to most people, to varying degrees of "talent". At what point is there a broad engagement, not merely to "universal mind", but in parallel, as in a "church" or "sangha" amongst spiritual practitioners?
"The way of the Tao is reversal." "Age of Aquarius"?
Right. Now count the abstract nouns in what you just said and try to operationalize them (find the referents)
Maps are not the territory, but we need them nonetheless. It's more a question of making accurate maps than of abandoning map making, since at its root, map making is just pattern recognition, which is inherent in all living things.
The legal concept of an orgnisation (corporation, etc.) as a "person" has had some unfortunate effects for actual human persons. I would prefer that the non-humans be described as entities to ensure that the privilege of humanity not be applied to them.
Legal consequences differ- you can put the human in jail (cf Martha Stewart) but you can't put the FDA or Pfizer in jail.
This is an existing example of the power of vocabulary manipulation- as in your recent example of calling a man a woman or an mRNA shot a vaccine.
Super lawyer Aaron Siri has established in court that both the FDA and CDC are captured agencies and work at the behest of their clients such as Pfizer, Moderna and other pharmaceuticals who fund them instead of actually providing any regulatory oversight.
See his interviews on the brillant The Highwire show and also:
I don’t like the word ‘captured’. It implies a helplessness, with no choice or chance of escape, and can create sympathy. Can we please instead use the proper definition? Corrupted, not captured.
I understand what you are saying. On the other hand, I do think a sizeable number of people are captured in the sense that their captors have a "file" of past transgressions that would ruin the person's life if made public. (Note that I am not excusing any of the evil behavior.)
Meaning that they were already corrupt beforehand if they have past transgressions behind used against them. But they're politicians, so it's no surprise. They lie for a living.
Often they are personal transgressions, such as infidelity or public exposure. I guess I would say that those with past transgressions are either corrupt or dysfunctionally stupid.
it hinges on the intention I guess; it always struck me that the organisation "CEPI" from persons close to/ wielding £ & apparent influence over such institutions, actually translates from the Latin to I captured ; )
Thank you Jessica for seeking out the truth . ACOG still recommends the jab till this day . Hospital systems know the truth . They know their delivery volumes. It’s sickening , there are lies upon lies . Follow the money 💰
Thank-you for this post. I'm an OB nurse and I do NOT recommend the shots period especially for pregnant mothers. Our NICU preterm birth rate is very high. The situation is tragic!
Oh but I think you're missing something here..... If pregnant people get jabbed, all is well 🙄 it's only the pregnant women and their babies who don't do so well..... 🥲
Maternal deaths in pregnancy, in labour and postpartum are way up for the first time in years. Oh and if you're unV you will get deliberately very low level care from medicos, as happened to a friend recently, luckily she survived and discharged herself asap. They really hope you die.
Q - their statements about the severity of C in pregnancy, how did they collate data on this for a 'novel' V?
Btw love the work of Dr James Thorp and the whistle blowers keeping him informed, agony for the good ones dealing with this and dead babies (stillborn doesn't quite cut it for a description of late in utero death) he mentioned 13 dead in one shift.
If I'm reading this article correctly, it appears that the page was taken down sometime between November 6 and November 7, which was election day. Coincidence?
To imagine how Pinnochio Walensky could recommend the jab given what was known, and to show up on fake news repeatedly lying to people. . . with that oh so cute smile. . . is either a sociopath or psychopath with zero conscience.
But Pinnochio and her husband did profit for selling out pregnant women.
Yes Jessica, as stated in the introduction by Graham Hood. In our state of New South Wales down here we had the lowest birthrate on record earlier this year (7NEWS report). Our Forest of the Fallen displays are helping to wake up the masses, this large one being in our state of Queensland: https://www.facebook.com/groups/182846877113140/permalink/657421929655630/
Just yesterday a 28 year old male soccer player from Ghana collapsed and died while running during a match in Albania. He had played for the national team of Ghana. Doctors in Albania are stumped but at least they have ruled out complications from childbirth.
I am sure that even trans women would agree that only women can become pregnant. The 'pregnant people' illustrates the confused thinking at the CDC even as the political boxes are ticked off. Oops!
try it by typing "pregnant people cdc vaccinated new data" into Brave browser
Thank You, Jessica. It looks like the miscarriage rate is about 30X higher for COVID vaccinations than for flu vaccinations. "What IS a Woman?"
;-)
It's been reported to be 3000% higher.
That is 30X. :-)
Depends really where she's from. My clan know men as kettle boilers. Yep, fit to tend the hearth while women worked. And that was the case late into the 20th Century. Local young women have forgotten this now and keep striving for 'rights' that they already have. 🙏
What was work for the women in your culture?
This „person” thing is really interesting. Until recently, it used to be widely used for legal persons (as if you were illegal) or incorporated entities (and you thought that movies about aliens snatching human bodies were fiction). December 2019 marked the beginning of reframing commonly used concepts. Along with “dying from” and “dying with” new classification of disease vs. not important disease, “asymptomatic” changing the meaning of the a- prefix to “not yet diagnosed with PCR”, persons finally became the eye of the psyclone.
Check the etymology (https://www.etymonline.com/word/per-), and you will find that the prescribed meaning of “pre-“ is “through” or “entirely”. “Son” is obvious, despite weird explanations of language “scientists” turning it into “sound”. Thus, when you weld per and son, you get “through the son”, a concept common in all major tribes, marking the importance of heirdom through the male bloodline. This may have a side meaning of restoring the “natural” order of importance of women in the society, when they had the freedom of taking care of the household (and a huge advantage of being exempt from taxation, a major glitch finally recognized by overlords and corrected with feminism movements which ultimately imposed taxes on women who came to be accepted as employees).
In this context, a pregnant person would mean anyone who comes through the son and has an important role to play (like in “a pregnant statement”). Strange, for sure, but not stranger than “tracking and tracing” innocent people for their pre-crime capacity to spread dis-ease. No wonder that even key persons in the crème de la crème government positions are unable to define what “woman” means.
Fascinating!
Terrifying! :-)
McCarthyism and blacklisting was a kindergarten play compared to facebookism and xism (formerly tweeterism). The former was largely limited to people of aspirations (as in “removal of liquids” - leading to the leftover of solid matter, not so easy to modify), intending to play social roles. What we have now with personism affects literally every body. Long-term social structure disruption by way of renaming a few concepts is truly amazing.
Nice words; but--sadly--that's true (in physical reality) only to the extent that individuals can enforce their natural freedom. Legal shenanigans get away w/ whatever they like because they're backed up by brute force (funded by our own wildly-regressive tax dollars!).
Yes, but, "dropping out" requires having the financial wherewithal to do so. Here's my (non-violent) solution: https://diy.rootsaction.org/petitions/end-poverty-demand-a-ubi-equal-to-what-congress-pays-itself
I get the point, but….good luck with that.
The gov't does whatever WE let it get away with.
Jill, I agree with that sentence. If everyone would simply say NO. So frustrating.
There you go! Now, we must start by ‘showing up’ and saying not only NO, but H3// NO.
So...they should be really happy getting free, unconditional cash from the gov't, right? Especially if it's enough to cover their basic needs.
Which is EXACTLY what Those In Control want us to believe UBI has to be like. Of course, it has to be unconditional. The means-testers have to be fired & sent home to find something less pernicious to do w/ their lives. Poverty causes so many other expensive problems that even having a UBI just high enough to cover everyone's basic needs would be CHEAPER THAN allowing it to continue: https://daviddegraw.org/peak-inequality-the-01-and-the-impoverishment-of-society/
How much time have you spent looking into intentional communities? The "free" ones?
Who likes the Andy Williams or Matt Monro version of "Born Free" best?
However nice it sounds, with all due respect, we don’t know anything of it. That is the realm of knowing of our Creator(s?). We can only guess, and our guesses always depend on how uncomfortable we are with what we have.
We don’t know what “natural” or “spiritual” means. If we knew, we would never even think about these words. It would be our integral part. But it is not. We differentiate the world into natural and not so natural. We oppose spiritual to various concepts. We play with these terms because we don’t know what they mean. We don’t even know if they have any meaning whatsoever. But we have devised them because they are easy to use to achieve division. Once we divide, we may feel needed to unite or wise to lead others. No humbleness. Is it natural or not natural arrogance?
We don’t know half of Earth’s creatures. How can we say “all”? We do know that even the strongest (that we know) of them are limited, bound, restricted and not free. An elephant or a horse cannot sleep lying. A fish is not free to go for a land trip. A bird is not free to walk on the ground all its life. Limitation seems to be the natural law, not freedom.
It’s all subjective. We need to precisely define what we are talking about. “They” do it. All law is a total aggregate of precise definitions (and some deliberate vague open spaces). Definitions are like a map. Once you have a map, you are free to choose the road. Without it, you are stuck. Which is waste of precious time and energy.
If definitions are like a map, it’s pretty hard to HAVE a map when they change definitions constantly to fit their narrative. It’s up to us to push back when they try to change these definitions. I may not be able to change the CDC when they change the definition of “vaccine” but I can sure ridicule and refuse to go along. Same for pronouns. Not playing their games and you’re either a man or a woman, full stop.
Absolutely..if we stop the flow of remuneration to these ‘controllers’ they will cease to control us.
The evidence is everywhere ... we live in the age of "reality is whatever you want it to be".
Er, horses do sleep lying down, they need an hour of this per day. They can lock their legs and sleep standing which they do all the time, especially in the wild with predator risk. 🙏
But we sleep in a comfortable horizontal position more than 1/3 of our life - despite predators watching us from all sides 24/7 and actively trying to get hold of our money, property or well-earned benefits. Most of these predators employ our neighbors, friends or even folks from our own family to keep tabs on us. Isn’t it strange?
"Definitions are like a map. Once you have a map, you are free to choose the road."
The map is not the territory. Words are defined in terms of other words. Circular. If you want to know the concrete meaning of a word, look for the referent. If you can't find it, you're dealing with an abstraction that can mean different things to different people. The way out of the trap is to search for the lower level referents that make up the concept behind the word, a referent being something objective that we can all agree upon. If you can't do that, you're basically talking nonsense. Nothing wrong with that, as long as you understand that's what it is.
We talk about things in the context of communication - otherwise we don’t need words or meanings or explanations. Communication means at least two parties exchanging or sharing information. If the intent is to “see eye to eye”, conventional references approximating different experiences are a must, that’s obvious. “What’s the time?” is a question about a map, not the territory, because the territory is a personal translation of the map (like primary school education) into a tangible experience. A fascinating process in itself.
They do control our food, water and fuel, and have a dominance in the means of violence, if not a "monopoly" on it. One can seek Divine Guidance within the "terrain", which is the most-intelligent "map".
Agreed. Supporting empathy within oneself is a "navigational cost" of "Divine-Guidance", in order to use the "smart map". I find myself paying this cost a lot lately, but would have it no other way. The great majority of people cannot live off-grid with their own sources of food, water and fuel, but with Divine Guidance, something can be worked out.
I am hopeful that enough of us who live with compassion can link up in parallel to be able to pull-together, to reach some kind of "critical mass" to be able to adapt the current predatory/parasitic economic paradigms to something more cooperative, something more like the Amazon rainforset.
"Hopeful"
"Hopeful" also implies "not sure". We are in overall agreement, but just as you examine the patterns of predation as being in full force and dominance, the means of harmony remains accessible to most people, to varying degrees of "talent". At what point is there a broad engagement, not merely to "universal mind", but in parallel, as in a "church" or "sangha" amongst spiritual practitioners?
"The way of the Tao is reversal." "Age of Aquarius"?
Just asking for a friend... :-)
I’ve been crying a lot lately. Contemplating transcendence. Thanks for this Raphael.
Right. Now count the abstract nouns in what you just said and try to operationalize them (find the referents)
Maps are not the territory, but we need them nonetheless. It's more a question of making accurate maps than of abandoning map making, since at its root, map making is just pattern recognition, which is inherent in all living things.
Creme de la crime
The legal concept of an orgnisation (corporation, etc.) as a "person" has had some unfortunate effects for actual human persons. I would prefer that the non-humans be described as entities to ensure that the privilege of humanity not be applied to them.
Legal consequences differ- you can put the human in jail (cf Martha Stewart) but you can't put the FDA or Pfizer in jail.
This is an existing example of the power of vocabulary manipulation- as in your recent example of calling a man a woman or an mRNA shot a vaccine.
Super lawyer Aaron Siri has established in court that both the FDA and CDC are captured agencies and work at the behest of their clients such as Pfizer, Moderna and other pharmaceuticals who fund them instead of actually providing any regulatory oversight.
See his interviews on the brillant The Highwire show and also:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/aaron-siri-part-2-how-the-vaccine-paradigm-has-led-to/id1471411980
I don’t like the word ‘captured’. It implies a helplessness, with no choice or chance of escape, and can create sympathy. Can we please instead use the proper definition? Corrupted, not captured.
I understand what you are saying. On the other hand, I do think a sizeable number of people are captured in the sense that their captors have a "file" of past transgressions that would ruin the person's life if made public. (Note that I am not excusing any of the evil behavior.)
Meaning that they were already corrupt beforehand if they have past transgressions behind used against them. But they're politicians, so it's no surprise. They lie for a living.
Often they are personal transgressions, such as infidelity or public exposure. I guess I would say that those with past transgressions are either corrupt or dysfunctionally stupid.
it hinges on the intention I guess; it always struck me that the organisation "CEPI" from persons close to/ wielding £ & apparent influence over such institutions, actually translates from the Latin to I captured ; )
Thank you Jessica for seeking out the truth . ACOG still recommends the jab till this day . Hospital systems know the truth . They know their delivery volumes. It’s sickening , there are lies upon lies . Follow the money 💰
...and follow the Sovereign Immunity.
Thank-you for this post. I'm an OB nurse and I do NOT recommend the shots period especially for pregnant mothers. Our NICU preterm birth rate is very high. The situation is tragic!
https://open.substack.com/pub/dee746/p/nicu-trends-continue?r=1g1b1r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Perhaps you should consider highly recommending the jabs for all biological males who suffer from the delusion that they can get pregnant.
Thanx Jessica for your continued efforts.
Your readers comments are fascinating and educational as well.
Thanx to all( I will not differentiate).
LYMI
Oh but I think you're missing something here..... If pregnant people get jabbed, all is well 🙄 it's only the pregnant women and their babies who don't do so well..... 🥲
Maternal deaths in pregnancy, in labour and postpartum are way up for the first time in years. Oh and if you're unV you will get deliberately very low level care from medicos, as happened to a friend recently, luckily she survived and discharged herself asap. They really hope you die.
Q - their statements about the severity of C in pregnancy, how did they collate data on this for a 'novel' V?
Btw love the work of Dr James Thorp and the whistle blowers keeping him informed, agony for the good ones dealing with this and dead babies (stillborn doesn't quite cut it for a description of late in utero death) he mentioned 13 dead in one shift.
If I'm reading this article correctly, it appears that the page was taken down sometime between November 6 and November 7, which was election day. Coincidence?
To imagine how Pinnochio Walensky could recommend the jab given what was known, and to show up on fake news repeatedly lying to people. . . with that oh so cute smile. . . is either a sociopath or psychopath with zero conscience.
But Pinnochio and her husband did profit for selling out pregnant women.
https://redstate.com/scotthounsell/2021/08/06/exclusive-cdc-director-walenskys-husband-received-5-million-in-hhs-grants-and-thats-just-the-start-of-it-n421809
And note the ties to the human cockroach Mr. Fauci, aka the Big Pharma sock puppet sho plays a doctor on TV>.
Very helpful link, thank you.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/12/13/rochelle-walensky-director-center-for-disease-control-and-prevention-cdc/
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2023/02/02/anthony-fauci-director-of-the-national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases-niaid-and-the-chief-medical-advisor-to-the-president/
PLEASE PUT THIS IN A NEW TAB UNTIL effective discussion
of perishable pages for people in need has occurred.
2023 - Annual update - Observations of Dr. Jessica Rose,
Made During Her Most Recent Trip Around the Sun.
2022 Recap:
Biomed/math science genius
Advocate for humanity
Award-winning surfer
Excellent photographer
Humorist
2023:
Philosopher
Forensics Detective ¹
Biomaterials Investigator ²
World-renowned researcher/speaker on VAERS/Covid 19
Provider of therapeutic Linky Doodles
1) Almost continuously, but notably revisiting a
4chan post from 2020, on 02 October 2023, also
discovering cardiac amyloidosis mimicking myocarditis.
2) And not afraid to look a spider in the ass (pictorially).
Methodology
- Sampling Brackets - ~November through October - Annually
- Sourcing - Dr. Rose's Substacks, 3rd-party interviews and comments.
- Corroboration - Dr. Rose's colleagues, peers and readers
- All attributions were made in the first year of observation.
- All chosen qualities appeared to have had significant pre-existence,
with the likely exception of Linky Doodles.
- No animals were harmed, confused or inconvenienced by this compilation.
Thanks for all your inspired and inspiring work!
Happy Birthday - this one and every one!
And for 2025: winner of the Nobel prize for medicine
Happy birthday! Is this 50? or 39 and holding?
I have been 39 now for 33 years and have watched the Jack Benny show on a black and white TV with rabbit ears.
Careful what you say to the young 'un's. They're likely to picture you wearing 'costume' ears.
So, are they holding 2024 open for some undisclosed
"Anti-Covid Remedy Remedy"
that they know is in the pipeline?
I figure they'll keep gaslighting us for another year before the truth comes out in 2025.
🇦🇺🥼 Former obstetrician and gynaecologist, Dr Luke McLindon, who now sells sheds and pergolas (6 June 2023): https://rumble.com/v2trbec-australian-medical-professionals-society-amps-national-tour-dr-luke-mclindo.html
he does?
🇺🇸 💉Just in, which includes 3 hour long hearing: OB-GYN Drops Alarming Miscarriage Data Before Congress: "I've Never Seen This Before" Dr. Kimberly Biss, an OB-GYN who has been involved in 8,000 pregnancies, details how miscarriage rates have doubled year-over-year since the introduction of the COVID-19 injections - https://open.substack.com/pub/vigilantfox/p/ob-gyn-drops-alarming-miscarriage?r=20pd6j&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Yes Jessica, as stated in the introduction by Graham Hood. In our state of New South Wales down here we had the lowest birthrate on record earlier this year (7NEWS report). Our Forest of the Fallen displays are helping to wake up the masses, this large one being in our state of Queensland: https://www.facebook.com/groups/182846877113140/permalink/657421929655630/
Just yesterday a 28 year old male soccer player from Ghana collapsed and died while running during a match in Albania. He had played for the national team of Ghana. Doctors in Albania are stumped but at least they have ruled out complications from childbirth.
Are we certain? 😉
not 100%
Well ok then, so you're saying there's a chance... 😁
You are amazing Jessica! Do you ever sleep?
What an asset to humanity you are.
I am sure that even trans women would agree that only women can become pregnant. The 'pregnant people' illustrates the confused thinking at the CDC even as the political boxes are ticked off. Oops!
Right!!! If the CDC doesn't even know that a man cannot get pregnant, how can they know a Covid vaccine is safe...
Its women who think they are men- transmen- that are the “people” who can get pregnant.
I guess I'm too old for this brave new world.
These people are really coo-coo for Cocoa Puffs.
they really are. like Homer said: I feel like I'm living in a cuckoo clock!
The first a screenshot you took shows a date of January 1, 2016 ....
i know. weird right?