58 Comments
Apr 7Liked by Jessica Rose

I will never forget when the sequencing and technique was poop pooed 💩, by an individual of stature importance and knowledge. Thanks Dr. Rose , you stood your ground …. Thank u for your knowledge and wisdom.

Expand full comment
RemovedApr 7
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Stop sticking your shitty adverts in loads of stacks. Lisa, Beth or whoever you are

Expand full comment
RemovedApr 13
Comment removed
Expand full comment

See these spams so much. No Thanks.

Expand full comment

troll

STOP.

Expand full comment
RemovedApr 10
Comment removed
Expand full comment

troll.

STOP.

If you want to say something say it. Don't send folks to a scam website.

Expand full comment
Apr 7·edited Apr 7Liked by Jessica Rose

Thanks Dr Jessica Rose 🌹 it does explain a lot many I will view it many times over so I can understand it to explain to others around me but it also explains a lot about the health issues of the cOVID-19 injectables affecting the heart as you know electrical impulses are very critical to the function arrhythmia and a fib , the basic functionality of the heart ,

if that affects on a nano level it totally makes sense why there is such an increase (epidemic ) issues of heart elements in the world……

Expand full comment

Not related. Gel electrophoresis is a tool that pulls laboratory specimens apart. The knowledge of which base pair attaches where, in DNA, would exist even if no electricity had been used to study the subject.

Many years ago when I was interning at a cancer institute, we had an electrophoresis machine in our lab that got occasional use. Back then, NASA had persuaded some NIH scientists that electrophoresis would work faster and with better purity, if the tests were run aboard the Space Shuttle while in orbit. Gravity squeezes the gel and some of the pores get bigger than others, causing incomplete separation and flawed data. The newer methods Dr Rose describes, do not use electrophoresis any more, so nobody ended up using the Space Shuttle for genetics research.

What's happening in vaxx-induced heart disease needs further study so lives can be saved, but appears to result from a poison that's formed when the vaxx reacts with our immune system. The poisoned heart muscle becomes weak.

Possibly an electrical problem is de-myelination. Myelin is an electrical insulator our bodies make from cholesterol, that prevents signals traveling on nerve bundles, from jumping to the wrong nerve and blocking communication. That's one of many possible results of a toxin attack on the heart, and we really need to study them all until we arrive at an explanation of what happened.

Those of us who suspect the C19 virus was designed as a weapon have much to chew on. Getting at the truth will probably require granting immunity from prosecution to any war criminals who come forward with the whole truth

Expand full comment

Hi Bob. I’m vaccine injured. Me and many others injured felt electrical or electricity going through whatever bodily injury you got. in my case, vision and loud tinnitus I felt electricity going through my brain for a time one evening. It was scary. I’d love to know what caused that. Also, many people got MS after the shot or MS type symptoms. That paper is no longer found on google but someone found it on the way back machine. At first I thought it was just me feeling the electrical feeling but discovered on real not rare so many others experienced it.

Expand full comment

I was referring to the process of how the heart works at the nanotechnology vaccine injectable interferes with that process it would explain the heart issues not the mechanism of sequencing I wasn’t referring to that

Expand full comment

A technique used to sequence DNA has nothing to do with vaccination or the way the heart works...

Expand full comment
Apr 7Liked by Jessica Rose

Good morning thank you for such a well written explanation! When I read I can hear your voice and your humor makes me chuckle along the way! Reading has always been a struggle for me I actually look forward to what you write!! Including the videos are an excellent learning tool as well! As diabolical as this all is your style is refreshing……can you believe this all happened?!?! As time goes on I think of the holocaust and how people felt about all the atrocities …..people ran to get tested and almost wore it like a badge of honor getting that swab up their noses …. They still say whether they did or didn’t have covid ….as I listen I honestly can’t believe how many fell for the brainwashing…..

As a little girl around 5 years old my mother took me for swimming lessons at a lake. The instructor told me to put my head under water . I said NO! … I will drown ……..lol mom took me home and as I got older I taught myself how to swim when I was ready to…….when this so called pandemic came on the news I had that very same reaction….NO! NO SWABS NO SHOTS . I didn’t trust them …..

Expand full comment

. . . ya' know? I think some folks just simply have better survival instincts. I would have stuck my head under water!

Expand full comment

Thanks Jessica, great accessible read.

In my 'Forrest Gump' of a career-life, I was at TIGR when Craig Venter and Claire Fraser sequenced the genome of microbes, then finally collaborated with NIH Human Genome Project to get a full human sequence. I was on their human subjects/ Animal care oversight board. [We were from Buffalo SUNY and worked with Darrell Doyle PhD making monoclonals in the early nineties. ]

"See what competition can do? Imagine a world where there’s only the NIH in control of everything. We need independent companies, and we need competition. "

I said something similar, like , 'everyone is competing, just like a basketball game,' to the press who interviewed me at that time. [Collins clearly did not like to be forced to actually produce scientific work. Too busy playing his banjo and quoting Bible verses... had to maintain that 'innocent image']

TIGR collaborated with everyone, and my hardest job was trying to convince Craig to NOT give away all his DNA to be used in experiments. Privacy issues!! Especially for related family. But he was a man on a mission, with big visions.

- Laura Kragie MD biomedworks.substack.com

Expand full comment
author

wow! awesome comment!

Expand full comment

Excellent and timely review. Thank you. As a primary care doctor being inundated with various commercial products and innovations, combined with the “individualized” optimal health concept, I would ask if you can suggest a contemporary “primer” text or source for clinical application ?

Expand full comment
Apr 7Liked by Jessica Rose

The best weapon against totalitarianism is billions of voices saying, "Not only No, but Hell No!"

Expand full comment
Apr 7Liked by Jessica Rose

👍👍 I took 3 things from that excellent piece:

1. Oxford Nanopore sequencing- is freaking cool AS. Totally makes sense why you shall utilise nothing else in genomee-land😉😂😂

2. The DARPA brainstab tools- uh yeps. The level of nudge involved on the public, for a testing mechanism that so many knew, was nowhere near reliable enough to be used diagnostically, was very interesting. Combined with the changes at regulatory agencies like TGA/FDA, to the registering parameters- it was like the freaking wild west! But I deviate slightly on your theory. Reality is 23&Me and the multitude of other DNA private companies, have had a lot of DNA information floating in the ether, for quite a while now, which has all been sold multiple times over. So I doubt it was a DNA dump exercise. If anything, I think it was more a refinement tool, training tool and possibly a hunting tool. For what? Who really knows, but it certainly wasn't for SARSCov2!😉🤨

3. The bit in this article that makes me C&C factory-

"...the long DNA is cut into shorter segments of specific lengths using sound waves....".

Now THATS very interesting. Things that make me go Hmmm?! BTJMO 😉🤔😉

Expand full comment
author

i know right?! everything is vibrating

Expand full comment

The problem is the "switching on and off" certain genes without knowing the reaction of other genes. It's one giant experiment with humans as the test subject.

Expand full comment

And that's the arrogance of their assumption of the "switching on and off" that I personally object to. They don't even know WHERE all the switches are, WHAT they switch on/off, but also haven't accounted for the unlimited unknown switches floating in the "junk DNA", that are activated by environmental, as well as psychoneuroendocrinoimmunological influences. 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤐🙄

Expand full comment

Oh I couldn't agree more! I once had a conversation with a tip UK geneticist who swore by gene therapy. I told him his methods were like playing football without knowing the rules. He never rebutted that statement.

Expand full comment

The switching issue is the field of epigenetics. Someone commented on epigenetics in this discussion

Expand full comment

Epigenetics is generally the study of how environment and time affects the genetic makeup of a lifeform. Until recently, epigenetics was left to nature that sorted out which animals needed wings to survive and which animals needed flippers albeit very slowly over many years.

Expand full comment

Right- but now many (functional medicine for instance) are trying to change genetic expression or suppression by hacking "above the gene".

Expand full comment

Thanks for some serious mind-fodder as a subset to the science DNA sequences. I need to ‘chew’ to role of government, property rights, and human rights aspects a bit but when you raise the moral question with respect to advancement in scientific knowledge you truly are asking about the future of civilization. I may try to elaborate my thoughts in a later comment.

Expand full comment
(Banned)Apr 7Liked by Jessica Rose

I will never swap my bad genes for the good ones……I hate to be a saint!

Expand full comment

Swab up nose, tongue in cheek?

Expand full comment
Apr 7Liked by Jessica Rose

So very cool Jessica! The capacity of the human brain made up of base pairs to figure out how to sequence base pairs .......Some kind of wonderland there !

Expand full comment

Never had a swab up my nose… but how do I know they didn’t sell my blood sample used for a routine lab series? I don’t of course I always hand write in things on consent forms like: I do not give permission for any of my bodily fluids or sample to be sold and/or used for genomic analysis or sequencing. Not that anyone has ever paid attention to this… but I state it anyway. I probably have some bad mark on my identification somewhere for being a dissident, and therefore limit my interactions with the medical industrial complex…. Where let’s face us we are considered Guinea pigs who have been duped for paying for the privilege of being experimental subjects. No jabs either.

Expand full comment

Thanks! Is the accuracy of the other two the same or better than Sanger?

Expand full comment
author

it depends what you have and what you want to do - single genes, 1-100 amplicon targets, etc - use Sanger, for example. NGS is great if you have a lot of genes, or a low starting amount of sample, for example.

this video gives a nice explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wpww8bb63zU

Expand full comment
author

they're both accurate

Expand full comment
Apr 7Liked by Jessica Rose

Seems like if there is a gene responsible for any of a number of maladies, they should be able to find it really fast. This should blow up the gene hypothesis for 99.99% cases of autism really really fast.

Expand full comment

But you end on a really terrifying note. Sequencing a person’s entire genome without their explicit consent seems like it should be illegal in a functioning society.

The Olympics in China in 2022 and their mandatory athlete swabbing definitely gave me the creeps!

Expand full comment

Noli me tangere. That is all, folks.

Expand full comment

Thank you for another enlightening and entertaining article that reinforced my decision to keep being a paid subscribers. AS an aside I am dubious about the future of gene swapping to correct disease as I am dubious about how great AI will be. If correcting genes was effective long term, why haven't these techniques eliminated sickle cell disease. I thought this would happen but I don't see any of the case reports one hears about turning into long term wide spread therapy. It makes me wonder if the body doesn't squash the cells producing the correct hemoglobin. (Yes, I should do a PubMed search and possibly will later.)

Expand full comment