Young Canadian doctors dead/dying, Manitoba data and other Canadian government data
Nothing to see here folks. Move along.
UPDATE: 11.19.22 93 young injected Canadian doctors suddenly dead now
UPDATE: 08.16.22 R.I.P. Dr. Ryan Buyting
AND ANOTHER… (these are 2 separate men: 1 was 52; 1 was 49).
UPDATE: Another Canadian man died suddenly.
First of all, young and healthy Canadian physicians are dying post COVID-19 injections. It’s a fact. They’re no longer with us. These deaths are statistically improbable and are not being investigated. What killed them? “Unspecified illness”? “Died swimming”? “Died in her sleep”? Are you f-ing kidding me? Have any of you heard of this happening before? I have not.
That’s #1.
#2: Manitoba data. Please go to this place where you’ll find data released on COVID-19-injection-related hospitalizations, ICU visits and deaths, as of 1:00 am on June 22, 2022. There are 2 charts that I would like to call attention to. The first one is Figure 6 as shown below.
This chart shows that the ‘Fully Vaccinated’ individuals are being hospitalized at higher rates per 100,000 person days. It also shows that more ‘Unvaccinated’ individuals are being sent to ICUs and dying. Rahh-hahahhhahaaa-eaaallllyyyyyyy? Do you know what I have to say about that? Look at the paragraph written above Figure 6. It states that the definition of an ‘Unvaccinated’ person is, and I quote:
Unvaccinated Case: Individuals not vaccinated or vaccinated 0–13 days following the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
I have written about this before using Nova Scotia data and in a publication that you can find here.
LET’S SAY THIS IN WITH CAPS LOCK ON AGAIN: IT IS POSSIBLE THAT EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE ‘UNVACCINATED’ INDIVIDUALS IN THESE DATA WERE IN FACT DOSED ONCE, MEANING, THEY WERE INJECTED! This could very well be why we see ANY reports of hospitalizations, ICU visits or deaths in the ‘Unvaccinated’ group. The actual ‘uninjected’ group most likely have close to zero hospitalizations, ICU visits or deaths.
Once again, let’s redo this chart so that the data are represented properly. The chart of the left is the depiction of the data if 100% of the ‘Unvaccinated’ are re-classified properly as having received a Single Dose. However, the chart on the right is the most appropriate way to depict the data. 20% of the ‘Unvaccinated’ data was kept classified as such, and the other 80% were classified as having received a Single Dose. The 20/80% split seems reasonable to me. It’s likely not 0/100%.
What does the more appropriately depicted bar graph on the right in Figure 3 tell us? It tells us that far fewer uninjected individuals are ending up in the hospital, ICU and dead and that following a single injection, many individuals are ending up in the hospital, ICUs and dead.
#3: Canadian health infobase data for serious and non-serious reports of adverse events in the context of the COVID-19 injectable products. The first graph I want to remark on is the one with the rates of the most frequently-reported adverse events. Paraesthesia? Really? Do you guys know what paraesthesia is indicative of?
Paraesthesia is a technical term used to reflect a perception of abnormal sensation, including feelings of pins and needles, tingling, pricking or a feeling as if ants are crawling over/under the skin and patients should be encouraged to fully describe what they are feeling. Paresthesia suggests abnormality affecting the sensory nervous system and may arise anywhere from the peripheral nerve to the sensory cortex.1
It is a neurological condition. Neurological. I find it shocking that the number 1 reported AE in this database is a neurological dysfunction associated with such conditions as multiple sclerosis and encephalitis.2 Shocking. But nothing to see.
The other graph I would like to bring attention is the one before the paraesthesia nightmare plot.
I don’t know if you guys noticed this, but what this data shows is that 23/100,000 kids ages 5-11 reported an adverse event in the context of the COVID-19 injectable products. That’s 1/4348 kids. 12-17 year olds: even better - 1/2941. 18-29: even better still! 1/2000 18-29 year olds suffering and reporting an adverse event. Is it myocarditis? Neurological issues? Death? They’re all adverse events being reported and listed as potential side effects of these injections. It could be any one of these. *This does not account for under-reporting.
Seriously. Even with the lamentable data exposure and non-existent transparency, even with the incredible and insidious censorship, even with the global hypnosis, you have to admit: SOMETHING IS WRONG HERE.
Enjoy your day and tell at least one other person the truth today.
https://www.racgp.org.au/afp/2015/march/paraesthesia-and-peripheral-neuropathy
https://mpkb.org/home/symptoms/neurological/paresthesia
Redefinition in science is so dangerous, eliminating standards and casting confusion and instability on objective reality from past, present and on into the future. Thank you for standing firm on truth and objective reality, keep standing firm.
My neighbor has a saying, it drives him nuts when propsed solutions are inane, his phrase is "what good is it if you cut the foot to fit the shoe?"
The number of young healthy Canadian doctors dead is close to the worldwide number of moneypox deaths, and while one is a global emergency the other is less than a blip on the radar.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/08/monkeypox-encephalitis-deaths-probed-as-global-cases-top-25000/?amp=1