What is a handler? #handlergate
And what does it have to do with anything?
This article is not going to be about science or a review of a paper or a new insight into how the COVID shots are destructive. It’s going to be about something that’s become somewhat of an important thing for me to understand over the past little while. It’s the concept of handlers.
Let’s go with the Merriam Webster dictionary definition since this is the dictionary they like changing definitions in the most frequently.
han·dler ˈhan(d)-lər ˈhan-dᵊl-ər
one that handles something; a person in immediate physical charge of an animal, especially : a person who exhibits dogs at shows or field trials; a person who trains or acts as second for a boxer; a manager of a political or public figure or campaign
So I guess we should focus on the latter definition: “manager of a political or public figure or campaign”, although I am not so sure that the former definition referring to handling ‘animals’ doesn’t also apply. The mentality sure does, it seems. Dance silly doggy!
I didn’t know what the concept of a handler really was until recently. It struck me as somewhat ludicrous that anyone would allow someone else to ‘Pavlov‘s dog’ them (never used this idea as a verb before). But here’s what I’ve observed about the whole thing: most of the people being handled don’t know that they’re being handled so how would they know that all that drool dripping down their lapel is from the ding-dong of a bell?
Oof! Just look at that face! This is a Newfoundland dog and yes, they do have swags of drool that envelop their faces.
I would go as far to say that >95% of the people being handled don’t know that they are not even making their own decisions. At least, not the decisions they would be making if they had autonomy of mind, body and action. I believe the handled are selected based on their level of innocence. The innocent are far more likely to be unsuspecting of (nefarious) entities handling them, thus, easier to handle. This is why children are often the targets of handlers. Especially child actors and performers. I suppose that managers and even parents could qualify for the job, if paid well enough.
I think this idea of selecting the innocent works very well as a modus operans of effectiveness for handlers, as well, depending on their goals. As part of a demands of the hierarchy of manipulative psychopaths, their goals involve installation of puppets to manipulate the public to make money, or get something that they might not normally get if they simply asked. ‘Excuse me millions of people, would you like to buy this monotonous, empty pop track?’ Probably wouldn’t work. But what if you dressed that request up a little in the form of an innocent girl?
If a political figure or a celebrity is innocent, likely they are also authentic in their behaviors and actions, and people will tend toward them, and like them. Authenticity is often a prized characteristic among the virtuous, even if it is being manipulated. If the handler of a figure or celebrity is perceived to be a trustworthy friend, lover, partner or parent, then you can imagine the control-ability of this person. The handled person might even be steered toward a massive oopsie-daisy at the end of their ‘run’ as part of the handler’s ultimate goal, and the people may even turn against them in the winky blink of an eye coated in mascara. The poor person. I know this might sound out-of-place as an example, but think of Britney Spears. I have always felt really bad for that beautiful girl. She has been destroyed by her handlers and the most saddening thing to me is that she is talented, and without those predators, she would likely have been just as successful, and not destroyed from the inside out. She might have had a long relationship with Justin Timberlake. They seemed like a very sweet couple. Were they? Maybe not. I don’t know the inner-workings of the pop-industry, and I don’t want to.
Also, think of the concept of a boy-band. Why do this? I mean, why create a boy band or girl band at all? And I use the word ‘band’ here very loosely. Because not everyone’s going to like the same person. Give the people variety and you’ll get a wider fan base. You’ll also give the illusion of choice. Everyone had a favorite Spice Girl, right? I liked Ginger.
My point (I think) is that when someone being handled comes into a bad light for whatever reason, it might not have anything to do with something they did. It very likely has nothing to do with who they actually are inside. So it seems pointless to demonize anyone specifically. Should it not be the handlers that are called out as demons? The problem is: how do we identify the handlers. Here’s the thing: we don’t have to. The antidote is simply keep your eye on the bigger ball - not on one individual or group and to be very aware of when you might be being manipulated away from your own heart.
Now this is not to say that there are not handled individuals who are total nightmares - take chairman hair-boy of the North, for example. That guy was born with the deep state embedded in his rectum. It would have been hard for him to avoid his pre-planned destiny seeing as who his father is (sorry, I had to), but nonetheless, he still could. To this day. Wouldn’t that be a plot twist! He seems to like being puppeteered, or perhaps, just a little too drunk on false WEF power? Chairwoman equine-teeth of the South loved it too. She was so sad when she had to stop horse-whipping the people that she was meant to be serving. What do you want to bet that neither one of them, nor their family members, got injected with anything but saline this whole time?
The only thing that the handler recipe requires is a predator, and a puppet - and innocents are ideal. I would refrain from referring to children as puppets however: I don’t think that children could ever really be puppets; they are simply being children - trusting in adult figure heads to navigate their way to their own adulthoods. The problem is when those figureheads have ulterior motives that are not necessarily good for the child.
I feel a little bit cynical and weird writing about this but I’ve been thinking about it a lot lately based on what I have been observing for quite some time now. I hinted at this in my last article that you can read here, and I really do think it’s important for us all not to fall for the tactics of the war-gamers. Handling people is one of their most used methodologies. Presidents and prime ministers are all handled - and likely always have been since the inception of these types of leaders in ‘democracies’. There’s a reason we call many ‘leaders’ puppets: because they are puppets.
The legacy media is handled. We all know that.
For some weird reason, well, probably no reason weirder than me focusing on it, I have acquired a unique lens into worlds that I never thought that I would even want to look at, and I find it hard to process a lot of what I see and hear. The political realm, is just, fake. I would imagine that every word that every politician says is written down for them by their handlers to simply read - verbatim. What exactly is the role of an ‘advisor’ anyway? Advisor, eh? Shouldn’t those people have, say, expertise on the subject matter of advisement? I doubt very much that the any of the ‘science’ advisors in this COVID debacle had any science background at all, and if they did, they aren’t doing much research and they aren’t up-to-date on peer-reviewed articles being published, the data being analyzed or the case studies being published by medical professionals.
I think it’s hard for me to process a lot of what I see and hear because this world of handlers is so foreign to my being: I am no Hollywood starlet and I am not a person of political or media influence and quite frankly, I loathe the idea of predation on innocents. I really do. I also loathe liars. It’s so beneath even the concept of intelligence to lie. It never works. Just like fraud. It never works. Why do they keep doing it then? Are they just that antiquated?
I wonder every day how in the living-loving-land I ever got to the point in my life where I find myself right now. I imagine we are all having thoughts like this, regularly. Are we really talking about WWIII without actually knowing anything about who the bad guys actually are? Did we really just pass ever-so-lightly into the segue to total social credit score control with the ‘introduction’ of papers to enter eating establishments based on injection status? Did we really just enter an age where it is acceptable to reward the compliant and punish the autonomous, using ‘treats’? How did we get here? How did I get here?
You know in the movie Inception (such utter genius) when diCaprio asks Page (don’t get me started on that) to retrace her steps as to how she got to the café where they were sitting, and she starts to answer as if she was convinced she knew how she got there only to realize, upon trying to retrace her steps, that she couldn’t recall how she got there? Remember that? That was one of the ways the people in the movie used to make it clearer to themselves that they were in a dream - if they couldn’t recall how the dream started, for example.
I am asked a lot of the time how I came to be involved in the so-called medical freedom movement (aka: MFM - I had to ask my partner who has nothing to do with this stuff what MFM stood for) and I think it boils down to two things: my resume, and my spirit. But I am not sure, and honestly I don’t remember how I came to know most of the people that I know now. It’s almost like not being able to remember the first part of a dream, but not quite. That was just an analogy. I am not saying that this is dream. Maybe a simulation, but not a dream. That’s for another Substack.
I have a lot of new friends and colleagues, and considering who some of my new friends are, it would be quite easy for me to imagine that someone might try to handle me. Maybe that’s why I am here. I have considered this. I consider everything, no matter how off-the-cuff. But suffice it to say, I am pretty sure I have nothing to worry about in this regard. There’s no one in my life that I consistently listen to, quite frankly. I am a pretty defiant person, and I usually do the opposite of what people tell me to do even if there was someone in my life who had a daily influence on me, so hard-to-handle might be a good way to describe me. I would put someone to the test, I think, if they tried to handle me, and I would probably make them want to quit. Pretty fast. Go get me a beer, handler.
So then, why am I here if not by someone else’s will, you ask? Quite philosophical… that question. Everyone should ask this of themselves today.
I think I am here doing this because I am weirdly and uniquely qualified to be - based on my background. It was quite natural for me to fall into researching everything related to SARS and COVID, which is interesting in and of itself, because if there actually was a colossal scandal with regard to a synthesized spike protein embedded on a coronavirus backbone originally designed to be the experimental virus used to potentiate HIV-1 vaccine design, for example, then I might be someone who might not only figure that out, but have the cojones to tell everyone about it. Still looking into this. I need to do some more reading. A lot more.
I feel like lately there is a lot of boy band break-uppage, and it seems to be happening from the inside. Some people are calling it ‘in-fighting’. A lot of new ‘names’ and labels have been thrown out lately including MFM, GoF and meanwhile, the old ones persist like ‘conspiracy theorist’ and ‘anti-vaxxer’. All of these labels are designed to group people so that it’s easier to write the individuals off. It’s a tactic, just like handling. An interesting thing to remember on this note is that there are still real people in the bodies speaking at events and rallies, regardless of whether or not they are handled. I wrote a response to a comment in my last Substack article about this. I was asked by a reader how I feel about the idea that there are people who are losing faith in some of the members of the MFM because they are seen more as celebrities than warriors. Although I can’t speak for others, my reply was this: from where I am standing, there is nothing glamorous about the lifestyles of the people they might have been referring to. Most of the people I know are just tired, and would love nothing more than a good night’s sleep. Sure, there are some bad guys around, but I would bet that there are more bad handlers than bad front-people.
This division and these kinds of thoughts are what we all need to resist. It’s a tactic, so it is hard to resist, but we should because if we don’t, then we’re all just being handled. There are imposters, yes, but the war raged on liars and imposters must be based in truth and higher level thinking. Know what I mean? Elevate everyone, even in spite of themselves. I’m not sure I’m conveying myself well here. You guys let me know, ok?
The reason I felt compelled to write this article was to solidify some of my own ideas on this subject matter, and to raise awareness about the incredibly disseminated handler issue that we have right now as a human society. The people you see, are the people the handlers want you to see. The handled are likely not even aware that they are being used as fall guys or patsies to be pitted against the people. The handlers of the handlers of the handlers (let’s call them The HoHoHo) will never be known to us - you can take that to the bank. That’s why it’s really important not to focus on the individuals at the facade of handlergate, but on the big picture. Do you like that Jikky? #Handlergate?
And just like Watergate, this too, shall arouse public interest: from gravel-to-gavel - from the streets to the courts.
The HoHoHo are trying very hard to incite violence and division. Don’t let them. Don’t let them tell you what to do. Don’t de-individualize people by lumping them into the newest fad name. That’s why those fad names exist. That’s what ‘anti-vaxxer’ is all about. It’s stupid and meaningless and it is nothing but a tactic designed to allow the finger-pointing machine to help us rip ourselves apart from the inside.
This entire COVID thing has introduced an award system for being non-autonomous. I implore all NOT to comply. Dog treats are not treats if you are a human being. A true treat is the feeling of treating yourself with respect. Value yourself - your sovereignty - your creativity - your uniqueness. This is just the beginning. The HoHoHo are going to try another round of all of the nonsense they have already pulled in the form of locking people up, gagging them and beating them if they try to live as autonomous beings. They will do this under the guise of ‘going green’ or some other crap.
Guard your freedom. Guard your rights. Guard your cash. Guard your land. Guard your farms. Guard your animals. Guard your family. Tight.
Do not go against your own heart. Fight The HoHoHo (and all the bad guys including the ones within) by being you. And by talking to your neighbors and befriending as many other humans as you can. Get to know other beings. Get to know yourself. Be sovereign and create sovereign ecosystems of sovereign beings. Sometimes I get comments from readers challenging my ideas about unifying and I am still trying to find the right way to ‘verbalize’ how I feel about unification of the many via independency of the individuals. Maybe the following is the best way for me to explain it. When I am the angry version of myself, I am less receptive and less receivable by others. I am not able to be have exchanges or experiences that I might have when I having one of those days where I am closing myself off to talking to others, for example. So by unity, I mean going within and pulling yourself out of your own funks (friends and family are awesome at helping you accomplish this too) so that you can give and get from others and exchanges can occur. We are better together, we humans.
United we stand. Divided we fall. And it only took me a world crisis and 48 years to find Tupac Shakur.
Eventually I knew, that I would find my way
After the darkest night always comes a brighter day.
Never surrender, it's all about the faith you've got
Don't ever stop, just push it til you hit the top
And if you drop, at least you know you gave your all
Be true to you, and that way you can never fall
But beware, these [HoHoHo]s ain't no joke
Just like a rope, they hang on you until you're broke
And when you're broke, they move onto the next dope
And there you are, can't even pay your car, nope
And when you reminisce, thinkin' how you got dissed
Remember how it felt and then remember this
Be true to you, believe that there's no one bigger.
And it ain't where you from that makes you hardcore
[Brother] it's the way you throw them thangs in the war.
Larry D. Goodman, Tupac Amaru Shakur, Derrick McDowell
There was a live mic incident in canada where the two top health officials were thumbing through the stack of papers in front of them and one says I never read this stuff I just say what they tell me to say They just didn’t care
Mitt Romney was told to take “the fall” in the second obama* debate, essentially installing Obama...
...his CIA “handler”, Cofer Black (another “retired” Intelligence agent) was awarded with Hunter’s Million dollar Burisma gig and established even more American Ruling Intelligence State control of Ukrainian Bioweapon “prevention” Laboratories