You will know the truth and the truth will set you free. Said by a guy, now out of fashion, who died in a horrible way. In the East, but also the Native Americans, until 100 years ago knew and practiced mahamudra. Voluntary exit from the body when the "dome" became unbearable. But the trick was, and is, that you didn't go anywhere but you re-established yourself in your true essence
It's accepted by many quantum phycisists, that the fundamental building block of reality is information, - "matter as such does not exist" as Max Planck said in 1944. We know only one causal explanation for information and that's intelligence. That's why the digital information in DNA is storng evidence for intelligent design. Random mutation cannot produce information hence the neodarwinian explanation for life is very unlikely to be true (I'd love to explain that to one of my greatest covid-heros Bret Weinstein). It's time to abandon philosophical materialism since we have known for over a 100 years, that stuff is not the fundamental building block of the physical reality. Information comes first which means mind comes first. In an old book it is stated that "In the beginning was the word", - word=information. So maybe we should be looking outside the physical reality to figure out what is going on in this strange world :-)
Continued incitement of division, hostility et al within humanity provides the opportunity of harvesting low vibrational energy as a fuel source (Monroe, 1978).
I think you are on to something. Makes me want to be filled with peaceful, loving, and kind thoughts 24/7. Most times when I pray that’s one of the things I ask for is to be filled with love, joy, peace, patience, goodness, faithfulness, generosity, and self-control. Maybe that will empower the good guys in the higher realms.
The dome hypothesis is the only rational explanation of the Earth-in-space structure, according to our established physics. There is a concept that when two media of different densities (pressures) are put next to each other without a rigid barrier, they will right away start mixing up, and the direction of the resulting flow is from higher pressure to lower pressure. With liquids, it takes a lot of time. With gases, the process is instantaneous.
When you puncture a balloon, it will explode - the high-pressure contents of the balloon wants to immediately flow into the low-pressure surroundings.
When you are in a tightly-closed “space” vehicle, and a puncture is caused by an external “object”, the vehicle should immediately explode, in a similar manner. Unless... you have a brave “astronaut” who closes the puncture with his finger (why not?)... or... what we are told about “space” is not factual.
We are told that there is literally nothing in the space. Which should mean that the pressure of the space is practically zero.
Which means that there must be a rigid barrier between the Earth’s atmosphere system and the surrounding “space”. Without this barrier, the whole Earth system would have been exploded into the space long long ago.
Besides, the Earth’s high-pressure atmosphere is a stable environment for (they say) millions of years. What kind of a truly powerful force would withstand the zero-pressure suction from the “space”?
Thus, what popular (school, academic) physics says about pressures and their interactions, when applied to the Earth-space system, gives rise to one obvious conclusion: there must be a rigid, tightly-sealed barrier all around the Earth. The dome.
This is the point where you should watch “Capricorn One”, review all photos taken on the Moon (all of them perfectly sharp, perfectly in focus, with perfect exposure), and ask yourself a question: “What’s really going on here?”
The hollow Earth concept is so different. 1) Nobody is capable of checking the polar region, except for the “allowed” parties. 2) Even so, the task appears to be an easy one (especially with modern technology), just travel several hundred miles away and see what’s there - but there is no trace of such expeditions. 3) Apparently, no one is interested in it - while much more complex and demanding challenges are happily pursued. 4) The established science has not said anything about it so far - so we do not have any official recognised outlook to refer to.
All in all, this one remains a fiction story, however interesting and appealing.
John Archibald Wheeler, pioneer of black-hole and worm-hole theory, famously suggested that the world requires an observer in order to exist. He called his theory ‘It-from-Bit’:
It from bit symbolizes the idea that every item of the physical world has at bottom — a very deep bottom, in most instances — an immaterial source and explanation; that which we call reality arises in the last analysis from the posing of yes-no questions and the registering of equipment-evoked responses; in short, that all things physical are information-theoretic in origin and that this is a participatory universe.
Max Planck, Nobel Prize Winner for Physics in 1918, stated:
I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.
Russian scientists announced I believe around the 50's that it was impossible for them to send missiles further than 160km. There's this video from Bill Nye where he replies to an student that the earth is a closed system "we cannot leave the earth".
The "dome" is inspired for what we see in the firmament, it looks like a dome.
What is true is that all those stars have been there for millenia. Therefore, those modern-physics animations where you see the earth dancing within the solar system with the other plane(ts) while travelling the universe like a comet are just cartoons for children (I saw Elana Freeland sharing this animation I refer to in one of her presentations, and automatically confirmed myself there was something off with the whole story of hers).
If those animations were true, the earth would be travelling with his fellow planets including the unmovable firmament along the universe.
Too complicated, too unrelated to what we can see and feel. Whoever can see and feel.
---
Uni-[vers]e - "único verso" - only verse
Uni-[vers]ity -
This applied to spirituality or religion means there is a unique truth to all of us.
This applied to "social science" means to teach the same concept or narrative to all of us.
---
Another nothing to see here is that names like Eratóstenes, Newton or Galilei started showing up in more recent history books since the late 1800s if not later. All of them were related, if not members themselves of Judeo-Masonic families or Judeo-Masonic influence groups. Let's remind ourselves that "hidden in plain sight" is a well-known masonic emblem.
What is cool and challenging here is to try to break the circular, concentric, spheric or more precisely volumetric approach to cosmology. The forever baking cake continuosly expanding into the nothingness since the big bang happened (another tale for the secular). Why is it challenging? because those bastards were telling you about he solar system and the "true nature" of the universe when you were 5 - 7 years old.
So the earth is not just rounded or flat.
This is not a marble nor a pizza travelling in the space. There is no space. The space is where we live in, this is the space. It is like an stratum that infinitely expands in all directions, but is limited in height. What is upstairs? Heavenly, more etheric worlds? What is dowstairs? Hellish more dense and unbreathable worlds? Is there anything else? How the astral planes interconnect all these layers? There exist a limit in the width of the stratum? or... only those of us who live close to the stratum frontier are really discovering or creating reality?
Think about the world on the limits of a 3D videogame keeps creating ifself, keeps expanding to the infinite, but just on the stratum you are at that moment.
So that is the cosmological flattenness many out there speak about. It may be not just infinitely un-explored but infinitely un-created.
If our existence was a digital construct, there would be no outcome in trying to crack open a physical dome?! Why would "they" program one in? Just to see if we would think there was one and try and crack it??! If the simulation was as sophisticated as it would have to be, it would be relatively trivial to program in the universe?
Any aberration would be proof of simulation, it would not 'fool' anyone.
Your are not gaining any credibility with these ideas unless they are clearly random musings on poorly thought out fiction.
It like the flat earth folk say it is impossible for 24h sunshine in the antarctic summer as the sun cannot be in the west and the east at the same time yet when the "Final Experiment" was done most of them refused to participate and then moved the goal posts and said it does not disprove a flat earth because none of your business.
The Voyager probes have demonstrated the dome is massive (the size of the visible universe at least) enough for people to accept that no nuke would make a difference.
Right, I confess, it did get a little more interesting after the intro but still rather all over the place. Discombobulating comes to mind. Your :D comment makes a bit more sense in light of your speculation that "The dome-world could also be a conceptual scaffold to help proto-conscious beings grasp their simulated state, thus preparing us for higher consciousness."
Your observation that dome sky and flat earth go together seems probable for some with a religious foundation to the concept but I cannot conceive of any connection with the "meditation/psychedelic experiences as potential simulation escapes".
You wrote "The idea that meditation unlocks our potential as fully conscious beings fits both models. In a simulation, it rewrites our code; in a dome-world, it transcends physical limits, connecting to a higher reality." Both explanations are without any basis. You spent a few paragraphs explaining that we do not know what happens then propose a fully formed explanation for what may not even be happening.
I grant the writing was not as bad as it seemed but requiring a lab mouse to play dead (as in Hitchikers guide) or blow a cage open with gunpowder from match-heads and nitrates from urine would not be the endpoints a researcher has put in place to decide if his mice have evolved.
I will keep my mouth shut when I have nothing useful to say.
I got to the part where you started to draw on SciFi and admit I did skim the rest. I will re-read it to see if I simply did not get past the long and irrelevant intro and missed the meat of it.
I kind of gave up as it was going into the weds and went to look at the comments in the hope that there was some explanation.
My comment was regarding your cryptic (perhaps humorous if the :D means that) comment about some simulator wanting to out themself by making a testable dome. I was not planning to comment on the post specifically as it did not make sense and as you suspected I was unable to complete reading it but the comment sounded rather unlike your well reasoned normal style and I confess that it probably triggered me.
Hi, "The Final Experiment", is this the recent one where they went to the antarctic? I was under the impression that this has been shown to be a set up? Made it a Hollywood basement so to speak.
If I come across this again, I'll post the link for you.
It was not a set up your impressions are incorrect, that is how they are trying to maintain control. The setup was that none of the serious flat earth promoters were prepared to go to Antarctica to personally witness the experiment FOR FREE.
Only 3 did go and they have the same results as the 12 globe earth witnesses. The sun was above the horizon for a complete circuit even though it was arctic night in the North of Finland just as it is every year. North of the polar circle there are days with NO SUN and at the same time there are days in Antarctica with NO SUNSET and 6 months later the situation is reversed.
There is nothing special here for a globe earth but it is impossible for a flat earth.
People who work in Antarctica observe the 24h sun every summer if the terrain and latitude permits, there is no argument except from flat earth promoters. Anyone with money can go there (I suppose some passport is needed but it has a tourist business) and see for themselves. Only the flatearth advocates who know it is a scam do not want to go.
The best way to confuse people is to tell them lies and convince them they are facts. If you can do this once you can do it over and over with cross reinforcement. Convince someone the earth is flat and then convince them that vaccine harms are a lie. All part of a calculated program of misinformation and lies.
No need to post the link, I have seen the lame critique. Claims that every person in the team was complicit in taking part in this deception after personal visit presence was offered.
And too be honest, neither provides a remedy of how to get away or out of this shit storm. The pack of any solution either offer means I largely lack interest in the conjecture. It just wastes thinking space.
I believe very little of what I see on either side of the fence.. All I proposed was that there was a video out there. They seemed to be showing it was a set and not actually at the location. That if I found the link again I would post it for those that saw it to make you their own minds.
Right your position was "I was under the impression that this has been shown to be a set up? Made it a Hollywood basement so to speak." and I thought that was a rather lazy position especially if based on one video. No worries. I agree most of it is a waste of time, I occasionally push back with some data when someone was convinced by propaganda but not much more I can do, there are so many things that cannot work with flat earth that it should not need discussing. They used to think the Earth was at the center of the universe and crude telescopes and careful record keeping put an end to that. Even the fellow in Ancient Greece figured out the diameter of the Earth. The fact that people offer the flatearth as a potential in this day has little excuse instead of credulity or malice, you seemed to be the first type so I offered some perspective.
We do launch rockets outside of the Earth, probes to other planets. Hard to intercept Saturn 5's or Starships, and then simulate their travel to the Moon or beyond and then ?3D print? a return vehicle to Earth. Much more likely and easier to do the whole thing in software, including simulated human beings.
Much easier to build a universe than to simulate it.
All the folk preaching that we are in a simulation have ZERO useful thoughts on what the simulation is in.
This physical creation is all or not, it may be a special case of astral, causal or other planes/realms but that too is IRRELEVANT. We do not gain any knowledge about how reality is shaped outside our creation or simulation by speculating that it is or is not a simulation.
We clearly live in a simulation designed to reap a harvest: souls who have thought enough about their existence to even contemplate something as “far out” as a simulated reality.
All the things thrown at them in the world is designed to keep them asleep as “the watchers” (the true ones and not the nephilim) keep an eye on them, and an eye out for those who rise in consciousness.
In our shamanic practices when we do a despacho, (offering to “the above”), the watchers are always included as recipients. Why would that be? We want favors from them to make life smoother, to clear away obstacles, while still being clear in mind that there is an ultimate creator of all things, who we also honor, and we are also part of that creator—a singularity called god! Far out!
When this reality ends and earth is no longer part of the simulation, the star pupils will simply go up to another reality and those souls who need to learn more go into another simulator to have their experience in a material world. After all, we are consciousness and consciousness has no material form but is in every material form, and that is the purpose of a simulation—learning and experience.
In a way we do live in a domed world. The world is about 70% water = oceans, seas and large lakes. Inside the water world the dolphins and whales use a much larger percent of their brains than humans. For what? Have you seen the movie LUCY? (good concept bad hollyweird execution). The whales and dolphins live in a natural world where they do not make tools or build cities like us "evil hairless apes" do. Our dome is our atmosphere. The next layer may be the gravitation field of the sun.
As someone who came of age in the late 1960s, I had my experiences with LSD, and Peyote. and it did take me on some interesting journeys. This was also the time when Carlos Castaneda was all the rage amongst the the psychedelic spiritual explorers. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=carlos+castaneda+books&t=newext&atb=v265-1&ia=web
Over time I found that my most wonderful journeys were when fully conscious without psychedelics or recreational pharmaceuticals, but with books; mostly the non space opera science and speculative fiction of that era. = A mental playground for ideas. No nukes required.
Next best out of this world experiences scuba diving the reefs on Bonaire, Hawaii, Great Barrier Reef around Lizard Island, Australia, Fiji's Yasawa Islands, Tortola Virgin Islands, and even the Florida Keys.
Thank you. I had an NDE many years ago, and have read many books on and spoken to many other human experiences. Dr. Raymond Moody, IANDs, etc. Dr Mark Pitstick has a beautiful site with free articles and videos, especially to help people struggling with grief. https://www.soulproof.com/. I like Jessica's thought experiment.
The entities making the observations must be amazed at the insouciance of humanity as we unleash proto-intelligent AI without a container to prevent it doing mischief.
You will know the truth and the truth will set you free. Said by a guy, now out of fashion, who died in a horrible way. In the East, but also the Native Americans, until 100 years ago knew and practiced mahamudra. Voluntary exit from the body when the "dome" became unbearable. But the trick was, and is, that you didn't go anywhere but you re-established yourself in your true essence
It's accepted by many quantum phycisists, that the fundamental building block of reality is information, - "matter as such does not exist" as Max Planck said in 1944. We know only one causal explanation for information and that's intelligence. That's why the digital information in DNA is storng evidence for intelligent design. Random mutation cannot produce information hence the neodarwinian explanation for life is very unlikely to be true (I'd love to explain that to one of my greatest covid-heros Bret Weinstein). It's time to abandon philosophical materialism since we have known for over a 100 years, that stuff is not the fundamental building block of the physical reality. Information comes first which means mind comes first. In an old book it is stated that "In the beginning was the word", - word=information. So maybe we should be looking outside the physical reality to figure out what is going on in this strange world :-)
Alternative to the alternative hypothesis:
Continued incitement of division, hostility et al within humanity provides the opportunity of harvesting low vibrational energy as a fuel source (Monroe, 1978).
I think you are on to something. Makes me want to be filled with peaceful, loving, and kind thoughts 24/7. Most times when I pray that’s one of the things I ask for is to be filled with love, joy, peace, patience, goodness, faithfulness, generosity, and self-control. Maybe that will empower the good guys in the higher realms.
The dome hypothesis is the only rational explanation of the Earth-in-space structure, according to our established physics. There is a concept that when two media of different densities (pressures) are put next to each other without a rigid barrier, they will right away start mixing up, and the direction of the resulting flow is from higher pressure to lower pressure. With liquids, it takes a lot of time. With gases, the process is instantaneous.
When you puncture a balloon, it will explode - the high-pressure contents of the balloon wants to immediately flow into the low-pressure surroundings.
When you are in a tightly-closed “space” vehicle, and a puncture is caused by an external “object”, the vehicle should immediately explode, in a similar manner. Unless... you have a brave “astronaut” who closes the puncture with his finger (why not?)... or... what we are told about “space” is not factual.
We are told that there is literally nothing in the space. Which should mean that the pressure of the space is practically zero.
Which means that there must be a rigid barrier between the Earth’s atmosphere system and the surrounding “space”. Without this barrier, the whole Earth system would have been exploded into the space long long ago.
Besides, the Earth’s high-pressure atmosphere is a stable environment for (they say) millions of years. What kind of a truly powerful force would withstand the zero-pressure suction from the “space”?
Thus, what popular (school, academic) physics says about pressures and their interactions, when applied to the Earth-space system, gives rise to one obvious conclusion: there must be a rigid, tightly-sealed barrier all around the Earth. The dome.
This is the point where you should watch “Capricorn One”, review all photos taken on the Moon (all of them perfectly sharp, perfectly in focus, with perfect exposure), and ask yourself a question: “What’s really going on here?”
You could consider hollow earth, just as Edmund Halley did (perhaps with similar underlying reasoning).
The hollow Earth concept is so different. 1) Nobody is capable of checking the polar region, except for the “allowed” parties. 2) Even so, the task appears to be an easy one (especially with modern technology), just travel several hundred miles away and see what’s there - but there is no trace of such expeditions. 3) Apparently, no one is interested in it - while much more complex and demanding challenges are happily pursued. 4) The established science has not said anything about it so far - so we do not have any official recognised outlook to refer to.
All in all, this one remains a fiction story, however interesting and appealing.
I don't think we went to the moon either...
John Archibald Wheeler, pioneer of black-hole and worm-hole theory, famously suggested that the world requires an observer in order to exist. He called his theory ‘It-from-Bit’:
It from bit symbolizes the idea that every item of the physical world has at bottom — a very deep bottom, in most instances — an immaterial source and explanation; that which we call reality arises in the last analysis from the posing of yes-no questions and the registering of equipment-evoked responses; in short, that all things physical are information-theoretic in origin and that this is a participatory universe.
Max Planck, Nobel Prize Winner for Physics in 1918, stated:
I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.
It is the good old Socratic forms - nothing new under the sun.
Russian scientists announced I believe around the 50's that it was impossible for them to send missiles further than 160km. There's this video from Bill Nye where he replies to an student that the earth is a closed system "we cannot leave the earth".
The "dome" is inspired for what we see in the firmament, it looks like a dome.
What is true is that all those stars have been there for millenia. Therefore, those modern-physics animations where you see the earth dancing within the solar system with the other plane(ts) while travelling the universe like a comet are just cartoons for children (I saw Elana Freeland sharing this animation I refer to in one of her presentations, and automatically confirmed myself there was something off with the whole story of hers).
If those animations were true, the earth would be travelling with his fellow planets including the unmovable firmament along the universe.
Too complicated, too unrelated to what we can see and feel. Whoever can see and feel.
---
Uni-[vers]e - "único verso" - only verse
Uni-[vers]ity -
This applied to spirituality or religion means there is a unique truth to all of us.
This applied to "social science" means to teach the same concept or narrative to all of us.
---
Another nothing to see here is that names like Eratóstenes, Newton or Galilei started showing up in more recent history books since the late 1800s if not later. All of them were related, if not members themselves of Judeo-Masonic families or Judeo-Masonic influence groups. Let's remind ourselves that "hidden in plain sight" is a well-known masonic emblem.
What is cool and challenging here is to try to break the circular, concentric, spheric or more precisely volumetric approach to cosmology. The forever baking cake continuosly expanding into the nothingness since the big bang happened (another tale for the secular). Why is it challenging? because those bastards were telling you about he solar system and the "true nature" of the universe when you were 5 - 7 years old.
So the earth is not just rounded or flat.
This is not a marble nor a pizza travelling in the space. There is no space. The space is where we live in, this is the space. It is like an stratum that infinitely expands in all directions, but is limited in height. What is upstairs? Heavenly, more etheric worlds? What is dowstairs? Hellish more dense and unbreathable worlds? Is there anything else? How the astral planes interconnect all these layers? There exist a limit in the width of the stratum? or... only those of us who live close to the stratum frontier are really discovering or creating reality?
Think about the world on the limits of a 3D videogame keeps creating ifself, keeps expanding to the infinite, but just on the stratum you are at that moment.
So that is the cosmological flattenness many out there speak about. It may be not just infinitely un-explored but infinitely un-created.
If our existence was a digital construct, there would be no outcome in trying to crack open a physical dome?! Why would "they" program one in? Just to see if we would think there was one and try and crack it??! If the simulation was as sophisticated as it would have to be, it would be relatively trivial to program in the universe?
:D because we might need something like that for it to fool us?
Any aberration would be proof of simulation, it would not 'fool' anyone.
Your are not gaining any credibility with these ideas unless they are clearly random musings on poorly thought out fiction.
It like the flat earth folk say it is impossible for 24h sunshine in the antarctic summer as the sun cannot be in the west and the east at the same time yet when the "Final Experiment" was done most of them refused to participate and then moved the goal posts and said it does not disprove a flat earth because none of your business.
The Voyager probes have demonstrated the dome is massive (the size of the visible universe at least) enough for people to accept that no nuke would make a difference.
Colour me not impressed Jessica.
Did you actually read my article?
Right, I confess, it did get a little more interesting after the intro but still rather all over the place. Discombobulating comes to mind. Your :D comment makes a bit more sense in light of your speculation that "The dome-world could also be a conceptual scaffold to help proto-conscious beings grasp their simulated state, thus preparing us for higher consciousness."
Your observation that dome sky and flat earth go together seems probable for some with a religious foundation to the concept but I cannot conceive of any connection with the "meditation/psychedelic experiences as potential simulation escapes".
You wrote "The idea that meditation unlocks our potential as fully conscious beings fits both models. In a simulation, it rewrites our code; in a dome-world, it transcends physical limits, connecting to a higher reality." Both explanations are without any basis. You spent a few paragraphs explaining that we do not know what happens then propose a fully formed explanation for what may not even be happening.
I grant the writing was not as bad as it seemed but requiring a lab mouse to play dead (as in Hitchikers guide) or blow a cage open with gunpowder from match-heads and nitrates from urine would not be the endpoints a researcher has put in place to decide if his mice have evolved.
I will keep my mouth shut when I have nothing useful to say.
I got to the part where you started to draw on SciFi and admit I did skim the rest. I will re-read it to see if I simply did not get past the long and irrelevant intro and missed the meat of it.
I kind of gave up as it was going into the weds and went to look at the comments in the hope that there was some explanation.
My comment was regarding your cryptic (perhaps humorous if the :D means that) comment about some simulator wanting to out themself by making a testable dome. I was not planning to comment on the post specifically as it did not make sense and as you suspected I was unable to complete reading it but the comment sounded rather unlike your well reasoned normal style and I confess that it probably triggered me.
I will comment below after reading.
Hi, "The Final Experiment", is this the recent one where they went to the antarctic? I was under the impression that this has been shown to be a set up? Made it a Hollywood basement so to speak.
If I come across this again, I'll post the link for you.
It was not a set up your impressions are incorrect, that is how they are trying to maintain control. The setup was that none of the serious flat earth promoters were prepared to go to Antarctica to personally witness the experiment FOR FREE.
Only 3 did go and they have the same results as the 12 globe earth witnesses. The sun was above the horizon for a complete circuit even though it was arctic night in the North of Finland just as it is every year. North of the polar circle there are days with NO SUN and at the same time there are days in Antarctica with NO SUNSET and 6 months later the situation is reversed.
There is nothing special here for a globe earth but it is impossible for a flat earth.
People who work in Antarctica observe the 24h sun every summer if the terrain and latitude permits, there is no argument except from flat earth promoters. Anyone with money can go there (I suppose some passport is needed but it has a tourist business) and see for themselves. Only the flatearth advocates who know it is a scam do not want to go.
The best way to confuse people is to tell them lies and convince them they are facts. If you can do this once you can do it over and over with cross reinforcement. Convince someone the earth is flat and then convince them that vaccine harms are a lie. All part of a calculated program of misinformation and lies.
No need to post the link, I have seen the lame critique. Claims that every person in the team was complicit in taking part in this deception after personal visit presence was offered.
And too be honest, neither provides a remedy of how to get away or out of this shit storm. The pack of any solution either offer means I largely lack interest in the conjecture. It just wastes thinking space.
I believe very little of what I see on either side of the fence.. All I proposed was that there was a video out there. They seemed to be showing it was a set and not actually at the location. That if I found the link again I would post it for those that saw it to make you their own minds.
Right your position was "I was under the impression that this has been shown to be a set up? Made it a Hollywood basement so to speak." and I thought that was a rather lazy position especially if based on one video. No worries. I agree most of it is a waste of time, I occasionally push back with some data when someone was convinced by propaganda but not much more I can do, there are so many things that cannot work with flat earth that it should not need discussing. They used to think the Earth was at the center of the universe and crude telescopes and careful record keeping put an end to that. Even the fellow in Ancient Greece figured out the diameter of the Earth. The fact that people offer the flatearth as a potential in this day has little excuse instead of credulity or malice, you seemed to be the first type so I offered some perspective.
I sense the demons feeding on your agitated brain.
These are musings, so lighten up please.
As in the Hunger Games.
We do launch rockets outside of the Earth, probes to other planets. Hard to intercept Saturn 5's or Starships, and then simulate their travel to the Moon or beyond and then ?3D print? a return vehicle to Earth. Much more likely and easier to do the whole thing in software, including simulated human beings.
Much easier to build a universe than to simulate it.
All the folk preaching that we are in a simulation have ZERO useful thoughts on what the simulation is in.
This physical creation is all or not, it may be a special case of astral, causal or other planes/realms but that too is IRRELEVANT. We do not gain any knowledge about how reality is shaped outside our creation or simulation by speculating that it is or is not a simulation.
Speculation can give rise to testing. I think it is good to think about such things.
We clearly live in a simulation designed to reap a harvest: souls who have thought enough about their existence to even contemplate something as “far out” as a simulated reality.
All the things thrown at them in the world is designed to keep them asleep as “the watchers” (the true ones and not the nephilim) keep an eye on them, and an eye out for those who rise in consciousness.
In our shamanic practices when we do a despacho, (offering to “the above”), the watchers are always included as recipients. Why would that be? We want favors from them to make life smoother, to clear away obstacles, while still being clear in mind that there is an ultimate creator of all things, who we also honor, and we are also part of that creator—a singularity called god! Far out!
When this reality ends and earth is no longer part of the simulation, the star pupils will simply go up to another reality and those souls who need to learn more go into another simulator to have their experience in a material world. After all, we are consciousness and consciousness has no material form but is in every material form, and that is the purpose of a simulation—learning and experience.
In a way we do live in a domed world. The world is about 70% water = oceans, seas and large lakes. Inside the water world the dolphins and whales use a much larger percent of their brains than humans. For what? Have you seen the movie LUCY? (good concept bad hollyweird execution). The whales and dolphins live in a natural world where they do not make tools or build cities like us "evil hairless apes" do. Our dome is our atmosphere. The next layer may be the gravitation field of the sun.
Other interest Sci-Fi thought experiments: Larry Niven's Book Ringworld: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Ring+World&t=newext&atb=v265-1&ia=web and Philip José Farmer's World of Tiers books https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Tier+World++Philip+Jose+Farmer&t=newext&atb=v265-1&ia=web
As someone who came of age in the late 1960s, I had my experiences with LSD, and Peyote. and it did take me on some interesting journeys. This was also the time when Carlos Castaneda was all the rage amongst the the psychedelic spiritual explorers. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=carlos+castaneda+books&t=newext&atb=v265-1&ia=web
We also had a plethora of spiritual gurus of which the most prominent was the Maharishi_Mahesh_Yogi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maharishi_Mahesh_Yogi Why? because the Beatles went to India to see him.
Over time I found that my most wonderful journeys were when fully conscious without psychedelics or recreational pharmaceuticals, but with books; mostly the non space opera science and speculative fiction of that era. = A mental playground for ideas. No nukes required.
Next best out of this world experiences scuba diving the reefs on Bonaire, Hawaii, Great Barrier Reef around Lizard Island, Australia, Fiji's Yasawa Islands, Tortola Virgin Islands, and even the Florida Keys.
The hindus figure this out thousands of years ago and called it Maya. :D
The firmament separates the waters from the waters. Read the Bible
not yet. too many extra words.
You should read this: https://a.co/d/c6YcK63
I think any open minded soul would find it quite interesting.
Hey broski!😎
Thank you. I had an NDE many years ago, and have read many books on and spoken to many other human experiences. Dr. Raymond Moody, IANDs, etc. Dr Mark Pitstick has a beautiful site with free articles and videos, especially to help people struggling with grief. https://www.soulproof.com/. I like Jessica's thought experiment.
The entities making the observations must be amazed at the insouciance of humanity as we unleash proto-intelligent AI without a container to prevent it doing mischief.
But is is very cool that you used the word “insouciance.”
Check out The Gene Keys
k