Discover more from Unacceptable Jessica
This is probably the worst thing I have seen so far.
You can't spell hypocrisy without psycho!
Please read this article recently published online in the Toronto Star and written by Health Reporter Megan Ogilvie and Staff Reporter May Warren. You can simply read my screenshots if you’ve been subjected to inflation. To summarize, one Torontonian Dr. Sun claims to have put HIS neck on the line by illegally and unethically injecting 500 infants (children <5) with COVID-19 products that are now proven entirely obsolete against Omicron, in order to protect them from Omicron. Sounds informed and up-to-date, doesn’t he?
Here’s the article. It’s short.
He felt he “ethically had no reason to say no”. Say ‘no’ to whom? To the parents? Were those parents signing consent forms for their children? How about liability waivers? How about CAERS reports in the case where one of those 500 infants was injured? If this person was up-to-date in the slightest, or had any ethical bearing, he would have let the concerned parents know that there was nothing to be concerned about, and if their children got a runny nose to give them soup and orange juice.
As life usually has it, this has ‘come up’ at the same time that I have been given the go-ahead to speak at yet another VRBPAC meeting: “Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee June 14-15, 2022 Meeting Announcement”, to discuss injecting 6 month-old babies-4 year-olds with the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 injectable products.
On June 15, 2022, under Topic II, the committee will meet in open session to discuss amending the EUA of the Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine to include the administration of the primary series to infants and children 6 months through 5 years of age, and also to discuss amending the EUA of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine to include the administration of the primary series to infants and children 6 months through 4 years of age.
Really? Amending the EUA huh? Wow. Doesn’t that mean that these products being discussed are still not FDA-approved? Why, yes it does!
So far, VAERS corroborates that it is not just MDs like Sun (ironic name, wuh?) breaking every ethical code that we have; it is random administrators of the injections in the United States. And likely, all over the world. I have prepared a few slides already for this upcoming VRBPAC meeting and I will share a couple of them with you here. 1,832 adverse events have been reported to VAERS for infants 0-5 years of age as of May 27, 2022. The following bar plot shows the data for 0-5 year-olds by dose. Not all of the children have dose data as indicated by N. You’ll note that some of these children have been injected 3 times (blue).
No where in the world have ‘approval’ or ‘permission’ to inject infants from ages 0-5 been granted as of this date May 27th, 2022. NO WHERE.
The most frequently reported adverse event in each age group is “Incorrect dose administered”. In the SYMPTOM_TEXT column in VAERS, it is common to see that children are being injected with products that haven’t been properly diluted prior to injection. I wrote an entire Substack on this. Read this: “Was given the wrong dose (20 mg instead of 10 mcg) of the Pfizer vaccine”. This repeats. It is also common to see that children are being injected at inappropriate ages. I also wrote a Substack on this.
Below is a bar plot that shows the adverse events being reported at ‘higher’ rates (more than 5 reports for each adverse event) for 0-5 year-olds. It is plain to see that the 2 highest oopsies involved admission of screwing up the ‘dose’ and/or the ‘age’. Apologies for this ugly plot. I don’t believe in altering labels.
Look. Sunny boy. It doesn’t matter if you think that these products are safe or effective. It doesn’t. What matters is that these products have not been approved - EUA or otherwise - for infants. THEY HAVE NOT. There is a process, you see. That is meant to be followed.
IT’S NOT UP TO YOU.
Clearly our medical doctors are being punished - YES PUNISHED (i.e.: Ira Bernstein/Crystal Luchkiw/Meryl Nass - just to name a few of the medical doctors that I know personally) - for prescribing safe, Nobel prize winning, off label PILLS - so why does this guy get to INJECT off-label experimental products into infants and not get punished? I bet you that nothing will happen to this guy. No medical license suspension. They’ll probably give him an award for being ‘brave’.
Although I know very well that the stand-in bureaucrats are using our ethical Codes, Oaths, Constitutions and Charters as toilet paper, this particular episode by Sun is in clear violation of informed consent law and classifies as Medical Malpractice if any of these children are (seriously) harmed as a result of his condemnable and reckless behaviour. So even though Pfizer and Moderna are not liable, the medical practitioners and administrators ARE, in the case of injury. Maybe these doctors need to start being made to fear something else for a change: litigation from angry parents who were misled, for example.1
Whenever I go into one of these Substacks, or anything really, I try to put myself in the shoes of all. In this case: the parents, the children, the Toronto Star writers and this doctor. This guy, Dr. Sun. Man, I can’t even do it. Even if he’s right, and these products in the experimental phase of their life-span turn out to be completely harmless, he still cannot inject infants prior to approval of these products. He cannot. This is beyond me. The parents were either completely mislead or simply decidedly uninformed due to lack of caring, and this is also horrific since it is the child that will suffer if an injury occurs. The children? Well, you know how I feel about that. You can’t make an informed decision if you are 2 or 3 or 4, can you?
For litigators: If Sun is exempt from liability claims in case of harm due to these injections then so should all medical doctors be in case of harm due to prescription of IVM or medical exemptions to protect from anaphylactic events.
And if practicing medical doctors, with decades of experience, excellent reputations and thousands of patients are stripped of their licenses for giving ‘off-label’ medicine to their patients, then so must the ones INJECTING off-label to under-aged infants.
Hypocrisy is very well among us.
(Code of the District of Columbia; § 7–1305.06a. Informed consent) This is only one state, and one example.