Tried to tell my family this THREE YEARS AGO, and was dismissed. And I agree with you that it's likely a lot more stuff that truly has a causal relationship also.
I just saw a case enter an Air Force airman was forced in having the shot then jailed for 66 days and missed the birth of his first child. On Newsmax they showed that he sued the AF and we need more people following suit.
I know of three people who have dropped down dead with heart attacks this week alone. One, in fact, is not fully dead yet as he was brought back by CPR but he’s not expected to be the same again if he makes it out of hospital.
In the decades that follow, what other ailments will befall these young men? How will their families react when they have the epiphany that the gov't lied to them and their children were at almost zero risk from the VID.
The "insufficient evidence" statement reminds me of all the allegations that the 2020 election was "the most secure in galactic history," simply because no judge has yet allowed any of the mountains of evidence to be admitted, or even examined, using spurious and absurd grounds like lack of standing, on an issue in which every citizen has standing. And still we get the useful idiots spouting "safe and effective," and these va... I can't even type the word anymore... are our only way out of this mess.
The Spanish and Hong Kong Flus both burned out (ever "heard" of herd immunity?) in less than three years, and here we are in year four...
So the judges argued a whole bunch of nonsense on "spurious grounds" including:
A) Courtrooms aren't allowed to define election results (no-one said they were, they were supposed to prosecute fraud)
B) The lawsuits were too early (I.E. before the election)
C) The lawsuits were too later (I.E. after the election)
D) The lawsuits couldn't yet be litigated because the election hadn't finished and so all facts of the case couldn't be brought to trial (I.E. it was brought during the election)
E) Pointing out each court contradicted itself is also spurious grounds as each "new" case is weighed on the individual merits (I.E. they can issue as many contradictory rulings as they want case-by-case)
F) The plaintiffs sued at the "right time" but they don't have any standing because only the State can bring lawsuit
G) [In the case of a State suing] A State doesn't have standing because it impacts other States elections and those elections are unrelated to the current State bringing suit
H) [In the case of a State suing their own election integrity workers] A State doesn't have standing to sue their own employees because their own employees completed the course of working during the State's own employment (read: 'you're suing yourself', apparently)
I) You can't prosecute a criminal using evidence from an electoral roll because electoral rolls are private information that the court isn't allowed to examine (even if it is fake)
J) Even if the information for the electoral rolls is public.
K) Even if a private third party had access to the electoral rolls that nobody is allowed to see even if they saw it, it doesn't count (???)
Good list. I hope you save it, and if you have the examples readily available, put one or two examples of a case beside each type (i.e. the lawsuits Kari Lake filed in Arizona). I haven't kept as close a track as I should have.
Unfortunately they're just examples from off the top of my head and I didn't keep data of the elections issues late 2020/2021 because I was too busy dealing with the fallout of a pandemic and then the adversely harmful mRNA shots which I was doing my level best to contain.
I think folks could understand why I prioritised people's health over election inconsistencies.
I don't mean to be rude, although I can't figure out how not to be, but what rock are you living under that you missed that elephant as it was squatting and doing its business right in front of you? "No, we can't say the Hindenburg exploded, because we weren't there..."
Dennis R. - I didn't miss the elephant. I just don't have time to keep up with all the play-by-play reports on court and other battles. What I'd missed was the decision that voters didn't have standing.
Ridiculous!
It may have been a headline somewhere, but I can't keep up with all of those either.
My main focus is COVID crimes, dangers. evasion & survival tactics.
PS: I've seen lots of pre-AI photos and films of the
OK, the indirect reference was an airball. My point being that EVERY US citizen had standing, because fraudulent elections affect every voter, if not every citizen. To claim that ANY entity lacked standing was fascism in bold letters, kinda like a case about a rape no one heard or saw in one of NY's poshest dept stores during the Carter administration, or ignoring statute of limitation because the potential defendant is The Donald.
The real problem with '20 was the absurdity of imagining the least inspirational candidate since Millard Fillmore getting 15M more votes than Obama in his last win over the second worst candidate since Millard. I mean, seriously? Nothing to see here?
As to the Hindenburg, to quote Monty Python, "it's only a model..." 🙄 😬
You want covid crimes, check out this article that points to something regarding the CDCs death tallies that I've not seen elsewhere. Zero excess deaths in 2020, once you check their (new) math, followed by 1/2 mil in each of the three "it's safe now; we've got these shots fer y'all" years, and that's, again, with the president and the talking heads belching out "safe and effective" and CDC claiming that none of those deaths could possibly have been caused by the (only) elephant in the room: https://www.fittrimimmortal.com/blog/covid-statistical-hijinx
Ah yes, Mitt Romney and his "47% quote" which showed he genuinely considered poorer people (who didn't earn enough to pay federal income tax ) to be scumbags.
I'm a Republican and I was absolutely disgusted. My husband and I have been in the "not earned enough to pay federal income tax" group at various points in our lives.
And yet I somehow doubt you ever considered staying in that group. The problem we have is not that some folks fall into that group (been there myself) but that some then get so comfortable there. It's why Brandon wants to give our hard earned money to pay for other people's educations, when the reason they can't pay is because they didn't go to college to build a life, but to study something ending in studies. These are the kids that end up believing in anthropogenic climate change, windmills and EVs.
The joke goes like this: A group of students went through the truly fascinating Egyptian Studies program, but upon graduating realized that the only career opportunity was teaching Egyptian Studies... the original pyramid scheme. Meanwhile, I worked three to five part time jobs, simultaneously, to get through UCSB (not Harvard). I cut hair, typed term papers, waited tables, sang folk songs at the local pizza joint on Friday nights and played in a rock band on Saturday nights, all while carrying 20 units, because I wanted to get out and get my life started. BTW, back then UC in-state tuition was $500. I even picked lemons with the migrant workers a time or two.
I don't object to unemployment and welfare, although I've never gotten either; I object to people making a career out of them and then voting Democrat because that's whose promising them a raise.
It's nice to see that they'll admit to ANY negative effects... But the stuff to which they deny a causal relationship... Are pretty well known to be adverse events, common to the shots. And they list broad swathes of "inconclusive" where reasonable people have already drawn conclusions... So essentially, what I see, is that myocarditis is something the couldn't deny anymore.
While local, non-serious side effects, such as malaise or sore arm are seen as with any vaccine, IN RARE INSTANCES, serious adverse events thought to be linked to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been noted.
I sent this paper out to some of my most zealous pro vax friends. Do they draw the conclusion that vaccinations are unsafe? NOT AT ALL. They conclude that such events are not proven to be linked -only "thought to be linked" and are quite rare. PHOOEY. I thought this article would red pill my friends. Instead they are celebrating mRNA vaccines for saving 14 million lives and having very few adverse events.
OH GOD. Does anyone know how it's possible to argue that Covid vaccines save lives? I thought excess mortality INCREASED after the vaccines were rolled out. So dropping dead from a heart attack post vaccine is due to global warming?
You can show the increase in all cause mortalities - which occurred AFTER the roll-out of the Experimental Synthetic mRNA Gene Therapy injections - not before them.
This study was attacked and deplatformed, but never disproven through a legitimate peer review process.
What saved lives was mutation to less deadly strains. Even then - the jabbed are more likely to become infected, get sick, enter the hospital, and die, than the unjabbed. The data from Scotland showed this, early-on.
I'm totally impressed with your reference to web.archive.org. I notice that my doctor friends continue to insist that vaccines save lives and that Covid vaccines saved 14 million lives. I'm simply astounded. It seems we live in two different worlds. Data from Scotland was no longer made available as soon as it started showing negative efficacy. I'm wondering how many heart attacks have to occur before people start realizing how lethal mRNA Covid vaccines are. Can we ever pierce the wall of propaganda that makes people feel safe and secure while getting abused by medical authorities?
It's a great question... The data here in America is garbage. They used deceptive definitions of vaccinated and unvaccinated. Expose-news reported on the Scotland data, until it was no longer available. Negative efficacy was immediately apparent on the graphs. So this "14 million saved" number is just fraudulent and made-up.
As I expect everyone here knows, they used the "not vaxxed until a month after your second shot," to put the vast majority of jab deaths into the covid numbers, since the majority of jab deaths occurred well within that window. But even the ACM numbers are defective. As I documented back in February and November of '21, by blaming every death on covid the CDC came to December of '20 with a shortage of 500K death certificates for Cancer and Heart Disease, so they simply invented 500 deaths in two weeks, the last week of December, and the first week of January (back-dated obviously). The true ACM increase in the past three years has been 500K each year, while the ACM for '20 was actually ZILCH: https://www.fittrimimmortal.com/blog/covid-statistical-hijinx
The CDC runs a database called wonder, where you can datamine a LOT of information. They just "unreleased" their 2022 numbers though, with no info on when they will be re-released (probably after being massaged to correct "errors".)
You can look look at 5 or 10 age groups and get the cause of death for people. There are a lot of other variables you can look at (state, sex, race, etc). So far I found that for people age 25-34 the CDC has classified almost all the extra deaths as "COVID" or as accidental drug overdoses.
The CDC commissioned this "independent" study so that they don't have to pay compensation claims under CICP.
So far only about 12 people have been compensated for an average of about $4000 each, which is most assuredly less than they spent accumulating the evidence and paying lawyers to assemble the claims. CICP isn't paying out claims for any conditions they aren't admitting the shots caused. And they are making sure that is a VERY short list. It's pretty much myocarditis and anaphylaxis, and they just basically announced they won't be paying for anyone who died of heart related issues.
The larger scandal here is the attitude that it is acceptable to continue jabbing people and making the "safe and effective" claim WITHOUT proof positive. In other words, human beings are knowingly being used as guinea pigs and all errors are on the side of risk and not caution. This is the most unethical period of "medicine" in history and it isn't even close. Society has become so desensitized to the plight of everyone other than themselves with an attitude of "hey, it didn't happen to me...I didn't have a problem" that Lord only knows what comes next. "Hey, they didn't load me onto the rail cars. They didn't put me in the 'shower'."
I have read that a significant percent of myocarditis sufferers die within 10 years. Given that myocarditis from COVID gene therapy injections tends to hit younger people, this really is a tragedy of epic proportions regarding total life years lost from just this one known side effect.
Yup. I've seen an estimate that 50% of myocarditis sufferers die or need heart transplants in 5 to 10 years. Hopefully the numbers won't be that bad.
It's absolutely unconscionable that the article said most cases were "mild" and improved after a few days in the hospital. There isn't any "mild" myocarditis, that's a term doctors use to describe relative severity, but all cases of myocarditis are very serious indeed.
Talk about slow to the party !! Plus the insidious use of statements thru out the paper to try and play down any solid evidence ( which has mounted to historical proportions in proving cardio dangers and injuries ) is absolutely disgusting. The pyramids would still be getting built if these guys were left in charge. The one GLOBAL item that has been prevalent thru the past 3 years from Pharma supported institutions like these is …… DENIAL. Criminal Denial. Denial that ably supported life altering injuries and deaths to millions around the world.
Get your brand new anti-Myocarditis jabs now! Myocarditis might be the new normal but we are about bucking the trend! Available at every pharmacy and soon to be rolled out at all supermarkets and shoe shine vendors. Get yours now - and another in two weeks time (or lose your freedom to work and leave the house).
Tried to tell my family this THREE YEARS AGO, and was dismissed. And I agree with you that it's likely a lot more stuff that truly has a causal relationship also.
Turbo cancers, menstrual and general fertility problems, prion disease, autoimmune issues. You name it. The people who pushed this are straight evil.
Oh yea, I imagine there's a lot of us that fall into this bucket aka the "I told you so" bucket.
Matter of fact, here's an article on the masks that called BS way back then: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-i-dont-wear-a-mask
There's a new expose on tinnitus in the Epoch Times. Publicly, the CDC says there was no signal. Internal emails say there was.
…… and miscarriages Placental abruptions and stillbirths …. Disgusting 🤮 all of it .
Yep! I know of one stillbirth and a few miscarriages myself!!
I’m sorry for your losses
So do I.
Disgusting all of it. Repetition for emphasis.
I re-emphasize the feeling of repugnancy and I raise to emesis.
just micturate on it!
I just saw a case enter an Air Force airman was forced in having the shot then jailed for 66 days and missed the birth of his first child. On Newsmax they showed that he sued the AF and we need more people following suit.
How exactly was he forced?
Maybe the shots don't cause myocarditis. Your heart is just bursting from pride after getting jabbed to save grandma.
I know of three people who have dropped down dead with heart attacks this week alone. One, in fact, is not fully dead yet as he was brought back by CPR but he’s not expected to be the same again if he makes it out of hospital.
:(
So heartbreaking! 💔
In the decades that follow, what other ailments will befall these young men? How will their families react when they have the epiphany that the gov't lied to them and their children were at almost zero risk from the VID.
The "insufficient evidence" statement reminds me of all the allegations that the 2020 election was "the most secure in galactic history," simply because no judge has yet allowed any of the mountains of evidence to be admitted, or even examined, using spurious and absurd grounds like lack of standing, on an issue in which every citizen has standing. And still we get the useful idiots spouting "safe and effective," and these va... I can't even type the word anymore... are our only way out of this mess.
The Spanish and Hong Kong Flus both burned out (ever "heard" of herd immunity?) in less than three years, and here we are in year four...
..."using spurious and absurd grounds like lack of standing, on an issue in which every citizen has standing."...
I somehow missed that. What kind of bullshit was used to keep that sized elephant out of the room?
So the judges argued a whole bunch of nonsense on "spurious grounds" including:
A) Courtrooms aren't allowed to define election results (no-one said they were, they were supposed to prosecute fraud)
B) The lawsuits were too early (I.E. before the election)
C) The lawsuits were too later (I.E. after the election)
D) The lawsuits couldn't yet be litigated because the election hadn't finished and so all facts of the case couldn't be brought to trial (I.E. it was brought during the election)
E) Pointing out each court contradicted itself is also spurious grounds as each "new" case is weighed on the individual merits (I.E. they can issue as many contradictory rulings as they want case-by-case)
F) The plaintiffs sued at the "right time" but they don't have any standing because only the State can bring lawsuit
G) [In the case of a State suing] A State doesn't have standing because it impacts other States elections and those elections are unrelated to the current State bringing suit
H) [In the case of a State suing their own election integrity workers] A State doesn't have standing to sue their own employees because their own employees completed the course of working during the State's own employment (read: 'you're suing yourself', apparently)
I) You can't prosecute a criminal using evidence from an electoral roll because electoral rolls are private information that the court isn't allowed to examine (even if it is fake)
J) Even if the information for the electoral rolls is public.
K) Even if a private third party had access to the electoral rolls that nobody is allowed to see even if they saw it, it doesn't count (???)
And so-on.
Thanks!
If this isn't the worst ever case of you-can't-make-this-shit-up, it had to make the finals!
Good list. I hope you save it, and if you have the examples readily available, put one or two examples of a case beside each type (i.e. the lawsuits Kari Lake filed in Arizona). I haven't kept as close a track as I should have.
Unfortunately they're just examples from off the top of my head and I didn't keep data of the elections issues late 2020/2021 because I was too busy dealing with the fallout of a pandemic and then the adversely harmful mRNA shots which I was doing my level best to contain.
I think folks could understand why I prioritised people's health over election inconsistencies.
I don't mean to be rude, although I can't figure out how not to be, but what rock are you living under that you missed that elephant as it was squatting and doing its business right in front of you? "No, we can't say the Hindenburg exploded, because we weren't there..."
Dennis R. - I didn't miss the elephant. I just don't have time to keep up with all the play-by-play reports on court and other battles. What I'd missed was the decision that voters didn't have standing.
Ridiculous!
It may have been a headline somewhere, but I can't keep up with all of those either.
My main focus is COVID crimes, dangers. evasion & survival tactics.
PS: I've seen lots of pre-AI photos and films of the
Hindenburg - with & and without the explosion 🙂
OK, the indirect reference was an airball. My point being that EVERY US citizen had standing, because fraudulent elections affect every voter, if not every citizen. To claim that ANY entity lacked standing was fascism in bold letters, kinda like a case about a rape no one heard or saw in one of NY's poshest dept stores during the Carter administration, or ignoring statute of limitation because the potential defendant is The Donald.
The real problem with '20 was the absurdity of imagining the least inspirational candidate since Millard Fillmore getting 15M more votes than Obama in his last win over the second worst candidate since Millard. I mean, seriously? Nothing to see here?
As to the Hindenburg, to quote Monty Python, "it's only a model..." 🙄 😬
You want covid crimes, check out this article that points to something regarding the CDCs death tallies that I've not seen elsewhere. Zero excess deaths in 2020, once you check their (new) math, followed by 1/2 mil in each of the three "it's safe now; we've got these shots fer y'all" years, and that's, again, with the president and the talking heads belching out "safe and effective" and CDC claiming that none of those deaths could possibly have been caused by the (only) elephant in the room: https://www.fittrimimmortal.com/blog/covid-statistical-hijinx
Ah yes, Mitt Romney and his "47% quote" which showed he genuinely considered poorer people (who didn't earn enough to pay federal income tax ) to be scumbags.
I'm a Republican and I was absolutely disgusted. My husband and I have been in the "not earned enough to pay federal income tax" group at various points in our lives.
And yet I somehow doubt you ever considered staying in that group. The problem we have is not that some folks fall into that group (been there myself) but that some then get so comfortable there. It's why Brandon wants to give our hard earned money to pay for other people's educations, when the reason they can't pay is because they didn't go to college to build a life, but to study something ending in studies. These are the kids that end up believing in anthropogenic climate change, windmills and EVs.
The joke goes like this: A group of students went through the truly fascinating Egyptian Studies program, but upon graduating realized that the only career opportunity was teaching Egyptian Studies... the original pyramid scheme. Meanwhile, I worked three to five part time jobs, simultaneously, to get through UCSB (not Harvard). I cut hair, typed term papers, waited tables, sang folk songs at the local pizza joint on Friday nights and played in a rock band on Saturday nights, all while carrying 20 units, because I wanted to get out and get my life started. BTW, back then UC in-state tuition was $500. I even picked lemons with the migrant workers a time or two.
I don't object to unemployment and welfare, although I've never gotten either; I object to people making a career out of them and then voting Democrat because that's whose promising them a raise.
It's nice to see that they'll admit to ANY negative effects... But the stuff to which they deny a causal relationship... Are pretty well known to be adverse events, common to the shots. And they list broad swathes of "inconclusive" where reasonable people have already drawn conclusions... So essentially, what I see, is that myocarditis is something the couldn't deny anymore.
This sentence appeared in the paper:
While local, non-serious side effects, such as malaise or sore arm are seen as with any vaccine, IN RARE INSTANCES, serious adverse events thought to be linked to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been noted.
I sent this paper out to some of my most zealous pro vax friends. Do they draw the conclusion that vaccinations are unsafe? NOT AT ALL. They conclude that such events are not proven to be linked -only "thought to be linked" and are quite rare. PHOOEY. I thought this article would red pill my friends. Instead they are celebrating mRNA vaccines for saving 14 million lives and having very few adverse events.
OH GOD. Does anyone know how it's possible to argue that Covid vaccines save lives? I thought excess mortality INCREASED after the vaccines were rolled out. So dropping dead from a heart attack post vaccine is due to global warming?
You can show the increase in all cause mortalities - which occurred AFTER the roll-out of the Experimental Synthetic mRNA Gene Therapy injections - not before them.
https://web.archive.org/web/20201126163323/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19
This study was attacked and deplatformed, but never disproven through a legitimate peer review process.
What saved lives was mutation to less deadly strains. Even then - the jabbed are more likely to become infected, get sick, enter the hospital, and die, than the unjabbed. The data from Scotland showed this, early-on.
I'm totally impressed with your reference to web.archive.org. I notice that my doctor friends continue to insist that vaccines save lives and that Covid vaccines saved 14 million lives. I'm simply astounded. It seems we live in two different worlds. Data from Scotland was no longer made available as soon as it started showing negative efficacy. I'm wondering how many heart attacks have to occur before people start realizing how lethal mRNA Covid vaccines are. Can we ever pierce the wall of propaganda that makes people feel safe and secure while getting abused by medical authorities?
It's a great question... The data here in America is garbage. They used deceptive definitions of vaccinated and unvaccinated. Expose-news reported on the Scotland data, until it was no longer available. Negative efficacy was immediately apparent on the graphs. So this "14 million saved" number is just fraudulent and made-up.
Why not show your friends this old hat - Slide 16, VRBPAC Meeting Presentation, Oct. 22, 2020.
https://mega.nz/file/gwIRjKCa#JmQ7iav-exz4fg06grCO1yZ9C2q8oO4nu2OWGL-8EqI
They ought to be well pleased that expectations were met, right?
As I expect everyone here knows, they used the "not vaxxed until a month after your second shot," to put the vast majority of jab deaths into the covid numbers, since the majority of jab deaths occurred well within that window. But even the ACM numbers are defective. As I documented back in February and November of '21, by blaming every death on covid the CDC came to December of '20 with a shortage of 500K death certificates for Cancer and Heart Disease, so they simply invented 500 deaths in two weeks, the last week of December, and the first week of January (back-dated obviously). The true ACM increase in the past three years has been 500K each year, while the ACM for '20 was actually ZILCH: https://www.fittrimimmortal.com/blog/covid-statistical-hijinx
The CDC runs a database called wonder, where you can datamine a LOT of information. They just "unreleased" their 2022 numbers though, with no info on when they will be re-released (probably after being massaged to correct "errors".)
You can look look at 5 or 10 age groups and get the cause of death for people. There are a lot of other variables you can look at (state, sex, race, etc). So far I found that for people age 25-34 the CDC has classified almost all the extra deaths as "COVID" or as accidental drug overdoses.
Oh well. My physician friends now love me and think I am one of them. I guess this is a good outcome.
The CDC commissioned this "independent" study so that they don't have to pay compensation claims under CICP.
So far only about 12 people have been compensated for an average of about $4000 each, which is most assuredly less than they spent accumulating the evidence and paying lawyers to assemble the claims. CICP isn't paying out claims for any conditions they aren't admitting the shots caused. And they are making sure that is a VERY short list. It's pretty much myocarditis and anaphylaxis, and they just basically announced they won't be paying for anyone who died of heart related issues.
The larger scandal here is the attitude that it is acceptable to continue jabbing people and making the "safe and effective" claim WITHOUT proof positive. In other words, human beings are knowingly being used as guinea pigs and all errors are on the side of risk and not caution. This is the most unethical period of "medicine" in history and it isn't even close. Society has become so desensitized to the plight of everyone other than themselves with an attitude of "hey, it didn't happen to me...I didn't have a problem" that Lord only knows what comes next. "Hey, they didn't load me onto the rail cars. They didn't put me in the 'shower'."
It's a slight consolation that hardly anyone is actually getting the COVID boosters.
Blue-pill people are subconsciously realizing that the shots, if they ever did any good, are not worth taking more of.
Precisely!!!
I have read that a significant percent of myocarditis sufferers die within 10 years. Given that myocarditis from COVID gene therapy injections tends to hit younger people, this really is a tragedy of epic proportions regarding total life years lost from just this one known side effect.
Yup. I've seen an estimate that 50% of myocarditis sufferers die or need heart transplants in 5 to 10 years. Hopefully the numbers won't be that bad.
It's absolutely unconscionable that the article said most cases were "mild" and improved after a few days in the hospital. There isn't any "mild" myocarditis, that's a term doctors use to describe relative severity, but all cases of myocarditis are very serious indeed.
British cardiologist Dr. Malhotra giving evidence in Helsinki. Powerful stuff about a cover up of post-jab increased heart attacks in the UK.
https://youtu.be/RvGCtM25fN0?si=nXakoryMf9tkkoSj
Talk about slow to the party !! Plus the insidious use of statements thru out the paper to try and play down any solid evidence ( which has mounted to historical proportions in proving cardio dangers and injuries ) is absolutely disgusting. The pyramids would still be getting built if these guys were left in charge. The one GLOBAL item that has been prevalent thru the past 3 years from Pharma supported institutions like these is …… DENIAL. Criminal Denial. Denial that ably supported life altering injuries and deaths to millions around the world.
Get your brand new anti-Myocarditis jabs now! Myocarditis might be the new normal but we are about bucking the trend! Available at every pharmacy and soon to be rolled out at all supermarkets and shoe shine vendors. Get yours now - and another in two weeks time (or lose your freedom to work and leave the house).
So that's it, right? We can halt the vaccine program, yes?
yes... ahem
Italian football over the weekend confirmed that...
Any saucy details?
Yeah but for sure it’s “self limiting” and only happens in one in a bazillion people.