Thank you for posting this. I heard about this issue a while ago - it is far from news for those of us who have been following closely this debacle. Drs. Jessica Rose and Kevin McKernan have spoken of it and I have heard Dr. Phillip Buckhaults mentioned.
He is obviously excellent at what he does but I must admit I found it somewhat alarming that a) he gave this jab to his daughters at all and b) that he would consider another one (if free of DNA) at this stage of the pandemic! I also doubt that it saved any lives it I cannot really see how this can be proved either way.
He states that it is a great platform (the mRNA) and it might well be wonderful for cancer when you are dealing with sick people who maybe have few options but surely this doesn’t make it great platform to dole out en masse to healthy people including the young.
I doubt anything large scale will come of this hearing . Can you imagine the reaction if the general public find out that they may have this foreign DNA installed in their genome with no known way of removing it? What are we going to say to young people - please don’t reproduce as we have no idea what you might pass down to them.
All this demonstrates to me more than ever that we must never, ever, mandate any medical product again, especially something under an EAU.
Hilary, 100%, especially re Dr. Buckhaults. Does he make his outrageous claim due to some deep-seated need to ameliorate his conscience for his abject stupidity in willingly allowing his daughters to be injected with this experimental shit lacking any long-term safety data whose contents were kept from the public at the time the shit was rolled out that comes with complete liability immunity for injury or death caused by said shit?
He is claiming that DNA work can address cancer. On the other side, Thomas Seyfried has been working for decades on the metabolic approach to cancer because genetics does not deal with the complexity of various forms of cancer even in the body of a single person.
Lotta people think cancer is largely a metabolic disease. I don't remember their reasons. Dr. Mercola wrote about this, I believe.
The "powers that be" detest Dr. Mercola, he was even publisized as one of the Top 10 spreading "disinformation" and Biden specifically called him out. We're in the beginning of a information Renaissance IMO, and I can't think of a better recommendation than a insult by Biden
I think his optimism stems from the fact that he is vested as he's from this particular industry. His reporting re DNA contamination is not thereby affected
Cancer and the official narrative is another area that we need to turn the scientific house upside down. I don't believe it is what the $cience has led the research to show or omit. I believe it is another miraculous process of our genius creator to protect and regenerate the body. Sayer Ji is doing some great work getting people to rethink about this.
The more they want you to take something affecting your body (or mind) the more steadfast I am in my resolve to never believe them again and to take nothing that they recommend. Maybe that will shorten my lifespan, but I consider that possible "trade off" against the proven BAD FAITH of our "betters", and I'll choose the unknown rather than trust these inhumane, dissembling (when they include any truth at all) ADVERSARIES who among other things, desire us dead, if/when we're not ENSLAVED.
I had a bit of a shock this evening that I'll file under "Evolution of Excuses" because I see a definite pattern emerging. The background: I cover a region of Western Canada delivering groceries to major supermarkets. As a result I talk to staff, including managers, and I've made a habit of inquiring about various things, notably the shortage of staff. They are all shorthanded and have been since the "pandemic" (tm). At first it was "nobody wants to work because they got paid to stay home." Once the heat was off it became "ah, those young kids, too lazy to work." Some truth there. Next up was, "a lot of people are booking off sick. F'n slackers." Well, maybe in the past, but in these numbers? So tonight I raised the question with the young gal unloading my truck, and she freaked me out. She says: "Yeah, where did everybody go?" "Did they all die of Covid?"
I swear I'm not making this up. I also wonder if I shouldn't have replied with "that, or the vaccines" because I think that freaked her out. The conversation ended there, so take it for what you will.
You see the problem, right? People are starting to notice, but what do you tell them? What *can* you tell them? That the vaccine they took is going to kill them? I mean if they were freaked out enough to take the vaccine, then imagine the panic that sets in once they finally get the news. That's an awful lot of people right there. Maybe we should be thinking about the psychological impact of that future event, because surely it's coming.
i had this same thing happen to me when i was speaking to a cab driver on Vancouver Island. No more drivers. Where did they go? One squad went down from 25 to 2 drivers. The man told me he knew exactly who went to other jobs and who left the country and this only included 5. Where did the other 18 go?
Has anyone noticed changes in traffic patterns? I live on the edge of town, on a street which people were increasingly using to bypass traffic on other main roads. In the years leading up to the fake pandemic, traffic had increased to the point where it had become a parking lot for the whole of rush hour- 3-6:30pm. In the last 2 years this traffic has dropped off a cliff to below what it was when I moved here 13 years ago. There's almost never a line anymore. It went from the point where I had to plan my errands to avoid this traffic, which could take me ten minutes or more to get out of my driveway making a left turn, to a ghost town.
Brian of The COVID Blog suggests the world is already a billion people short. While it may sound extreme, it is, in fact, perfectly in line with the ominous Deagel forecast.
The unfortunate piece on BOTH sides of the same coin, is FEAR. Fear of the truth. Especially when it means admission of having made a mistake. That takes HUMILITY.
PRIDE is also as deadly as fear. People would rather die that say they were wrong.
Truth spoken with love and compassion is the only way out.
That would be the best. Finding someone in a place of power who has the chutzpah to do the right thing is the problem. I guess it is going to take more people losing young, healthy loved ones unexpectedly, suddenly to DEMAND justice. There does not seem like there are enough of us. Keep speaking up, right?
"There does not seem like there are enough of us. Keep speaking up, right?"
These are two important points to consider, and thank you for raising them.
I do think there are enough of us if we can 1. define our objectives, 2. focus our energies, and 3. coordinate our strategies.
I'm a strong believer in the idea that "change comes from the margin." That is to say, small groups of people, or individuals working alone, are often responsible for the most profound changes in human thought and action. Ofttimes they don't realize themselves how far-reaching the changes they introduced can be.
This 2015 article, ironically from the NY Times, speaks about some aspects of that mantra.
A good example of change at the margin is the lightbulb. Thousands of people did not simultaneously think about lightbulbs, and then proceed to create them. Only a few people had the idea, fewer still pursued it, and only one is credited with its invention. But think of the profound changes that lightbulbs introduced. Dangerous gas lighting was replaced in cities. Rural areas with nothing but lamp oil or candles suddenly had reliable lighting which allowed for more reading and study without ruining one's eyes. Result, a rise of literacy in formerly marginal regions. Factories could operate at night with the huge increase in production that implied, and so on. Some effects were obvious, some were unintended consequences, both positive and negative. You can make this argument for almost every technology or philosophy ever introduced, from the printing press to the automobile or aircraft on the material side, to the rise of Christianity, Islam or Marxism on the philosophical side - all the work of a few, or a single individual.
While numbers are important, it's what happens at the margin that gets the ball rolling. So being as they say "marginalized" is no excuse to give up if you're really committed to whatever it is you believe will improve our situation. Recognize that no matter how difficult the struggle or how alone you might feel, historically you're in very good company.
That brings us to the three points I raised: 1. define our objectives, 2. focus our energies, and 3. coordinate our strategies. Rather than tell people how to go about that, I'm going to think about it myself for a while and encourage others to do the same. Then we can compare notes and see what sort of consensus emerges on how to proceed. So, later today I'll post my thoughts on the topic and encourage others to do likewise. We're not alone, we're not helpless, and were not hampered by the fact that only a few people will read this, because that's how change happens. It starts at the margin.
I love this. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and insights. Being marginalized has its advantages for sure, especially if it is paired with a pit-bull mentality! I will def give serious thought to the 3 points you raised.
TRUTH??? SPOKEN TRUTH??? The weak morons who allowed vaccination are infused with the DEADLY SIN , PRIDE. Its counterpart VIRTUE is HUMILITY which I GUARANTEE has been wiped by all the vaccines their dolt parents allowed from the hour the weak moron was born...
I had a similar response from a young lady in Vancouver this weekend.
She "believes" in "Climate Catastrophe", didn't recognise my mention of Klaus Schwab and the WEF, thought that a planetary population of half to one billion was a good idea, and terminated the conversation when I suggested that our government had consistently lied to us.
We are acquaintances through her boyfriend so I stopped. She likely knows that I worked as a physician for forty years (many of my friends don't know of my chemistry background) but "shut me down" because she is a scientist and knows these things.
The observation that the more years of "education" we have had , the more indoctrinated, submissive, and subservient to the narrative we become rings true. I am impressed that Dr. Rose has passed through that stage and retained her critical faculties.
I wonder of these "clever" people believe they wiill be part of this lucky draw of 500 mill surviving people that will survive, ha ha. A real arrogance and übermensch mentality shines through here. Like in the 1930's and 1940's in the olld reich/order of Germany.
"Maybe we should be thinking about the psychological impact of that future event, because surely it's coming". So succinct and painfully true, and applies to the unvaxed who panic in silence for their loved ones fate.
Bear in mind that the 30% who got saline (if that's true) still thought they were getting the vaccine, i.e. they're still part of the cult. I put the number of people that actually avoided the vaccine at about 22%. Basically we're the control group. What that means I'm not exactly sure, but there's an old Roman saying, "If you want peace, prepare for war" As a general rule it means be prepared for the worst if you wish to survive, and if what Paul Cottrell has suggested is true, we're going to be facing that in about 5 years. Already the signs are appearing. As for a fix, I have confidence in the scientific method. In scientists, not so much. Right now they're just stomping out brush fires. To actually fix the problem we have to get at the people who are setting them, and we're nowhere near that at this point, in fact the two people closest to identifying them are at each other's throats right now, which is not an encouraging sign.
I've been waiting for that event for some time. I even credited part of the Ukraine frenzy to looking for a distraction ("never let a crisis go to waste")
I figure that that event will lead to Trump being blamed for the "vaccine" (it's not a vaccine) but the ability of humans to not pay attention to "important" but not "urgent" information and refusal to accept facts in favor of ignorance, as another impediment to overcome. I'm pretty sure that there are other "distractions" planned to keep attention ELSEWHERE
We want to stop or eliminate more poisoning from happening, cordon and contain the incident, so to speak.
Find treatments or antidotes for those poisoned and assist them with their recovery
Find methods to prevent the occurrence of future poisoning episodes
And then establish a better and more homeostatic system in the future.
One that allows us to thrive, be free and make decisions for ourselves and play a role in our communities without the constant mass psychosis, one size fits all models, assumptions and gaslighting by the few.
Any step closer to that direction is a good one in my opinion
Agree. It was a Worldwide psyop just to get those pre-generated depopulation bioweapons into people’s arms. I said so on Twitter a long time ago and am still permanently banned there for speaking my mind.
That ban along with the LinkedIn ban told me a lot.🎯
There are plenty of people I mix with in activist groups that are unjabbed. Tomorrow is My Place meeting where maybe 120-150 people will attend and I’ve yet to come across a jabbed person except venue staff. What concerns me is the shedding/transmission to the unjabbed as per Dr Anna’s M’s findings. We still have to go to church, shopping, hospitals and such, mixing with the jabbed and I wonder about casually passing and interacting with the 5 times jabbed virtue signallers.
The people that got the jabs wil not even admit that there is anything wrong. That is the first nearly insurmountable problem. Next is, do what? There are like 1300 side effects, and untold variations of cancer alone. And if it is a DNA issue, The Powers That Be aren’t going to admit to what they did to try to help. Most doctors are unable to admit the jab caused any illnesses, so their hands are effectively tied.
Sure, try to dissuade others from getting more jabs, but many still won’t admit their error and psychologically they will need to continue vaxxing.
For most of "these" people it is too much evil to understand, they will look the other way, to make sure no one can talk them through. Evrey little bit of scientific info we got around this scam covid treatment and the speculations around it, will be too much info. They would rather cover their ears and remove themselves from hearing, than working out strategies to preserve their lives and own bodies, because they have zero effort to put in or to be able to disbelieve what should be right and that govs always care for us. That part of illusion will be the hardest for them to change in their own minds. The moment they let go of that illusion, a lot of mind changes take place.
I discuss the topic of Menticide on my podcast because if we think things are as they appear (ie: we needed these shots or else), then we miss the bigger picture.
Don’t know if the audience is spiritual or Christian based, but when we look into matters spiritually, we all need to become activated because this is spiritual warfare here. I discuss how Gnosticism - the mythical aspect of Christianity can be good here
This guy brags on his lab coming up with the Covid test. So he is egotistically tied to a false belief that the jabs had a positive effect in keeping people out of hospital. Covid tests are so ridiculous. I do like that he realizes a cancer risk but of course he minimizes it.
There is definitely some good, some bad to what he says. Wonder how much of HIS funding comes from - well, you know the rest of the question. He certainly seems to be "tip-toeing thru the tulips".
And wearing the white coat....lol. So simple to do. Wish he’d have splashed a little fake blood on it, and maybe added a stethoscope, you know for added credibility. Would compliment the disheveled wild hair and the medallion necklace
Exactly. Notice how he describes his position at the very beginning. Sounds like a medical contractor. Contractor mentality. Fast talking, praise the potential in the platform, hint to the future of potential cancer treatments for individuals like on the panel.
I put this elsewhere (as a top-level comment) here because I think your point about funding is good when you are trying to nudge consideration of the implications of not only B’s testimony, but the others’ (Isaw 3 ON YT as of today…still 🫤…for now…hope someone duplicates on Rumble ASAP. I would…don’t know how.
It is a shame, besides explaining the scientific arm of the mRNA vaxxes, he also has to explain to the legislators how they should run their state health agencies, in order to provide safe medicines.
I would volunteer to be sequenced since I had the Pfizer and got cancer soon after. I met dozens of people who got the same fairly unusual cancer right after the fax and all but 1 had Pfizer.
It's amazing this news isn't public yet. I've been waiting for some cancer incidence statistic updates. Of course when it started going up after the vax they blamed it on people putting off screening, due to Covid, which was BS in the cases I know of.
What I've seen a lot of, even more than new cancers, is people who have been in remission for 10+ years suddenly getting new, more rare forms of cancer. There are papers that show the spike protein breaks tumor suppressor genes, but nobody seems to know about those.
The increased incidence of cancers, 'turbo-cancers' and rapid progression to stage 4 after injection, especially among those in remission was pointed out by Prof Angus Dalgleish, oncologist, ages ago in an open letter to the Editor of the BMJ, calling for immediate suspension and further investigation, - of course, it's gone nowhere.
The authorities and the manufacturers have no intention of paying heed to such polite requests by experts to suspend and investigate.
When medical ethics are dead, at the top level - and they are - what else can one really expect? It's like asking Stalin, very politely, to shut down the gulags. Or Sauron to forget about that little ring......
In the UK those over 60, the 'vulnerable' those in contact with them, health sector workers and, for God's sake, the pregnant are now being invited (there is no mandate) to get injected, and the campaign has even been brought forward from October to September - as a 'precautionary' (!!!) measure. That is the official response to Prof Dalgleish.
Dear Dr. Rose, thx for sharing the presentation as well as the substack poster from SC. All of the presenters from the hearing are fascinating. I moved to SC from Michigan two years ago which is definitely a pro HHS, FDA, CDC state especially the political leaders and Universities. The SC Governor recently spoke about his anti mask anti lockdowns, and anti school closure sentiments. So glad to live here. Yet my physician is very pro injection. I share my own sentiments openly and refuse to comply with any pop up mask 'requirements' and actually just verbalizing it calmly seems to be effective here! Thanks for what you all are doing....because of you all, only about 7% will get the "cancer booster" now being pitched. Also, I have never gotten one injection and here I am still negative for antibodies. I take all the recommended vitamins and supplements, have no chronic conditions, and am 61. I work hard to be healthy and in great condition. My immune system takes care of me.
I think Dr. Stebel raises some basic issues with the modRNA. Apart from the contamination with DNA, the whole modRNA stuff is beyond salvageable. Their codon optimization is nuts. The fact that there are multiple codons encoding for the same Aminoacids hints toward a mechanism which the idiocy of trying to "optimize" those codons completely neglects. It took millions of years for that equilibrium to establish. Different tissues have different concentrations of aminoacids, depending on what triplet is used the speed of the translation is different all those things lead to different folding of the resulting protein. So depending on what tissue you have your modRNA transfect, you may end up with different proteins! And then there is this whole N1- Pseudo-Uridine. If this stuff stays in the cell and is being reused in protein production, what does that do to the functionality of the cell?
Great vid - truly optimistic to lean toward INCOMPETENCE as opposed to MALICE, when any discussion addresses 'intent'. Some may consider that a stretch, in view of what we have experienced over the past couple of years. Let's hope some of the (very) Good Doctor's recommendations grow legs !
Thank you for posting this. I heard about this issue a while ago - it is far from news for those of us who have been following closely this debacle. Drs. Jessica Rose and Kevin McKernan have spoken of it and I have heard Dr. Phillip Buckhaults mentioned.
He is obviously excellent at what he does but I must admit I found it somewhat alarming that a) he gave this jab to his daughters at all and b) that he would consider another one (if free of DNA) at this stage of the pandemic! I also doubt that it saved any lives it I cannot really see how this can be proved either way.
He states that it is a great platform (the mRNA) and it might well be wonderful for cancer when you are dealing with sick people who maybe have few options but surely this doesn’t make it great platform to dole out en masse to healthy people including the young.
I doubt anything large scale will come of this hearing . Can you imagine the reaction if the general public find out that they may have this foreign DNA installed in their genome with no known way of removing it? What are we going to say to young people - please don’t reproduce as we have no idea what you might pass down to them.
All this demonstrates to me more than ever that we must never, ever, mandate any medical product again, especially something under an EAU.
Hilary, 100%, especially re Dr. Buckhaults. Does he make his outrageous claim due to some deep-seated need to ameliorate his conscience for his abject stupidity in willingly allowing his daughters to be injected with this experimental shit lacking any long-term safety data whose contents were kept from the public at the time the shit was rolled out that comes with complete liability immunity for injury or death caused by said shit?
Dr malone is the same, his daughter was damaged by pfizer mrna, picked it up somewhere...
☝️Exactly what I wanted to say... Thank you Hilary...
That was gold 🥇
He is claiming that DNA work can address cancer. On the other side, Thomas Seyfried has been working for decades on the metabolic approach to cancer because genetics does not deal with the complexity of various forms of cancer even in the body of a single person.
Lotta people think cancer is largely a metabolic disease. I don't remember their reasons. Dr. Mercola wrote about this, I believe.
The "powers that be" detest Dr. Mercola, he was even publisized as one of the Top 10 spreading "disinformation" and Biden specifically called him out. We're in the beginning of a information Renaissance IMO, and I can't think of a better recommendation than a insult by Biden
I think his optimism stems from the fact that he is vested as he's from this particular industry. His reporting re DNA contamination is not thereby affected
I thought the mRNA already flunked cancer but he's a Doctor or something...oh the double irony. I here there's a lot of Turbo cancer out there...
Cancer and the official narrative is another area that we need to turn the scientific house upside down. I don't believe it is what the $cience has led the research to show or omit. I believe it is another miraculous process of our genius creator to protect and regenerate the body. Sayer Ji is doing some great work getting people to rethink about this.
The more they want you to take something affecting your body (or mind) the more steadfast I am in my resolve to never believe them again and to take nothing that they recommend. Maybe that will shorten my lifespan, but I consider that possible "trade off" against the proven BAD FAITH of our "betters", and I'll choose the unknown rather than trust these inhumane, dissembling (when they include any truth at all) ADVERSARIES who among other things, desire us dead, if/when we're not ENSLAVED.
We'll "own nothing and be happy", huh?
I had a bit of a shock this evening that I'll file under "Evolution of Excuses" because I see a definite pattern emerging. The background: I cover a region of Western Canada delivering groceries to major supermarkets. As a result I talk to staff, including managers, and I've made a habit of inquiring about various things, notably the shortage of staff. They are all shorthanded and have been since the "pandemic" (tm). At first it was "nobody wants to work because they got paid to stay home." Once the heat was off it became "ah, those young kids, too lazy to work." Some truth there. Next up was, "a lot of people are booking off sick. F'n slackers." Well, maybe in the past, but in these numbers? So tonight I raised the question with the young gal unloading my truck, and she freaked me out. She says: "Yeah, where did everybody go?" "Did they all die of Covid?"
I swear I'm not making this up. I also wonder if I shouldn't have replied with "that, or the vaccines" because I think that freaked her out. The conversation ended there, so take it for what you will.
You see the problem, right? People are starting to notice, but what do you tell them? What *can* you tell them? That the vaccine they took is going to kill them? I mean if they were freaked out enough to take the vaccine, then imagine the panic that sets in once they finally get the news. That's an awful lot of people right there. Maybe we should be thinking about the psychological impact of that future event, because surely it's coming.
i had this same thing happen to me when i was speaking to a cab driver on Vancouver Island. No more drivers. Where did they go? One squad went down from 25 to 2 drivers. The man told me he knew exactly who went to other jobs and who left the country and this only included 5. Where did the other 18 go?
Has anyone noticed changes in traffic patterns? I live on the edge of town, on a street which people were increasingly using to bypass traffic on other main roads. In the years leading up to the fake pandemic, traffic had increased to the point where it had become a parking lot for the whole of rush hour- 3-6:30pm. In the last 2 years this traffic has dropped off a cliff to below what it was when I moved here 13 years ago. There's almost never a line anymore. It went from the point where I had to plan my errands to avoid this traffic, which could take me ten minutes or more to get out of my driveway making a left turn, to a ghost town.
Brian of The COVID Blog suggests the world is already a billion people short. While it may sound extreme, it is, in fact, perfectly in line with the ominous Deagel forecast.
The COVID Blog https://thecovidblog.com/2023/04/20/5-reasons-to-believe-the-global-population-is-already-one-billion-people-less-than-it-was-in-january-2020/
Deagel https://archive.ph/wZ55l
You passed by to surf and didn't schedule a lecture?
The unfortunate piece on BOTH sides of the same coin, is FEAR. Fear of the truth. Especially when it means admission of having made a mistake. That takes HUMILITY.
PRIDE is also as deadly as fear. People would rather die that say they were wrong.
Truth spoken with love and compassion is the only way out.
While I agree with the sentiment, I think Justice has to come first.
That would be the best. Finding someone in a place of power who has the chutzpah to do the right thing is the problem. I guess it is going to take more people losing young, healthy loved ones unexpectedly, suddenly to DEMAND justice. There does not seem like there are enough of us. Keep speaking up, right?
"There does not seem like there are enough of us. Keep speaking up, right?"
These are two important points to consider, and thank you for raising them.
I do think there are enough of us if we can 1. define our objectives, 2. focus our energies, and 3. coordinate our strategies.
I'm a strong believer in the idea that "change comes from the margin." That is to say, small groups of people, or individuals working alone, are often responsible for the most profound changes in human thought and action. Ofttimes they don't realize themselves how far-reaching the changes they introduced can be.
This 2015 article, ironically from the NY Times, speaks about some aspects of that mantra.
https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/06/30/change-comes-from-the-margins/
A good example of change at the margin is the lightbulb. Thousands of people did not simultaneously think about lightbulbs, and then proceed to create them. Only a few people had the idea, fewer still pursued it, and only one is credited with its invention. But think of the profound changes that lightbulbs introduced. Dangerous gas lighting was replaced in cities. Rural areas with nothing but lamp oil or candles suddenly had reliable lighting which allowed for more reading and study without ruining one's eyes. Result, a rise of literacy in formerly marginal regions. Factories could operate at night with the huge increase in production that implied, and so on. Some effects were obvious, some were unintended consequences, both positive and negative. You can make this argument for almost every technology or philosophy ever introduced, from the printing press to the automobile or aircraft on the material side, to the rise of Christianity, Islam or Marxism on the philosophical side - all the work of a few, or a single individual.
While numbers are important, it's what happens at the margin that gets the ball rolling. So being as they say "marginalized" is no excuse to give up if you're really committed to whatever it is you believe will improve our situation. Recognize that no matter how difficult the struggle or how alone you might feel, historically you're in very good company.
That brings us to the three points I raised: 1. define our objectives, 2. focus our energies, and 3. coordinate our strategies. Rather than tell people how to go about that, I'm going to think about it myself for a while and encourage others to do the same. Then we can compare notes and see what sort of consensus emerges on how to proceed. So, later today I'll post my thoughts on the topic and encourage others to do likewise. We're not alone, we're not helpless, and were not hampered by the fact that only a few people will read this, because that's how change happens. It starts at the margin.
I agree! Change Has to come from the grass roots or the bottom. Not from billionaires with an agenda or the politicians they have purchased.
I love this. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and insights. Being marginalized has its advantages for sure, especially if it is paired with a pit-bull mentality! I will def give serious thought to the 3 points you raised.
Thanks for the comment. Hope is increasingly needed as information is disseminated regarding the Plandemic
Concurrent, humans can do BOTH at the same time
TRUTH??? SPOKEN TRUTH??? The weak morons who allowed vaccination are infused with the DEADLY SIN , PRIDE. Its counterpart VIRTUE is HUMILITY which I GUARANTEE has been wiped by all the vaccines their dolt parents allowed from the hour the weak moron was born...
I had a similar response from a young lady in Vancouver this weekend.
She "believes" in "Climate Catastrophe", didn't recognise my mention of Klaus Schwab and the WEF, thought that a planetary population of half to one billion was a good idea, and terminated the conversation when I suggested that our government had consistently lied to us.
We are acquaintances through her boyfriend so I stopped. She likely knows that I worked as a physician for forty years (many of my friends don't know of my chemistry background) but "shut me down" because she is a scientist and knows these things.
The observation that the more years of "education" we have had , the more indoctrinated, submissive, and subservient to the narrative we become rings true. I am impressed that Dr. Rose has passed through that stage and retained her critical faculties.
I wonder of these "clever" people believe they wiill be part of this lucky draw of 500 mill surviving people that will survive, ha ha. A real arrogance and übermensch mentality shines through here. Like in the 1930's and 1940's in the olld reich/order of Germany.
"Maybe we should be thinking about the psychological impact of that future event, because surely it's coming". So succinct and painfully true, and applies to the unvaxed who panic in silence for their loved ones fate.
I think it's more positive to focus on the fact that 30% of shots look like saline, and science (tm) will find a fix for the vaccine baddies.
Bear in mind that the 30% who got saline (if that's true) still thought they were getting the vaccine, i.e. they're still part of the cult. I put the number of people that actually avoided the vaccine at about 22%. Basically we're the control group. What that means I'm not exactly sure, but there's an old Roman saying, "If you want peace, prepare for war" As a general rule it means be prepared for the worst if you wish to survive, and if what Paul Cottrell has suggested is true, we're going to be facing that in about 5 years. Already the signs are appearing. As for a fix, I have confidence in the scientific method. In scientists, not so much. Right now they're just stomping out brush fires. To actually fix the problem we have to get at the people who are setting them, and we're nowhere near that at this point, in fact the two people closest to identifying them are at each other's throats right now, which is not an encouraging sign.
I've been waiting for that event for some time. I even credited part of the Ukraine frenzy to looking for a distraction ("never let a crisis go to waste")
I figure that that event will lead to Trump being blamed for the "vaccine" (it's not a vaccine) but the ability of humans to not pay attention to "important" but not "urgent" information and refusal to accept facts in favor of ignorance, as another impediment to overcome. I'm pretty sure that there are other "distractions" planned to keep attention ELSEWHERE
thank you Jessica for raising the discussion and awareness
Julian, Australia
:D
Although I strongly suspect intentional and deliberate biowarfare
It's just too far out there for most to agree with this
Because they don't understand the scope and capabilities of biological weapons
Most of what people know about is 80s or early 90s technology
If anything at all
That was thirty years ago
Nor do they want to believe it
Even if they did the research
But I still support anyone moving the message closer to
Hey, we have a problem
Let's do something about it
I mean at the end of the day
We want to stop or eliminate more poisoning from happening, cordon and contain the incident, so to speak.
Find treatments or antidotes for those poisoned and assist them with their recovery
Find methods to prevent the occurrence of future poisoning episodes
And then establish a better and more homeostatic system in the future.
One that allows us to thrive, be free and make decisions for ourselves and play a role in our communities without the constant mass psychosis, one size fits all models, assumptions and gaslighting by the few.
Any step closer to that direction is a good one in my opinion
Agree. It was a Worldwide psyop just to get those pre-generated depopulation bioweapons into people’s arms. I said so on Twitter a long time ago and am still permanently banned there for speaking my mind.
That ban along with the LinkedIn ban told me a lot.🎯
Isn’t it too late to do something about it? It seems most people got the jab at least once.
There are plenty of people I mix with in activist groups that are unjabbed. Tomorrow is My Place meeting where maybe 120-150 people will attend and I’ve yet to come across a jabbed person except venue staff. What concerns me is the shedding/transmission to the unjabbed as per Dr Anna’s M’s findings. We still have to go to church, shopping, hospitals and such, mixing with the jabbed and I wonder about casually passing and interacting with the 5 times jabbed virtue signallers.
Most, not all
And those who did, most aren't dead yet
So perhaps
I'd suggest doing something is better than nothing
But that's just my 2 cents
The people that got the jabs wil not even admit that there is anything wrong. That is the first nearly insurmountable problem. Next is, do what? There are like 1300 side effects, and untold variations of cancer alone. And if it is a DNA issue, The Powers That Be aren’t going to admit to what they did to try to help. Most doctors are unable to admit the jab caused any illnesses, so their hands are effectively tied.
Sure, try to dissuade others from getting more jabs, but many still won’t admit their error and psychologically they will need to continue vaxxing.
The supreme art of war is to win without fighting
So don't let them defeat you by defeating yourself before the battle even begins.
Do you know what happens if you double a penny (1 cent) every day for a month?
It ends up being more than $5 million.
It's the small things that compound and make the difference
For most of "these" people it is too much evil to understand, they will look the other way, to make sure no one can talk them through. Evrey little bit of scientific info we got around this scam covid treatment and the speculations around it, will be too much info. They would rather cover their ears and remove themselves from hearing, than working out strategies to preserve their lives and own bodies, because they have zero effort to put in or to be able to disbelieve what should be right and that govs always care for us. That part of illusion will be the hardest for them to change in their own minds. The moment they let go of that illusion, a lot of mind changes take place.
I discuss the topic of Menticide on my podcast because if we think things are as they appear (ie: we needed these shots or else), then we miss the bigger picture.
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/september-11th-and-menticide#details
What’s occurring is the power of narratives and the narrative of the vaccine looks to remain intact (ie: safe and effective)
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-power-of-narratives-and-how-they
Don’t know if the audience is spiritual or Christian based, but when we look into matters spiritually, we all need to become activated because this is spiritual warfare here. I discuss how Gnosticism - the mythical aspect of Christianity can be good here
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/why-gnosticism-is-the-christianity#details
PS: love how you call out that we’re free to disagree. Something so simple yet many have forgotten it 🙏🏾
I cringe when doctors say this drug saves lives.
This guy brags on his lab coming up with the Covid test. So he is egotistically tied to a false belief that the jabs had a positive effect in keeping people out of hospital. Covid tests are so ridiculous. I do like that he realizes a cancer risk but of course he minimizes it.
There is definitely some good, some bad to what he says. Wonder how much of HIS funding comes from - well, you know the rest of the question. He certainly seems to be "tip-toeing thru the tulips".
And wearing the white coat....lol. So simple to do. Wish he’d have splashed a little fake blood on it, and maybe added a stethoscope, you know for added credibility. Would compliment the disheveled wild hair and the medallion necklace
Lol.
Exactly. Notice how he describes his position at the very beginning. Sounds like a medical contractor. Contractor mentality. Fast talking, praise the potential in the platform, hint to the future of potential cancer treatments for individuals like on the panel.
🎯
I put this elsewhere (as a top-level comment) here because I think your point about funding is good when you are trying to nudge consideration of the implications of not only B’s testimony, but the others’ (Isaw 3 ON YT as of today…still 🫤…for now…hope someone duplicates on Rumble ASAP. I would…don’t know how.
It is a shame, besides explaining the scientific arm of the mRNA vaxxes, he also has to explain to the legislators how they should run their state health agencies, in order to provide safe medicines.
He walks a fine line that I would guess will be seen as going over it to the dark side, i.e. the Vaccine is bad.
Upon reading the other comments about worker shortage, we can barely keep a decent staff, and the amount of "sick time" taken is staggering.
My cousin owns a sausage production/deli/ restaurant. She can’t get any people in to work. The people that are working there now are age 60 up to 75.
I would volunteer to be sequenced since I had the Pfizer and got cancer soon after. I met dozens of people who got the same fairly unusual cancer right after the fax and all but 1 had Pfizer.
I have 12 relatively young friends all battling new cancers after their Covid jabs. If you count friends/family of friends my list is up to 30.
It's amazing this news isn't public yet. I've been waiting for some cancer incidence statistic updates. Of course when it started going up after the vax they blamed it on people putting off screening, due to Covid, which was BS in the cases I know of.
What I've seen a lot of, even more than new cancers, is people who have been in remission for 10+ years suddenly getting new, more rare forms of cancer. There are papers that show the spike protein breaks tumor suppressor genes, but nobody seems to know about those.
The increased incidence of cancers, 'turbo-cancers' and rapid progression to stage 4 after injection, especially among those in remission was pointed out by Prof Angus Dalgleish, oncologist, ages ago in an open letter to the Editor of the BMJ, calling for immediate suspension and further investigation, - of course, it's gone nowhere.
The authorities and the manufacturers have no intention of paying heed to such polite requests by experts to suspend and investigate.
When medical ethics are dead, at the top level - and they are - what else can one really expect? It's like asking Stalin, very politely, to shut down the gulags. Or Sauron to forget about that little ring......
In the UK those over 60, the 'vulnerable' those in contact with them, health sector workers and, for God's sake, the pregnant are now being invited (there is no mandate) to get injected, and the campaign has even been brought forward from October to September - as a 'precautionary' (!!!) measure. That is the official response to Prof Dalgleish.
I hope you will check VAERS for both infant/newborn cancers and rare genetic disease increases. Also for IUGR (growth restriction in-utero)
One family I know of: cancer diagnosed in baby in-utero two months before due date. Neuroblastoma on adrenal gland in the unborn child .
Mother is big believer in all vaccines and undoubtedly received every COVID booster shot. Unless physician filed it, this will not be in VAERS.
HOW do you give experimental products to children? When the illness is a COLD?
Dear Dr. Rose, thx for sharing the presentation as well as the substack poster from SC. All of the presenters from the hearing are fascinating. I moved to SC from Michigan two years ago which is definitely a pro HHS, FDA, CDC state especially the political leaders and Universities. The SC Governor recently spoke about his anti mask anti lockdowns, and anti school closure sentiments. So glad to live here. Yet my physician is very pro injection. I share my own sentiments openly and refuse to comply with any pop up mask 'requirements' and actually just verbalizing it calmly seems to be effective here! Thanks for what you all are doing....because of you all, only about 7% will get the "cancer booster" now being pitched. Also, I have never gotten one injection and here I am still negative for antibodies. I take all the recommended vitamins and supplements, have no chronic conditions, and am 61. I work hard to be healthy and in great condition. My immune system takes care of me.
I would urge people to watch this interview. https://drbine.substack.com/p/solari-special-report-future-science
I think Dr. Stebel raises some basic issues with the modRNA. Apart from the contamination with DNA, the whole modRNA stuff is beyond salvageable. Their codon optimization is nuts. The fact that there are multiple codons encoding for the same Aminoacids hints toward a mechanism which the idiocy of trying to "optimize" those codons completely neglects. It took millions of years for that equilibrium to establish. Different tissues have different concentrations of aminoacids, depending on what triplet is used the speed of the translation is different all those things lead to different folding of the resulting protein. So depending on what tissue you have your modRNA transfect, you may end up with different proteins! And then there is this whole N1- Pseudo-Uridine. If this stuff stays in the cell and is being reused in protein production, what does that do to the functionality of the cell?
And then there is more stuff to think about.
https://ghostfromthefuture.substack.com/p/what-if-we-had-not-thought-insane
He is a powerful speaker, I hope this gets the job done.
Great vid - truly optimistic to lean toward INCOMPETENCE as opposed to MALICE, when any discussion addresses 'intent'. Some may consider that a stretch, in view of what we have experienced over the past couple of years. Let's hope some of the (very) Good Doctor's recommendations grow legs !