South Carolina Senate Hearing - USC Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults
DNA/COVID-19 products (modified mRNA + DNA)/AEs/cancer and more...
University of South Carolina Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testifies before South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on DHEC.
Please have a listen. Although I do not not necessarily agree that these shots saved anyone from hospitalization or death, we are not only allowed to disagree, but it makes up a better thinking group. Phillip makes excellent points having sequenced some of the COVID-19 modified mRNA vials and he describes how the DNA contamination could integrate into the genome to mess up other genes, induce cancers and last a long time.
He mentions these problems in the context of the Pfizer products primarily, but these problems are not limited to Pfizer. He mentions Moderna at the end when Rep. Adam Morgan poses a question about how many people got injected with potentially contaminated COVID-19 products.
Phillip compares all of these little pieces of DNA increase the likelihood of integration based on the sheer number of these little DNAs, irrespective of the size (length) of the DNAs. I actually had thought that size was a factor but he says here that it is not. He makes the analogy to buckshot.
Phillip recommends the collection of stem cells from a variety of people who’ve been injected with the modified mRNA products, and for multiple lab to sequence the DNA of these stem cells to determine the theoretical risk that integration is occurring.
He also goes over the reason this DNA got left behind from the in vitro transcription process to contaminate the commercial products. He also discusses the bait and switch from Process 1 (clinical - trials) to Process 2 (commercial - people) modified mRNA production. For Process 1, they made the modified mRNA using PCR. For Process 2 required for up-scaling the product, they made the modified mRNA using the plasmid/E. coli system. The latter introduce/welcome the problems of DNA and LPS contamination. Josh Guetzkow will be discussing this in detail on Dr. Drew soon.
Phillip is a self-proclaimed fan of the modified-mRNA-LNP platform and talks about using it to ameliorate (cure) cancer in the future, but not before the manufacturers resolve the issue of DNA contamination.
I do not agree. But again, this is still allowed. I believe that this platform is dangerous for reasons that supersede DNA contamination. I also don’t buy that they didn’t know about potential problems associated with left-over contaminant DNA. There are standard assays and protocols for check for purity of product at the end of the modified mRNA manufacturing process.
I also have brand new questions about the DNA vaccines which, as of today, I am looking into. Everyone should read this paper:
KURTH, R. (1995). Risk Potential of the Chromosomal Insertion of Foreign DNA. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 772(1 DNA Vaccines), 140–151. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb44739.x
I think it’s going to be very interesting to see if his recommendations are followed - if people’s stem cells are checked - or if as he says, they sweep it under the rug. Having said that, it is also possible that the findings will not be in the favor of the program and that these will be hidden, much like the Pfizer clinical trial data was attempted to be hidden for our lifetimes.
Either way, I think it is very important to watch this story closely. I am going to continue my investigations into the potential problems associated with the DNA vaccines as well. As is pointed out in the paper above:
In summary, the worrisome aspects of foreign DNA integrating into cellular DNA are those concerning the potential risk of tumor induction.1
Yes indeed. And even though these DNA vaccines technically do not carry the coding material necessary for integration to occur (ie: viral integrase proteins)23, I still think we need to check people’s stem cells as suggested by Phillip for recipients of the modified mRNA products (Pfizer and Moderna), and the DNA vaccines as well (Janssen and Astrazeneca).
Listen all the way to the end: the questions posed by the hearing participants are very good.
Kevin’s work is published here on pre-print server.
“It takes about 3 hours to check a vial of ‘vaccine’ to see if it’s got this in it. About 100 bucks of reagents.” Phillip Buckhaults
KURTH, R. (1995). Risk Potential of the Chromosomal Insertion of Foreign DNA. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 772(1 DNA Vaccines), 140–151. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb44739.x
COFFIN, J. M. 1990. Molecular mechanisms of nucleic acid integration. J. Med. Virol.
COFFIN, J. M. 1992. Retroviral DNA integration. Dev. Biol. Stand. 76 141-151. FEARON, E. R. & B. VOGELSTEIN. 1990. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 61: 759-767
Thank you for posting this. I heard about this issue a while ago - it is far from news for those of us who have been following closely this debacle. Drs. Jessica Rose and Kevin McKernan have spoken of it and I have heard Dr. Phillip Buckhaults mentioned.
He is obviously excellent at what he does but I must admit I found it somewhat alarming that a) he gave this jab to his daughters at all and b) that he would consider another one (if free of DNA) at this stage of the pandemic! I also doubt that it saved any lives it I cannot really see how this can be proved either way.
He states that it is a great platform (the mRNA) and it might well be wonderful for cancer when you are dealing with sick people who maybe have few options but surely this doesn’t make it great platform to dole out en masse to healthy people including the young.
I doubt anything large scale will come of this hearing . Can you imagine the reaction if the general public find out that they may have this foreign DNA installed in their genome with no known way of removing it? What are we going to say to young people - please don’t reproduce as we have no idea what you might pass down to them.
All this demonstrates to me more than ever that we must never, ever, mandate any medical product again, especially something under an EAU.
I had a bit of a shock this evening that I'll file under "Evolution of Excuses" because I see a definite pattern emerging. The background: I cover a region of Western Canada delivering groceries to major supermarkets. As a result I talk to staff, including managers, and I've made a habit of inquiring about various things, notably the shortage of staff. They are all shorthanded and have been since the "pandemic" (tm). At first it was "nobody wants to work because they got paid to stay home." Once the heat was off it became "ah, those young kids, too lazy to work." Some truth there. Next up was, "a lot of people are booking off sick. F'n slackers." Well, maybe in the past, but in these numbers? So tonight I raised the question with the young gal unloading my truck, and she freaked me out. She says: "Yeah, where did everybody go?" "Did they all die of Covid?"
I swear I'm not making this up. I also wonder if I shouldn't have replied with "that, or the vaccines" because I think that freaked her out. The conversation ended there, so take it for what you will.
You see the problem, right? People are starting to notice, but what do you tell them? What *can* you tell them? That the vaccine they took is going to kill them? I mean if they were freaked out enough to take the vaccine, then imagine the panic that sets in once they finally get the news. That's an awful lot of people right there. Maybe we should be thinking about the psychological impact of that future event, because surely it's coming.