One thing bothers me, and always has - with this and all other disputed items.
If the so-called vaccine deniers who have done careful analyses of available data, like this, are wrong, why are these analyses not properly and scientifically debunked? All we get is bluster, very occasionally quoting improperly conducted trials.
There is of course a good reason they are not debunked, and that is because they are correct.
So glad to see you are emphasizing the exclusion criteria and early unblinding of the oringinal phase III press releases. For Pfizer and Moderna to call them "trials" was a mockery of us all. These simple red flags should have alerted any semi-conscious physician to the shameless fraud being perpetrated in 2020. Thank you for your work.
How to fudge the data: "The problem I see here is that filing a report of “No adverse event” - a non clinical outcome - precludes the reporting of an eventual AE that describes a clinical outcome and perhaps a serious one.". Good catch, Jessica.
All of it .... tragic . Maiming and deaths will continue. Autoimmune issues will continue to rise . We have a new NP in the office, she refused to comply with the vaccine schedule in a peds office .... wait till she sees the side effects of the jab in an ob/ gyn office . 🥲
The list of adverse reactions on one product alone... is horrifying and should give you a clue just how unsafe this product really is.. no other drug/vaccine potion or lotion on the market has such a long list of side effects. (some life changing.. some fatal.)
The only way something this bad could make it on to a pharmacy shelf.. is for nefarious shenanigans by modern day witch doctors to hoodwink through the use of bribery.
Truly many problems that do not bode well for safe and effective. Our moms and children are not guinea pigs for potentially dangerous products. This is extremely faulty research at best.
There are reasons for not giving certains medicines to pregnant women and nursing moms.
Hereafter a list of the different groups of AE that i made out of Eudravigilance ( https://www.adrreports.eu/en/index.html ) with the related number of different AE registered to each one.
I separated those related to Foetal and Neonatal issues as to emphasize them and their numbers are not included in the Pregnancy related conditions.
Pregnancy related conditions, 159 /
Foetal isssues, 103 /
Neonatal issues, 117 /
Blood and lymphatic system disorders, 221 /
Cardiac disorders, 284/
Congenital. Familial and genetic disorders, 413 /
Ear and labyrinth disorders, 77 /
Endocrine disorders. 109 /
Eye disorders, 363 /
Gastrointestinal disorders, 580 /
General disorders and administration site conditions, 648 /
Hepatobiliary disorders, 128 /
Immune system disorders, 98 /
Infections and infestations, 658 /
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications, 448 /
Investigations, 2170 /
Metabolism and nutrition disorders, 193 /
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, 355 /
Neoplasm benign, malignant and unspecified, including cysts and polyps, 650 /
Nervous system disorders, 818 /
Product issues, 50 /
Psychiatric disorders, 414 /
Renal and urinary disorders, 227 /
Reproductive system and breast disorders, 351 /
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, 408 /
Skin ans subcutaneous tissue disorders, 354 /
Vasculalr disorders, 275/
And they are those who have been officially declared and registered, which implies that there could be a lot more.
Is there someone somewhere that has been informed of all these AE and had their consequences clearly explained in a layman language before being injected ?
If not, it means that there have never been a free an informed consent anywhere.
And the fact that the declaration are on a voluntary basis and not updated means that, at the very beginning of those systems of AE reporting, it was clearly intended that they were made so as to never reflect the reality for there would have never been any profit made out of any injection.
When one does not want others to know the temperature in the room, one breaks the thermometer or makes it false reading by changing the scale on it.
That is exactly the same that has been done in health ( death ) care.
Would it be considered as "safe and effective" to have a radar system where the operator would decide by oneself what one officially declares to have on the radar's screen, the way it pleases oneself however it correlates with reality or not ?
So why do it when it comes to so dramatic consequences for so many lives would you ask ?
The action of unblinding the study is quite nefarious. Additionally, the regulators who are supposed to oversee these things should be held accountable as well. No more revolving door between manufacturers and government entities.
If you want an example of what "Public-Private Partnership" really means look no further than the deadly covid pandemic. Government agencies conspiring with Big Pharma to kill and injure millions of innocent people in pursuit of wealth and power. Expect more of the same if "we the people" don't rise up in serious, active opposition.
They did not even test these bioweapons on pregnant mice, much less pregnant women. The docs warn pregnant women to avoid tuna fish because of the mercury, but then tell them to get a flu shot which has far more mercury. Looks like they want to kill us.
One thing bothers me, and always has - with this and all other disputed items.
If the so-called vaccine deniers who have done careful analyses of available data, like this, are wrong, why are these analyses not properly and scientifically debunked? All we get is bluster, very occasionally quoting improperly conducted trials.
There is of course a good reason they are not debunked, and that is because they are correct.
Am I wrong?
So glad to see you are emphasizing the exclusion criteria and early unblinding of the oringinal phase III press releases. For Pfizer and Moderna to call them "trials" was a mockery of us all. These simple red flags should have alerted any semi-conscious physician to the shameless fraud being perpetrated in 2020. Thank you for your work.
Excellent analysis. It seems that the approach is actually to inject everyone and hide the data.
"Also sounds like a crime against humanity. Doesn’t it?" YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All of it does! All of it done with Forethought and Malice!
How to fudge the data: "The problem I see here is that filing a report of “No adverse event” - a non clinical outcome - precludes the reporting of an eventual AE that describes a clinical outcome and perhaps a serious one.". Good catch, Jessica.
All of it .... tragic . Maiming and deaths will continue. Autoimmune issues will continue to rise . We have a new NP in the office, she refused to comply with the vaccine schedule in a peds office .... wait till she sees the side effects of the jab in an ob/ gyn office . 🥲
The list of adverse reactions on one product alone... is horrifying and should give you a clue just how unsafe this product really is.. no other drug/vaccine potion or lotion on the market has such a long list of side effects. (some life changing.. some fatal.)
The only way something this bad could make it on to a pharmacy shelf.. is for nefarious shenanigans by modern day witch doctors to hoodwink through the use of bribery.
Truly many problems that do not bode well for safe and effective. Our moms and children are not guinea pigs for potentially dangerous products. This is extremely faulty research at best.
There are reasons for not giving certains medicines to pregnant women and nursing moms.
Hereafter a list of the different groups of AE that i made out of Eudravigilance ( https://www.adrreports.eu/en/index.html ) with the related number of different AE registered to each one.
I separated those related to Foetal and Neonatal issues as to emphasize them and their numbers are not included in the Pregnancy related conditions.
Pregnancy related conditions, 159 /
Foetal isssues, 103 /
Neonatal issues, 117 /
Blood and lymphatic system disorders, 221 /
Cardiac disorders, 284/
Congenital. Familial and genetic disorders, 413 /
Ear and labyrinth disorders, 77 /
Endocrine disorders. 109 /
Eye disorders, 363 /
Gastrointestinal disorders, 580 /
General disorders and administration site conditions, 648 /
Hepatobiliary disorders, 128 /
Immune system disorders, 98 /
Infections and infestations, 658 /
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications, 448 /
Investigations, 2170 /
Metabolism and nutrition disorders, 193 /
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, 355 /
Neoplasm benign, malignant and unspecified, including cysts and polyps, 650 /
Nervous system disorders, 818 /
Product issues, 50 /
Psychiatric disorders, 414 /
Renal and urinary disorders, 227 /
Reproductive system and breast disorders, 351 /
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, 408 /
Skin ans subcutaneous tissue disorders, 354 /
Vasculalr disorders, 275/
And they are those who have been officially declared and registered, which implies that there could be a lot more.
Is there someone somewhere that has been informed of all these AE and had their consequences clearly explained in a layman language before being injected ?
If not, it means that there have never been a free an informed consent anywhere.
And the fact that the declaration are on a voluntary basis and not updated means that, at the very beginning of those systems of AE reporting, it was clearly intended that they were made so as to never reflect the reality for there would have never been any profit made out of any injection.
When one does not want others to know the temperature in the room, one breaks the thermometer or makes it false reading by changing the scale on it.
That is exactly the same that has been done in health ( death ) care.
Would it be considered as "safe and effective" to have a radar system where the operator would decide by oneself what one officially declares to have on the radar's screen, the way it pleases oneself however it correlates with reality or not ?
So why do it when it comes to so dramatic consequences for so many lives would you ask ?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
“Safe and effectively” over is good. 😄
The action of unblinding the study is quite nefarious. Additionally, the regulators who are supposed to oversee these things should be held accountable as well. No more revolving door between manufacturers and government entities.
They've gone too far...killing the babies. One in Four babes goes to the NICU? Mom's milk taking up to 10 days to "Come in"...
Thank-you for your hard work Jessica!!!
https://open.substack.com/pub/dee746/p/moms-milk-delay-post-covid-trend?r=1g1b1r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
https://open.substack.com/pub/dee746/p/babies-going-to-the-nicu?r=1g1b1r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Lost for words 🤯😢
If you want an example of what "Public-Private Partnership" really means look no further than the deadly covid pandemic. Government agencies conspiring with Big Pharma to kill and injure millions of innocent people in pursuit of wealth and power. Expect more of the same if "we the people" don't rise up in serious, active opposition.
"if the product has not been proven to be safe, then who cares if it works." THAT - and plenty of it, please!
They did not even test these bioweapons on pregnant mice, much less pregnant women. The docs warn pregnant women to avoid tuna fish because of the mercury, but then tell them to get a flu shot which has far more mercury. Looks like they want to kill us.