Did you already mathematically extrapolate organ tissue concentrations past 48 hours? If not I may have some R codes to fit the curve and extrapolate out to further time points. I think this is a pattern and mirrors why they didn't test the draining lymph vessels of the injection site. It's criminal that they are still redacting pertinent information, even after all the experimental injection mandates that killed and disabled people!
Great to know Chris Masterjohn is on the story. The redactions should be considered contempt of court, and the lawyers should return to get these redactions reversed.
Should I assume since they are redacting like 50% of the most important info and are getting away with that, the next round will be like 60% redacted and then round six will be 100% redacted? Or am I being too optimistic, and the second round will be 75% redacted and....
I'm half surprised they didn't just follow the lead of the FDA and redact the whole damn thing.
Interesting Moderna patent #10,703,789 July 7, 2020 has references to Luciferase. Go to https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search to do the search. Abstract of patent states "A pharmaceutical composition which has a plurality of lipid nanoparticles that has a mean particle size of between 80 nm and 160 nm and contains a modified mRNA encoding a polypeptide. The lipid nanoparticles include a cationic lipid, a neutral lipid, a cholesterol, and a PEG lipid. The mRNA contains a 5'-cap, 5'-UTR, N1-methyl-pseudouridine, a 3'-UTR, and a poly-A region with at least 100 nucleotides." You can word search Luciferase in the document you download.
No Jessica, it is not legal for the FDA to redact the data, it isn't proprietary or trade secrets. It is not FDA's place to protect Pfizer or - as we heard from CDC -decide that data isn't "ready for prime time" because the data could be "misinterpreted" and lead to "vaccine hesitancy." It is called Freedom of INFORMATION. Attorneys need to get back into the courtroom, ask for the FDA chief(s)/director(s) to be held in criminal contempt (Set their asses in the local jail) until this and all the information is unredacted, pay a hefty fine - one that sends a big enough message PR wise that even MsM has to note it, plus attorney fees and costs of course.
Another interesting discussion on Luciferase is from journalist Emerald Robinson via her substack dated November 4, 2021. https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/what-is-luciferase?s=r You can read it for free. Emerald is like Ivory Hecker, ex-national journalists (fired) who now freelance true journalism.
This is information people have the right to know about. I have no information of an education behind my name so I wouldn't understand it. Although, we do have Jessica to untangle the mystery once we get the data. Thanks Jessica.
Did you already mathematically extrapolate organ tissue concentrations past 48 hours? If not I may have some R codes to fit the curve and extrapolate out to further time points. I think this is a pattern and mirrors why they didn't test the draining lymph vessels of the injection site. It's criminal that they are still redacting pertinent information, even after all the experimental injection mandates that killed and disabled people!
Great to know Chris Masterjohn is on the story. The redactions should be considered contempt of court, and the lawyers should return to get these redactions reversed.
Secrets protect their keepers.. heavy handed redaction a virtual admission of guilt.
Unconscionable. Thank you for continuing to research, expose and educate.
Wow, I'm speechless!
Should I assume since they are redacting like 50% of the most important info and are getting away with that, the next round will be like 60% redacted and then round six will be 100% redacted? Or am I being too optimistic, and the second round will be 75% redacted and....
I'm half surprised they didn't just follow the lead of the FDA and redact the whole damn thing.
Check out the less redacted data from Australia- Kudos to Unglossed & Modern Discontent for the info & analysis: https://moderndiscontent.substack.com/p/clarifying-yesterdays-lipid-nanoparticle?s=r
they are probably protecting the rat's personal health information with the redactions
Interesting Moderna patent #10,703,789 July 7, 2020 has references to Luciferase. Go to https://www.uspto.gov/patents/search to do the search. Abstract of patent states "A pharmaceutical composition which has a plurality of lipid nanoparticles that has a mean particle size of between 80 nm and 160 nm and contains a modified mRNA encoding a polypeptide. The lipid nanoparticles include a cationic lipid, a neutral lipid, a cholesterol, and a PEG lipid. The mRNA contains a 5'-cap, 5'-UTR, N1-methyl-pseudouridine, a 3'-UTR, and a poly-A region with at least 100 nucleotides." You can word search Luciferase in the document you download.
No Jessica, it is not legal for the FDA to redact the data, it isn't proprietary or trade secrets. It is not FDA's place to protect Pfizer or - as we heard from CDC -decide that data isn't "ready for prime time" because the data could be "misinterpreted" and lead to "vaccine hesitancy." It is called Freedom of INFORMATION. Attorneys need to get back into the courtroom, ask for the FDA chief(s)/director(s) to be held in criminal contempt (Set their asses in the local jail) until this and all the information is unredacted, pay a hefty fine - one that sends a big enough message PR wise that even MsM has to note it, plus attorney fees and costs of course.
Another interesting discussion on Luciferase is from journalist Emerald Robinson via her substack dated November 4, 2021. https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/what-is-luciferase?s=r You can read it for free. Emerald is like Ivory Hecker, ex-national journalists (fired) who now freelance true journalism.
This is information people have the right to know about. I have no information of an education behind my name so I wouldn't understand it. Although, we do have Jessica to untangle the mystery once we get the data. Thanks Jessica.