Remember the Wistar Rat biodistribution Pfizer document I wrote about?
Well this one's even better.
I would like to call everyone’s attention to the document in the released Pfizer document dump entitled: “R&D STUDY REPORT No. R-20-0072 EXPRESSION OF LUCIFERASE-ENCODING MODRNA AFTER I.M. APPLICATION OF GMP-READY ACUITAS LIPID NANOPARTICLE FORMULATION”. This study was reported on November 27, 2020 and was designed to test an LNP-formulated modRNA encoding luciferase (used representatively) to investigate in vivo biodistribution and immune responses of injection candidates. Thanks to Chris Masterjohn for bringing this one to my attention. The pages herein refer to Version 3 of this document. Where are the other 2 versions? The study was 9 days.
First of all, please refer to page 5.
It would be quite shocking to know who signed off on this. Let’s FOIA that, shall we?
Please go to page 19. This is what Pfizer calls revealing data. That whole section redacted below once showed images of the biodistribution of the LNPs for, get this, UP TO 9 DAYS!
Remember what I wrote previously about not knowing what happened in the Wistar rats after 48 hours with the curves on an exponential up? Maybe these jerks knew that from this mouse study and that’s why they stopped measuring at hour 48 in the Wistar rat study. Makes you wonder, eh? The rat study began on July 16, 2020 and lasted 7 days. It was reported and signed off on November 5, 2020 by ‘someone’. So it did come after the mouse study.
If we were allowed to see where and for how long the accumulation occurred, maybe it would have confirmed that these LNPs stick around a long time. Maybe it would have confirmed biodistribution at high concentrations in the Adrenal glands? And ovaries? Show us the figures!
The thing about this is, as Byram Bridle pointed out in our call tonight, that this is NOT privileged information. This is simply data: results from the study determining where the LNPs went in mice to determine if this crap might do the same in humans. So, is it even legal to redact this kind of information? Especially when this was the forced released material?
An interesting point about this study is that they mention differences between the 3 products they (BioNTech) are manufacturing.
At BioNTech, three different RNA platforms formulated with lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are under development, namely non-modified uridine containing mRNA (uRNA), nucleoside-modified mRNA (modRNA) and self amplifying RNA (saRNA).
So the stuff they tested in this study were the nucleoside-modified mRNA (modRNA) - the ones with the swapped out pseudouridines. Just a point of interest.
Refer to page 12. No interest in telling us what lipids they used that presumably, ended up in people.
Please go to page 21. Yeah they say ‘liver’, but the adrenal glands sit on top of the kidneys (right next door to the liver) and are critical to the optimal functioning of the RAAS (the system that controls blood pressure and electrolyte balance). I am writing this up soon.
And please go to page 22. Again, redacted results on a judge-ordered release of safety documents. What on earth could these charts have revealed?
Page 32. So they are hiding the data on Groups 2 and 3 which are the test groups. Good to know the buffer control doesn’t even look that consistent.
Bdeh, bdeh, bdeh that’s all for now folks.
Did you already mathematically extrapolate organ tissue concentrations past 48 hours? If not I may have some R codes to fit the curve and extrapolate out to further time points. I think this is a pattern and mirrors why they didn't test the draining lymph vessels of the injection site. It's criminal that they are still redacting pertinent information, even after all the experimental injection mandates that killed and disabled people!
Great to know Chris Masterjohn is on the story. The redactions should be considered contempt of court, and the lawyers should return to get these redactions reversed.