197 Comments
User's avatar
Buddha Mike's avatar

You are amazing!

Never stop!

The truth will come out eventually.

Thank you for giving me hope for the future of science.

The last 6 years has been a disgrace.

Expand full comment
Marjorie rodd's avatar

I was smiling while reading your post. How bad ass to be able to fragment their amoral blathering with precise scientific data. This was truly surgical. However, so sad that you would need to waste your time and energy on their intentional defensive plays when the loss of human life and unnecessary suffering is the pawn.

Expand full comment
GeoffPainPhD's avatar

They could at least have sent it to me as I am one of their invited reviewers.

Expand full comment
Lone Star's avatar

Well, that raises the question: Who are the “invited reviewers and how are they specified for this submission?

Expand full comment
GeoffPainPhD's avatar

As Jessica points out, Cureus Editors rejected her paper before sending to reviewers.

Expand full comment
rjt's avatar

At which point the "Editors" should be identified.

Expand full comment
Eleftherios Gkioulekas's avatar

Editor in Chief calls the shot, but he probably invites recommendations from editors in the editorial board before making a decision.

Expand full comment
Mike Williams's avatar

The best reviewers would be the Australian TGA reviewers.TGA let anything through if their masters..sorry..the people that pay 95% of their wages want them too...

Expand full comment
Sharon Leona's avatar

It is so demoralizing to see how invasive the corruption is throughout.

Expand full comment
110th's avatar

What you're seeing is just how much work we have to do in cleaning out all liars and the effects of their lies. This should not demoralize you. It should birth the carrying out of our Duty. One step at a time. I am in the building trades. I have experienced helpers literally walk off of jobs once the materials for say a chimney are delivered.

Looking at 2500 bricks on the ground, 65 flue tiles, 25 bags of mortar and cement along with three tons of sand makes all who allow themselves to see only the completion of the job overwhelmed. What I tell my helpers is don't look to the completion just the fact that today we only have to use 300 bricks and 3 bags of mortar THEN WE GO HOME, rest and do the same tomorrow. I hope you take my meaning.

Expand full comment
KELA's avatar

Now that you know about that it was submitted, why don’t you ask Cureus for a copy so you can review it?

Expand full comment
Lone Star's avatar

LOL. Or gather a group of willing “invited reviewers” from their roster of same, and solicit their review.

Expand full comment
Sharon Leona's avatar

or ask Jessica Rose for a copy and do an independent review for her.

Expand full comment
Susan Liang's avatar

According to Cynthia Chung of Rising Tide Foundation, the goal to create a scientific elite that censors rather than promotes scientific studies, that is, true science, has been achieved to the harm of society. There is a scientific industrial complex (likely tied to DARPA, the military industrial complex).

The public needs to know, but does not.

Expand full comment
Dr. Jim's avatar

I have been calling this the medical-scientific-pharma industrial complex for several years now. Clearly most of main stream medicine is in the bag or blue-pilled, drank the kool-aid, etc. It is beyond me tho, how they all became that way. That must have been a years long process, part of which was the indoctrination with 'evidence-based medicine'.

Expand full comment
Sharon Leona's avatar

Lots of paid salesmen. And yes it has been going on for several decades. The drug cartels spend unimaginable (that's why I can't recall the amount) bags of money to persuade, advertise, incentivise and invade the medical curriculum

Expand full comment
Dr. Jim's avatar

I'm a retired physician, and I agree with your position. Big pharma (and others in Medical Industy) are big players. However, I also know that what was typically offered to MDs was a pen or an office lunch, and, ironically, the Gov't got all out of kilter and made everyone track what was received. However, there has been much larger $$ available for influential physicians, for whom they paid junkets to comfortable locations for conferences, with generous stipends, or speaking stipends; $$ also available for MDs to study new medications (this was likely more innocent for many, since drugs must be tested clinically, but some docs are known to have entire portions of their practices set up to do these studies), then a level above is the academic settings $$$, where entire departments are recipients of lavish luncheons, dinners, also studies, and much bigger fish (MDs) receive $$$ for their input (supportive of course) into studies about new medications, with papers galore, written by these MDs and their minion subjects, the residents and interns, so they may also have many projects ongoing for many such meds and treatments or surgical implants, etc. And of the course the Medical School ($$$$) then is recipient of the Pharma largesse as well, perhaps making "donations" to such-and-such Med School, to a Department for new equipment, etc. Very creative. And of course you get to the mega-recipient lever, like Fauci of NIAID and NIH (since he essentially ran both), where the Bigs awarded funds ($$$$$) for 'research' of multiple millions of dollars, which Fauci awarded to his pet MDs for their 'studies', which Fauci oversaw, and basically if the doc does not do what Fauci wants, no more $$, no more career. Big Pharma also supports medical journals in billions of advertising, so of course, the Editors (who oversee ALL accepted/rejected articles) play by the rules and reject anything anti-pharma. Sinful. And of course they support the Societies with similar largesse, but I think the AMA is the most in the tank. They have NOT supported mainstream MDs for decades.

Expand full comment
Sharon Leona's avatar

When Creator's guidelines for living are absent corruption abounds. I'm sure there are many biblical references to this proverb in the Bible. It's a fundamental principle. Without acknowledgement of the Holy Creator and adherence to His will for our lives: Jeremiah 17:9 - The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?

Expand full comment
Dana Veye's avatar

DARPA gave Jen Doudna heaps of funding for her CRISPR research

Expand full comment
Sharon Leona's avatar

It has been going on long. Since the Flexnor Report/Rockefeller takeover of health care in America and then around the world. Another prime example is the funding given to Dr. Szmuness, who was awarded millions to develop the Hep. B. vaccines that precipitated the HIV and AIDS epidemic. He himself had suspicions and concern about contamination in batches of his vaccines coming from NIH and where ever Dr. Szmuness' hepatitis tests were conducted, became the epicentres for the transmission of the HIV virus. So. hard to accept, and not be traumatized that this what the world we live in is like.

Expand full comment
Esteban's avatar

Damn it feels good to not be jabbed

Expand full comment
AlsoMe's avatar

If only I hadn't had more of my health trashed by shedding :(

Expand full comment
KELA's avatar

And feeling healthy!

Expand full comment
Adam Sullivan's avatar

Thank you for the detailed rebuttal in your response. It's funny how one can watch an argument in a very unfamiliar field, but clearly see who is bringing the evidence-based objective analysis. Keep up the great work, please.

Expand full comment
The Great Santini's avatar

They don’t think DNA fragments in the shots is a big deal. Or perhaps their rejection is because they think it is a big deal and they don’t want to talk about it.

Expand full comment
Rob's avatar

Out of sight...out of mind...and the COVID shots are "safe and effective".

Expand full comment
Frank Wolstencroft's avatar

Dr Fauci was just given a US Presidential pardon by President Joe Biden for crimes he might have committed.

Expand full comment
Rob's avatar

And so we should see exactly what crimes Fauci might have committed...Trump should immediately release all of his emails (completely unredacted of course)

Expand full comment
gusman's avatar

might have committed.

Like (1)

might.eses deaths. inusa. hanghim high

Expand full comment
gusman's avatar

so was thethe phlidomid drug

Expand full comment
Dana Veye's avatar

They are so adamant in their position and willing to palm off any old excuse to remain part of the True Science! gang, and now they believe they enjoy the protection by a senile racist turds blanket immunity to King Fauci. I believe, they are secretly plopping out besser blocks like billions of other people that took their biological rocket fuel.

Expand full comment
Sharon Leona's avatar

what are 'besser blocks'?

Expand full comment
Dana Veye's avatar

Rectangular concrete blocks used in construction instead of clay bricks

Expand full comment
Swamp_Yankee's avatar

It's almost as if the editors never took a biology class.

Expand full comment
Mike Williams's avatar

And never took an ethics class either...

Expand full comment
Bradley Lewis's avatar

When you present a scientific study to an entity that is part of a completely politicized system for which "science" is primarily about publishing desired results then it's time to create new entities and abandon a systemically corrupt system. They're ossified and and will be cracking apart.

Expand full comment
David White (Oz Dave)'s avatar

I would have to wonder if the Cureus team and others like them, if jabbed, aren’t suffering from some form of psychosis that might affect their ability to make rational decisions: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1360338/full

Expand full comment
Rob's avatar

Journals often receive funding from the pharmaceutical industry, so there is significant control on what gets published.

Expand full comment
KELA's avatar

Definitely something to consider

Expand full comment
M. N. Mead's avatar

How very Cureus. You appear to have discovered yet another form of weaponized retraction --- and you're on the preemptive retraction list, courtesy of Bio-Pharma. At least they're not wasting your time as they did with our Lessons Learned paper last January!

Expand full comment
Darrell O. Ricke, M.S., Ph.D.'s avatar

Rather, these editors will not consider the possibility of the reported science being real given the widespread distribution of the vaccines combined with ignorance of associated reports of aggressive cancers. Three monkeys scenario - see no plasmids or cancers, hear no counter narratives, and censor all who think otherwise...

Expand full comment
JACKIE BAGLEY's avatar

Well done. I have such huge respect for yourself and your immense expertise - and your tireless pursuit of getting the truth to the forefront. Thank you immensely for sharing your knowledge with us. I am so thankful for you. It was your paper in 2021, which first cited these vaccines as "High risk experiments" calling them gene therapy, that was my lifeline when I was asked to justify my abstinence from taking the injection to keep my job as a University Professor - although I was not able to win through arbitration nor through a Human Rights Complaint that was dismissed (Alberta), I stood tall knowing that I was aligned with the likes of a great mind, yourself. You gave me the courage to continue through a very stressful time. I no longer have my house. But I have my health, and my future, and my young daughter has her mother. I cannot thank you enough. You are truly a guardian of the people.

Expand full comment
Dana Veye's avatar

All the best to you, Jackie, and your daughter. I hope you can keep on going.

Expand full comment
JACKIE BAGLEY's avatar

Thank you! that is so kind!

Expand full comment
Dana Veye's avatar

No worries. The last 5 years have been horrible, and it's irredeemably changed my id. Can't imagine losing my assets in the process and relying on the bond between my daughters to get up everyday and breathe. ❤️

Expand full comment
JACKIE BAGLEY's avatar

Thank you Dana. I really appreciate this :)

Expand full comment
TRM's avatar

Of course DNA contamination is not an issue the Australian government report says so. Read it here:

https://i.postimg.cc/9FF569px/Open-And-Transparent-Aussie.png

Full transparency and openness. What more do you want? LOL

Expand full comment
Dana Veye's avatar

Jeez, I'd sure hate to live in that open air prison controlled by second-rate chancers and carpetbaggers that couldn't be trusted to go get the lunch orders.

Expand full comment
Tim Williams's avatar

Go get em, Dr Rose!

Expand full comment