Unacceptable Jessica

Share this post

Real time obstetrician/gynecologist's data on new patients and miscarriages for 2021 and 2022 (and now 2020 for baseline)

jessicar.substack.com

Real time obstetrician/gynecologist's data on new patients and miscarriages for 2021 and 2022 (and now 2020 for baseline)

Direct from the horse's mouth...

Jessica Rose
Nov 18, 2022
469
40
Share this post

Real time obstetrician/gynecologist's data on new patients and miscarriages for 2021 and 2022 (and now 2020 for baseline)

jessicar.substack.com

My contact is providing details on 2020 data. Here’s one additional plot.

Figure i: New patients versus miscarriages for 2020, 2021 and 2022.

Here’s some monthly data for 2020 for now. Let me know what else you want to see (Joel). :) I am double checking if that July 2020 data point is correct. It looks weird. I checked and it’s a real point. Just anomalous.

Figure ii: Comparison of miscarriage rates from new patients for 2020 through 2022.

I have been contacted by an obstetrician/gynecologist with some data they had been collecting for the past 2 years as part of their sacred duty in their practice. This person collected new patient data and miscarriage data and also has average rates for the past years.

This is what the data looks like.

First is a chart showing new patients per month for 2021 and 2022 when compared to the average number of new patients in 2020 which was between 32 and 40. For each month in both 2021 and 2022, the number of new patients falls below the average.

1

UPDATE: New patient data with 2020 for baseline.

Figure 1: New patient data from an Obstetrician/Gynecologists’s office for 2021 and 2022.

Now perhaps it could also be that women are choosing not to get pregnant because psychopaths are trying to make the world explode, but if that’s the case, then why are we seeing more miscarriages as well as shown in Figure 2?

Update: Miscarriages absolute counts with 2020 data for background.

.Figure 2: Miscarriage data from new patient data from an Obstetrician/Gynecologists’s office for 2020, 2021 and 2022.

The numbers of miscarriages are higher for each month except for November 2021 (we don’t have December data yet). The numbers are the same for April and May. Now these miscarriage numbers are the numbers of miscarriages per number of new patients per month so when we plot the rates, it becomes abundantly clear that the miscarriage rates are twice that in 2022 than they were for 2021 as shown in Figure 3 on average.

Figure 3: Miscarriage rates from new patient data from an Obstetrician/Gynecologists’s office for 2021 and 2022.

If we only look at the December 2021 miscarriage rate and compare it to the 2022 rates, we get a clearer picture of what the miscarriage rates have been since the COVID-19 injectable products have been rolled out in the U.S. when compared to the average for 2021 (excluding December).

Figure 4: Miscarriage rates from new patient data from an Obstetrician/Gynecologists’s office for December 2021 through to November 2022 with average for December-November 2021 shown (orange line).

So with just a few points of data, we get an unbiased assessment of the change in miscarriage rates in 2021 and 2022. It is pretty clear from this data that, for some reason, there are more miscarriages and fewer new moms to begin with in 2022.

Perhaps the most concise way to show the difference between 2021 and 2022 is by showing the cumulative losses (miscarriages) against the cumulative losses over cumulative new patients as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5: Cumulative losses compared to cumulative losses to cumulative new patients for 2021 and 2022.

By the way, I thought it appropriate to show everyone the current (09.09.22; 07.14.22; 10.27.22) product monographs with regard to the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen products in pregnant women. Oh and don’t forget to register your data to the snake pit. You cannot make this shit up.

Figure 6: Product monographs for Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen.
1

This doesn’t surprise me as people were forced into lockdowns, etc, which would explain the 2021 data. The 2022 data, this needs explaining, doesn’t it. I moved this comment here because I don’t think it’s lockdowns. I think it’s the injections.

40
Share this post

Real time obstetrician/gynecologist's data on new patients and miscarriages for 2021 and 2022 (and now 2020 for baseline)

jessicar.substack.com
40 Comments
Kevin Krause
Writes Covid Recovery Strategies
Nov 18, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Funny thing is, when I had a visit with my doctor the other day and we were both decrying the poor state of the medical profession. I snuck in the conversation that I don't trust FDA and the other health agencies. As an example, I used the line from the head of the vaccine review committee when they were "considering" approving the vax for kids that "we'll never know until we try" and the back pedaling on the "safe for pregnant women" (without actual data) BS that was main streamed. He didn't acknowledge what I was saying but I could tell he was uncomfortable or perhaps he was Comfortably numb 😉

Expand full comment
Reply
1 reply
MB
Nov 18, 2022·edited Nov 19, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

In Fall 2021 a friend saw their GYN and the dr acknowledged he was seeing many cases of irregular cycles post-jab and even several of his patients starting menstruation again after being multiple years post-menopause. My friend asked “Given what you’ve seen, would you suggest I get my young daughters vaxxed?” His reply was “HELL NO!! But if you ask me in front of my colleagues, I would say ‘Yes absolutely, and you go get your booster asap!’” Such is the sad state of affairs where doctors know better but are unwilling to speak out. I am grateful to the doctor who shared this data with you. Every bit of revelatory data contributes to the unraveling of the narrative. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Reply
38 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Jessica Rose
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing