i was a contributor on lnp work, yeah. not sure how i like how it's being interpreted though. the message was meant to be: lnps not safe. without lnps, no mrna tech.
i was a contributor on lnp work, yeah. not sure how i like how it's being interpreted though. the message was meant to be: lnps not safe. without lnps, no mrna tech.
With respect, people have a right to their interpretations given the millions of people murdered and maimed by the mrna platform. There is no trust with scientists, doctors and pharma anymore. Also, the issue of reverse transcriptase (Alden et al) has not been fully explored, so, respectfully, to break the issue down into something so simple (mrna and LNPs) is short sighted in my opinion. People are right to be angry given the unknowns with this technology.
i was a contributor on lnp work, yeah. not sure how i like how it's being interpreted though. the message was meant to be: lnps not safe. without lnps, no mrna tech.
With respect, people have a right to their interpretations given the millions of people murdered and maimed by the mrna platform. There is no trust with scientists, doctors and pharma anymore. Also, the issue of reverse transcriptase (Alden et al) has not been fully explored, so, respectfully, to break the issue down into something so simple (mrna and LNPs) is short sighted in my opinion. People are right to be angry given the unknowns with this technology.
Maybe Dr. McCullough got a tap on the shoulder?