Discover more from Unacceptable Jessica
PSA: The FDA has declared that only bivalent shots are authorized for use in US - April 18, 2023
"The monovalent Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are no longer authorized for use in the United States."
Head to the FDA website here.
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration amended the emergency use authorizations (EUAs) of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 bivalent mRNA vaccines to simplify the vaccination schedule for most individuals. This action includes authorizing the current bivalent vaccines (original and omicron BA.4/BA.5 strains) to be used for all doses administered to individuals 6 months of age and older, including for an additional dose or doses for certain populations. The monovalent Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are no longer authorized for use in the United States.
The monovalent Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are no longer authorized for use in the United States.
So listen. The bivalent shots ‘provide’, at best, an immune tickle against two extinct SPIKE variations. Furthermore, recently, bivalent vials have been sequenced and found to be contaminated. Adverse event reports have been piling up in VAERS one week following original release-for-administration date, on September 2, 2022.
The bivalent shots were never authorized to be given as a first dose, especially not to new borns and babies.
Even Paul Offit calls these products a cautionary tale.
Peter Marks continues to reinforce that in addition to: 1. robust, life-long natural immunity achieved by being simply exposed to SARS-2, or 2. the ‘effects’ (I would not call it immunity - perhaps a form of autoimmunity/hyper-inflammation) of having been injected with the monovalent experimental COVID injectable products, that the bivalent shots are going to help people avoid dying from COVID.
You know what would help people avoid dying from COVID? Repurposed drugs. Medical doctors being allowed to make their own decisions as opposed to taking orders from incentivized bureaucrats. Allowing people to get sun, exercise, eat well, drink clean water, hug each other. Allowing people to work a job that actually allows them enough food and shelter to enjoy life. Or releasing the reign of terror incessantly imposed on good people all throughout the world. It’s really, really evil - and that is the appropriate word - to terrorize our elders. That’s what would help people stop dying from COVID.
Give some God-given respect to our elders (and infirm) and promote focused care and regimens that, among other things, DO include re-purposed drugs for them, as opposed to isolating them and letting them die alone, terrified. That’s what would stop people dying from COVID.
“Evidence is now available that most of the U.S. population 5 years of age and older has antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, either from vaccination or infection that can serve as a foundation for the protection provided by the bivalent vaccines. COVID-19 continues to be a very real risk for many people, and we encourage individuals to consider staying current with vaccination, including with a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine. The available data continue to demonstrate that vaccines prevent the most serious outcomes of COVID-19, which are severe illness, hospitalization, and death.”
Marks forgets to mention ANYTHING about the risks of being injected that are now solidly documented (even by the CDC), and he also does not discern between the massive differences (with regard not only to antibodies, but ALL IMMUNE SYSTEM CELLS AND MEDIATORS), between natural immunity - against a complete set of proteins, and ‘temporary’ ‘immunity’ and or tolerisation - against a single, terribly problematic mass-produced antigenic protein.
He doesn’t mention anything about the differences between these extraordinarily different processes that everyone is entitled to know prior to being injected. He doesn’t mention anything about side effects.
If you aren’t up-to-date, the manufacturing processes (good manufacturing processes (GMPs)) have been called into question, and continue to be called into question. Marks actually states that the Bivalent shots are safe because they are made the same way as the monovalent shots. Really? Well then on that basis, they are susceptible to contamination, and random vials need to be checked. That’s what that means.
The data accrued with the investigational Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine (original and omicron BA.1) and with the monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine are relevant to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent because these vaccines are manufactured using the same process.
Read the entire disclosure for yourself. Decide for yourself. Read how few people were actually involved in what Marks refers to as a safety study as the foundation for the authorization of these products.
Again, here’s the most recent VAERS domestic data relevant to the bivalent shots. There are N = 25,118 reports submitted since release in early September, 2022. I do not include the URF here (with URF: 31 → N = 778,658 adverse event occurrences). Granted, many of these reports are likely due to the damages done by previous monovalent shots, for example, in those who did not receive the bivalent shots as a primary shot, but nonetheless, the safety of these products requires re-examination by non-conflicted labs.