189 Comments

My immunology professor in medical school always told us … it’s a bunch of shit don’t be fooled . One of the main reasons I never took the jab💩

Expand full comment

Excellent! Which school was that? Your prof was ahead of his/her time!

Expand full comment

Texas

Expand full comment

not to be messed with

Expand full comment

Female also taught embryology

Expand full comment

I know a female M.D. who directed the Dept. Of Infectious Diseases at UT med school in Houston for 25 years, 1995-2020, and consulted with drug companies. She was a big believer in vaccines even though she got shingles after taking the vaccine and went deaf in one ear. She was a fine athlete and ran marathons, skied, and played tennis. I don't know how many covid jabs she had but she just died 2 weeks ago at 76. The cause of death was not mentioned.

Expand full comment

so, you learned embryology from primary sources, not from philosophers of science... excellent!

Expand full comment

What exactly was he referring to by that label?

Expand full comment
May 1Liked by Jessica Rose

Once again I find you amazing Dr. J. Your mind and thought patterns are dynamics that impress me. I encourage you yet again, maybe that is part of my purpose here but I cannot be silent in the face of such ultra competence and excellence. You are an amazing woman in your knowledge and I am sure I am not the only one who cherishes you for being who and what you are. Do not be discouraged ever but if you are and need encouragement tell me so I can lift you up. I am sure you have someone to turn to and we all have those "down" times but I will provide you a feast of complimentary desserts to consume in any event.

Expand full comment

Dr. J is one of the very, very blessed human beings who uses the gifts God gave her to speak the truth wherever and however she can. And in turn, those fortunate enough to have found her are also blessed.

Expand full comment

She has to be in top 1% of IQ measurement.

Expand full comment
May 1Liked by Jessica Rose

How many hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent on 'cancer research,' over how many decades? End result of all that 'research:' no cancer cures and increasing cancers.

Enter mRNA products falsely labeled as 'vaccines.' These products not only don't work, they cause far more illness, injury and death than covid. One illness caused and/or exacerbated by mRNA products is cancer - of all types. 'Turbo" cancers are now rampant, especially in younger age groups.

Now, Moderna and Pfizer want to sell more ineffective and deadly mRNA products to 'treat' the cancers their first mRNA products cause and increase.

I hope the majority of people aren't fooled like they were with the covid/mRNA product operation. The difference now is that hundreds of doctors and medical scientists are out in front of this next round of 'pandemic' and 'vaccine' operations, and educating people that covid, monkeypox and Avian flu are falsely inflated, and their mRNA products are deadly and ineffective.

Expand full comment

Yet the sad reality is that there are still hundreds of doctors and medical scientists still on board with all of the lies and still damaging the health of their patients.

Expand full comment

The mRNA products are not the main problem.Its the delivery method of all muscular injection vaccine products that could be the bigger problem...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbZ6E2rhdcw

Expand full comment

Don't be siIly, it is not the injection method that is causing injuries and death. It is the DNA contamination as noted by Dr Bushholz.

Expand full comment

Oh god...how do you manage to type and breath at the same time?

How did the "dna contamination" occur before the Mrna vaccines were ever used...mic drop clunk..how does the "dna contamination" cause delayed onset of cardio events..how does it explain anything?..

Its probably best if you dont communicate with people

Expand full comment
May 1Liked by Jessica Rose

Superb, Jessica!

What is to be noted is that this is only in Stage 3 trials, but is already being splashed across the front and home pages as a 'cure'.

In fact, they are merely recruiting further sufferers as willing experimental subjects when the treatment gets accelerated approval.

And, as with the Covid pseudo-vaccines, the regulators will somehow overlook any nasty adverse events.

Cynical, criminal, beyond words.

Expand full comment

Dr. Thomas Seyfried has demonstrated based on the 1920's research that cancer is mostly metabolic and comes from too much sugar/carbohydrates in the diet. Shift to the keto style of above-ground vegetables and meat from animals, the human traditional diet, that cancer is becomes a minor issue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ebPZP9hBPA

Expand full comment

It doesn't come from too much sugar/carbs..its that cells with damaged mitochondria have no choice other than to revert to glucose for survival.

You fix the mitochondria first. Then you can extend the fasted state.

Expand full comment

Fasting and apoptosis is required to speed the process of normalization and to eliminate the damaged mitochondria, but you can get there by proper diet alone which reduces weight, improves the vascular system, lowers glucose and can eliminate diabetes and etc. Whatever works to keep individuals on a proper dietary regime whether it includes fasting or not. Multiple paths to recovering health.

Expand full comment

I personally like a weekly 36 hr fasting protocol combined with intermittent fasting on other days that consist of a mostly clean omnivorous diet

Expand full comment

A daily intermittent fasting and a clean omnivorous diet works best for me to sustain my approach with out periodic bouts of feeling I have to binge with carbs. I think it is personal. What works best is something we each need to find. The idea though is that we each do this, we need far less expense on health care. The system currently in place has misled us with the goal of expanding itself. More doctors need more patients and top-down they qualify more disease issues that need more meds when in fact simple dietary protocols would be far cheaper.

Expand full comment

I bet that there were almost no cancers back then and that the cause of them now is very different.

Expand full comment

Same for heart disease and diabetes and likely Alzheimer's.

Expand full comment

Cancers certainly figure in early medical literature, 18thc, most notably breast and skin cancers.

Expand full comment

Exactly

Expand full comment

And stay away from Glyphosate!!☠️ And get sunshine!!☀️

Expand full comment

Of course, we all know the diet they plan to move us to, don't we? Thoroughly carcinogenic, plus lack of fresh air, sun, and movement as per the lockdowns......

Expand full comment
May 1Liked by Jessica Rose

I'm baffled by how this gene technology is meant to target cancer.

So the cancer cells display unique proteins on their surface, so the way to have the immune system target them is....have other randomly-selected cells in your body also display these [formerly] unique proteins?

Cancer is what happens when your immune system fails to kill cells which deviated from their reproductive programming, either because of a deficiency in the immune system, or because the cells by chance mutated in such a way as to ensure their survival despite the immune system. I don't see how relying on mechanisms in the immune system which have already failed is going to work.

Expand full comment

I believe the other cells displaying "destroy me" proteins is an unwanted situation.

Expand full comment
May 1Liked by Jessica Rose

Yes, so what would the mRNA tech do to healthy cells to aid the immune system in destroying the cancer cells?

Expand full comment
author

yes. it amps up the normal response.

Expand full comment

It kond of made sense for SARS2, where the immune system could theoretically be trained against the spike protein before a real infection (still think it is insane to intentionally point killer cells at healthy body cells)

But in the case of cancer, the immune system has already ignored these surface proteins, or the cancer cells would have been destroyed. Forcing more cells to display these proteins is going to what...prompt the immune system to suddenly go apeshit against cells displaying them? What happens to healthy cells which display them?

Further, what if the proteins have some homology to normal proteins?

Expand full comment

The problem with melanoma is that it is widely distributed when it spreads. (Breast cancer is also managed with the same assumption- "it is a systemic disease.")

You can't really target the area where the melanoma originally was found as it has often spread at the time of initial biopsy. Most surgeons by protocol will do a secondary wide excision, even if the initial excision appears complete. So using the LNP system at least makes some sense in that you would want full body spread of the "treatment." At least they don't have to lie about the shot staying in the deltoid.

The final song lyrics remind me of Frederic Pohl's brief story "Day Million."

Expand full comment

I don't know, and I'm not sure they care unless sales are harmed.

Expand full comment

Alex, I think I comprehend the mechanics a bit … the first step is uptake of LPN mRNA payload to healthy cells … then the cells produce the protein strand and display it on exterior where it is recognized as foreign and dealt with by trainable immunity.

Problems …

1) it does not “stay in the arm”, that sucker goes EVERYWHERE so you have freaking liver cells making the target and being targeted.

2) lpn is itself toxic without strong data on half life or toxicity

3) the mRNA … to make it less fragile and not subject to amylase breakdown was “fiddled with” in the covid shots … it seems this might work TOO WELL??? The body works the way it does for REASONS … gah!!!!!!! Anyway would the mRNA for cancer vax be fiddled with too?

4) etc etc

Expand full comment

> then the cells produce the protein strand and display it on exterior where it is recognized as foreign and dealt with by trainable immunity.

Ok, but the cancer cells already have these on their surface, and the immune system failed to train its immunity on them.

This seems like basic logic to me.

Expand full comment

Good point Alex

Expand full comment

This gene technology is meant to CAUSE cancer not target it.

Except perhaps in the sense of target it to make things even worse.

Assuming of course there is anything in the individual treatments. I would not trust big pharma as far as I could throw it.

Expand full comment

Yes, I agree, but they have to at least have some plausible mechanism for it to work in the aadvertised purpose. What is that mechanism?

Expand full comment

No doubt they will tell us if we ask! However, I am not sure there is much point as they can make it up anyway.

I had immuno-therapy in 2020 for 9 sessions until I worked out what was going on and stopped. I think that was based on the mRNA platform. Try this link if you wish to the drug I was given.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nivolumab#Mechanism_of_action

It is quite likely it has chemically damaged my pituitary gland as my energy is affected.

Expand full comment

What if there is no such thing as an immune system? What if it's another failed scientific model?

Expand full comment

I think a person believing that would have to ignore a lot of empirical evidence.

Expand full comment

There is no harm in reviewing the evidence. Why do we believe what we believe? If it's only because we have confidence in the words and prestige of learned people, then we are ignorant and we live at a high risk of being fooled by charlatans who exploit our ignorance.

Expand full comment

Cancer patients make such LOVELY subjects for testing. They BEG to be tested on. They never complain about side effects and when they die, no one bats an eye.

Expand full comment

I was tested upon. I didn't beg for it though. I am complaining in as much as I write abouit it. NHS oncologists are ignorant morons. This explains some of what went on.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in

P.S. I am not dead yet in case you wondered! :)

Expand full comment

I will take the time to read your account, Michael. I am sorry I made that presumption about cancer patients, that they “beg” to be included in “trials” (I know they are very crappy trials which is why I put that word in quotations). I wish you healing and peace. I am very glad you are not dead! 🙏🙏

Expand full comment

Thank you. Forgive me if I sounded a little brusque. It was not meant that way. I was trying to be somewhat tongue-in-cheek. The reality is that all the treatments let alone vaccines are trials, monitored for side effects (deaths don't seem to count much!).

So many people are taken in by oncologists and big pharma, it is quite, quite evil and I intend to see big pharma destroyed.

Expand full comment

I want to like this comment but it’s too sad 😔

Expand full comment
May 1Liked by Jessica Rose

The research dollar bestowed upon the "favored" ala Judy Mikovits description on Plague of Corruption.

The Fauci business model to create an never-ending income stream for his loyal and favored principal investigators -- all others be damned. AZT research was a classic mess that cost an untold number of lies.

Pushed until it's patent ran out.

Expand full comment

Where do I start?

They do know that LNP induced interleukin 6 is oncogenic and mediates tumour growth?

What about PD-1+ CTL inactivation, tumour antigen or not?

M1u? Is that in there? TLR & IFN pathway inhibition?

Latent oncoviruses

Tumour mutations?

TAMs & TH2 subclasses?

Autoimmune carpet bombing?

***

Added to pre-existing inflammation, mRNA-lipid nanoparticles induce inflammation exacerbation (IE)

"...Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in serum and Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 2 (MIP-2) in liver significantly. Our report identifies this phenomenon as inflammation exacerbation (IE), which was proven to be specific to the LNP, acting independent of mRNA cargo, and was demonstrated to be time- and dose-dependent.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8695324/

Expand full comment
May 1Liked by Jessica Rose

You said cancer was preventable, then just walked past that. Maybe something about that?

Expand full comment
author

it's a metabolic disorder... mitochondria need to be healthy. antioxidants essential. vitamin D essential. oxygen essential.

Expand full comment

Seed oils are a big (if not the main) problem.

Expand full comment

Alex….And the Glyphoste those seed oil plants are sprayed with!!☠️

Expand full comment

Does that include virgin olive oil ??

Expand full comment

It still contains linoleic acid, which seems to be the main driver of disease.

Having a splash of olive oil on your salad is not going to give you diabetes.

It is the fact that *everything* has rapeseed, sunflower, or soybean oil in it.

So if your diet is free of seed oils elsewhere, you don't have to worry about the olive oil.

Expand full comment

I get the other oils, but I am pretty sure that olive oil is only good. It is the base of Mediterranean diet, you know the one you see in the 'blue zones' where people like in Greece live long life, that is ALL olive oil...

Expand full comment

That is observer bias, because you want to believe olive oil is ok.

It is still 9% linoleic acid. That is bad.

But few people go round chugging olive oil. They drizzle some on their food and that's it.

If people did the same with rapeseed oil, they'd probably be ok, but processed food and chicken/pig fat is chock full of linoleic acid.

Expand full comment

Dr. Mercola agrees that seed oils are a he problem.

Expand full comment

Is there any empirical evidence that seed oils cause cancer ?

Or is this more WEF bullshit ?

Expand full comment

The WEF and their ilk are promoting seed oils as "heart healthy" and "better for the planet".

What sort of empirical evidence would you like?

Expand full comment

Just numbers you fool.

Expand full comment

Rude.

What does that even mean?

There are studies showing mitochondrial fusion when subjects are fed stearic acid.

People can halt their CAC score progression by eliminating seed oils from their diet

As the amount of seed oil in the human diet has increased (pig and chicken count as seed oil, because they are fed seed oil and it accumulates in their fat), diabetes and other metabolic disorders such as obesity have increased in lockstep

If you have done any reading in the area, you will know that population studies are unreliable and wide open to fraud.

Expand full comment

And oncologists tell people to avoid anti-oxidants as they can interfere with chemo.

Maybe it's really the chemo interfering with the anti-oxidants!

Expand full comment

Have you written something on the topic and I missed it ? about prevention ?

Expand full comment

Surfing essential

Expand full comment

Heart and skeletal muscle rarely if ever become cancerous. That might get you curious..😉

Expand full comment

Heart cancer is rare but it can happen,, and is very nasty.

Expand full comment

That is very interesting :-)

Expand full comment

Do we REALLY know finitely what causes cancer? It is observed to occur in families … choose your family wisely I guess? Ha ha ha. There are very few diseases we can say are entirely preventable… scurvy comes to mind. It fun dealing with scurvy. Or rickets? These will never be vaccine fodder for big pharma but … cancer … I don’t know, Jessica …

Expand full comment

Cells can't maintain a fasted stated due to poor membrane lipid composition leading to truncated Krebs cycle with citrate export and a reversion to glycolysis and reliance on glucose.

It's been published in the literature since the 60's 😉

Expand full comment

Then sugar is the problem ?

Expand full comment
May 1·edited May 1Liked by Jessica Rose

"I would need to know far more about the targeting process with regard to the tumor itself, and of course, some studies on the empty LNPs, please."

And have the ability to pay for it! These things typically cost in the Millions and even with Insurance, not all Insurers will cover these more esoteric therapies where only marginal success, at best, has been confirmed.

As for the LNP's, I agree 100%. It's scandalous (but what isn't these days?) that has never been even a small scale study testing LNP against placebo to establish safety. I suppose the thinking is, if we don't bother testing any vaccine against a real inert placebo, why bother ;-)

Expand full comment

LNP's as the delivery system are not to be questioned, it seems; that's why they gave the liars Kariko and Weissman the Nobel Prize as the royal seal of approval.

There's an analogy here with the spread of the coal-based factory system: already by the 1830's in Britain people could see the terrible pollution of air and water, the ill-health and stunted growth of the workers, but....it made money. Lots of money, and so it became the future.

Expand full comment

I had been treating a melanoma on my face with prescribed fluorouradine cream for about a year with no improvement. I mentioned this to a friend who informed me that after the oncologist told his mother , age early 90's who had melanomas, that chemotherapy did not work, he treated his mother with ivermectin, and after 6 weeks, her melanomas were gone, mystifying the oncologist. I then tried topical ivermectin (ivermectin in isopropanol), and my melanoma was gone in 5 days!!!!. I continued for a month and on my visit to the dermatologist, I informed him what I did, and he simply responded that ivermectin is approved for dermatology and that he could prescribe ivermectin cream to replace the fluorouradine cream. I responded that I had lots of ivermectin in isopropanol and didn't need the cream. Yes, I know this is anecdotal, however, I do believe there are alternative therapies, especially to gene therapies that have unknown side effects.

Expand full comment

thank you for posting this! very important information!!

Expand full comment

I'm taking Pembrolizumab for NSCLC. As sick as I am, I don't think Pseudouridine will help!

Expand full comment

Pseudouridine comes much earlier in the piece at the "creating a market" stage?

Expand full comment

I like your taste in music!

Expand full comment

Let me see if i got this correct. We are going to vaccinate w/mRNA to kill cancer that the mRNA covid vaccines created???

Expand full comment

You got it! A bit more sneaky and elegant than the Sacklers who created the opioid epidemic and then moved into treating opioid addiction with their new drug!

Expand full comment

Along the lines of the unproven theory that software companies maliciously create a virus in order to get more people to purchase anti-viral software. Something uneasy about that intentionality theory because it forces me to consider could a businesses be that corrupt that they would even consider doing this.

Expand full comment

They are and they do. Microsoft updates spring to mind.

Expand full comment

There is a general idea that what monopolists or oligopolists always do is this:

1) identify a natural process

2) develop a tech that imitates the natural process

3) assign intellectual property to the tech

4) up-sell (using coercion as needed) the new tech to the suckers who don't know about point 1

5) deny that 1 ever existed

6) use public health propaganda to terrorize everyone to force the monopsonist* of very expensive weapo... I mean... medicines to buy, at a very high price, the new and useless tech that will cause diseases never seen before, as well as much sorrow and gaslighting

7) brainwash young doctors and young scientists in training using the military educative complex so that they never realize they are reasoning and acting as enforcers of the rules of a cult

8) enjoy huge profits!

In this case, the natural process that is denied to exist is the natural and spontaneous remission or cure of any cancer.

The word 'fraud' falls short to describe this operation, in my opinion.

The underpants gnomes are attacking again!

*monopsonist is a symmetric concept of monopolist, and it means 'only one buyer is allowed to buy product X' in the same sense that monopolist means 'only one seller is allowed to sell product X'; almost by definition, the State is the monopsonist.

Expand full comment

Thinking about it, that comment of yours would make a great post on your site.

Expand full comment