73 Comments
User's avatar
Lisa Novakowski's avatar

Can we safely say that the more inoculations of this garbage. The more it weakens the immune system.

Mark Much's avatar

Yes, although Peter Hotez is still urging us to get more jabs.

Suzy Cue's avatar

He is an evil imbecile. Also, mentally ill. He needs to be ignored and/or mocked.

Mark Much's avatar

Or arrested with Bill and Faucho and charged with crimes against humanity.

Lilly's avatar

Hotez! The damn captured CDC tells pregnant women to get it and they also push for 6 wk & older infants to get shots.

Mark Much's avatar

Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier did warn that everyone who got the jabs should be tested for AIDS and that a large percentage would be dead in 5 years.

norica's avatar

And now G. Vanden Bossche is warning of the potential highly contagious aids like variant. He admits that he may be wrong, but the possibility is scary. Humans have introduced an unnatural virus that has become endemic. The likelihood that this could get worse is much higher than already existing viruses that have already played out their evolutionary path and to which we have previously been exposed . Logic 101

Lilly's avatar

I would not believe anything that comes from these muppets.

Esteban's avatar

Millions of dollars of propaganda did not work on me.

Pureblood and proud

Drop Stix's avatar

That's one of the most fascinating parts about all this. Can we predict with any certainty who is not susceptible to such propaganda? I haven't been able to pin down any clear patterns amongst the people I know. Rich, poor, highly educated, left school early, blue/white collar, male/female, old/young.

Intelligent people still took the jabs and trusted the health sector had their backs and wouldn't lie. How much of that was coercion and how much naivety/trust in the propaganda is hard for me to isolate with any certainty. Maybe 50/50?

What made them blind to what many of us thought was so obvious, even when we tried to explain it to them? I fear if we don't figure that out and address it, what was once thought of as inconceivable will happen again.

Sandy K's avatar

Turn off the TV...I have never owned the beast and stopped watching in 1969...learned meditation & yoga in early 70's. Namaste!

Lilly's avatar

I quit believing in the news back during the Gulf war. Then when covidsmovid rolled in, I would cut the TV on at night, it was left in whatever channel there was. And some world news came/comes on at 4am and repeats for 3 hours. I would hear the things they were saying and literally be talking back to the TV, asking it, 'Have you lost your mind?'

I had to start changing the station, as soon as I cut it on. Things got much better after I started doing that. While I wasn't sitting down in front of it, it was for background noise. If it were up to me, I would have had music cranked up.

Drop Stix's avatar

It's sometimes useful to keep abreast of what is being spoon fed the unsuspecting and terminally gullible, so I watch TV often, especially 'news' channels. Apart from that, I do agree with the yoga recommendation, although the version I practise most these days is kayoga. My next kayak will be named "safe and effective" :-)

norica's avatar

Yes. Also, this helps to avoid the echo chamber of confirmation bias. I hate that term, but it fits.

norica's avatar

This is great to hear.

norica's avatar

Sample size of one: 95 % of everyone I know not only bought the propaganda, they still subscribe to it and double down every time logic challenges them.

Lilly's avatar

95% sounds about right.

Marie Long's avatar

I keep remembering what my mother said to me long ago -- if everyone else is jumping of the cliff, are you going to as well.....

Lilly's avatar

It's a phenomenon that has been going on for all of time. You can't address it for the reasons that you can't figure out who.

Drop Stix's avatar

I wonder if it's a learned trait or just the way some of us are hard-wired. I mean, if indoctrinati...ooops, I mean, schools, had, for the last few decades, classes on critical thinking or anything that justified or championed a healthy degree of scepticism as a civic duty would that have helped? i dunno.

John Curran, in 1790 (why do we continue to never learn enough from the cycles of the past), wrote:

"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt."

Lilly's avatar

Abstract concept teaching introduced by Dept of Ed after GenX, pushed emphasizing the 3 R's to back burner.

LibrarianLiz's avatar

You can take a look at the flip side of this, who saw that is was propaganda, or that something was just not right, at Igor Chudov's substack. It's on top of the fold, so to speak. I think it's titled vaccine skeptics are the real [or true?] critical thinkers. It is a couple of years old but it is fascinating to see who saw thru the craziness. There were over 3,000 comments last I looked.

When they said, this was 'safe and effective' for pregnant women, that's when I knew something was up because nothing is safe for pregnant women. Others said they saw 'tells' like from poker games. Others had run from totalitarian governments and recognized the signs. Some knew science and saw things weren't adding up right. And others had dealt with abusive relationships and somehow they knew. I think some of the same tactics were used. These are the main ones I remember. I'm sure there are other ways people saw.

But yes, I too, have spent much time thinking on why so many did not see. We may be about to see it all again as they ramp up the bird flu.

Suzy Cue's avatar

Esteban - so, what’s your point? To brag about how you’re smarter than others, so they can feel bad? Reread what you wrote in your comment, and put yourself in the other’s person’s shoes. Do you not realize how obnoxious you sound? No one likes a smug braggart. P.S. I also managed to remain unjabbed, but I feel no need to rub it in other peoples’ faces.

Lilly's avatar

He wasn't rubbing it into anyones face. It's thus indignation from ppl like you that irritates the hell out of me.

He stated millions spent on propaganda. (probably billions, @Estaban)

Is that a rub or an observation?

It's attitudes such as yours, Ma'am, that need to cease & desist.

I wonder, did you stand up, speak out from the get-go? Or did you sit back and keep mum on not getting a shot, letting the few who stood up and spoke out from the beginning, stand out front?

How does that read to you? That would be a rub.

Ppl decided whether they would get a shot, that should have been IT, THE END, FINITE. However, TPM who tell the Fed Gov what to do, implemented plans that had already been written. I'm not sure what your level of awareness is with regard to the puppet masters, so you may not know what that means.

anyone can appear put together, strong mentally and physically, emotionally stable, etc in good times. It's when we aren't in good times that a person's true character and strength truly show.

I have a huge amount of compassion ruled by my empathy, however, I learned some time ago, to not let that rule my common sense.

It's an important concept.

Drop Stix's avatar

What you interpret as obnoxious I read as proud and vindicated. To each their own.

norica's avatar

Pride is not something to be proud of

Drop Stix's avatar

Call it whatever you like. Esteban withstood the challenges that many failed or failed to see. A very well done to them, and to us all who, despite pressures from so many different angles, didn't cave or eventually woke up to the astounding manipulation. If you consider that level of self-respect and self-recognition a negative thing or arrogance or automatically undesirably prideful, that's your call.

Again, to each their own.

Lilly's avatar

I suggest that you take your own advice about others shows.

Elroy's avatar

Thank you for writing this! I know more about this topic than I’ve ever wanted to, and I’m not even in the medical field (I’m an engineer)… what I’ve found is so upsetting and concerning. I’m worried about the long-term fallout from all these exploratory injections. I’m also worried that we’ll never really know what was done to people, for all these “products” had EUA approval, and that approval allows the manufacturers to vary the formulation on the fly (with little to no oversight). There are major concerns that the real reason people got batch numbers is because different batches truly did have different formulations, and “they” were watching to see the effects/results (like it was all one big experiment, which I think it was).

One amazing resource I’ve found is howbadismybatch.com I don’t know who put that together (but thank you to who did) as it’s a massive repository of information. VAERS is notorious for underreporting because of its cumbersome and restrictive entry format. I have a feeling true numbers are much higher. It’s all such an epic tragedy.

norica's avatar

Everything you mentioned begs to be elaborated. I agree with all that you have said and would like to know more. Have you considered writing down your ideas?

Elroy's avatar

Uhh… I’m just someone who got caught in the crosshairs of all this Covid stuff, and I have written about it, but only in legal documents that I used to defend myself. I work for a world-known product company, and corporate went dystopian with a creepy Covid mandate (which they’re currently being sued over; multiple lawsuits… I’m not a part of those suits (because I got the company to back off me), but I know all the players). I’m still employed there, but now corporate knows that I know what they did (and it’s bad!), so I kind of have a creepy spotlight on me at the moment.

As you can probably tell, I do feel compelled to share… I have compiled so much tangible information from so many sources over the past many years. I’ve learned about HEK-293, cytokine storms, how these injections are actually cellular genetic treatments, how the big pharma names were just leased to the products, but the substances themselves were really made by DARPA in government facilities (which is why quality is so bad and they are contaminated), I know the nano-lipids used are only for lab use, and not clinical use (as they are known to be massive inflammatories), and I also know that early on in Covid many doctors had figured out that Covid was man-made and had written white papers on the topic and none could get their work published in any medical journals nor publications (like Nature) because all publishers were under orders to route any and all newly submitted papers through the W.H.O. for review (aka, censorship), and any papers exposing Covid for what it really was we’re blocked.

I also know about corporate-government collusion, E.S.G., C.E.I. scoring, financial corruption, and how that and Covid all tie together.

I have enough pieces to know what the bigger picture is… and it’s terrifying. It’s massive. It is being dismantled and crushed, but it’s not really safe to speak openly about the bigger picture yet. Maybe just about bits and pieces, but I’ll get stomped if I put all the pieces together publicly.

I’ll close with just a heads up that there’s more craziness to come in the next few months. I think things will get kind of scary. I hope and pray everyone stays safe and healthy.

norica's avatar

Stay safe and healthy as well

John Day MD's avatar

"BT" means "Bacillus thuringiensis" in my world.

;-}

JayBee's avatar

Thanks for this superb analysis, Jessica.

On observation alone, I noticed the repeat breakthrough infections in family and friends, usually in the 3+ Injection cohort. Not a scientific approach of course, but very telling.

Richard C Phillips's avatar

You are a great scientist with a heart of gold! Thank you for your devotion to truth!

Janna's avatar

More great information from my most trusted source. Thank you.

You may be interested in this YouTube channel. He has been breaking down the igG4 issue in relation to cancer.

https://m.youtube.com/@Merogenomics/search?query=IgG4

Leskunque Lepew's avatar

And.. all of this is being swept under the rug by the powers that be. Everything is fine, and all is well.

All this information should be in all media.

Thank you so much for all your efforts to shed light on this crime against humanity.

now is new's avatar

Its not over as there are many fronts we have to deal with. The Satanic Blood lust

is always hungry. The Unvaccinated will be the front line troops now.

Rod McLean's avatar

Thanks Jessica ,interesting and informative paper. The depletion of the immune system in those individuals receiving the jab will result in an increase in more dangerous and metastatic complications. How do you feel about the hypothesis that as the boosters unleash billions of spike protein in the body ,the resulting antibody enhancement wears down and prematurely ages the immune system leaving the body open to a plethora of diseases and auto immune illness?

Sandy K's avatar

Please attach a PDF of this 'preview' paper so we can save it! Thank you!!!!!

norica's avatar

Keeping up with the research is beyond admirable at this point. Reading this article, I kept saying to myself, "If only people stopped taking boosters. If only people would acknowledge the failed experiment on humanity back in 2021, 2022, 2023? If only. Then we could stop this madness and proclaim these shots are ZERO benefit and all risk!!! " Back in 2021 it was well known that shots caused reactivation of herpes, shingles, cytomegalovirus as well as Bell's palsy, as well as causing immunosuppression

and immunocompromise. It was in the mainstream media!!! So....how on Earth could anyone, knowing this, expect the shot to protect against any viral attack from any source!!! The cognitive dissonance is as insane as saying , "Not voting for Kamala means that you are against women's best interests."

Pete Lincoln's avatar

Interesting. But couldn't this be interpreted as the latter doses are generating fewer AE’s and not necessarily related to more Breakthroughs per dose. Perhaps due to lower amounts of DNA contamination over time. As such, breakthrough reports, which may remain constant represent a higher percentage of VAERS reports.

To assess whether Breakthroughs are increasing if you can get data on number of 1.2,3,4 doses delivered in US you can calculate VAERS reports per dose and compare dose 4 with the lower doses. Far fewer people got dose 4 than dose 2

Jessica Rose's avatar

yes. i will keep trying but this data is very hard to access. the CDC even stopped releasing general counts last year.

Suzy Cue's avatar

Thank you, Jessica Rose. Excellent information. But…are we preaching to the choir? How do you get more folks to see this kind of info?

Drop Stix's avatar

I recently openly mused on one of Steve Kirsch's articles how great it would be to erect a billboard opposite a local clinic and display many important study conclusions, etc for both patients and practitioners to read. It turns out they did that. Would love to do it here in NZ.

sumpaul's avatar

Put it on your t-shirt and wear it every day.

I get some 'looks', smiles and interesting conversations.

All of which are useful in building awareness and creating connections.

Aquila's avatar

"Safe and effective." Lol!

Make sure you're "up to date" with your "boosters". Lol!

Or "public servants" will fire you and exclude you from society.