208 Comments
author

I really appreciate and love you all, and that includes the guys who run Substack. We really need you!

Expand full comment

Thank you, Jess. I hope I didn’t alarm you more than necessary with my ever more strident claims that these injections were designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors. But that is what my steady gaze is telling me and no one has rebutted what I’ve said. I was in the engine room of many teams involved daily in so-called structure-based (or “rational”) drug design for decades. I also have a training in mechanistic toxicology.

I know how extraordinarily sensitive we all were to the “maybe this aspect might represent a toxicological issue” at all times. Two main failure modes of new mechanisms of action pharmaceuticals are (1) failure to show efficacy (our medical hypothesis was wrong) & (2) safety issues in the context of the intended use precluded further development.

Failures like these are ones daily reality. We’re nowhere near as clever at guessing ahead of time what’s going to work and what’s going to be safe.

A general rule of thumb is that powerful mechanisms tend not to be very safe. That’s probably why most drugs are either tepid in their usefulness or carry liabilities that have to be tiptoed around.

This dictum wasn’t popular but I wasn’t in the business of trying to be popular.

In the case of public health interventions, the priority is SAFETY, not efficacy, because huge numbers of people are going to be get exposed who never were at risk.

Knowing what I do, there was not the slightest possibility that the intentions here were other than to cause harms.

You’re right: they’re going to do it again.

Every version of mRNA-based products is going to be unavoidably, axiomatically unsafe and this is well known to my peers involved in their design.

Even at this late stage, I issue this demand that they stop what they are doing, resign and join me in the trenches.

It wouldn’t take many of you to push these lunatics into the sea where they belong. But I need back up.

Thank you, Jess. Your clear thinking is more than good enough.

Expand full comment

I appreciate your perspective on this, Jessica. I respect people on both sides of this debate and and am happy to engage in dialogue with people of differing views on this and any other topic.

My own focus is on propaganda, and within that framework, I know language is used to control people’s perceptions of reality, so calling what occurred during COVID a “pandemic” was the precept used to justify all ensuing tyranny and democidal policies. I have been exposing this linguistic manipulation of perception to induce thought-stifling fear since my first Substack article in April 2021:

• “A Primer for the Propagandized: Fear Is the Mind-Killer”: https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/a-primer-for-the-propagandized

In “What If They Threw a Pandemic & Nobody Came?” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/what-if-they-threw-a-pandemic-and), I cite extensively from a 2009 “Forbes” article titled “The Pandemic Is Political” in which Michael Fumento observes:

“As evidence continues to mount that swine flu is more of a piglet than a raging razorback, why isn’t curiosity mounting as to why the World Health Organization declared it a pandemic? And definitions aside, why does the agency continue to insist we’re going to get hammered? The answers have far less to do with world health than with redistribution of world wealth.”

He notes:

“Medically, the pandemic moniker is unjustifiable. When the sacrosanct World Health Organization (WHO) made its official declaration in June, we were 11 weeks into the outbreak, and swine flu had only killed 144 people worldwide …

“So how could WHO make such an outrageous claim?

“Simple. It rewrote the definition of ‘pandemic.’

“A previous official definition (and widely used unofficial one) required ‘simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.’ Severity—that is, the number—is crucial, because seasonal flu always causes worldwide simultaneous epidemics. But one promulgated in April just days before the announcement of the swine flu outbreak simply eliminated severity as a factor.”

This 2009 redefinition during the swine flu dress rehearsal set the stage for the globally coordinated fear campaign and is what enabled them to impose tyranny so swiftly in 2020. (Mistakes Were NOT Made.)

The reason it is important to push back against calling what occurred during COVID a “pandemic” is because that term generates the fear, panic, and legal parameters that permit wide-scale totalitarianism. That triggering term will be used during the next escalation to tyranny under the guise of public health, which will be even more dangerous if WHO is endowed with the one-world supranational powers it is presently seeking.

Denis Rancourt’s research makes it clear there was no impact on mortality from COVID itself but only in direct relation to the lethal protocols. When we call what happened during COVID a “pandemic,” we lend cover to the perpetrators of these murderous policies and obscure the fact that the deaths were human-caused rather than disease-caused, and this not only deters our efforts to hold the perpetrators accountable but paves the path for rinse-and-repeat atrocities (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/eulogy-for-the-covid-kapos and https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-amnesty-demanders).

Instead, we need to lay bare the artifice of the propaganda-concocted illusion that there was a dangerous contagious disease and help people see what would have happened had conventional approaches been applied. This is what I tried to capture in “A Very Boring Story About What Could Have Been in Under 200 Words,” and I encourage everyone to spend two minutes watching Visceral Adventure’s delightful animation of my short story and then share it to help us make this a reality for future so-called pandemics:

https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/a-very-boring-story-about-what-could-900

Expand full comment

There was a plandemic. Do not trust anyone who can’t say this was a depopulation effort . I have had more than my share of dead babies and turbo cancer at my job . One of which I got fired from .

Expand full comment

I was getting so depressed by all the "infighting" in the last couple of weeks. This brilliant substack shows me that the people I've trusted from the start are the right people, our hearts are the same even if my brain cannot match up. I will continue to trust my instincts, thank you so much Jessica.

Expand full comment

LOL WEF "‘how to regain public trust’. Yeah, good luck with that, assholes."

Expand full comment

The only pandemic I have witnessed in the last 4 years has been one composed of an almost total absence of logical and critical thinking at a global level.

It has been the skilfully orchestrated consequence of a worldwide eugenics project that is intended to be the culmination of an idea that is more than a century old.

To achieve this, the oldest and most effective tactic for defeating the enemy before the battle has even been fought has been used: the instilling of fear in the designated victim.

The fear was planned, generated, nurtured and whipped up to the maximum tolerable level, which in this case can easily be compared to the content of the book "The shock doctrine" by author Naomi Klein, and it worked perfectly.

Humanity has found itself in the role of the deer on the railway track unable to leap out of the mortal danger heading towards it, paralysed as it is by fear and blinded by the headlight of the locomotive bearing down on it.

Nothing, absolutely nothing, holds him back... except fear.

If we add to this a skilful blend of the principles and observations contained in 'The crowd: A study of the popular mind' and 'Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media', the recipe has proved almost perfect.

Has there really been a medical pandemic?

Given that mortality rates for the usual and recurrent respiratory diseases have "almost magically disappeared" at the same time as this supposed pandemic was "born".

Whereas the most effective drugs for treating them have become inaccessible, and have even been declared lethal and banned from sale.

Whereas inhumane and lethal "treatments" have been imposed on the weakest and most defenceless.

Whereas before the flood of injections of gene therapies, authorised hastily and indiscriminately, the total number of deaths, from all causes, had not varied in such a way as to indicate or suggest a real pandemic, in accordance with the definition in force according to the medical dictionary before it was rewritten by the proponents and champions of life-saving injections.

Whereas the number of deaths from all causes has begun to show a marked and remarkable increase, following the tidal wave of gene therapy injections and other unspeakable coercive measures incomprehensible to any logical and empathetic mind.

The answer that follows from the above is a categorical NO, if we stick to the 'true' definition of the medical meaning of the word pandemic.

In fact, everything that has been achieved so far could be understood in a different light if we apply the principles of binary explosives to what we have seen over the last 4 years.

We could compare what has been achieved so far as phase 1 of the process.

PHASE 1

20 gene therapy manufacturers have produced more than 90 different recipes (still unknown to this day), each with variations (batch number).

In addition, it has been claimed that a person can safely receive injections from different manufacturers.

It should also be remembered that certain races and ethnicities were more intensely affected by these miracle recipes which, according to someone who for the past few days seems to have been suffering from selective amnesia , were supposed to protect against everything, even death.

Add to this the fact that the VAERS disclaimer (https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html) clearly states that:

"VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS. Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the public".

So isn't it possible, or even likely, that the manufacturers of these miracle products have accumulated enough informations to allow them to move on to phase 2?

PHASE 2

FEAR

"Whereas it has been shown that events of intense fear leave biological traces in the brain known as engrams.

Until now, engrams have mainly been observed in the frontal cortex and the amygdala, brain regions linked to the management of emotions, but new discoveries are also implicating the hypothalamus, a very primitive brain region that is involved in the secretion of hormones that trigger all the body's responses, such as the acceleration of the heart, sweating and above all reflex gestures: either immobility or flight" ( Informations taken from : FEAR LEAVES TRACES IN OUR BRAIN https://www.planetesante.ch/Magazine/Psycho-et-cerveau/Mecanismes-du-cerveau/La-peur-laisse-des-traces-dans-notre-cerveau )

When fear reaches a certain level and lasts long enough, it leaves indelible traces that programme future behaviour and attitudes.

Reactivating fear, and the submissiveness it engenders, is much easier because humans are already conditioned and in a state of potential hyper-reactivity.

So, for the next eugenics attack, already planned and improved by the knowledge acquired at the psychological level, the planning and implementation of the fear element will be greatly facilitated.

It will be no more complicated than flipping a switch.

No doubt this is why some people, gathered in a certain place this week, have chosen to hold their meeting under the theme: "Rebuilding trust" in order to prepare the fertile and profitable ground for obedience.

For those who have understood this from the start, there will be no surprises and their resistance should only increase.

RECIPES FOR GENE THERAPY

Given all the "privileged" information to which the ''chefs from hell '' have had access, it is likely that their next recipes will be sufficiently effective to quickly make the gullible and those weakened by 4 years of physical, psychological and economic war bend over backwards.

What's more, this data should enable them to target very precisely the groups they have chosen to decimate first.

Add to this other data available from genetic data banks, some of which have official links with pharmaceutical giants, not to mention the theft of millions of records from some DNA banks.

The amount of official and unofficial informations available would make it possible to develop the ultimate biological weapon, if someone took the trouble to subscribe to such a project...

Will it be disease X or Y?

I don't know.

Will there be another ‘ declared ‘ pandemic?

Without a doubt.

If someone tells you they've seen and spoken to Santa Klaus, should you believe it ?

That's the question.

If enough of us hold fast, the second element of this binary explosive will be lacking and it will be nothing more than a damp squib.

I leave you here with the words of someone really gifted :

“THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated”

― Thomas Paine, The Crisis

Manufacturers

AstraZeneca, Bharat Biotech, Biological E Limited, CanSino Biologics, Chumakov Centre

Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, HIPRA, Janssen ,Moderna

Novavax , Pasteur Institute of Iran (IPI) and the Finlay Institute of Vaccines of Cuba , Pfizer-BioNTech

Sanofi-GSK, Shifa Pharmed, Sinopharm , Sinovac Biotech, University of Queensland - The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedeness Inovations (CEPI), University of Queensland and the Australian pharmaceutical company CSL Limited

Valneva ,Vector State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology

Worldwide Recipes Names

Ad26.COV2.S, Ad26COVS1, AD5-nCOV , Aurora-CoV , BBIBP-CorV , BBV152 , BECOV2D , BIBP vaccine

Bimervax , Biological E COVID-19 , BIV1-CovIran , Bivalent Omicron 4/BA. 5 , Bivalent Omicron 5

Bivalent Omicron BA , Bivalent Original , BNT162b2 , ChAdOx1-S / Vaxzevria , Comirnaty , Convidecia

Corbevax , CoronaVac , Covaxin , COVID-19 mRNA vaccine ( nucleoside-modified )

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Moderna , COVID-19 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccine ( mRNA )

COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna Intramuscular Injection , COVID‑19 Vaccine Moderna

COVIran Barakat , COVIran Barekat , COVIran Barkat , Covishield , CoviVac , Covovax

CX-024414 , Elasomeran , EpiVacCorona , EpiVacCorona-N , Famtozinameran , FINLAY-FR-2

Gam-COVID-Vac , Hayat-Vax , Imelasomeran , Janssen , Jcovden , JNJ-78436735 ,

Johnson & Johnson COVID‑19 vaccine , Medigen COVID-19 vaccine , Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine

mRNA-1273 , MVC COVID-19 vaccine , MVC-COV1901 , Novavax COVID-19 vaccine , Nuvaxovid

NVX-COV2373 , Pasteurcovac , PastoCovac , Pfizer-BioNTech , PiCoVacc , QazCoVac-P , QazCovid-in

QazVac , Riltozinameran , SARS-CoV-2 rS , SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp , Sinopharm BIBP COVID-19 vaccine

Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine , Sinopharm WIBP COVID-19 vaccine , Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine

Soberana 02 , Soberana 2 , Spikevax , Spikevax XBB.1.5 , Sputnik V , TAK-019 , TAK-919 , Tozinameran

V451 , VAC31518 , Valneva COVID-19 vaccine , VAT00002 , VAT00008 , Vaxzevria , VIDPREVTYN BETA

VLA2001 , VLA2101 , WIBP-CorV , Zhong'aikewei , Zhongkangkewei , .ZyCoV-D

Expand full comment

It is ridiculous that people who essentially had the same painful shared experience over the last 3 years end up fighting over semantics. Bad way for story to end.

Expand full comment

> I think SARS-2 became endemic very quickly because, well: nature.

Where is your evidence that "SARS-2" (SARS-CoV-2) exists?

Oh that's right. There is none.

In fact, it's FAR WORSE then there just being No Virus.

CON-VID has:

👉NO New, Unique, & defining Syndrome! That's STEP ZERO!!!

👉NO Rigorous Etiology, inc. a search for a TOXIC cause (of the non-distinguishing syndrome)

👉NO Suspect Pathogen Isolated (No Virus!)

👉NO Proof that the missing, CGI, computer model virus causes the non-distinguishing syndrome, WHAT JOKE THIS ALL IS!)

👉NO Validated Lab Test, calibrated to real-world CRM (Certified Reference Material... because NONE EXISTS)

👉NO Differential Diagnosis! SEE: https://mikestone.substack.com/p/differential-diagnosis

Jessica Rose: GET WITH THE MODERN ERA, and FOLLOW THE SCIENCE!

If you claim that SARS-CoV-2 exists (has been isolated, and proven to be both pathogenic [causes cell necrosis AND symptomatic disease] AND transmissible between hosts using normal modes of exposure), THEN LET US SEE YOUR PROOF.

Otherwise, you should STAND DOWN with your Pseudoscience and Virus Pushing.

Thanks.

Expand full comment

In my experience, those arguing that there was 'no pandemic' comprises a large group of people who argue that there was no novel virus, that GOF is a 'myth' and even that viruses do not exist. The latest revelations, if I am not mistaken, prove beyond all reasonable doubt that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was real, synthetic (not natural, NOT a goddamn zoonosis) and that it was manufactured via a very specific process by specifically identifiable persons. It was then released or 'escaped', transmitted from person to person via airborne pathways, infected people via the respiratory tract mainly, AND caused disease (sometimes serious/fatal) in a small section of the population. Covid disease, as explained by Pierre Kory, WAS in fact diagnosable and presented as a 'novel' set of symptoms - without the need for any particular symptom to be novel in itself. There, sorted, can we please stop bickering about this now and accusing one another of being 'controlled opposition'.

Expand full comment

I was called an anti-vaxer, conspiracy theorist too many times in 2020. I'm now feeling a little more smug, thanks to people like Jessica.

Expand full comment

One step is to go on the offensive, not to "hang 'em high"-- that can come later-- but to build shields such that whatever they do can do minimal damage. For example:

Insist on informed consent to all medications. Deny all medical mandates and overturn Supreme Court decisions that supported mandates, such as Jacobson 1905 and Buck v Bell, 1927. The 'evil' of allowing people to refuse medical measures is far outweighed by the evil of mandating them. This evil of mandates has a trajectory running from eugenics in America to eugenics in Nazi Germany (yes, indeed it does) and on to the unethical and harmful Covid measures and vaccines. We can now see that trajectory, and we have to stop it.

Take away the emergency powers of governments, as these are the tools of tyrants everywhere.

Decentralize government and medical care. We don't need the UN or the WHO to watch over us and tell us what to do, and we don't need dictates coming from the CDC and the FDA.

Power, intelligence and agency belong to individuals. Power over individuals doesn't belong to the government.

Underlying the massive, undue and dictatorial power of the federal government is the money-printing authority of the Fed and the inflation it causes, and above that the secrecy and immunity from legal attacks of the globalist bank, the Bank for International Settlements. This top-down monetary framework is how global control is instituted, and it has to be curtailed.

We have a lot of work to do. But first we have to see that the monster is government power and that the collectivist argument-- that government can represent "the greater good" and make dictates for the good of all-- is an utterly failed conceit, and that individual self-determination is the only way toward a free society.

Expand full comment

Bobby Kennedy took some heat for allowing that recent events constituted a “real” pandemic while other pandemics have been fake. By strict definition I don’t think he was wrong. It’s just that the word has powerful connotations of mass death like the plagues of centuries past caused by the pathogen. What about this one?

“Fake” I believe means “the boy who cried wolf” so to speak. Swine flu was a fake pandemic. But the vaccine was a bust so we toughed it out. Thank goodness. What innocent times when a vaccine program was curtailed merely because it was killing people.

Here again, there was an ugly bug, but GMO this time. How do you cure that? If it’s GMO you use Roundup or the equivalent: Remdesivir. Right? Makes sense. It was going to kill you anyway. Right? Wrong. Ioannidas at Stanford knew it wouldn’t. His repeat estimates with ever expanding data sets got the same answer. The mortality of the virus in a “let ‘er rip” scenario was not zero but a tiny fraction of what happened. With common sense treatments you get to near zero quickly.

The GMO bug wasn’t a big deal for me personally. Or the Mrs. Our symptoms were identical including temporary loss of SOS. We got the fancy nucleic acid test. Positive. Don’t bother us with that antibody crap. Other folks ... lots of them, I guess ... had low O2 levels and needed some help if the spike exposure got too far along. As we know there was a very deadly bioweapon called “hospital protocols and doctors” that sent hundreds of thousands if not 1M Americans to COVID heaven. We can call it a “traditional” pandemic if we expand the definition to death by Federal and industry interventions aided by mass media on the take. Hospital protocols and shots. Had we rolled out LOCAL interventions ... boutique repurposed drugs, horse dewormer, nasal sprays and whatever works ... the death toll would have been minimal.

This means we had a pandemic of human evil and stupidity in equal measure. It’s not “stupid” if killing everybody was the intent. Had the shots been manufactured with statutory controls and testing of content to assure uniformity of mRNA octane, the program might very well have killed ALMOST everybody. All of Biden’s electorate, to start. Do they not understand this? No. That is the problem of censorship and media manipulation of public perception still potent but somewhat waning.

It’s complicated. I will not be too hard on Bobby Kennedy ... not about this.

Expand full comment

Diamond Princess. IFR .15% vast majority over age life expectancy. If there was no new nomenclature, and normal protocols for respiratory illness enacted eg. antibiotics would anything have looked different?

Expand full comment

Dr. Unacceptable Jessica/Joan of Arc and Dr Mike Yeadon, are 2 wonderful Scientific Souls that had it right from the get go.. when this maddening era is over you will be remembered as Guardians of Mankind .. Guardians of Science.. Thank you both for Rockin it thru this Psyop with Real Excellence each and everyday.. !!

Expand full comment

There was NO pandemic OR any virus.

The corrupt to core WHO had merely changed pandemic criteria from excess mortality to excess cases, and through the fraudulent misuse of PCR generated data to create the illusion of a pandemic.

Germ theory is complete bullshit.

The way I see it now is there are 3 distinct groups. Group 1 are the Covidiots, the obedient type, who still believe everything, will mask up, take jabs etc etc as soon as they are instructed. The gormless GPs who lack any critical thinking ability, and whose careers have probably been spent following a path set out in front of them WITHOUT any deviation are also in this group. Mainstream media/ Big Pharma must prevent any information getting to these sheeple. These are to be fed with never ending bullshit variants to keep the fear going.

Group 2 are those who know something is wrong/dangerous/ criminal with the jabs and have abandoned mandated vax programmes and have left Group 1 never to return , certainly not with Sars Cov2 and variants. In this group there are GPs with zero morals, who know full well the harm modern 'medicine' and vaccination is doing, but carry on dishing the garbage out because they are protected by government and captured regulators. This lot have abandoned the 'do no harm' principle for their own financial security. The other 'professionals' in this group are the 'courageous' ones who speak out about the CONvid jabs and the dangers/deaths/injuries. This lot though have to cling onto Germ theory bullshit or their entire careers have been built on a lie. The 'non' professionals who have, over time, left Group 1 regards the 'courageous' professionals as their friends . They 'non' professional MUST be kept onboard with germ theory at all cost, and most certainly must not join group 3.

Group 3 know that germ theory is complete rubbish, and the likes of Jenner, Pasteur, Koch etc were complete frauds plus Rockafella medicine is the root of modern day 'ills'.

Having spent probably 18 months in group 2 , before researching the history of medicine, terrain and Antoine Beauchamp, I am now in Group 3 never to go anywhere near the other 2 !!

I do appreciate the courage of those who have spoken out though.

I am a qualified Chemist from the 1980s, spent 25+ years mainly in analytical chemistry involving untold method development and validation. I never joined group 1 because in early Feb 2020 I heard about the Drosden/Croman PCR test method hastily rubber stamped by the WHO (without validation) and knew something fishy was about to happen. I did not know enough about the human immune system to solidify my position. Therefore, at the age of 61, I started a part time degree course on Human sciences, Epidemiology and Immunology in 2020. I discovered Jessica through a 3rd party and reading her work has helped me (Many thanks). As I progress I am starting to run in 'conflicts' with my tutors (mainly with vaccination 'successes' ) . The last year of my course could be interesting!!

Expand full comment