Focused take-down of the bad guys

Some words and re-iterations

There is a lot of ongoing ‘debate’ pertaining to whether or not there was a pandemic. I am in quite a few ‘Whatsapp’ groups and this morning I decided to contribute to one in the context of an ongoing ‘was there a pandemic?’ debate in my own attempt to help provide clarity from an etymological point of view.

I wrote this just now:

pan = all, epi = upon, en = in, demos = people

A pandemic refers to an all-people-affecting 'thing.' The 'thing' is what peeps are arguing about. However, regardless of the 'thing' - be it a novel lab-engineered pathogen, 'PCR testing' with cts>40 or injections - there was a pandemic. If the 'thing' is the former or the latter (maybe even the middle), endemic states are next. I think SARS-2 became endemic very quickly because, well: nature. It has obviously happened in the latter because the shots are affecting everyone, continuously, even those who weren't injected. And 'testing' continues of course - not the testing that would make sense, however which would be antibody testing. Heaven forbid we should do anything that makes sense.

Agencies (like WHO/CDC) and governments alike, decided to add onto the word 'pandemic' (all-people-affecting thing) to include the not-necessarily-inclusive idea that the thing affecting the people is NOVEL: all-people-affecting NEW thing.

To me, it's easy to see, in the case of pathogens at least, that they (WHO/CDC) were not 'intelligent' to add this adjective, but 'knowledgeable': they know pathogens are lab-made for their pre-emptive vaccine/bioweapons research projects. SARS-2 (more specifically, the spike) was engineered in a lab. See Alex Washburne's work.

There was a pandemic. Whatever 'thing' people want to accept as the 'thing' is fine with me at this point. But we must collectively focus on stopping 1. illegal bioweapons research and 2. vaccine authorization without appropriate trialing and 3. the modified mRNA platform - especially this saRNA crap and 4. total lack of control/transparency in health policy decision-making from unelected organizations and NGOs is key.

I realize that accepting multiple versions of what the ‘thing’ is, comes with problems from the point of view of establishing ‘what actually happened?’ with regard to the onset of the ‘pandemic’. If we don’t have a correctly established problem, how can we find a solution, right? The pathogen released was not deadly to most people as it was being portrayed - and subsequently and continuously used to get everyone injected - but it’s possible that we lucked into this outcome.

The lockdowns were deadly. The injections are deadly. Withholding standard off-label treatments and drugs was and is deadly. Think secondary pneumonia.

The key is focused destruction of the things propagating lies and unwarranted fear. It is indeed hard to figure out who is lying. But there are tells. Having said that, not everyone is lying: sometimes, it’s just a disagreement of semantics as if the case with the word ‘pandemic’. But in this specific context, the important question to ask is not whether or not there was a pandemic, but whether or not the ‘thing’ was, and will be, harmful, so we can ensure this ‘pandemic’ stunt isn’t pulled again. I think they will try, by the way, not long into the near future, and if they have these sickening IHR amendments in place and the glabalistic (NOT a typo) hold on health care policy and decisions in place, then we’re going to be screwed. All countries need to withdraw from the WHO, I think, and establish their own sovereign techniques to keep populations healthy. It’s what we did before the WHO.

The concern in of all us is the ‘declaration of a new pandemic’, even for those who don’t believe there was one by any definition. This is one of the things that the WEF members are scheming about in Davos right now. Their primary agenda talking point (if you don’t know) is ‘how to regain public trust’. Yeah, good luck with that, assholes. When they ‘declare a new pandemic’, this word ‘pandemic’ should make everyone’s eyebrow go up. Just one. As in, re-hee-hee-hee-heee-lly. Now, this is not to say that they’re not GOFing the next take-down pathogen, but more likely is that they will be symptom-laundering the shot effects using the guise of some ‘normal pathogen’ for which people ‘aren’t getting vaccinated against anymore’. The blame will always be shifted to us.

Whether or not there is something actually new and deadly, is the more pertinent thing to focus on. In my opinion, there will neither be a new nor a deadly thing with regard to a pathogen. But this is just my opinion based on observing tyranny for the past 4 years. They won’t need one.

Here’s a short list of pandemic (all-people-affecting) things that SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED NEAR HUMANS AGAIN.

1. Lockdowns

2. Masks in people who do not strictly require PPE

3. Quarantine of the healthy

4. Mandatory ANYTHING

5. Modified mRNA-LNP platforms

6. Gain of function pathogens and/or development

7. Globalization of health care or economy

It is clear, crystal clear in fact, that the insanity of buggering around with mother nature - viruses and genes, for example - is not going to end well, especially if strictly in the hands of sponsors and funding agencies who say things like this very publicly: ‘now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care [and] reproductive health services, we could lower [the projected population count of 9 billion] by perhaps 10 or 15%’.

Ghates is talking about slowing down population growth in the above quote that you can find here in the context of ‘reproductive health services’, and I think that is concerning.

Essential reading (sorry for the self-plug):

and

The Smoking Gun

The preprint referred to in both articles above can be found here.

Everyone should read author Alex Washburne’s work. His work is absolutely wonderful.

A short history of SARS-CoV-2 Origins

I am going to leave it at that for now. Sorry for the fast and furious article - I jotted all this down in one go and didn’t refine my ideas.

To summarize, dangerous pathogens are being made and played with, gene therapy technology is being normalized, good safety studies (by any sane person’s definition) for the modified mRNA-LNP technologies have been by-passed and this extends into the foreseeable future. We must stop globalization of all things at all cost, and when the petrol-dollar collapses, for GOD’S SAKE, do not run to the arms of the CBDC assholes.

Please take a deep breath, hum your favorite tune, and let your thoughts quieten. The answers will become clearer.

Time and practice makes a perfect version of imperfect. I am going surfing.

Addendum: Read this entitled: “US scientists proposed to make viruses with unique features of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan”, and follow Emily Kopp.