What I would really love is for a working group of three or four substack researchers to systematically go through all the vaccine research. I strongly suspect they will find endless examples of methodology and protocols that were basically designed to make sure the vaccine looked good.
In short
Fraud, deliberately
What I would really love is for a working group of three or four substack researchers to systematically go through all the vaccine research. I strongly suspect they will find endless examples of methodology and protocols that were basically designed to make sure the vaccine looked good.
Get "Turtles all the Way Down", edited by Mary Holland, ISBN 978-965-598-146-9 to get a complete picture documented and cited of the fraud that's been perpetrated by 'science' for 100 years now. Or "Murder by Injection" by Eustace Mullins ISBN 978-1-911417-00-2...or "Deadly Medicines and Organized Crimes" by Peter Gotzsche ISBN978-1-84619-844-7....I'm a biologist and went on a DEEEEP dive about 12 years ago....holy sh*t, as we say in the vernacular....
Use of relative risk, rather than absolute risk, is a prime example of this. I have seen this used repeatedly to justify certain horrors. We have seen the use of mice trials to justify human injections. We have seen doctored placebos used to disguise damage done by test substances.
As a physicist, with some knowledge of statistics, I am out of my lane and depth in many of these papers. I can often see, however, where scientific method is being abused.
If REAL legislators ever control power in Congress, one of the first things they should do is to force rule changes in all Gov't agencies that require ethical statistical design and analysis -- REAL placebos replacing all fake placebos being just one. (ie. Absolute risk replacing relative risk [new vaccine compared to Saline solution, not another vax])
What I would really love is for a working group of three or four substack researchers to systematically go through all the vaccine research. I strongly suspect they will find endless examples of methodology and protocols that were basically designed to make sure the vaccine looked good.
In short
Fraud, deliberately
Get "Turtles all the Way Down", edited by Mary Holland, ISBN 978-965-598-146-9 to get a complete picture documented and cited of the fraud that's been perpetrated by 'science' for 100 years now. Or "Murder by Injection" by Eustace Mullins ISBN 978-1-911417-00-2...or "Deadly Medicines and Organized Crimes" by Peter Gotzsche ISBN978-1-84619-844-7....I'm a biologist and went on a DEEEEP dive about 12 years ago....holy sh*t, as we say in the vernacular....
Science is broken.
Ego, intellectual conservativism, financial corruption.
So much pretend junk science.
People say trust the Science the way they used to say Trust Jesus.
Real honest Science is to be found here on Substack, not in the medical industry, academic industry or government.
Yes, I love these substack scientists with all my heart!!!
Great idea.
Use of relative risk, rather than absolute risk, is a prime example of this. I have seen this used repeatedly to justify certain horrors. We have seen the use of mice trials to justify human injections. We have seen doctored placebos used to disguise damage done by test substances.
As a physicist, with some knowledge of statistics, I am out of my lane and depth in many of these papers. I can often see, however, where scientific method is being abused.
If REAL legislators ever control power in Congress, one of the first things they should do is to force rule changes in all Gov't agencies that require ethical statistical design and analysis -- REAL placebos replacing all fake placebos being just one. (ie. Absolute risk replacing relative risk [new vaccine compared to Saline solution, not another vax])