42 Comments
Apr 28, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Thank you for this post. My medical school gave us ZERO guidance on dissecting journal articles and discovering potential pitfalls. Everything I learned about evaluating scientific evidence was in surgery residency and it was spotty at that, wholly inadequate for determining which evidence should influence my practice, which now looks like it is designed to be that way. We are encouraged to "follow the guidelines," but who watches the watchers? Obviously our peer review system is not doing its job.

Dr. Rose, this is beautifully written as usual and made a complex topic understandable. Keep up the great work!

J. Hogan, MD

Expand full comment

Thank you Jessica and also Byram Bridle for calling this one out!

My mental health plummeted just the other day when I was first made aware of this "study". I don't actually want to call it a study either, because it's essentially just a mental game they played with imaginary values plucked out of thin air, from what I can tell.

I saw the hostile nature and the division it was intended to cause. And see the general apathy of those who don't understand. The typical vaccinated citizen.

I feared an imminent witch hunt and felt like I needed to head for the hills or set plans for it. I made a bug out bag. Better safe than sorry.

I have calmed down a bit now. Thank you. Seriously.

Expand full comment

Great job, Jessica! I’ve been reading your Substack for a while but subscribed after reading this one. I can no longer contain my wish to introduce myself to you as a fellow soldier in this important war. I also have a masters degree in mathematics with a special interest in Dynamical Systems Theory (I was a teaching assistant for an ODE course that used Hirsch and Smale “Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems and Linear Algebra” as the text). I left math after a masters to go to medical school, and am now a practicing psychiatrist, but have been active in the COVID-19 early treatment movement, offering early treatment to my patients when they are left abandoned to no care by their PCP. You can find my name as author #7 on this important paper by Dr. Peter McCullough: https://www.imrpress.com/journal/RCM/21/4/10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.264

Thank you for all you do. I’m a grateful fan of your work.

Expand full comment

Jessica Rose, how is it possible for you to make applied maths understandable to underlings like myself? Thank you for taking the time and effort. Together we will fight the good fight. My mantra, one person at a time. Sometimes uncomfortable, but hopefully planting seeds of doubt in the sheeple.

Expand full comment
Apr 28, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

Thank you for all the amazing work and thorough analysis you provide, as a Unvaccinated Canadian myself it’s comforting to know we have great people like you fighting for the truth and who aren’t controlled or bought by big pharma.

Expand full comment

Bottom line is they will tell any lie in order to vaccinate the control group. As long as we exist, we are a threat to their power. Thanks for being a pit bull on this.

Expand full comment

I love this new scientific accountability movement of calling for the retraction of fraudulent papers.

Here’s another one people can take action on:

https://darbyshaw.substack.com/p/why-this-ivermectin-study-must-be

Expand full comment

still scratching my head on the 'unvax putting vax at increased risk' craziness. um okay, doesn't that mean that the jab DOESN'T WORK? plain and simple logic here. Vulcan children would laugh (if they knew how ;) )

Expand full comment

I can’t read this all right now, but I have read enough to make me angry at the people that I worked for/under/with in an engineering school during lockdown.

All of them played along. And many of them played (modeled) HARD.

Expand full comment

I was a math major, but never took statistics or applied math, so I don't understand your equations, but the last point, that they are invalidly assuming .2 probability of immunity when it is closer to .8 or .9 is quite easy to understand, as is the Fisman's conflicts of interest.

You are right that the entire purpose of the article is to sow division and vilify the unvaccinated. Despicably written and despicably peer reviewed.

Expand full comment

Given the reality of Covid shot damage, both already occurring and the unknown long term, Trudeau's comments are criminal. DO WE TOLERATE HIM?

Expand full comment

Seems like the Diamond Princess was the best Wu-flu transmission experiment. Several thousand elderly passengers mingled on a ship with a population density 50 times greater than Hong Kong's. 80% of the passengers and crew never had symptoms, none of the crew died, and I think just 7 passengers died, a small fraction of one %. This was never anything to fear, anymore than any flu season. Yet the rat bastards at the WEF who control the W.H.O. shut down the world's economy, discouraged early treatments, all to scare people to stay home and wait for a "vaccine" that would save them. But this gene therapy is much deadlier than the virus, which was the whole point. It's so much easier to commit genocide by scaring people to death so they and their kids will eagerly line up to take a death jab than it is to round them up and transport them to extermination camps. Bring on Nuremberg 2.

Expand full comment

Jessica, this is one of your most important articles, and I wish I'd been "first to comment" in order to encourage its wide sharing at the top of the pile. I was writing one up myself, but won't bother to finish it now because I can just point to yours (and will).

Modeling is one of the immensely productive things we do with math. It's also one of the ways people can "lie with statistics" and showing how that happens is important.

As I encourage sharing this article...I'd also like to encourage you to make a video presentation. It could be five minutes, but would be enormously effective.

Expand full comment

You have done an outstanding take-down of this flawed paper! I see that in the last eight hours, WebMD and News Medical have joined the ranks of the other misinformation-spreading outlets. When the paper is ultimately withdrawn thanks to your and Dr. Bridle’s efforts, I hope that the media will report on its flawed nature with the same gusto as it has been reporting on its mistaken findings. Sadly, I know they won’t.

Expand full comment

I know my experience on the ground is anecdotal, but I trust what I see around me way more than I trust any public health official. What I’ve been and am being told is consistently different than what I’m seeing on the ground here in SF Bay Area of California (a very high percentage of which have been injected). Since the shot program began last year, the only people I know who have gotten or get Covid are the ones participating- the v@xed. Everyone around me that is v@xed is getting sick. My unvaccinated friends have and are not. I do, however, know at least four people that have been v@x injured. My story feels like is one of thousands I’ve seen.

Thank you for calling for the retraction of this insidious paper. It’s just straight malicious. And it flies in the face of reality.

Expand full comment

"Unworthy of life/Do we tolerate these people".

One of this quotes was spoken by a high level nazi referring to the jews of poland I believe it was.1943-4 not sure One was said by a high level canadian politician about some of his fellow canadians 2020 not sure In fairness I assume because he is being supported by many of his fellow legislators they must also feel the same way. Just spreading the weight of it, so its a lighter burden for all involved.

These quotes were said in different times I put them in one set of " marks they are they same quote after all. Maybe the times aren't so different.

I heard 50% + of our legislators our Klaus Swhwab(?) grads, not sure if that is contagious or not, hope not. gee now I'm the one that's scared.

As for the study,

The "health by the month" arm of the major investment firms are simply trying to drive profits by scaring everyone within earshot, I think under the newly crafted legislation its legal, you know for the greater good.

A headline like that (injected vs non injected) is more than enough to destroy families work relationships. As to the meat of it,, doesn't matter its a tabloid read just the headline please, just the headline, really its all that's required nothing to see here move on.. I guess I won't be going to my sons wedding this summer. I wonder if there is legal action here, hmmmm nope they can say anything they want. Its the law.

My friends back to basics time, we are being data dumped.

I believe they (pharma) are feeding us unending documentation knowing it takes time to process this info:

time is our biggest enemy and their biggest friend.

There will be more and more bright and shinny catastrophes to distract and overwhelm. Such as double digit inflation, bankruptcies war, next pandemic on and on.

We forgot WMD bank collapse etc... we dont talk about them anymore and nothing happened to the perps even though WMD lie cost 100,000 +lives and the lie was proven.

time is our biggest enemy and their biggest friend.

does ivermectin/hydroxy work, when did they know who knew who suppressed it.

As they drive home"safe and effective" we must drive

"does ivermectin/hydroxy work, when did they know/ who knew/who suppressed it".

If we can prove that one point everything else falls everything else was WMD

"does ivermectin/hydroxy work, when did they know/ who knew/who suppressed it"

We need to start at the top and go down. Nice thing is the truth is on our side and that one thing is an easy point to prove, easy to sell, easy to prosecute.

As a bonus every politician that said we have to wait for the "safe and effective" vaccine at the cost of 15,000 lives a day is guilty of at least something you decide?????

I don't capitalize canada anymore, where my heart lives.

Shawn663

Expand full comment