Share this comment
Thanks Jessica as ever for your balance and brilliance. Other factors IMHO certainly include the rollout of 5G, LED streetlights and street cameras, and people's proximity, exposure, mitigation, etc., with respect to these weapon systems. See the work of Mark Steele, saveusnow.substack.com, and Anders O Brunstad, e.g., rumble.com/v4j65hx-ande…
© 2025 Jessica Rose
Substack is the home for great culture
Thanks Jessica as ever for your balance and brilliance. Other factors IMHO certainly include the rollout of 5G, LED streetlights and street cameras, and people's proximity, exposure, mitigation, etc., with respect to these weapon systems. See the work of Mark Steele, saveusnow.substack.com, and Anders O Brunstad, e.g., https://rumble.com/v4j65hx-anders-brunstad-excess-deaths-due-to-5g-vaxx-activation.html
Depopulation is the aim, on a scale beyond the worst holocaust imaginings. Indeed, factoring in the climate 'net zero' nonsense, homo sapiens would become completely extinct, along with most of other natural living things too. Not so wise. Anyway thanks, and I remain increasingly optimistic that the house of cards will collapse relatively soon (a year or two at most) and so we manifest the peace and rebuild. It's a soul thing. A fearless love thing. Gratitude and peace.
Whats wrong with LED streetlights, besides being too damn bright?
Krishna, here is a bit of information, but there’s more out there… https://open.substack.com/pub/romanshapoval/p/when-we-dont-see-the-light?r=l7pna&utm_medium=ios
Thanks. That article refers to two different possible dangers: the light emitted and wifi signals that come with some LED lighting packages.
I agree there is lots of established research on the health problems associated with unnatural light (even so-called full spectrum lights) and the goodness of moderate sunlight and keeping a normal daylight schedule.
The study on wifi dangers by Martin L. Pall is at
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300355
However there is a reasonable and scathing review of that wifi study in one of its comments
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118303979
so at best i would say the topic needs more focused and rigorous research.
Great question thanks (gives me opportunity to post links again) see Mark Steele's work at https://saveusnow.substack.com/ and the Anders O Brunstad video with Maria Zeee - https://rumble.com/v4j65hx-anders-brunstad-excess-deaths-due-to-5g-vaxx-activation.html
Please cite some scientific studies. The videos and scaremongering blogs can come afterwards when there is actually some evidence to work with.
Thanks. Mark Steele's videos on saveusnow.substack.com give the evidence. He refers to the use of the word 'scaremongering' too. Ultimately these matters are for each of us to consider and decide. My own view is that Mark Steele is correct. Feel free to contact Mark directly via his substack - and/or challenge him directly. Anders O Brunstad is contactable also, and both of them are members of Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics (MD4CE) founded by UK Dr Stephen Frost and moderated by Charles Kovess - Rumble.com/user/cbkovess. Thanks again.
Thanks for your polite and respectful response! I will check that info