Strive to excel in the science of skepticism. I succeeded on the day of 9/11/2001 when I stopped to do a rough calculation on the energy required to bring down the Twin towers exceeded the impact of a Boeing 767 by a factor of 24 billion to one
Strive to excel in the science of skepticism. I succeeded on the day of 9/11/2001 when I stopped to do a rough calculation on the energy required to bring down the Twin towers exceeded the impact of a Boeing 767 by a factor of 24 billion to one
I had the approximate figures on-hand in 2001. It was based on amount of fuel in a B-767 and the consequence of the impact on both Twin Towers constructed with a steel inner core and and outer steel "chassis" that made them the strongest buildings in the world in many respects. Each of the 110 floors was a full acre in size. Jet fuel impact on steel was almost no consequence and the aluminum aircraft construction was no match for the steel outer chassis and inner steel core. CGI trickery was used to make it appear the jet entered the building. My goal was to estimate the number of times the towers would need to be impacted by a fully fueled 767 in order to approximate the result of near free-fall collapse. Since then I discovered one of the aircraft that reportedly hit the tower was found to be in service for several years following 9/11. It was then that I realized it was all a false-flag lie and no planes hit the buildings. So the 24 Billion number is far too low. See the Tower collapse analysis here - https://tinyurl.com/5n67s4s5
Pretty sure that was symbolic, and also a blood sacrifice. Anyone who knows anything about magick, knows that magick requires payment
I think about 2 sides (pillars) representing opposing sides (neither "good" nor "bad", and that was meant to be a time of showing removal/an end to the duplicit nature of whatever...ending, aand being merged into a 1
The problem with those buildings was there was no possible "legal" way to destroy them, 'cause they were loaded with asbestos
Strive to excel in the science of skepticism. I succeeded on the day of 9/11/2001 when I stopped to do a rough calculation on the energy required to bring down the Twin towers exceeded the impact of a Boeing 767 by a factor of 24 billion to one
Good for you.
But I've seen entire buildings destroyed by one lit match, and the Ruhr dams wrecked by a few bouncing bombs... so I'd like to see your figures.
The energy that destroyed the twin towers was already contained in the twin towers in the form of gravity...latent energy.
I had the approximate figures on-hand in 2001. It was based on amount of fuel in a B-767 and the consequence of the impact on both Twin Towers constructed with a steel inner core and and outer steel "chassis" that made them the strongest buildings in the world in many respects. Each of the 110 floors was a full acre in size. Jet fuel impact on steel was almost no consequence and the aluminum aircraft construction was no match for the steel outer chassis and inner steel core. CGI trickery was used to make it appear the jet entered the building. My goal was to estimate the number of times the towers would need to be impacted by a fully fueled 767 in order to approximate the result of near free-fall collapse. Since then I discovered one of the aircraft that reportedly hit the tower was found to be in service for several years following 9/11. It was then that I realized it was all a false-flag lie and no planes hit the buildings. So the 24 Billion number is far too low. See the Tower collapse analysis here - https://tinyurl.com/5n67s4s5
Steel is funny stuff. Did you ever see that video of a suspension bridge that, when subjected to high winds, simply shook itself into oblivion?
Wind is funny stuff. Faulty construction of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington, 1940. Look it up.
Pretty sure that was symbolic, and also a blood sacrifice. Anyone who knows anything about magick, knows that magick requires payment
I think about 2 sides (pillars) representing opposing sides (neither "good" nor "bad", and that was meant to be a time of showing removal/an end to the duplicit nature of whatever...ending, aand being merged into a 1
The problem with those buildings was there was no possible "legal" way to destroy them, 'cause they were loaded with asbestos
So multiple goals achieved at once with that one
did you write about that? is love to read your research if you did.