That's good nit-picking science/math of course - I guess it's the kind of issue that would be used to 'discredit' your work. However, there's still an elephant in the room regardless of how it's holding its trunk. I hope to live long enough to see the charade collapse. Best wishes to you.
Agreed. Yet, anything that can be used to discredit you will be used so. This is a war with multi billions of $ against you. The covid-19 policies were a huge awakening for me. For 80 years, in spite of some negative personal experiences, I had reasonable faith in official experts, excepting those bad apples that popped up from time to time. Now I see the whole body of academic science is riddled with the cancer of vested interest funding and I trust no one in a prominent position. Here is more news that seemed like a joke: ‘Project to suck carbon out of sea begins in UK’ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr788kljlklo There are ~1.4 x 10^12 cubic metres of sea water. Even if human produced CO2 was a significant climate modifier this is absurd. Even more touching is “There's also the question of what a large quantity of low-carbon water would do to the sea and the things that live in it”. That is being researched too. Being on the right side gets you funding, being on the wrong side sees you trashed. Meanwhile the USA and its allies trash nations in West Asia to maintain control of oil & gas.
This is indeed semantics. Your original usage of "inflection point" agrees with common usage to mean a sudden change in slope of some curve. Mathematically, that's incorrect, "sloppy", but that's become a common slop. A better term would be simply transition point, or maybe "elbow" in the curve. There is an elbow around 1996.
Other than the Pharma Bots, nobody touches it, and it forces me to search back into my limited data skills. It is because of your openness in this post that I/we trust your data. Genuine thanks from Team Dustin.
From what I understand, and it's very basic, is that they found, way back when, that a live virus vaccine was not strong enough to stimulate the immune system.
So they started using "adjuvants" in the vaccine, like aluminum and mercury, to give the immune system a little kick.
(I learned that from none other than Bobby Kennedy, Jr. Back when I listened to every word he said. I am grateful. And now, since August 2023, terribly sad.)
Thank you again for all! It is encouraging to see this kind of information staging a bit of a revival. I recall being informed of the Aluminum toxicity connection in nutrition class in chiropractic college 50 years ago. BTW Stannous Fluoride (water fluoridation) is a by product of the aluminum industry used as a rat poison until another market was identified. NB: If reincarnation is real, I pray to come back being as smart as Jessica Rose.
Oh contraire my dear Jessica, you are blessed with a wonderful mind and soul. You’re definitely what I would describe as smart, highly intelligent, and very kind.
Your IMA fellowship alone debunks your self-assessment! 😉 💪 🍾 🥂 👍
Not to mention citations in papers, praise from readers, viewers, interviewers &, colleagues, also re:-Stacks! ....And requests for your expertise from numerous Governments, Advocacy Groups, and Professional Associations!
YES, I believe attacking the big dog is the way to go. Severe autism is the place to start the unraveling. When studies shown reductions in that particular variable peoples' attention will be won.
Dr. Paul Offut, says we could inject 10,000 vaccines Ito a child and not have to worry about the aluminum. Let's try this out on him and Fauci, and little Hobbit Hotez, and Birx and Collins and Gates. I'll administer the jabs and Jessica can keep tabs on the adverse reactions.
Tangential: when did Aluminium cans become the norm for beverages? I'm not that old, but still old enough to remember rusty metal beer cans being the norm growing up. Then at some point, Aluminium cans became mandatory (and recycling them as well - not anything else made from Aluminium though).
Anyway.
Does/can the content of the can affect the Aluminium somehow, so that miniscule amounts are released into the soda/pop? Sure, it depends on what's in the can, even I know get that, but look at what's in Coca Cola f.e. or some other such drink. Does it matter if it's alcoholic or not?
I'm throwing this out here because I haven't the background to know, or even start looking or thinking about it (my background is pol-sci, social sciences in general and other "fuzzy" stuff) - maybe some STEM-headed fellow reader have an inkling or idea if this is just me being Chicken Little or if there's some validity to the question.
Because I have a sneaking suspicion that the change to Aluminium cans coincides with the 1986 law change about vaccines in the USA, and the 1995 roll-out of ever-greater number of doses using Aluminium adjuvants, and you don't need to be a chymist to understand exposure-dosage-frequency over time, or that some materials each deemed harmless in small amounts and on their own accumlates in parts of the body and interact and may become toxic.
You are perceptive. Yes, more acidic contents(Coke!) are likely worse, studies have shown more migration into container contents regarding as you infer.
However, I recently noticed a study publicized by Nicolas Hulscher(Dr Peter McCullough's substack) in which, if you look closely, there is information indicating that the intestinal tract can handle 1000 times more aluminum concentration than the blood. That is, with regards to being taking up by body cells and available, so to speak. So, INJECTIONS containing aluminum, purposefully micronized for takeup, have WAY more potential than ingesting aluminum that comes from sources not meant for takeup.
For example, some folks are all in a titter about using aluminum cooking pans, often coated with teflon. Well, think about it. The aluminum has to be severely treated and bound up with various treatments to make the surface coatable; then, it is coated with., . . wait for it, TEFLON, and cured/ fused at very high temperatures. Now, consider the question how in the world will Al 3+ ions(Dr Exley's biggest concern) get out of being bound both to aluminum(!) and out from under the cover of a baked on TEFLON(huge molecule) coating? Likelihood near zero.
Same goes for inside of aluminum cans: they are covered with plastic to prevent the aluminum taste coming through. The aluminum ions must first get unbound from their other aluminum buddies and then, migrate through the plastic coating. Likelihood near zero.
Sadly people consider what’s put into their bodies as akin to spitting in the ocean. Plus there’s always the anomaly…the 100-year old whose secret to long life was to smoke a cigar daily.
Especially when you consider the homegrown experiment many of us have inadvertently done…leaving Coke in a metal pan for a few days and then discovering pitting in the metal!!! Or using Coke to clean dirty battery terminals.
It's weird I think, these rules we have for so many things, that they are so haphazard no matter which nation one lives in.
If I buy tar, it comes in a heavy-duty steel can with a secure lid. If I buy kerosene or linseed oil, it comes in a flimsy plastic bottle. Ammonia, I can get at the grocery store.
Warning labels galore all over the packaging.
But a soda or candy or "food" containing umpty-eleven chemicals, including four different artificial sweeteners? No warnings.
Not even the Fun Light-brand of non-carbonated beverages comes with a warning, and that one people here use undiluted to kill ants.
The is not the only way “they” are getting aluminum into people. Stratospheric aerosol injection has it potentially coming down in rain into ground water, crops and livestock.
Democracy Now attacks RFK Jr., emphatically states vaccines don't cause autism. How can Dr. Rose present data that indicates such a link and yet apparently none exists?
its all about because they 'say so'. I say how can the know for a fact what DOESN'T cause it if they don't bother to put up any solid, replicatable evidence for what DOES.
One thing that may have been missed Jessica. Note that between 1950 and 81 no, as in zero, new jabs showed up in the vax schedule. However, before this period 3 jabs were installed. Before this the incidence of autism shows a FLATLINE. After these three, alone, the curve tilts up, ever so slightly. That did not occur at random.
Here’s the controversial, now retracted, paper published in The Lancet in 1998 that kicked things off re suggesting a possible link between the MMR and autism:
We have identified a chronic enterocolitis in children that may be related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction. In most cases, onset of symptoms was after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation. Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and its possible relation to this vaccine.
It doesn't seem likely that the measles virus in the MMR vax would cause brain inflammation because the measles virus in an unvaccinated child doesn't do so. But the MMR vaccine may have additional ingredients or mnaufacturing steps which are added because of the measles part of it.
Not sure if it’s relevant but the deodorant I use is aluminum free and many vaccines are not? Is that too obvious that aluminum might be best not to consume into our bodies? Doesn’t make sense to me.
Let me respond by pasting a bit of text from my post above:
I recently noticed a study publicized by Nicolas Hulscher(Dr Peter McCullough's substack) in which, if you look closely, there is information indicating that the intestinal tract can handle 1000 times more aluminum concentration than the blood. That is, with regards to being taking up by body cells and available, so to speak. So, INJECTIONS containing aluminum, purposefully micronized for takeup, have WAY more potential than ingesting aluminum that comes from sources not meant for takeup.
For example, some folks are all in a titter about using aluminum cooking pans, often coated with teflon. Well, think about it. The aluminum has to be severely treated and bound up with various treatments to make the surface coatable; then, it is coated with., . . wait for it, TEFLON, and cured/ fused at very high temperatures. Now, consider the question how in the world will Al 3+ ions(Dr Exley's biggest concern) get out of being bound both to aluminum(!) and out from under the cover of a baked on TEFLON(huge molecule) coating? Likelihood near zero.
Same goes for inside of aluminum cans: they are covered with plastic to prevent the aluminum taste coming through. The aluminum ions must first get unbound from their other aluminum buddies and then, migrate through the plastic coating. Likelihood near zero.
That's good nit-picking science/math of course - I guess it's the kind of issue that would be used to 'discredit' your work. However, there's still an elephant in the room regardless of how it's holding its trunk. I hope to live long enough to see the charade collapse. Best wishes to you.
it's more semantics, really
Agreed. Yet, anything that can be used to discredit you will be used so. This is a war with multi billions of $ against you. The covid-19 policies were a huge awakening for me. For 80 years, in spite of some negative personal experiences, I had reasonable faith in official experts, excepting those bad apples that popped up from time to time. Now I see the whole body of academic science is riddled with the cancer of vested interest funding and I trust no one in a prominent position. Here is more news that seemed like a joke: ‘Project to suck carbon out of sea begins in UK’ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr788kljlklo There are ~1.4 x 10^12 cubic metres of sea water. Even if human produced CO2 was a significant climate modifier this is absurd. Even more touching is “There's also the question of what a large quantity of low-carbon water would do to the sea and the things that live in it”. That is being researched too. Being on the right side gets you funding, being on the wrong side sees you trashed. Meanwhile the USA and its allies trash nations in West Asia to maintain control of oil & gas.
This is indeed semantics. Your original usage of "inflection point" agrees with common usage to mean a sudden change in slope of some curve. Mathematically, that's incorrect, "sloppy", but that's become a common slop. A better term would be simply transition point, or maybe "elbow" in the curve. There is an elbow around 1996.
You’re right, and It’s not fair.
Speaking of… “air quotes” are made with a gesture of fingers. Once you’ve put them in print, they’re not really air quotes anymore.
Just a friendly ribbing, hope you don’t mind—I adore you and your writing!
Don't know if it's correct, but I've had good results substituting apostrophes for quotation marks.
Pretty soon there'll be a moving emoji doing the air quote thing.
It’s not rocket science.If you inject toxins you will get a change in the order of things.
Inject??????????? LOL
You meant:
Breath 7G SMART DUST air
Eat 7G SMART DUST farm animals
Drinker polluted 7G SMART DUS water
Have LED streetlight Photonic weapons in your neighborhood
Have SMART METERS installed in your neighborhood
Have Ring Camera voice activated Ultrasonic weapons in your town
These are the PRIMARY source of Lithium, aluminum, titanium in humans.
NONE of these involve Hoax vaccines nor injection.
Exactly
Jessica - I have reposted your original Vaccines to Autism Cases Chart many many times: https://x.com/JesslovesMJK/status/1852647853266440668
Other than the Pharma Bots, nobody touches it, and it forces me to search back into my limited data skills. It is because of your openness in this post that I/we trust your data. Genuine thanks from Team Dustin.
There is a link between aluminium and the brain and therefore links to autism and dementia shown on autopsy.
https://t.co/Df68k3QoCT
Aluminum & mercury should never be put inside the body!
What’s the point of putting aluminum in a so called vaccine.
I’m not calling them vaccines, in my opinion they’re a Concoction of poison meant to do harm.
Sundrop the point is to hyperstimulate the immune system. And this is why I believe they can not make a truly “safe” vaccine.
From what I understand, and it's very basic, is that they found, way back when, that a live virus vaccine was not strong enough to stimulate the immune system.
So they started using "adjuvants" in the vaccine, like aluminum and mercury, to give the immune system a little kick.
(I learned that from none other than Bobby Kennedy, Jr. Back when I listened to every word he said. I am grateful. And now, since August 2023, terribly sad.)
I agree 👍
Thank you again for all! It is encouraging to see this kind of information staging a bit of a revival. I recall being informed of the Aluminum toxicity connection in nutrition class in chiropractic college 50 years ago. BTW Stannous Fluoride (water fluoridation) is a by product of the aluminum industry used as a rat poison until another market was identified. NB: If reincarnation is real, I pray to come back being as smart as Jessica Rose.
that's sweet thanks. but i'm not that smart. i am just persistent.
Oh contraire my dear Jessica, you are blessed with a wonderful mind and soul. You’re definitely what I would describe as smart, highly intelligent, and very kind.
YES! that.
and I will second that.
See Jess
Her brain boogie.
Jess' got friends .
Friends' brains boogie.
All that boogie'n gonna shake n' pound
Pharma's damn devils back in the ground.
--------------------------------------------------------
Your IMA fellowship alone debunks your self-assessment! 😉 💪 🍾 🥂 👍
Not to mention citations in papers, praise from readers, viewers, interviewers &, colleagues, also re:-Stacks! ....And requests for your expertise from numerous Governments, Advocacy Groups, and Professional Associations!
gee, add humble to that list, honey
I do not concur with your statement.
You ARE that smart. And persistent.
Liar, liar pants on fire!
Smart, persistent, modest, and surfing across "life, the universe and everything".
;-}
Nice analysis Jessica. I’d be interested to know if you get a similar correlation with severe autism as opposed to all forms.
YES, I believe attacking the big dog is the way to go. Severe autism is the place to start the unraveling. When studies shown reductions in that particular variable peoples' attention will be won.
Dr. Paul Offut, says we could inject 10,000 vaccines Ito a child and not have to worry about the aluminum. Let's try this out on him and Fauci, and little Hobbit Hotez, and Birx and Collins and Gates. I'll administer the jabs and Jessica can keep tabs on the adverse reactions.
we're been saying that for years, Mark (in the autism community) ;)
That won't give us an ounce of info about effects on children, but do it anyway - and televise it - for the tons of RIGHTEOUS schadenfreude!
Don't leave out Baric & Daszak
Tangential: when did Aluminium cans become the norm for beverages? I'm not that old, but still old enough to remember rusty metal beer cans being the norm growing up. Then at some point, Aluminium cans became mandatory (and recycling them as well - not anything else made from Aluminium though).
Anyway.
Does/can the content of the can affect the Aluminium somehow, so that miniscule amounts are released into the soda/pop? Sure, it depends on what's in the can, even I know get that, but look at what's in Coca Cola f.e. or some other such drink. Does it matter if it's alcoholic or not?
I'm throwing this out here because I haven't the background to know, or even start looking or thinking about it (my background is pol-sci, social sciences in general and other "fuzzy" stuff) - maybe some STEM-headed fellow reader have an inkling or idea if this is just me being Chicken Little or if there's some validity to the question.
Because I have a sneaking suspicion that the change to Aluminium cans coincides with the 1986 law change about vaccines in the USA, and the 1995 roll-out of ever-greater number of doses using Aluminium adjuvants, and you don't need to be a chymist to understand exposure-dosage-frequency over time, or that some materials each deemed harmless in small amounts and on their own accumlates in parts of the body and interact and may become toxic.
Yup. The go to bloke on all things aluminium & health is Dr Chris Exley.
Buy his book & read it. https://www.skyhorsepublishing.com/9781510762534/imagine-you-are-an-aluminum-atom/
. . . and also follow his substack here https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/.
You will find scientific support for your suspicions about drinks cans. I now avoid them completely.
Much obliged, thank you.
I could rail against the "the government allowes it, therefore it's safe"-mentality all day, any day, but I got to plant peas and beans in the garden.
Excellent plan. Choose your compost wisely . . .
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/what-do-you-think-you-are-putting?
I have, to no avail. Friends and family think government should be trusted, means well and is like father Christmas!
I was just going to mention Dr Exley
You are perceptive. Yes, more acidic contents(Coke!) are likely worse, studies have shown more migration into container contents regarding as you infer.
However, I recently noticed a study publicized by Nicolas Hulscher(Dr Peter McCullough's substack) in which, if you look closely, there is information indicating that the intestinal tract can handle 1000 times more aluminum concentration than the blood. That is, with regards to being taking up by body cells and available, so to speak. So, INJECTIONS containing aluminum, purposefully micronized for takeup, have WAY more potential than ingesting aluminum that comes from sources not meant for takeup.
For example, some folks are all in a titter about using aluminum cooking pans, often coated with teflon. Well, think about it. The aluminum has to be severely treated and bound up with various treatments to make the surface coatable; then, it is coated with., . . wait for it, TEFLON, and cured/ fused at very high temperatures. Now, consider the question how in the world will Al 3+ ions(Dr Exley's biggest concern) get out of being bound both to aluminum(!) and out from under the cover of a baked on TEFLON(huge molecule) coating? Likelihood near zero.
Same goes for inside of aluminum cans: they are covered with plastic to prevent the aluminum taste coming through. The aluminum ions must first get unbound from their other aluminum buddies and then, migrate through the plastic coating. Likelihood near zero.
As I recall, only 3% of ingested aluminum is absorbed, compared to 100% when injected.
The other thing is that 150 years ago, there was virtually no aluminum in circulation. It was all sealed up in ore.
Wondering whether someone should advise POTOS to switch to Mexican Coke in glass bottles.
Sadly people consider what’s put into their bodies as akin to spitting in the ocean. Plus there’s always the anomaly…the 100-year old whose secret to long life was to smoke a cigar daily.
How about aluminum foil?
Good lord, we used aluminum foil for everything. We cooked chicken IN IT on the grill.
Then wrapped our food in it.
It's in a lot of cooking pans.
And they use it in chemtrails, don't they?
Especially when you consider the homegrown experiment many of us have inadvertently done…leaving Coke in a metal pan for a few days and then discovering pitting in the metal!!! Or using Coke to clean dirty battery terminals.
Good points.
It's weird I think, these rules we have for so many things, that they are so haphazard no matter which nation one lives in.
If I buy tar, it comes in a heavy-duty steel can with a secure lid. If I buy kerosene or linseed oil, it comes in a flimsy plastic bottle. Ammonia, I can get at the grocery store.
Warning labels galore all over the packaging.
But a soda or candy or "food" containing umpty-eleven chemicals, including four different artificial sweeteners? No warnings.
Not even the Fun Light-brand of non-carbonated beverages comes with a warning, and that one people here use undiluted to kill ants.
Very interesting!
One thing, yes, Substact is great for getting peer reviews from outside of the box.
But, the greatest part for me, is that you are open minded, not only to acknowledge, consider them and test empirically the proposed corrections.
Many, especially the ones inside the box, would never do that.
My tip to the hat to you!🖖🏾
The is not the only way “they” are getting aluminum into people. Stratospheric aerosol injection has it potentially coming down in rain into ground water, crops and livestock.
https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/?utm_source=global-search
Democracy Now attacks RFK Jr., emphatically states vaccines don't cause autism. How can Dr. Rose present data that indicates such a link and yet apparently none exists?
https://youtu.be/rbJKXdI5xo0
Thanks Jessica for all you do!
its all about because they 'say so'. I say how can the know for a fact what DOESN'T cause it if they don't bother to put up any solid, replicatable evidence for what DOES.
This is the very question I ask. Over and over. And guess what? It’s ignored.
One thing that may have been missed Jessica. Note that between 1950 and 81 no, as in zero, new jabs showed up in the vax schedule. However, before this period 3 jabs were installed. Before this the incidence of autism shows a FLATLINE. After these three, alone, the curve tilts up, ever so slightly. That did not occur at random.
So, what in fact, were those vaccines?
DTP, DT, & Td
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/reczl3kjulkwcgeo6evmr/Auminum-adjuvants-autism.pdf?rlkey=1hs06tl1up7zak44cjtkwqjpp&dl=0
MMR vaccines has no aluminum, yet it is the most commonly talked about vaccine in the context of autism. Why?
Here’s the controversial, now retracted, paper published in The Lancet in 1998 that kicked things off re suggesting a possible link between the MMR and autism:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(97)11096-0/fulltext
The paper is an ‘early report’ and concludes:
QUOTE
We have identified a chronic enterocolitis in children that may be related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction. In most cases, onset of symptoms was after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation. Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and its possible relation to this vaccine.
END OF QUOTE
I'm no expert here but there is lots of talk about the three vaccines in one being a problem.
Maybe only because ONE of them causes the problem alone, but also there is a chance of confounded interactions in this. . . "experiment".
The measles component cause brain inflammation.
Exactly which ingredient in the MMR vaccine causes brain inflammation? Is it the (attenuated) mealses virus itself or is it some added chemical?
If it is an added chemical (or biological), then is the same thing also used in some other vaccines?
When only mumps and rubella were given in the study you don’t see the same brain inflammation.
It’s the measles component per a SS I just read this morning. I’ll like it if I can find it.
It doesn't seem likely that the measles virus in the MMR vax would cause brain inflammation because the measles virus in an unvaccinated child doesn't do so. But the MMR vaccine may have additional ingredients or mnaufacturing steps which are added because of the measles part of it.
Children’s Health Defense has a terrific video re: MMRII vaccine package insert.
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/trending-news-segments/mmrii-vaccine-of-the-week/
Wasn't this the vaccine that Andy Wakefield wrote about, with others, in the study that got him booted?
I think mercury was the problem, or have I got that wrong?
And what he was suggesting, I believe, is that the mmr was possibly causing gastric problems connected, possibly, to autism.
Not sure if it’s relevant but the deodorant I use is aluminum free and many vaccines are not? Is that too obvious that aluminum might be best not to consume into our bodies? Doesn’t make sense to me.
Let me respond by pasting a bit of text from my post above:
I recently noticed a study publicized by Nicolas Hulscher(Dr Peter McCullough's substack) in which, if you look closely, there is information indicating that the intestinal tract can handle 1000 times more aluminum concentration than the blood. That is, with regards to being taking up by body cells and available, so to speak. So, INJECTIONS containing aluminum, purposefully micronized for takeup, have WAY more potential than ingesting aluminum that comes from sources not meant for takeup.
For example, some folks are all in a titter about using aluminum cooking pans, often coated with teflon. Well, think about it. The aluminum has to be severely treated and bound up with various treatments to make the surface coatable; then, it is coated with., . . wait for it, TEFLON, and cured/ fused at very high temperatures. Now, consider the question how in the world will Al 3+ ions(Dr Exley's biggest concern) get out of being bound both to aluminum(!) and out from under the cover of a baked on TEFLON(huge molecule) coating? Likelihood near zero.
Same goes for inside of aluminum cans: they are covered with plastic to prevent the aluminum taste coming through. The aluminum ions must first get unbound from their other aluminum buddies and then, migrate through the plastic coating. Likelihood near zero.
Thanks!