I was just saying earlier that even if the vials weren't contaminated, it's STILL risky and remains the choice of the individual to choose to get injected or not.
Individual can not wisely choose if the individual does not know what he/she is choosing. If you, the expert, just found out what is in the barrel, 13 B recipients were injected unknown substance and many unwillingly. STILL risky should imply NO CHOOSING.
Yes it no more constitutes a *choice* than, for instance, obeying a road sign. An act is not a choice merely because in principle one could have done otherwise. No choice can be judged independently of its circumstances.
When I тАШchooseтАЩ to comply with traffic signs itтАЩs on the assumption that itтАЩs in my interest. No one could freely choose something potentially lethal to their welfare unless suicidal. To designate submission to the injection a тАШchoiceтАЩ is a travesty: being prey to deception is the polar opposite of choice.
This abuse of meaning and truth - тАЬitтАЩs your right to chooseтАЭ- undermines resistance. Right and wrong are not reducible to тАШchoiceтАЩ. Even if suicidal itтАЩs wrong to take the jab because suicide is wrong. *Logically* however itтАЩs perfectly correct.
I am not sure these can ever be made without some contamination, or without issues of post translation modifications, glycosylation, and errors in translation.
I know...
I was just saying earlier that even if the vials weren't contaminated, it's STILL risky and remains the choice of the individual to choose to get injected or not.
Individual can not wisely choose if the individual does not know what he/she is choosing. If you, the expert, just found out what is in the barrel, 13 B recipients were injected unknown substance and many unwillingly. STILL risky should imply NO CHOOSING.
Yes it no more constitutes a *choice* than, for instance, obeying a road sign. An act is not a choice merely because in principle one could have done otherwise. No choice can be judged independently of its circumstances.
When I тАШchooseтАЩ to comply with traffic signs itтАЩs on the assumption that itтАЩs in my interest. No one could freely choose something potentially lethal to their welfare unless suicidal. To designate submission to the injection a тАШchoiceтАЩ is a travesty: being prey to deception is the polar opposite of choice.
This abuse of meaning and truth - тАЬitтАЩs your right to chooseтАЭ- undermines resistance. Right and wrong are not reducible to тАШchoiceтАЩ. Even if suicidal itтАЩs wrong to take the jab because suicide is wrong. *Logically* however itтАЩs perfectly correct.
I am not sure these can ever be made without some contamination, or without issues of post translation modifications, glycosylation, and errors in translation.