Why are they using the toxic SM-102 when their sister company Acuitas produced the LNPs that Pfizer used, that were (supposedly) tested and passed by their friends Charles River labs. Like, why add in a new toxic compound that is lab use only? Was it just to show that people really don't care and as long as the media tell you to shut up about it, you will?
I think I know the reason. These jabs are designed for depopulation to make billionaire sociopaths happy, so they were designed to be toxic. Like 007, Pfizer and Moderna have a license to kill with emergency use authorization.
Michael Palmer, MD did a good deep dive on how the cationic lipids will cause DNA damage. He didn’t distinguish from those used in the Pfizer jab. See: 6:47, 11:08 in PATHWAYS TO VACCINE INJURY WITH PROF. MICHAEL PALMER MD
“Cationic lipids cause intense tissue damage and inflammation. Cationic lipid toxicity problem not solved”
He then concludes why probably all cationic LNPs are carcinogenic by design as they must puncture the cell walls to work and subject the cell to oxidative damage. Where at the very least long term carcinogenic effects should be considered in a classical dose dependent model like being exposed to radon for example.
I think you're overreacting. While I've not tried SM-102, I've been using 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide sauce and ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) powder on my eggs in the morning, with no noticeable problem.
Mutagens... they're starting to be found everywhere. Better start eating lots of berries, spices and foods high in antioxidants and start limiting inflammatory processes where you can. Oxidative stress and inflammation are bad mmkay.
So the medical industrial politcal complex has spent 2 years being busy not lying to us then? I personally am convinced that any and all new-age 'vaccines' are to be avoided like the plague.
All the TV drugs ads usually have a phrase "and may (significantly) increase your risk of certain cancers"...the Informed Consent on the "magic juice" to borrow Ed Dowd's term, should list cancer as a side effect. Actually I think most vaccines contain harmful chemicals and all come with the risk of dysregulating and permanently harming immune system...I know this personally.
Given my bias against these injectables, I would like nothing more than to conclude SM-102 is toxic. But I think your analysis suffers from an unintended comparison between Cayman’s current and former formulations of SM-102. Apparently, SM-102 used to be listed as a solution in chloroform (see https://youtu.be/iZ2nPiTt12A?t=65). But as you reported, the current formulation is in ethanol. This would explain your statements, “There is an SDS for chloroform, and there is an SDS for SM-102. They are separate and different.”
Regardless, it appears that the current Safety Data Sheet states the hazards of ethanol, not the hazards associated with SM-102 itself. On page 2/11 it says, “Hazard-determining components of labeling: ethanol.”
Finally, there is this statement that can be reached from a link in the Product Description for SM-102 (or directly at https://www.caymanchem.com/news/sm-102-statement): “While it is a common solvent, ethanol has several known serious hazards, which have been included on Cayman’s SDS. Neither the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS), or the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Classification and Labelling Inventory list any hazards associated with SM-102.”
I share your love of data sleuthing, and I am hooked on your substack. Keep it up!
I would agree that something seems off with this SDS as I work with absolute ethanol which has is highly flammable and has a NFPA fire rating of 3 while this one has a zero. In the lower portion there are DOT placards which list it correctly as flammable (3). And it’s also important to note that water has a MSDS as well - it’s potentially lethal by inhalation! And as far as these being lab-grade: that should only mean they were manufactured for research use only and not manufactured using GMP standards required for use in humans. While I remain quite wary of the vaccines, I also want to be nuanced and skeptical and less reactionary when looking at such things.
Yep, agree. Just guessing they flash off the solvent(whatever it is) during processing to make the neat sm-102 LNP feed stock.
Conclusions through this fog of chemistry mostly above my head:
-- The real problem is inflammation potential of the LNP
-- carcinogenicity for long term inability of a body to disable or excrete this crapp
-- the neurotoxicity and ability of this material to cross blood brain barriers or other barriers
-- the ability of the body to sense this material and put out an immune response
-- the fact that it appears no long term studies on humans, rats, or whatever appears to have been done to understand the above by the agencies responsible for regulating nor the Pharma companies pushing this crapp.
The volume of ethanol in the 0.5 ml shot is not toxic if injected intravenously. Historically, intravenously injected ethanol was used to suppress premature labour in pregnancy. It can still be used for treatment of DT's (alcohol withdrawal), and in methanol poisoning (wood alcohol) to saturate the alcohol dehydrogenase system and prevent conversion of methanol to (toxic) formaldehyde.
Intramuscular injection (the Vaxx all stays in your deltoid, recall) may be locally painful and inflammatory, but should not be systemically toxic. In all toxicology, dosage matters.
"I know how to read MSDS sheets. It’s a vital part of doing safe work in the laboratory environment. It’s the very first thing I do. "
Thinking for yourself is the first problem.. some folks just lack trust in experts!
"Oh. So it’s very low. In in vitro and in vivo models. And how many animals were tested? Ok. Hmm. And no carcinogenicity studies. They aren’t meant to cause cancer. Right. "
Contrary to public belief most chemical substances are NEVER tested for safety because looking for problems destroys the ability of profiteers to say, "We see no harm." which is the substantial equivalent for safe in America's public health policy.
If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe. For the chemicals being used in large quantities, Scorecard tells you whether or not eight basic types of tests for health and ecological effects have actually been conducted, based on the public record.
Today I watched a video discussion, apparently the second with both Dr. Naomi Wolf (of Daily Clout) and Edward Dowd (former Blackrock portfolio manager) and at 23:50 Dr. Wolf talks about
SM-102 in the Moderna vaccine and how there are two grades of it, a lab grade, which is carcinogenic, among many other terrible things, and a less toxic grade...and that it is not clear which grade was put in the Moderna vaccine.
The entire discussion is a review of the Daily Clout team findings of the Pfizer research information recently released under the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) after a judge ruled that they could not have the 75 years requested, to release said information. ???!!!
I read this post prior to the viewing of that video, so was well informed (thank you Jessica Rose)
Thanks Sharon. I’ll search for the video. If you have the link handy, would appreciate it. Staying informed seems to upset my stomach too. Deep slow breathing is helping. Feel better.
Thank you for digging and breaking all this down to inform us. Made me think of something RFKJr said - parents spend a lot of time researching to find the safest car seat for their child, but they don’t think to research what they are injecting into their child’s bodies. Such a simple but profound observation. If they only knew…
You are grasping at straws. The Spikevax dose is "efficient" in preventing Covid-19, compared to the very low concern about danger from the SM-102 lipid. In the test group, I would not like to be among the two members of the placebo group in the ICU because of the severe reaction to Covid-19 infection. There were no cases of severe reaction to Covid-19 among all who got the Spikevax jab. In the UK Spikevax report, this is the comment about efficiency:
"Among all subjects in the PPS, no cases of severe COVID-19 were reported in the vaccine group compared with 30 of 185 (16%) cases reported in the placebo group.
Of the 30 participants with severe disease, 9 were hospitalised, 2 of which were admitted to an intensive care unit. The majority of the remaining severe cases fulfilled only the oxygen saturation (SpO2) criterion for severe disease (≤ 93% on room air).
The vaccine efficacy of Spikevax to prevent COVID-19, regardless of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (determined by baseline serology and nasopharyngeal swab sample testing) from 14 days after Dose 2 was 93.6% (95% confidence interval 88.6, 96.5%).
Additionally, subgroup analyses of the primary efficacy endpoint showed similar efficacy point estimates across genders, ethnic groups, and participants with medical comorbidities associated with high risk of severe COVID-19.
The level of protection gained after dose 1 was assessed in a post-hoc analysis in the mITT Set. In the interval 14 days after dose 1 to dose 2, there were 35 cases of COVID-19 on placebo and only 2 in the vaccine group. This indicates that the vaccine may provide some level of protection from 14 days after the first dose and before receiving dose 2. For optimal protection, two doses should be administered one month apart."
Sorry, the name “Spikevax” is akin to naming the push to get any U.S. vaccine to market, “Warp Speed”- both very stupid names. Who is going to want to take “Spikevax” except the propagandized? Early treatment saves lives, Marv. We never needed a vaccine for this illness and we still do not need one. Ridiculous waste of money, time putting human health in great peril, which has never been in worse shape than now!
I just had my 2nd Moderna Spikevax booster and I feel much more confident as I'm going mask-free to Florida. Even DeSantis and his Surgeon General supports Spikevax, and TFG at Mar-a-Lago. I respect your views, to each his own.
Point taken. My husband and I are in our mid 60s, healthy. We’ve been SARSCov2 virus-free for the entire pandemic with weekly ivermectin, serum vit D levels in the 60-80ng/ml range, and plenty of vitamin C, exercise, and melatonin at night with great sleep habits. To each his or her own is correct. We would never, ever, ever take one of these biologic injectable products. They’re simply too dangerous and completely unnecessary in our view. Training our immune systems little by little is where it’s at- no doubt we have both been exposed multiple times to this virus, but it does not faze us, nor are we frightened in general. If a more virulent variant comes along, as Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche seems to think it will, we will cross that bridge when we come to it and perhaps deal with it differently in some way. But we will wait for a proper mucosal vaccine for this virus. Enjoy Florida.
I agree. There's no need to fight over our differences. My brother in Arizona travels to Mexico guite frequently to pick up a large batch of Ivermectin for his neighbors at Sun City. He's a retired pharmacist who believes in Vaccines for everything except Covid. He is a firm Ivermectin proponent, with Vitamin D and C like you. He caught Covid several weeks ago, a moderately severe case, but he recovered, thanks to Ivermectin. Like you, I'm heathy and remain Covid free. Maybe it's due to the vaccine, but it certainly makes me worry-free. I agree that intranasal vaccines are important as they could provide an immune response in the nasal mucosa, thus stopping Covid from hitching a ride and spreading, unlike my current Spikevax jab.
I wish you good health Marv, now and always. As a retired internal medicine clinician, I’ve still been able to treat nearly 30 people by recommending the FLCCC protocol for Covid-19. Most of my “patients” have been ages 51-88 with the bulk of them in their 60s and 70s, many with multiple comorbidities. Not one of them ever developed Covid organizing pneumonia, nor ever dropped their oxygen saturations, nor did any of them have to be hospitalized. Not one developed Long Covid either. They were all treated starting on DAY ONE of symptoms. I always recommend the FLCCC protocol whether someone is vaccinated or not. Cheers.
My brother in Arizona religiously follows the FLCCC protocol, which is excellent. The FLCCC does not discourage the use of Covid vaccines, noting that: "Vaccines have shown some efficacy in preventing the most severe outcomes of COVID-19 however, vaccines are part of a multi-modal COVID-19 strategy and we encourage health authorities to allow doctors to use all tools at their disposal." Perhaps we can meet in the middle. Maybe Jessica too. Take care.
Hopefully your luck will continue, considering the enormous increase in report of severe post-Covid shot reactions, including deaths, when compared with all the traditional vaccines combined; the fact that the great majority of adverse reactions go unreported; and the complete lack of knowledge about long-term shot injuries.
Regarding deaths, the latest credible estimate of how may lives were saved in the U.S. by Covid vaccinations is about 234,000 deaths https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/covid19-and-other-leading-causes-of-death-in-the-us/ On the other hand, for Covid vaccine deaths, about 20,000 deaths according to VAERS have occurred shortly after vaccination. This is obviously high for deaths caused solely by the vaccine, but even if we use the entire amount it is less than 0.004% of the total vaccine doses (about 570,000,000). Also, in Arizona in February, the risk of dying for unvaccinated adults who catch covid is 59 times greater than those who are fully vaccinated with a booster. https://www.azdhs.gov/covid19/documents/data/rates-of-cov-19-by-vaccination.pdf?v=20220302 If I were a betting man, which I am, I would place all my bets on the vaccine, as compared to Ivermectin and Vitamin D. However, as I said to Mel, to each his own.
Covid's been treatable since day one. Because the WHO/CDC/Fauci et al instructed! doctors to send Covid patients home untreated, even though they were aware that many doctors were treating successfully; and given the remdesivir and intubation/ventilation to which patients were subjected in hospital; hundreds of thousands of Americans have needlessly lost their lives to the illness. Given that reality, that Covid could have been and can be treated, the emergency authorization of the shots was and is illegal. Had treatments been discussed - encouraged, even, as they should have been - the Covid mortality rate would have been that of a severe influenza, revealing all the restrictions that followed as irrational as they were, and still are. Not a means of health care, but of control.
A recent study by a Columbia University PhD researcher concluded that the actual number of Covid shot-associated deaths is 20 times the number reflected in VAERS. The 2010 HHS-funded, Harvard-affiliated study of the efficacy of VAERS concluded that "fewer than 1% of adverse vaccine events are reported." Based on his decade of experience, an ER nurse I interviewed estimated that that figure should be more like 1 in 1,000. Vaccine injury's the underbelly of the industry. You'll never find an honest discussion of it in the mainstream. There's good reason vaccines were described as "unavoidably unsafe" by both the U.S. Congress and SCOTUS, starting with the fact that the injected foreign material bypasses the liver before entering the bloodstream. Vaccines are time bombs.
There's a good example of Covid shot injury reality in a video made by a group of Australian nurses, EMS technicians and ambulance drivers. In it they describe the pulmonary embolisms, paralysis, cardiac and respiratory arrests, intracranial hemorrhage, strokes ("in the young" [30-year olds]), pericarditis, tremors, sepsis, death and more that they're seeing post-Covid shot. Their faces are covered, because, as they tell us, they've been threatened with deregistration if they talk about the injuries. The same thing has been told us by many RNs in the U.S., as well.
Vaccination's always been an issue of trust, exponentially more so with the genetically modified Covid injections. After years of interviews of MDs, RNs, PhDs and scores of parents of children who'd been severely neurologically damaged or killed by the CDC's recommended childhood shots I can only tell you that when it comes to vaccines, trust in the CDC and the rest of the lemming mainstream is trust misplaced.
If you are right, up to 400,000 deaths in the U.S. are caused by the Covid vaccination jab. Forget about the CDC and FDA, one would think that at least one or more of the 50 States' health agencies would have detected this and made it public. But not a word. Instead, all of these 50 States support the Covid vaccine to reduce deaths. Of course, all of them and me may be victim to a massive conspiracy led by WHO/CDC/Fauci. They've even fooled Trump. And DeSantis. And Kristi Noem, etc. Who should lead us out of this mess?
Yep, one would think that. As it is, insurance companies nationwide are reporting a 40% increase in deaths in ages 18 - 64 during the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2021. I don't know about 1st quarter 2022, haven't seen mention yet, but that's people of working age, for millions of whom Covid shots became a requirement for employment beginning in late summer, 2021. Researchers are indeed asking, where are the authorities? Why isn't anyone investigating this? Scott Davidson, an east coast insurance CEO, calls the excess deaths a crisis; says that even a 10% excess death rate is considered a once-in-200-years occurrence.
WHO/CDC/Fauci are foot soldiers, marching along to the tune of the Great Reset, sponsored by the World Economic Forum. Trump, DeSantis and Noem indeed fell into the trap, as has the bulk of the public, motivated by well nurtured irrational fear of infectious illness and lured by the vaccine myth - though the powers that be had to change the definition of vaccine before they stuck the label on the genetically modified Covid shots. Trump's egregiously at fault, what with the absurdity called warp speed vaccine development and his continued espousal of the mythical good provided by the shots, and professed pride in the supposed millions of lives thereby saved. At least DeSantis has stepped up to the plate, taking moves to actually protect Floridians against medicopolitical control.
I don't know who can lead us out of this mess, but I know of plenty of people who're tryin', like the good Dr. Rose. As for me, it'll take as many people as necessary to hold down an out of shape 77-year old to give me a jab. LOL!
If I was a betting man I'd place bets that you're a malicious sort of character betting on Bill Gates being successful, whether the jabs are beneficial or not to the individuals tasked with testing this tech (most of the western world) doesn't bother you in the least.
Marv, I don't believe for a minute Trump had a clue when Warp Speed came along. . . he was duped easily. He walked right into that bat. Think about it. He saw Fauci's Warp Speed project as his winning election ticket. Trump did not come up with Warp Speed; it was planned years in advance.
What if he had taken office instead of sleepy Joe? HE would be stuck with dumping this leaky vaccine, this poison vaccine on the populous. It would have been a tough final term with all the MSM and liberals pointing their fingers at HIM-- another four years of that.
Why are they using the toxic SM-102 when their sister company Acuitas produced the LNPs that Pfizer used, that were (supposedly) tested and passed by their friends Charles River labs. Like, why add in a new toxic compound that is lab use only? Was it just to show that people really don't care and as long as the media tell you to shut up about it, you will?
I really don't know my friend. I am trying to find out.
I think I know the reason. These jabs are designed for depopulation to make billionaire sociopaths happy, so they were designed to be toxic. Like 007, Pfizer and Moderna have a license to kill with emergency use authorization.
Thanks for digging into this. Really appreciate your work.
Michael Palmer, MD did a good deep dive on how the cationic lipids will cause DNA damage. He didn’t distinguish from those used in the Pfizer jab. See: 6:47, 11:08 in PATHWAYS TO VACCINE INJURY WITH PROF. MICHAEL PALMER MD
“Cationic lipids cause intense tissue damage and inflammation. Cationic lipid toxicity problem not solved”
https://doctors4covidethics.org/video-replays-d4ce-symposium-iii-session-i/
He then concludes why probably all cationic LNPs are carcinogenic by design as they must puncture the cell walls to work and subject the cell to oxidative damage. Where at the very least long term carcinogenic effects should be considered in a classical dose dependent model like being exposed to radon for example.
https://etana.substack.com/p/the-arc-of-a-fraud/comments
Dr. Naomi Wolf mentions SM-102 in this interview with Ex BlackRock manager Edward Dowd. Plenty of other interesting info from Pfizer’s trial data.
Ooo - that is such a good follow up to a paper that I read yesterday. Thank you! Amazing work as always. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34841223/#:~:text=Clinical%20trials%20and%20ongoing%20vaccinations,are%20highly%20inflammatory%20in%20mice.
Also referenced in footnote #7 of Jessica's article...
Wow! This is explosive, literally as well as figuratively. Glad I kept SM-102 out of my veins
I think you're overreacting. While I've not tried SM-102, I've been using 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide sauce and ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate) powder on my eggs in the morning, with no noticeable problem.
lol
Did you add ketchup?
No. I don't like ketchup.
So Shawn, I don't get the joke here:
are these two long-winded polymers the constituents in SM-102?!
Mutagens... they're starting to be found everywhere. Better start eating lots of berries, spices and foods high in antioxidants and start limiting inflammatory processes where you can. Oxidative stress and inflammation are bad mmkay.
So the medical industrial politcal complex has spent 2 years being busy not lying to us then? I personally am convinced that any and all new-age 'vaccines' are to be avoided like the plague.
I'm convinced that all old age ones should be avoided like the plague. In fact I think the plague should also be avoided.
All the TV drugs ads usually have a phrase "and may (significantly) increase your risk of certain cancers"...the Informed Consent on the "magic juice" to borrow Ed Dowd's term, should list cancer as a side effect. Actually I think most vaccines contain harmful chemicals and all come with the risk of dysregulating and permanently harming immune system...I know this personally.
Given my bias against these injectables, I would like nothing more than to conclude SM-102 is toxic. But I think your analysis suffers from an unintended comparison between Cayman’s current and former formulations of SM-102. Apparently, SM-102 used to be listed as a solution in chloroform (see https://youtu.be/iZ2nPiTt12A?t=65). But as you reported, the current formulation is in ethanol. This would explain your statements, “There is an SDS for chloroform, and there is an SDS for SM-102. They are separate and different.”
Regardless, it appears that the current Safety Data Sheet states the hazards of ethanol, not the hazards associated with SM-102 itself. On page 2/11 it says, “Hazard-determining components of labeling: ethanol.”
Finally, there is this statement that can be reached from a link in the Product Description for SM-102 (or directly at https://www.caymanchem.com/news/sm-102-statement): “While it is a common solvent, ethanol has several known serious hazards, which have been included on Cayman’s SDS. Neither the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS), or the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Classification and Labelling Inventory list any hazards associated with SM-102.”
I share your love of data sleuthing, and I am hooked on your substack. Keep it up!
I would agree that something seems off with this SDS as I work with absolute ethanol which has is highly flammable and has a NFPA fire rating of 3 while this one has a zero. In the lower portion there are DOT placards which list it correctly as flammable (3). And it’s also important to note that water has a MSDS as well - it’s potentially lethal by inhalation! And as far as these being lab-grade: that should only mean they were manufactured for research use only and not manufactured using GMP standards required for use in humans. While I remain quite wary of the vaccines, I also want to be nuanced and skeptical and less reactionary when looking at such things.
Yes, it does seem to be ethanol. How well is it separated from ethanol before use in the vaccines etc?
Yep, agree. Just guessing they flash off the solvent(whatever it is) during processing to make the neat sm-102 LNP feed stock.
Conclusions through this fog of chemistry mostly above my head:
-- The real problem is inflammation potential of the LNP
-- carcinogenicity for long term inability of a body to disable or excrete this crapp
-- the neurotoxicity and ability of this material to cross blood brain barriers or other barriers
-- the ability of the body to sense this material and put out an immune response
-- the fact that it appears no long term studies on humans, rats, or whatever appears to have been done to understand the above by the agencies responsible for regulating nor the Pharma companies pushing this crapp.
The volume of ethanol in the 0.5 ml shot is not toxic if injected intravenously. Historically, intravenously injected ethanol was used to suppress premature labour in pregnancy. It can still be used for treatment of DT's (alcohol withdrawal), and in methanol poisoning (wood alcohol) to saturate the alcohol dehydrogenase system and prevent conversion of methanol to (toxic) formaldehyde.
Intramuscular injection (the Vaxx all stays in your deltoid, recall) may be locally painful and inflammatory, but should not be systemically toxic. In all toxicology, dosage matters.
love you Jessica! you are amazing.
God bless you sister- so appreciative of your efforts!
"I know how to read MSDS sheets. It’s a vital part of doing safe work in the laboratory environment. It’s the very first thing I do. "
Thinking for yourself is the first problem.. some folks just lack trust in experts!
"Oh. So it’s very low. In in vitro and in vivo models. And how many animals were tested? Ok. Hmm. And no carcinogenicity studies. They aren’t meant to cause cancer. Right. "
Contrary to public belief most chemical substances are NEVER tested for safety because looking for problems destroys the ability of profiteers to say, "We see no harm." which is the substantial equivalent for safe in America's public health policy.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120917041002/http://scorecard.goodguide.com/chemical-profiles/chems-profile-descriptions.tcl#basic_testing
Basic Testing to Identify Chemical Hazards
If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe. For the chemicals being used in large quantities, Scorecard tells you whether or not eight basic types of tests for health and ecological effects have actually been conducted, based on the public record.
Today I watched a video discussion, apparently the second with both Dr. Naomi Wolf (of Daily Clout) and Edward Dowd (former Blackrock portfolio manager) and at 23:50 Dr. Wolf talks about
SM-102 in the Moderna vaccine and how there are two grades of it, a lab grade, which is carcinogenic, among many other terrible things, and a less toxic grade...and that it is not clear which grade was put in the Moderna vaccine.
The entire discussion is a review of the Daily Clout team findings of the Pfizer research information recently released under the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) after a judge ruled that they could not have the 75 years requested, to release said information. ???!!!
I read this post prior to the viewing of that video, so was well informed (thank you Jessica Rose)
of the implications therein.
It's been a tough day on my stomach.
Thanks Sharon. I’ll search for the video. If you have the link handy, would appreciate it. Staying informed seems to upset my stomach too. Deep slow breathing is helping. Feel better.
https://www.onenewspage.com/video/20220307/14469630/BOMBSHELL-Naomi-Wolf-Interviews-Edward-Dowd-About-Pfizer.htm
Sorry, was discussing a neighborhood fencing project with parties involved.
The link above is not the one that I viewed the interview on, but it is the very same interview. Hope it works for you!
Sharon
Yes it opened. Thank you!!
Thank you for digging and breaking all this down to inform us. Made me think of something RFKJr said - parents spend a lot of time researching to find the safest car seat for their child, but they don’t think to research what they are injecting into their child’s bodies. Such a simple but profound observation. If they only knew…
Wow! Whats the problem? 😬
You are grasping at straws. The Spikevax dose is "efficient" in preventing Covid-19, compared to the very low concern about danger from the SM-102 lipid. In the test group, I would not like to be among the two members of the placebo group in the ICU because of the severe reaction to Covid-19 infection. There were no cases of severe reaction to Covid-19 among all who got the Spikevax jab. In the UK Spikevax report, this is the comment about efficiency:
"Among all subjects in the PPS, no cases of severe COVID-19 were reported in the vaccine group compared with 30 of 185 (16%) cases reported in the placebo group.
Of the 30 participants with severe disease, 9 were hospitalised, 2 of which were admitted to an intensive care unit. The majority of the remaining severe cases fulfilled only the oxygen saturation (SpO2) criterion for severe disease (≤ 93% on room air).
The vaccine efficacy of Spikevax to prevent COVID-19, regardless of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (determined by baseline serology and nasopharyngeal swab sample testing) from 14 days after Dose 2 was 93.6% (95% confidence interval 88.6, 96.5%).
Additionally, subgroup analyses of the primary efficacy endpoint showed similar efficacy point estimates across genders, ethnic groups, and participants with medical comorbidities associated with high risk of severe COVID-19.
The level of protection gained after dose 1 was assessed in a post-hoc analysis in the mITT Set. In the interval 14 days after dose 1 to dose 2, there were 35 cases of COVID-19 on placebo and only 2 in the vaccine group. This indicates that the vaccine may provide some level of protection from 14 days after the first dose and before receiving dose 2. For optimal protection, two doses should be administered one month apart."
Sorry, the name “Spikevax” is akin to naming the push to get any U.S. vaccine to market, “Warp Speed”- both very stupid names. Who is going to want to take “Spikevax” except the propagandized? Early treatment saves lives, Marv. We never needed a vaccine for this illness and we still do not need one. Ridiculous waste of money, time putting human health in great peril, which has never been in worse shape than now!
I just had my 2nd Moderna Spikevax booster and I feel much more confident as I'm going mask-free to Florida. Even DeSantis and his Surgeon General supports Spikevax, and TFG at Mar-a-Lago. I respect your views, to each his own.
Point taken. My husband and I are in our mid 60s, healthy. We’ve been SARSCov2 virus-free for the entire pandemic with weekly ivermectin, serum vit D levels in the 60-80ng/ml range, and plenty of vitamin C, exercise, and melatonin at night with great sleep habits. To each his or her own is correct. We would never, ever, ever take one of these biologic injectable products. They’re simply too dangerous and completely unnecessary in our view. Training our immune systems little by little is where it’s at- no doubt we have both been exposed multiple times to this virus, but it does not faze us, nor are we frightened in general. If a more virulent variant comes along, as Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche seems to think it will, we will cross that bridge when we come to it and perhaps deal with it differently in some way. But we will wait for a proper mucosal vaccine for this virus. Enjoy Florida.
I agree. There's no need to fight over our differences. My brother in Arizona travels to Mexico guite frequently to pick up a large batch of Ivermectin for his neighbors at Sun City. He's a retired pharmacist who believes in Vaccines for everything except Covid. He is a firm Ivermectin proponent, with Vitamin D and C like you. He caught Covid several weeks ago, a moderately severe case, but he recovered, thanks to Ivermectin. Like you, I'm heathy and remain Covid free. Maybe it's due to the vaccine, but it certainly makes me worry-free. I agree that intranasal vaccines are important as they could provide an immune response in the nasal mucosa, thus stopping Covid from hitching a ride and spreading, unlike my current Spikevax jab.
I wish you good health Marv, now and always. As a retired internal medicine clinician, I’ve still been able to treat nearly 30 people by recommending the FLCCC protocol for Covid-19. Most of my “patients” have been ages 51-88 with the bulk of them in their 60s and 70s, many with multiple comorbidities. Not one of them ever developed Covid organizing pneumonia, nor ever dropped their oxygen saturations, nor did any of them have to be hospitalized. Not one developed Long Covid either. They were all treated starting on DAY ONE of symptoms. I always recommend the FLCCC protocol whether someone is vaccinated or not. Cheers.
My brother in Arizona religiously follows the FLCCC protocol, which is excellent. The FLCCC does not discourage the use of Covid vaccines, noting that: "Vaccines have shown some efficacy in preventing the most severe outcomes of COVID-19 however, vaccines are part of a multi-modal COVID-19 strategy and we encourage health authorities to allow doctors to use all tools at their disposal." Perhaps we can meet in the middle. Maybe Jessica too. Take care.
Hopefully your luck will continue, considering the enormous increase in report of severe post-Covid shot reactions, including deaths, when compared with all the traditional vaccines combined; the fact that the great majority of adverse reactions go unreported; and the complete lack of knowledge about long-term shot injuries.
About "long-term shot injuries," since I'm 79, it's not a concern to me. But if I was 18, I would wait until the intranasal vaccines.
Regarding deaths, the latest credible estimate of how may lives were saved in the U.S. by Covid vaccinations is about 234,000 deaths https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/covid19-and-other-leading-causes-of-death-in-the-us/ On the other hand, for Covid vaccine deaths, about 20,000 deaths according to VAERS have occurred shortly after vaccination. This is obviously high for deaths caused solely by the vaccine, but even if we use the entire amount it is less than 0.004% of the total vaccine doses (about 570,000,000). Also, in Arizona in February, the risk of dying for unvaccinated adults who catch covid is 59 times greater than those who are fully vaccinated with a booster. https://www.azdhs.gov/covid19/documents/data/rates-of-cov-19-by-vaccination.pdf?v=20220302 If I were a betting man, which I am, I would place all my bets on the vaccine, as compared to Ivermectin and Vitamin D. However, as I said to Mel, to each his own.
Covid's been treatable since day one. Because the WHO/CDC/Fauci et al instructed! doctors to send Covid patients home untreated, even though they were aware that many doctors were treating successfully; and given the remdesivir and intubation/ventilation to which patients were subjected in hospital; hundreds of thousands of Americans have needlessly lost their lives to the illness. Given that reality, that Covid could have been and can be treated, the emergency authorization of the shots was and is illegal. Had treatments been discussed - encouraged, even, as they should have been - the Covid mortality rate would have been that of a severe influenza, revealing all the restrictions that followed as irrational as they were, and still are. Not a means of health care, but of control.
A recent study by a Columbia University PhD researcher concluded that the actual number of Covid shot-associated deaths is 20 times the number reflected in VAERS. The 2010 HHS-funded, Harvard-affiliated study of the efficacy of VAERS concluded that "fewer than 1% of adverse vaccine events are reported." Based on his decade of experience, an ER nurse I interviewed estimated that that figure should be more like 1 in 1,000. Vaccine injury's the underbelly of the industry. You'll never find an honest discussion of it in the mainstream. There's good reason vaccines were described as "unavoidably unsafe" by both the U.S. Congress and SCOTUS, starting with the fact that the injected foreign material bypasses the liver before entering the bloodstream. Vaccines are time bombs.
There's a good example of Covid shot injury reality in a video made by a group of Australian nurses, EMS technicians and ambulance drivers. In it they describe the pulmonary embolisms, paralysis, cardiac and respiratory arrests, intracranial hemorrhage, strokes ("in the young" [30-year olds]), pericarditis, tremors, sepsis, death and more that they're seeing post-Covid shot. Their faces are covered, because, as they tell us, they've been threatened with deregistration if they talk about the injuries. The same thing has been told us by many RNs in the U.S., as well.
Vaccination's always been an issue of trust, exponentially more so with the genetically modified Covid injections. After years of interviews of MDs, RNs, PhDs and scores of parents of children who'd been severely neurologically damaged or killed by the CDC's recommended childhood shots I can only tell you that when it comes to vaccines, trust in the CDC and the rest of the lemming mainstream is trust misplaced.
Steve Kirsch is using 41x is the under-reporting factor, so Marv's 20,000 estimate runs up to 800,000 or so. . .
If you are right, up to 400,000 deaths in the U.S. are caused by the Covid vaccination jab. Forget about the CDC and FDA, one would think that at least one or more of the 50 States' health agencies would have detected this and made it public. But not a word. Instead, all of these 50 States support the Covid vaccine to reduce deaths. Of course, all of them and me may be victim to a massive conspiracy led by WHO/CDC/Fauci. They've even fooled Trump. And DeSantis. And Kristi Noem, etc. Who should lead us out of this mess?
Yep, one would think that. As it is, insurance companies nationwide are reporting a 40% increase in deaths in ages 18 - 64 during the 3rd and 4th quarters of 2021. I don't know about 1st quarter 2022, haven't seen mention yet, but that's people of working age, for millions of whom Covid shots became a requirement for employment beginning in late summer, 2021. Researchers are indeed asking, where are the authorities? Why isn't anyone investigating this? Scott Davidson, an east coast insurance CEO, calls the excess deaths a crisis; says that even a 10% excess death rate is considered a once-in-200-years occurrence.
WHO/CDC/Fauci are foot soldiers, marching along to the tune of the Great Reset, sponsored by the World Economic Forum. Trump, DeSantis and Noem indeed fell into the trap, as has the bulk of the public, motivated by well nurtured irrational fear of infectious illness and lured by the vaccine myth - though the powers that be had to change the definition of vaccine before they stuck the label on the genetically modified Covid shots. Trump's egregiously at fault, what with the absurdity called warp speed vaccine development and his continued espousal of the mythical good provided by the shots, and professed pride in the supposed millions of lives thereby saved. At least DeSantis has stepped up to the plate, taking moves to actually protect Floridians against medicopolitical control.
I don't know who can lead us out of this mess, but I know of plenty of people who're tryin', like the good Dr. Rose. As for me, it'll take as many people as necessary to hold down an out of shape 77-year old to give me a jab. LOL!
DeSantis is on record as saying that he didn't approve of Florida becoming a bio-medical security state. Which is far more than Trump has ever done.
If I was a betting man I'd place bets that you're a malicious sort of character betting on Bill Gates being successful, whether the jabs are beneficial or not to the individuals tasked with testing this tech (most of the western world) doesn't bother you in the least.
What happens when someone takes off Gates' head?
No, I trust Trump. He should be given high praise for Warp Speed.
All the more reason for those who might vote for him, not to then.
Marv, I don't believe for a minute Trump had a clue when Warp Speed came along. . . he was duped easily. He walked right into that bat. Think about it. He saw Fauci's Warp Speed project as his winning election ticket. Trump did not come up with Warp Speed; it was planned years in advance.
What if he had taken office instead of sleepy Joe? HE would be stuck with dumping this leaky vaccine, this poison vaccine on the populous. It would have been a tough final term with all the MSM and liberals pointing their fingers at HIM-- another four years of that.