Evidence that 'boosting' in current COVID-19 context is pointless immunologically, and dangerous, due to original antigenic sin (antigenic/immune imprinting) - see 'swine flu'
Boosters may be useless immunologically, but that was never their purpose; they are very useful for boosting Pfizer's profits and for birth control and removing useless biscuit eaters from the planet.
Jul 14, 2022·edited Jul 14, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose
Here's another angle of reflection about relationships between virus and bacteria: there are interesting theories about virus-bacteria cooperation, which may explain why azithromycin helps fighting against the viral phase of Covid-19 : SARS-CoV2 virus needs the help of intracellular bacteria (such as mycoplasma or prevotella) to properly replicate. Since some classes of antibiotics (cyclines, macrolides) destroy those intracellular bacteria, they prevent SARS-CoV2 from replicating, without directly acting on it.
Thank you Jessica, each of your exceptional analysis makes a difference.. in ultimately turning the tide.. Relentless pursuit of the Facts of every paper... every study.. Currently working in a remote area in Yosemite that prevents my viewing your work more often..darn it.. Always look forward to your powerful insights..! Keep Going Joan of Arc! You are crushing it!!
Rose-Vanden Bossche: #1 Team!!! Just to mention one standout quality of this team in my opinion. The Rose-Vanden Bossche team do not sully themselves by opining upon the filthy political aspect of this nightmare, as far as I'm aware. They remain within their area of expertise. That would be data-statistical analysis, epidemiology, virology, and logical-rational thought-conclusions. In short: "The Science."
Jessica said, "By the way, guess what? We’ve completely neglected further study of the bacteriology of influenza and all focus seems to have turned to ‘vaccines’. How ridiculous."
In this regard, do we really fully understand the role or roles that macrolides like Azithromycin play in the original Zelenko protocol against Covid-19 progression? Are they just antiviral in this respect, or is there more to it?
I cannot believe FDA is requiring the bivalent jabs to include the Wuhan-1 mRNA to guarantee ADE ... See Perpetual Pandemic. Can't wait for your ADE article.
I have to pat myself on the back a bit while reflecting on this awesome new post. I have many times in my main outlet for Covid commentary, Chris Martenson's PeakProsperity.com, coined and used the phrase, "Thor's hammer of original antigenic sin" to describe what I believe the mRNA transfections will accomplish. Based on the quote from GVB, I think this phrase nails it.
I’m skeptical of natural OAS, and everything else were been told so far about the Spanish Flu.
This is slightly tangential to your post, but something I’ve been wondering about for the past 2.5 years; and your post prompted me to look further into it.
From what I’ve read, I suspect the high number of deaths in 1918 wasn't due to OAS, but rather immune dysfunction, caused by hypersensitivity or serum sickness, from vaccines.
The 1918 pandemic didn’t start in Spain. The first cases were diagnosed at Fort Riley, Kansas, shortly after a mass vaccination of US Military recruits. [1]
Those soldiers had been given multiple experimental vaccines. At least one of which, for meningococcal meningitis, was made from horse serum. [2] [3]
Vaccines made from horse serum are known to cause serum sickness.
This was known as early as 1906. [4]
Serum sickness weakens the immune system. It depletes complement, and causes vasculitis, and low WBC counts. This can last for months, depending on the number, and timing, of injections. [5]
IOW, the Army intentionally injected their soldiers with something to weaken them, before sending them to other bases, then across the globe.
The Rockefeller Institute created this new meningococcal vaccine. Besides giving it to American troops, they also shipped it to England, France, Belgium and Italy. [1] (Not Spain?)
....................
The Spanish Flu was especially dangerous for young, healthy, men in the military. But not all of them. Only the new recruits were dying. Seems odd.
"Military health records for barracks and battleships also painted a different picture. New recruits – men unlikely to have been exposed to resident bacteria – died in droves, while soldiers whose immune systems were accustomed to the local bugs survived." [6]
I’m guessing that ONLY the new recruits were forced to get the experimental vaccines.
....................
2 million soldiers received a series of new vaccines between Jan. - June 1918. [2]
Beginning in March, soldiers started getting sick, within days to weeks after receiving the vaccines. [1]
“Fourteen of the largest training camps had reported influenza outbreaks in March, April, or May…” [7]
"By the War Department’s most conservative count, influenza sickened 26% of the Army—more than one million men—and killed almost 30,000 before they even got to France.2,3 " [7]
....................
Autopsies show people didn’t die from the flu virus itself, but rather from secondary infections — bacterial pneumonia. [6]
The deaths were mostly among young healthy adults, with strong immune systems.
Why was the 1918 flu season such an outlier?? What else happened that year??
....................
As WWI ended, the public was told that US soldiers were bringing contagious diseases home with them. Civilians were scared into taking the same meningococcal vaccines, that had been making the soldiers sick, thus shrinking the control group. [3]
Only the vaccinated died, according to Dr. Eleanor McBean, who experienced the 1918 pandemic first hand. [2]
What was the real death count from the Spanish Flu? How many of that group received an experimental vaccine? Surely someone’s keeping those records hidden safely away.
I believe the vaccines weakened the recipients’ immune systems, making them susceptible to invasive bacteria, causing fatal pneumonia.
It’s also possible those who became sick spread the bacterial pathogens to their fellow soldiers, friends, and family members. The CDC calls them “cloud adults.” [8]
....................
Do you have any other thoughts on The Spanish Flu pandemic?
Oh by the way, watch this! https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/07/original-antigenic-sin-the-highly-jabbed-are-breeding-variants-and-perpetuating-an-endless-pandemic-video/ref/6/
Boosters may be useless immunologically, but that was never their purpose; they are very useful for boosting Pfizer's profits and for birth control and removing useless biscuit eaters from the planet.
"The biggest problem with this paper, to me, is the lack of a control group that represents natural immunity - ie: individuals who were NOT injected"
These mythical creatures were NOT SUPPOSED to exist...
Here's another angle of reflection about relationships between virus and bacteria: there are interesting theories about virus-bacteria cooperation, which may explain why azithromycin helps fighting against the viral phase of Covid-19 : SARS-CoV2 virus needs the help of intracellular bacteria (such as mycoplasma or prevotella) to properly replicate. Since some classes of antibiotics (cyclines, macrolides) destroy those intracellular bacteria, they prevent SARS-CoV2 from replicating, without directly acting on it.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3712423
"Evidence that 'boosting' in current COVID-19 context is pointless immunologically due to original antigenic sin (antigenic/immune imprinting)"
... but we will never know for sure, until we have killed all the "useless eaters" first :P.
Love,
Fauci
Thank you Jessica, each of your exceptional analysis makes a difference.. in ultimately turning the tide.. Relentless pursuit of the Facts of every paper... every study.. Currently working in a remote area in Yosemite that prevents my viewing your work more often..darn it.. Always look forward to your powerful insights..! Keep Going Joan of Arc! You are crushing it!!
Rose-Vanden Bossche: #1 Team!!! Just to mention one standout quality of this team in my opinion. The Rose-Vanden Bossche team do not sully themselves by opining upon the filthy political aspect of this nightmare, as far as I'm aware. They remain within their area of expertise. That would be data-statistical analysis, epidemiology, virology, and logical-rational thought-conclusions. In short: "The Science."
Jessica said, "By the way, guess what? We’ve completely neglected further study of the bacteriology of influenza and all focus seems to have turned to ‘vaccines’. How ridiculous."
In this regard, do we really fully understand the role or roles that macrolides like Azithromycin play in the original Zelenko protocol against Covid-19 progression? Are they just antiviral in this respect, or is there more to it?
I cannot believe FDA is requiring the bivalent jabs to include the Wuhan-1 mRNA to guarantee ADE ... See Perpetual Pandemic. Can't wait for your ADE article.
Great stuff Jess. I vote for a lab origin of Spanish flu. Don't blame the pig!
You should talk to Geert about antibody dependent enhancement of disease which he predicts is arriving in weeks or months
I have to pat myself on the back a bit while reflecting on this awesome new post. I have many times in my main outlet for Covid commentary, Chris Martenson's PeakProsperity.com, coined and used the phrase, "Thor's hammer of original antigenic sin" to describe what I believe the mRNA transfections will accomplish. Based on the quote from GVB, I think this phrase nails it.
Any thoughts on whether mAbs (e.g., Regeneron) lead to OAS / ADE in the unvaxxed?
"Variant chasing - it's like trying to dig your way out of a hole. Dig up, stupid!"
People like you, Jessica, don't realize that the Earth is round :P... Of course, there is A LOT of digging to be done :P!
“the virus/bacteria combo plate”
Love it! ❤️
Jessica, Hi, I’m a big fan of your work!
I’m skeptical of natural OAS, and everything else were been told so far about the Spanish Flu.
This is slightly tangential to your post, but something I’ve been wondering about for the past 2.5 years; and your post prompted me to look further into it.
From what I’ve read, I suspect the high number of deaths in 1918 wasn't due to OAS, but rather immune dysfunction, caused by hypersensitivity or serum sickness, from vaccines.
The 1918 pandemic didn’t start in Spain. The first cases were diagnosed at Fort Riley, Kansas, shortly after a mass vaccination of US Military recruits. [1]
Those soldiers had been given multiple experimental vaccines. At least one of which, for meningococcal meningitis, was made from horse serum. [2] [3]
Vaccines made from horse serum are known to cause serum sickness.
This was known as early as 1906. [4]
Serum sickness weakens the immune system. It depletes complement, and causes vasculitis, and low WBC counts. This can last for months, depending on the number, and timing, of injections. [5]
IOW, the Army intentionally injected their soldiers with something to weaken them, before sending them to other bases, then across the globe.
The Rockefeller Institute created this new meningococcal vaccine. Besides giving it to American troops, they also shipped it to England, France, Belgium and Italy. [1] (Not Spain?)
....................
The Spanish Flu was especially dangerous for young, healthy, men in the military. But not all of them. Only the new recruits were dying. Seems odd.
"Military health records for barracks and battleships also painted a different picture. New recruits – men unlikely to have been exposed to resident bacteria – died in droves, while soldiers whose immune systems were accustomed to the local bugs survived." [6]
I’m guessing that ONLY the new recruits were forced to get the experimental vaccines.
....................
2 million soldiers received a series of new vaccines between Jan. - June 1918. [2]
Beginning in March, soldiers started getting sick, within days to weeks after receiving the vaccines. [1]
“Fourteen of the largest training camps had reported influenza outbreaks in March, April, or May…” [7]
"By the War Department’s most conservative count, influenza sickened 26% of the Army—more than one million men—and killed almost 30,000 before they even got to France.2,3 " [7]
....................
Autopsies show people didn’t die from the flu virus itself, but rather from secondary infections — bacterial pneumonia. [6]
The deaths were mostly among young healthy adults, with strong immune systems.
Why was the 1918 flu season such an outlier?? What else happened that year??
....................
As WWI ended, the public was told that US soldiers were bringing contagious diseases home with them. Civilians were scared into taking the same meningococcal vaccines, that had been making the soldiers sick, thus shrinking the control group. [3]
Only the vaccinated died, according to Dr. Eleanor McBean, who experienced the 1918 pandemic first hand. [2]
What was the real death count from the Spanish Flu? How many of that group received an experimental vaccine? Surely someone’s keeping those records hidden safely away.
I believe the vaccines weakened the recipients’ immune systems, making them susceptible to invasive bacteria, causing fatal pneumonia.
It’s also possible those who became sick spread the bacterial pathogens to their fellow soldiers, friends, and family members. The CDC calls them “cloud adults.” [8]
....................
Do you have any other thoughts on The Spanish Flu pandemic?
_________________________________________________
1 Barry, K. , “Did a Military Experimental Vaccine in 1918 Kill 50-100 Million People Blamed as ‘Spanish Flu’”? Nov. 13, 2018, https://healthimpactnews.com/2018/did-a-military-experimental-vaccine-in-1918-kill-50-100-million-people-blamed-as-spanish-flu/
2 Sharav, V., “How Eugenics Leads to Genocide, WWII and The Spanish Flu,” The Expose, March 7, 2022
https://expose-news.com/2022/03/07/vera-sharav-how-eugenics-leads-to-genocide/
3 Martingano, S., “The 1918 ‘Spanish Flu’; Only The Vaccinated Died” ; May 29, 2020
https://salmartingano.com/the-1918-spanish-flu-only-the-vaccinated-died/
4 Jackson, R., SERUM SICKNESS. ; J Cutan Med Surg. 2000 Oct; 4(4):223-5
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/120347540000400411
5 Nancy Rixe, N., M. Tavarez, M., SERUM SICKNESS; StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL)
NCBI Bookshelf; Last Update: May 2, 2022 ; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538312/
6 Callaway, E. ; “Bacteria were the real killers in 1918 flu pandemic” ; New Scientist; Aug 4, 2008
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic/
7 Byerly, C., “The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919”; Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 82–91
8 “Deaths from Bacterial Pneumonia during 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic” - Volume 14, Number 8—August 2008 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC; https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/8/07-1313_article