However that doesn't address Jessica's concern with the use of the word vaccine. The word has been used for years to propagandize people to take vaccine's. The word is charged.
To see how word meanings change with usage, consider the word "gay". For me the very first meaning "happy and carefree", then followed by homosexual. Why that order? Because I grew up with the original meaning of the word gay. Many decades before the current use of the word. So while it has faded into the background it still comes to mind first and then follow by the current meaning of "Gay".
So Jessica's concern about the collective understanding of the meaning of the word "Vaccine" is a valid concern, at least to me.
That's a strong point. Have to use the language as its understood if you are looking to meet people where they are at. I'd like to see things move so people realize like I did that the word works but only because other vaccines have as many issues with them as well.
Regarding language. I am not impressed with changing peoples thinking by changing the meaning of words.
The French language as I understand is quite accurate with it's meanings. They don't change over time. If this is true it is a blessing as generations can communicate clearly as well as books written hundreds of years ago still convey a clear meaning to the present day reader.
A lot of words have been corrupted. One pernicious change highlighted years ago was for "pirate" which used to only refer to armed robbery of ships at sea or shore, not "theft" of "Intellectual Property" as was later corruptly added. It is nonsense to call copying of the intangible as theft, unless for a unique identifying mark or image. Most human ideas and knowledge were based upon many layers of older work, so much "IP" is overrated.
I'll tell you, I've bought every iteration of many an album from LP's, to cassettes, 4-track, 8-track, quad (which was the very best music I ever heard in ANY vehicle), then the fragile CD, then a tougher CD, finally ending in the downhill-through-slush-run that is iTunes: muddled muddy clipped noise...it's horrible.
The sound quality has diminished, spectacularly, in one generation. Unfamiliar to younger people are two things: Clear blue clean skies and the sound of a great music coming accurately out of a Hi-Fi, nothing clipped to increase storage space on the medium: If there were lots of songs, it'd be a double album, which was such a treat. Especially the art work.
What if I made cabinets? Beautiful cabinets. Should I get a royalty every time someone opens one of the cabinet doors? I have more right to expect it, since the cabinet provides timeless utility, regardless whether you like the cabinet or not. Most music is forgotten... today's music is especially forgettable...
I like the idea of inventors and creators having a way to gain materially from their work but IP is can be brutal. The example that comes to mind for me again and again was the use of forceps by a private practice during child birth. Which if made a widespread practice could have saved countless lives but served as a competitive advantage for this family business for a generation or so first. Where's the line? what's fair compensation, etc.
IP is every word we speak actually. If IP had been used and enforced from the beginning of human's evolution, we would still be in the stone age. What we have now is nothing less that glorified rent seeking hiding behind the mask of tangible property law and patents to garner unearned remuneration.
Please help me understand where my understanding is wrong.
Additional reply as I just got this email from the https://archive.org/ which I support.
Judge sets date of oral argument for March 20
Judge John G. Koeltl has set March 20 as the date for oral argument in Hachette v. Internet Archive, the lawsuit against our library. At its core, this lawsuit is about a library's right to own and lend books. We stand ready to fight this fight for all libraries!
How can you help?
Do you work in a library? Sign up for our Virtual March for Libraries to get in front of your representatives in Congress & speak up for library digital rights.
Do you use the Internet Archive for reading or research? We are gathering testimonials about how our library & collections are used in different research projects & settings. Share your story now!
Are you on social media? Over the next three weeks, we will be telling the story of how our library works and how the library practice of controlled digital lending is being used by libraries around the world. Please share these posts with your followers! We are active on Mastodon, Facebook & Twitter.
Want to help in other ways? Stay tuned for additional updates through this newsletter.
Can I just say, one of my favorite things about Substack is that folks like Aaron Siri and Jessica Rose are engaging in a public dialogue. They read each other, adapt to one another, acknowledge one another's points, retract and adapt their positions when they find they are wrong... and that, in my opinion is such a wonderful thing to see!! I also am guilty of sometimes reacting first, then carefully pondering what is being said. I hope I live out the example that Rose and Siri are setting--they aren't "colleagues" per se, since one is a biomedical researcher and one is an attorney, but they have perspectives that influence and craft one another and they engage with each other respectfully. It betters them both. And I hope I live out the example in my life, too.
It's noteworthy that the initial misunderstanding was on Twitter, while the thoughtful piece was written on Substack - That which we call a Tweet by any other name would be as thoughtless.
I agree 100% with you Donna! You said that way better than I ever could have. unfortunately my patience for crafting eloquent sentences passed ~2.5 years ago with Fauci...LOL Thank you Donna.
Apples are fruits. Oranges are fruits. Both are generally pretty safe to eat. Pokeberries are also fruits but are poisonous so it's best not to eat them. The only reason the authorities labelled the covid shots as vaccines was to play on the associations people had with previous vaccines as 'safe and effective.' Whether traditional vaccines are, in fact, safe or effective is questionable, as these address a myriad of different technologies, pathogens and infectious pathways and risk/benefit profiles. Nevertheless, they preyed up on people's general assumption of safety and efficacy of vaccines to put these nasty products into the masses.
Gee. Let's just cut to the chase. The never has been, and never will be, a "safe and effective" "Vaccine". The "science" is based on 200 years of deception.
True- I grow the equivalent of traditional "vaccines" in the research lab, but in a typical lab they are termed biohazardous waste, and disposed of as such. But those equivalents from a "vaccine" production facility are injected into people. No matter if one follows the most scrupulous of manufacturing protocols, a solution of lysed dead cells is just that.
I also spent 30yrs isolating DNA and sequencing and analyzing genomes, and not one time has any so-called virus that are supposed to be in these "vaccines" ever been isolated (meaning isolated) and its genome sequenced. A tough pill to swallow, perhaps, but considering the scientific rigor absent in every other aspect of pharmaceutical production, are we not going to ask for the scientific proof that viruses exist?
My first 4 Golden retrievers all had all their jabs and all had allergies, illnesses, gran mal seizures, and Cancer. During this time I started to research vaccines and 5 years ago when I got my 5th Golden at 5 Weeks old, I decided NO SHOTS. Not even the Stupid Rabies one. In 5 years he has visited a vet once. At 5 months I noticed a worm in his stool. ONE De-worming pill. That is it! No allergies, no ear infections, no skin rashes. He is the most Healthy dog I have ever known. Giving animals any Jabs is Animal Cruelty!
That is great Greg! It is all just to get money from you. Also they push the heart worm pills and flea pill, of which I never gave either. The vets are just pharma pushers too. So happy to hear your golden is in such wonderful health. :)
I think it is darker than even that. Isn't it obvious that having a dog these days is almost impossible. They're all being neutered, the food they eat is giving them permanent seizures, insurance companies and building owners are refusing housing to people with dogs. Dogs, who have saved the lives of men innumerable times in thousands of years and millions of loving pets, the last friend to ever betray you, is to be banned by 2030. That is the scientific consensus.
How do you control a population? Nothing showing any courageous attributes, and especially those as selfless as a dogs courage, will be allowed to inhabit the minds of men.
I came to the same conclusion 20 years ago with SARS 1 and H1N1 (here in Toronto) and my subsequent research into vaccines went deeper than Wakefield and I asked myself, why would I vaccinate my dogs if I would never do it for a human - which came to include the heartworm pills. Back then my family doc was a pediatrician and friend, and therefore open to such a conversation, but he retired shortly thereafter so, until now with the sequel - SARS 2 - I was pretty much on my own. It's wonderful to finally find a community here, thanks to real scientists like Unacceptable Jessica :)
I agree David. I gave up those shots to my dogs years ago. I only got the rabies one (every 3 years). This is all a scam. Little wonder our pets get sick with all these diseases that people get.
Dr. David Martin has a deep medical science and investment resume. Dr Martin also runs a company (M·CAM International) that finances cutting edge innovation worldwide. He is also one of the key people seeking justice in lawsuits suing medical companies and the federal government involved in delivering the so-called vaccines for CV19. In simple terms, according to Dr. Martin, the CV19 vaccines are “bioweapons.” Big Pharma and the government knew it and also knew it would cause massive deaths and permanent injuries. Dr. Martin says, “It’s going to get much worse. . . . It is not a Corona virus vaccine. It is a spike protein instruction to make the human body produce a toxin. . . . The fact of the matter is the injections are an act of bioweapons and bioterrorism. They are not a public health measure. The facts are very simple. This was premeditated. . . . This was a campaign of domestic terror to get the public to accept the universal vaccine platform using a known biological weapon. That is their own words and not my interpretation.”
How many will die from the CV19 bioweapons? Dr. Martin says, “By their own estimate, they are looking for 700 million people globally, and that would put the U.S. participation in that of the injected population as 75 million to 100 million people. . . . There are a lot of reasons why they hope it will be between now and 2028 because there is this tiny little glitch of the illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs. So, the fewer recipients of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the better. Not surprisingly, the recommendation was people over the age of 65 were the first ones to get injected.”
Dr. Martin thinks the catastrophic effects of the CV19 injections will hit the medical industry soon. Dr. Martin explains, “The dirty secret is . . . there are a lot of pilots having micro vascular and clotting problems, and that keeps them out of the cockpit, which is a good place to not have them if they are going to throw a clot for a stroke or a heart attack. The problem is we are going to see that exact same phenomenon in the healthcare industry and at a much larger scale. So, we now have, along with the actual problem . . . of people getting sick and people dying, we actually have that targeting the healthcare industry writ large. Which means we are going to have nurses and doctors who are going to be among the sick and dead. That also means the sick and the dying are also not going to get care.”
Dr. Martin and his group are suing everybody from President Biden along with the FDA, CDC, Pfizer, Moderna and many others over the deaths and injuries from the CV19 bioweapons fraudulently passed off as “vaccines.” The next big court case is July 6, 2022, in federal court in Utah. Dr. Martin contends “this is far worse” than the Nuremberg trials of Nazis after WWII and adds, “This is organized crime. . . . They have hidden behind the immunity shield that absolves them of product liability by naming the delivery of a bioweapon–a vaccination program. . . . This is actually a criminal act. This is an act of domestic terror, and it is an anti-trust violation. This is racketeering. This is old school racketeering, and it is no different than the mob in the 1920’s. This is old school racketeering for personal gain and profit at the expense of human lives. You need to call it what it is, and it’s organized crime. I would say the Nazis were better than the people who are doing this. . . . The real question is why did American citizens develop a weapon to kill Americans and get paid to do it? That is a morally outrageous question, and, unfortunately, almost no one is asking it.”
There is much more in the 1-hour and 3-minute interview.
Join Greg Hunter od USAWatchdog.com as he interviews Dr. David Martin, the top expert in the ongoing and unfolding CV19 vax genocide and litigation for 6.21.22.
Watch till the Very End. This is the most comprehensive history and solutions brought about yet!!
Frank, thanks for bringing up Dr. David Martin. Martin and others have shown that DARPA has been funding research resulting in US patent filings (publicly available) for last 2 decades, which suggests the “vaccine” was not as rushed as officially reported
Joe, you are welcome. David has lived these issues new to all of us for a long time. Remember, he was asked to be the GM of the dark side as outlined in his book Coup d’Twelve.. there is no person on this planet that has the insight he does.
If you can make it here is his next presentation:
You could obsess about paying your taxes, reminisce about the sinking of the Titanic or spend your April 15 with Dr. David Martin , Kim Martin and a bunch of our friends in Berkeley Springs WV...
I read yesterday that the reason the U.K. have / are stopping the push for the ‘free’ (taxpayer funded!) C19 injections - other than for the ‘vulnerable’ - is not based on health concerns / adverse effects of the products. It is a financial decision, due to the impact on the NHS, overwhelmed with treating those who ‘stepped forward and offered their arms’ and subsequently suffering.
Furthermore, The NHS in effect abandoned the general health of the nation by mass withdrawal or delays to access diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitative health measures and concentrated on covid, which has been disastrous.
Great article Jessica. I am shocked that even normal vaccines are not subjected to the rigorous testing that we have all been told. But I can attest that regular vaccines can and do cause serious adverse events, so it does fit with my experience. I had a bout with Parsonage-Turner Syndrome (Brachial Plexus Neuropathy) only days after a H1N1 shot. It was the most severe, searing, excruciating pain possible. It is essentially an auto-immune response to a vaccination that kills a nerve in the shoulder. The pain stops once the nerve is dead (3 weeks in my case) and then you have ZERO ability to move your arm. Its like the power cord to the muscles is cut. Then the arm muscles waste away. I will never get another vaccine, inoculation, jab, shot or injectable product for the rest of my life. I would rather die than go through that pain again. And that was from something 1000x safer than the Covid chemical.
I read Aaron's piece and my takeaway was that what we thought vaccines were and what they actually were, are two different things. We thought they were safe, tested extensively against placebos, gave lasting immunity, stopped the spread of disease, and were responsible for the elimination of the target disease.
None of that was ever true.
I thought his point was that we feel different about the Covid "vaccine" because we see the harm so clearly because we (1) gave it to adults and (2) gave it to most of the population at the same time. The reality he is alerting us to is that other "vaccines" are just as unsafe and ineffective, but we don't notice as much because infants can't complain and there are not as many vaccinated at once.
I though it was a great piece that is having the effect of alerting everyone as to the harm being caused by this industry.
words DO have power beyond their strict definition. the word vaccine carries a huge amount of weight in dogma. ZERO other medical product enjoys the amount of blind, unquestioning faith that vaccines do. Witness the fact that even people who otherwise would not touch a pharma product and acknowledge the vast corruption of the pharma industry, will defend vaccines vigorously, even in the absence of any real knowledge of the science. in that way, vaccines pretty much meet the definition of a religion, the followers more cult-like than any mere 'patients'. no amount of data will sway these folks. someone could drop in front of them with the needle still in their arm and they would still call it a coincidence.
add in to that, the LEGAL definition of 'vaccine', which also might be part of the perspective that Mr Siri is coming from (not sure if he mentions this in the original article; I need to go back and read it too). in naming the injectable product a 'vaccine', it now enjoys the liability shield, with the PREP act as the cherry on top. and just to be extra, extra sure that its all win/win for the makers, putting it on the US childhood schedule, indemnifies these jabs forever. unless of course, we succeed in tearing the whole sordid, deadly thing DOWN. and we dearly need to.
You are so correct! The word “vaccine” summons an army of blindly dogmatic defenders ... it calls forth the fertile soil of generations of carefully sown propaganda ... the word is massively important as a tool for selling anything to be injected by needle.
On a personal note, I am a person wary of any sort of directive, anti establishment at my obstinate core but I was completely fooled by the falsehoods of vaccination! I though there was an impeccable track record of safety and effectiveness that proved them necessary and good. I never wondered about the smallpox story I was first told in school at a very young age, I never questioned there were great advances in health and longevity due to this wonderful invention of forcing laden liquid into the skin with needles. Oh boy
BelleTower - when were you 'red pilled' into the falseness of the vaccine dogma, pre- or post-covid? just being curious as to what it takes for most to have the curtain pulled. its been 15 yrs for me. after my now-18 yr old son was dx with autism (which is multi-factorial - he also pulled a LOT of mercury from me, from amalgam dental fillings), the hardest thing for me to digest was the fact that our (US) agencies were LYING about vaccines. it was more difficult for me to accept THAT than to accept my son's developmental disability. in the intervening years, I seen nothing but MORE proof of their (CDC, FDA, HHS...) shameful shilling for pharma. MORE proof of wrongdoing, MORE proof of brainwashing propaganda. yet never in my wildest dreams did I think the whole covid debacle would happen. disheartening, yes but maybe, just maybe, it will be waking up MORE to question it all. but the 'faithful' koolaid drinkers are firmly entrenched
I have always been wary of vaccines, it never felt right holding that screaming baby while a nurse injected her with vial after vial … still I assumed I was the one in the wrong for not appreciating the marvelous tech enough to excuse the delivery methods. But then, long before most of my friends even knew there was a novel virus headed our way, I began to feel tremendous apprehension about things to come (my husband is from China and we were hearing reports from relatives). My mom senses were fully triggered and I knew there would be a “mandatory” vaccine being pushed on me and my kids … I could not have imagined at that time (January 2020) that it would come so quickly and incorporate gene therapy technology. I couldn’t sleep o was so very anxious about the future. By the time we locked down in March, I was a mess. I finally had to relinquish the problem to God. I prayed one night that He take my family on his hands and carry us through whatever was coming. Peace came to me then and over the next few months I researched everything I could get my hands on and built a very solid case for not taking any of the injections being offered. From there I was exposed to anti vax material I had not bothered to see before (this revelation re hep B vax is a good example) … I became entrenched ANTI VAX … a “never again” anti vaxxer.
BelleTower - yay on the 'mom senses'! the powers-that-be fail to take into account the very real intuitive senses of mothers (ok, parents in general. plenty of 'warrior dads' out there).
I am still struggling with the in-your-face reality of the totalitarian agenda. THAT'S what's keeping ME up at night!
us OG (old guard - I strongly identify as that though know many who have been in this fight longer than I, like Dr Brian Hooker and Polly Tommy, from 'Vaxxed' & CHD) used to be so fringe that we often flew completely under the radar (that's not to say we didn't FIGHT for more awareness). but no longer. we clearly have to choose a side of the barricades now.
I do have a tiny favor to ask (& its not in any way meant as criticism): please reconsider referring to yourself as 'anti-vax'. this is a pejorative & highly derogatory term planted on us by the opposition. (I've told friends & family that the term cringes like the N or R words to me.) I'm sure you've noticed how it has been slapped on ANYONE who veers 'off narrative' in the slightest.
several folks have offered up alternatives like "ex vaxxer" (Polly's preferred term) or 'vaccine risk aware' (Dr Lyons-Weiler). or even 'pro independent science'.
I'm not quite sure just yet how I feel about Health Freedom Movement but at least it has a positive connotation. who doesn't want to make their own health decisions, right??
I guess I am saying that using 'anti' anything kinda plays into the hands of the elites whose control we have to resist.
Okay you have a point re anti vaxxer pejorative … ex vaxxer is perfect! Also, tiny point of correction for you, warrior mom … OG is Original Gangsta obvs 😂. I have three teenagers at the moment so should not be questioned on this topic … I’ve been to school and back, mocked mercilessly on the finest points of language … ha ha ha!!
oh no! (lol) I have never heard that... Original Gangsta. (I have a 17 yr old and still never heard that.) well I guess I gotta 'school' some in the movement calling us veterans 'OG' (and they mean 'old guard') too funny. I guess I'll identify as 'old timer', lol.
yeah, ex vaxxer DOES fit for those of us who DID vax our kids, to negative results.
The world will be an immeasurably better place when humanity wakes up to the fact that there has never has been a need for vaccines - because there is no such thing as a virus.
"Vaccine (L. Vaccines, from vacca, a cow). Killed or modified live virus, bacteria, or rickettsiae prepared in suspension for inoculation. Used to treat certain infectious diseases.
Four classes: 1. Contains living attenuated infectious organisms 2. Contains infectious agents killed by physical or chemical means 3. Contains soluble toxins of microorganisms 4. Substances extracted from infectious agents
Function: to stimulate the development in the body of specific defensive mechanism which results in more or less permanent protection against a disease. An attack of smallpox or diphtheria leaves recovered patient permanently immune. A successful vaccine does the same thing without risk of illness."
From Tabers 1970.
I see no resemblance to the mRNA shot they've tried to sell as a "vaccine". Or apparently to several other "vaccines" currently on the market. Those have been deceptively marketed as vaccines as well..pertussis.
Yes, I'm old. But I can still spot the deception of the pharma industries. I guarantee many others learned this definition of "vaccine" and presumed this mode of action to still be the expectation.
I always appreciate your honesty, sense of humor and caring beyond your keen intellect. Thank you for your well thought out and communicative response. I want to add that I wrote to him privately about his piece. While he is hung up on the technicalities of “vaccine” he missed how the majority of people wrongly defined vaccines and how that was intentionally used to perpetrate this mass crime against humanity. I knew from watching The Highwire that these were not tested for ability to stop transmission so that is not new news but people argued with me way back then that of course they did. That is what vaccines do! Also, these were not studied to see if they could cause cancer or birth defects. I believe those are tested for with regular vaccines so I don’t believe these meet the same standards and criteria as the pre-Covid vaccines. Further, because they were first patented as gene therapy I think that should have been told and yes, they intentionally did not want that told because people would not want to take them. I hope he will follow up with a softer stance to his audience because they are helping to fund him doing very good work but he just offended the hands that feed the cause.
Aaron Siri Esq is a lawyer. He's looking at it purely from what he would be able to argue in court, what the otherside would present as rebuttal, and what he can likely win with.
He has/continues to have done great work and I'm glad for him being here and working with ICAN....BUT I do agree with your definition, on the whole and frankly if I was in court, I'd hope he would be arguing better than that.
A good judge would agree to the nuanced meaning and expanded definition you've given. And a crappy one would take the easy definition.
Agree! These are not vaccines they are LNP injectables they failed attempts at gene-BASED therapies. I love the way Jessica writes (humor and style included) and describes the essence of the reality.
Call them "covid-19 injections". It is accurate and all parties will understand the meaning without an unecessary nomenclature argument.
Furthermore, you touched on a fantastic point. We need to keep the definition of the word "vaccine". But we've discovered that no injections currently on the market (including the 110 forced into infants for profit) meet the definition of "vaccine".
So we need ensure that all "vaccines" meet the health and efficacy standards we were bamboozled into believing ever existed in the first place.
How we do that with the monumental corruption and rot in tgs FDA, NIH, and CDC is the hard part...
They simply changed the definitions so they all fit. It’s a pretty low bar. Do people know that having antibodies doesn’t equate to not spreading or becoming infected? Why are generic antibodies the definition at all for immunity? That shouldn’t be. It just makes people think they know something that they don’t. Oh, that’s why, silly me.
Yes, I agree - what is antibody generation other than our poor body screaming WTF? They admit to including aluminum, mercury, squalene etc precisely for that purpose. Fun times, eh :)
I'm with Siri on this one as it turns out the entire concept of 'vaccine' has been overrated and mythologized. Its time to audit them all.
I understand you and agree.
However that doesn't address Jessica's concern with the use of the word vaccine. The word has been used for years to propagandize people to take vaccine's. The word is charged.
To see how word meanings change with usage, consider the word "gay". For me the very first meaning "happy and carefree", then followed by homosexual. Why that order? Because I grew up with the original meaning of the word gay. Many decades before the current use of the word. So while it has faded into the background it still comes to mind first and then follow by the current meaning of "Gay".
So Jessica's concern about the collective understanding of the meaning of the word "Vaccine" is a valid concern, at least to me.
That's a strong point. Have to use the language as its understood if you are looking to meet people where they are at. I'd like to see things move so people realize like I did that the word works but only because other vaccines have as many issues with them as well.
Very good point.
Regarding language. I am not impressed with changing peoples thinking by changing the meaning of words.
The French language as I understand is quite accurate with it's meanings. They don't change over time. If this is true it is a blessing as generations can communicate clearly as well as books written hundreds of years ago still convey a clear meaning to the present day reader.
Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
A lot of words have been corrupted. One pernicious change highlighted years ago was for "pirate" which used to only refer to armed robbery of ships at sea or shore, not "theft" of "Intellectual Property" as was later corruptly added. It is nonsense to call copying of the intangible as theft, unless for a unique identifying mark or image. Most human ideas and knowledge were based upon many layers of older work, so much "IP" is overrated.
I'll tell you, I've bought every iteration of many an album from LP's, to cassettes, 4-track, 8-track, quad (which was the very best music I ever heard in ANY vehicle), then the fragile CD, then a tougher CD, finally ending in the downhill-through-slush-run that is iTunes: muddled muddy clipped noise...it's horrible.
The sound quality has diminished, spectacularly, in one generation. Unfamiliar to younger people are two things: Clear blue clean skies and the sound of a great music coming accurately out of a Hi-Fi, nothing clipped to increase storage space on the medium: If there were lots of songs, it'd be a double album, which was such a treat. Especially the art work.
What if I made cabinets? Beautiful cabinets. Should I get a royalty every time someone opens one of the cabinet doors? I have more right to expect it, since the cabinet provides timeless utility, regardless whether you like the cabinet or not. Most music is forgotten... today's music is especially forgettable...
I like the idea of inventors and creators having a way to gain materially from their work but IP is can be brutal. The example that comes to mind for me again and again was the use of forceps by a private practice during child birth. Which if made a widespread practice could have saved countless lives but served as a competitive advantage for this family business for a generation or so first. Where's the line? what's fair compensation, etc.
IP is every word we speak actually. If IP had been used and enforced from the beginning of human's evolution, we would still be in the stone age. What we have now is nothing less that glorified rent seeking hiding behind the mask of tangible property law and patents to garner unearned remuneration.
Please help me understand where my understanding is wrong.
Additional reply as I just got this email from the https://archive.org/ which I support.
Judge sets date of oral argument for March 20
Judge John G. Koeltl has set March 20 as the date for oral argument in Hachette v. Internet Archive, the lawsuit against our library. At its core, this lawsuit is about a library's right to own and lend books. We stand ready to fight this fight for all libraries!
How can you help?
Do you work in a library? Sign up for our Virtual March for Libraries to get in front of your representatives in Congress & speak up for library digital rights.
Do you use the Internet Archive for reading or research? We are gathering testimonials about how our library & collections are used in different research projects & settings. Share your story now!
Are you on social media? Over the next three weeks, we will be telling the story of how our library works and how the library practice of controlled digital lending is being used by libraries around the world. Please share these posts with your followers! We are active on Mastodon, Facebook & Twitter.
Want to help in other ways? Stay tuned for additional updates through this newsletter.
Whereas I grew up in the 90s, so I'm most familiar with the definition of "gay" as meaning "stupid". ;P
("You hear they banned roller blading in the mall?" "Yeah, that's so gay!")
I wonder what future generations will understand by the word "vaccine"...
With his name, he would be attuned to the power of words.
Can I just say, one of my favorite things about Substack is that folks like Aaron Siri and Jessica Rose are engaging in a public dialogue. They read each other, adapt to one another, acknowledge one another's points, retract and adapt their positions when they find they are wrong... and that, in my opinion is such a wonderful thing to see!! I also am guilty of sometimes reacting first, then carefully pondering what is being said. I hope I live out the example that Rose and Siri are setting--they aren't "colleagues" per se, since one is a biomedical researcher and one is an attorney, but they have perspectives that influence and craft one another and they engage with each other respectfully. It betters them both. And I hope I live out the example in my life, too.
We also email each other. :)
It's noteworthy that the initial misunderstanding was on Twitter, while the thoughtful piece was written on Substack - That which we call a Tweet by any other name would be as thoughtless.
haha! yes i couldn't have expressed how i feel and think about this complex issue in a 'tweet'.
I agree 100% with you Donna! You said that way better than I ever could have. unfortunately my patience for crafting eloquent sentences passed ~2.5 years ago with Fauci...LOL Thank you Donna.
And we too( as readers) are made better for this open engagement between these two (and other) thoughtful writers. So appreciated.
Apples are fruits. Oranges are fruits. Both are generally pretty safe to eat. Pokeberries are also fruits but are poisonous so it's best not to eat them. The only reason the authorities labelled the covid shots as vaccines was to play on the associations people had with previous vaccines as 'safe and effective.' Whether traditional vaccines are, in fact, safe or effective is questionable, as these address a myriad of different technologies, pathogens and infectious pathways and risk/benefit profiles. Nevertheless, they preyed up on people's general assumption of safety and efficacy of vaccines to put these nasty products into the masses.
Complete agree!
Gee. Let's just cut to the chase. The never has been, and never will be, a "safe and effective" "Vaccine". The "science" is based on 200 years of deception.
True- I grow the equivalent of traditional "vaccines" in the research lab, but in a typical lab they are termed biohazardous waste, and disposed of as such. But those equivalents from a "vaccine" production facility are injected into people. No matter if one follows the most scrupulous of manufacturing protocols, a solution of lysed dead cells is just that.
I also spent 30yrs isolating DNA and sequencing and analyzing genomes, and not one time has any so-called virus that are supposed to be in these "vaccines" ever been isolated (meaning isolated) and its genome sequenced. A tough pill to swallow, perhaps, but considering the scientific rigor absent in every other aspect of pharmaceutical production, are we not going to ask for the scientific proof that viruses exist?
After learning this over the past 12 - 15 months, I have decided that my dogs don't need annual jabs either.
My first 4 Golden retrievers all had all their jabs and all had allergies, illnesses, gran mal seizures, and Cancer. During this time I started to research vaccines and 5 years ago when I got my 5th Golden at 5 Weeks old, I decided NO SHOTS. Not even the Stupid Rabies one. In 5 years he has visited a vet once. At 5 months I noticed a worm in his stool. ONE De-worming pill. That is it! No allergies, no ear infections, no skin rashes. He is the most Healthy dog I have ever known. Giving animals any Jabs is Animal Cruelty!
That is great Greg! It is all just to get money from you. Also they push the heart worm pills and flea pill, of which I never gave either. The vets are just pharma pushers too. So happy to hear your golden is in such wonderful health. :)
I think it is darker than even that. Isn't it obvious that having a dog these days is almost impossible. They're all being neutered, the food they eat is giving them permanent seizures, insurance companies and building owners are refusing housing to people with dogs. Dogs, who have saved the lives of men innumerable times in thousands of years and millions of loving pets, the last friend to ever betray you, is to be banned by 2030. That is the scientific consensus.
How do you control a population? Nothing showing any courageous attributes, and especially those as selfless as a dogs courage, will be allowed to inhabit the minds of men.
I came to the same conclusion 20 years ago with SARS 1 and H1N1 (here in Toronto) and my subsequent research into vaccines went deeper than Wakefield and I asked myself, why would I vaccinate my dogs if I would never do it for a human - which came to include the heartworm pills. Back then my family doc was a pediatrician and friend, and therefore open to such a conversation, but he retired shortly thereafter so, until now with the sequel - SARS 2 - I was pretty much on my own. It's wonderful to finally find a community here, thanks to real scientists like Unacceptable Jessica :)
I agree David. I gave up those shots to my dogs years ago. I only got the rabies one (every 3 years). This is all a scam. Little wonder our pets get sick with all these diseases that people get.
https://twitter.com/NaturallyFTW/status/1625251557724811283?cxt=HHwWpsCzjcnrho4tAAAA
I've been laughed at as well. I don't care. Thanks for the short video.
I wish I could broadcast this around the world, far and wide!!
I've been looking for a short piece to illustrate my life long experience and horror with animal "vaccines".
I think the quotation marks around the word "vaccine" is necessary.
Because every "vaccine" is toxic.
Simply: poison.
Dr. David Martin has a deep medical science and investment resume. Dr Martin also runs a company (M·CAM International) that finances cutting edge innovation worldwide. He is also one of the key people seeking justice in lawsuits suing medical companies and the federal government involved in delivering the so-called vaccines for CV19. In simple terms, according to Dr. Martin, the CV19 vaccines are “bioweapons.” Big Pharma and the government knew it and also knew it would cause massive deaths and permanent injuries. Dr. Martin says, “It’s going to get much worse. . . . It is not a Corona virus vaccine. It is a spike protein instruction to make the human body produce a toxin. . . . The fact of the matter is the injections are an act of bioweapons and bioterrorism. They are not a public health measure. The facts are very simple. This was premeditated. . . . This was a campaign of domestic terror to get the public to accept the universal vaccine platform using a known biological weapon. That is their own words and not my interpretation.”
How many will die from the CV19 bioweapons? Dr. Martin says, “By their own estimate, they are looking for 700 million people globally, and that would put the U.S. participation in that of the injected population as 75 million to 100 million people. . . . There are a lot of reasons why they hope it will be between now and 2028 because there is this tiny little glitch of the illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs. So, the fewer recipients of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the better. Not surprisingly, the recommendation was people over the age of 65 were the first ones to get injected.”
Dr. Martin thinks the catastrophic effects of the CV19 injections will hit the medical industry soon. Dr. Martin explains, “The dirty secret is . . . there are a lot of pilots having micro vascular and clotting problems, and that keeps them out of the cockpit, which is a good place to not have them if they are going to throw a clot for a stroke or a heart attack. The problem is we are going to see that exact same phenomenon in the healthcare industry and at a much larger scale. So, we now have, along with the actual problem . . . of people getting sick and people dying, we actually have that targeting the healthcare industry writ large. Which means we are going to have nurses and doctors who are going to be among the sick and dead. That also means the sick and the dying are also not going to get care.”
Dr. Martin and his group are suing everybody from President Biden along with the FDA, CDC, Pfizer, Moderna and many others over the deaths and injuries from the CV19 bioweapons fraudulently passed off as “vaccines.” The next big court case is July 6, 2022, in federal court in Utah. Dr. Martin contends “this is far worse” than the Nuremberg trials of Nazis after WWII and adds, “This is organized crime. . . . They have hidden behind the immunity shield that absolves them of product liability by naming the delivery of a bioweapon–a vaccination program. . . . This is actually a criminal act. This is an act of domestic terror, and it is an anti-trust violation. This is racketeering. This is old school racketeering, and it is no different than the mob in the 1920’s. This is old school racketeering for personal gain and profit at the expense of human lives. You need to call it what it is, and it’s organized crime. I would say the Nazis were better than the people who are doing this. . . . The real question is why did American citizens develop a weapon to kill Americans and get paid to do it? That is a morally outrageous question, and, unfortunately, almost no one is asking it.”
There is much more in the 1-hour and 3-minute interview.
Join Greg Hunter od USAWatchdog.com as he interviews Dr. David Martin, the top expert in the ongoing and unfolding CV19 vax genocide and litigation for 6.21.22.
Watch till the Very End. This is the most comprehensive history and solutions brought about yet!!
https://usawatchdog.com/up-to-700-million-worldwide-will-die-from-cv19-vax-by-2028-dr-david-martin/
June 2023
Frank, thanks for bringing up Dr. David Martin. Martin and others have shown that DARPA has been funding research resulting in US patent filings (publicly available) for last 2 decades, which suggests the “vaccine” was not as rushed as officially reported
Joe, you are welcome. David has lived these issues new to all of us for a long time. Remember, he was asked to be the GM of the dark side as outlined in his book Coup d’Twelve.. there is no person on this planet that has the insight he does.
If you can make it here is his next presentation:
You could obsess about paying your taxes, reminisce about the sinking of the Titanic or spend your April 15 with Dr. David Martin , Kim Martin and a bunch of our friends in Berkeley Springs WV...
https://arlingtoninstitute.org/a-deep-assessment-of-the-biggest-change-in-history-making-our-way-through-the-coming-year/?fbclid=IwAR079GNps2UjsEuV1PEWO8M5XU--2Y9ZRmYzNoMVaDc-9hWF3tyKnbbtqVU
I read yesterday that the reason the U.K. have / are stopping the push for the ‘free’ (taxpayer funded!) C19 injections - other than for the ‘vulnerable’ - is not based on health concerns / adverse effects of the products. It is a financial decision, due to the impact on the NHS, overwhelmed with treating those who ‘stepped forward and offered their arms’ and subsequently suffering.
Furthermore, The NHS in effect abandoned the general health of the nation by mass withdrawal or delays to access diagnostic, therapeutic and rehabilitative health measures and concentrated on covid, which has been disastrous.
Never safe
Never effective
Never justified
Never free
And just like that.
They destroyed liberty
With malignant cells
Warning bells
All ignored
As many snored
Fast asleep
As the ship goes on sinking.
Sinking deep.
The media doesn't tell both sides.
It says one thing whilst the other hides
Sleight of hand
Heads in the sand
Collusion
Delusion
Leading us astray.
Is that freedom?
Is it our future?
Is this our fate?
Cancers
Tumors
Crippling
Sickling
Disasters
Forever fixed with sticky plasters
Bandaids on bullet wounds
Forever and ever
Never safe
Never effective
Never justified
Never free...
Never going to stop rebelling.
Not ever.
Not me.
When is a 'vaccine' not a 'vaccine'?
In the space it takes for Merriam Webster to update the definition...
Ba-da-boom, tish. Thank you. I'll get my coat...
lol
Great article Jessica. I am shocked that even normal vaccines are not subjected to the rigorous testing that we have all been told. But I can attest that regular vaccines can and do cause serious adverse events, so it does fit with my experience. I had a bout with Parsonage-Turner Syndrome (Brachial Plexus Neuropathy) only days after a H1N1 shot. It was the most severe, searing, excruciating pain possible. It is essentially an auto-immune response to a vaccination that kills a nerve in the shoulder. The pain stops once the nerve is dead (3 weeks in my case) and then you have ZERO ability to move your arm. Its like the power cord to the muscles is cut. Then the arm muscles waste away. I will never get another vaccine, inoculation, jab, shot or injectable product for the rest of my life. I would rather die than go through that pain again. And that was from something 1000x safer than the Covid chemical.
I read Aaron's piece and my takeaway was that what we thought vaccines were and what they actually were, are two different things. We thought they were safe, tested extensively against placebos, gave lasting immunity, stopped the spread of disease, and were responsible for the elimination of the target disease.
None of that was ever true.
I thought his point was that we feel different about the Covid "vaccine" because we see the harm so clearly because we (1) gave it to adults and (2) gave it to most of the population at the same time. The reality he is alerting us to is that other "vaccines" are just as unsafe and ineffective, but we don't notice as much because infants can't complain and there are not as many vaccinated at once.
I though it was a great piece that is having the effect of alerting everyone as to the harm being caused by this industry.
He certainly got you thinking Jessica! :)
Yes, the difference in visibility of harms is extremely interesting.
words DO have power beyond their strict definition. the word vaccine carries a huge amount of weight in dogma. ZERO other medical product enjoys the amount of blind, unquestioning faith that vaccines do. Witness the fact that even people who otherwise would not touch a pharma product and acknowledge the vast corruption of the pharma industry, will defend vaccines vigorously, even in the absence of any real knowledge of the science. in that way, vaccines pretty much meet the definition of a religion, the followers more cult-like than any mere 'patients'. no amount of data will sway these folks. someone could drop in front of them with the needle still in their arm and they would still call it a coincidence.
add in to that, the LEGAL definition of 'vaccine', which also might be part of the perspective that Mr Siri is coming from (not sure if he mentions this in the original article; I need to go back and read it too). in naming the injectable product a 'vaccine', it now enjoys the liability shield, with the PREP act as the cherry on top. and just to be extra, extra sure that its all win/win for the makers, putting it on the US childhood schedule, indemnifies these jabs forever. unless of course, we succeed in tearing the whole sordid, deadly thing DOWN. and we dearly need to.
You are so correct! The word “vaccine” summons an army of blindly dogmatic defenders ... it calls forth the fertile soil of generations of carefully sown propaganda ... the word is massively important as a tool for selling anything to be injected by needle.
On a personal note, I am a person wary of any sort of directive, anti establishment at my obstinate core but I was completely fooled by the falsehoods of vaccination! I though there was an impeccable track record of safety and effectiveness that proved them necessary and good. I never wondered about the smallpox story I was first told in school at a very young age, I never questioned there were great advances in health and longevity due to this wonderful invention of forcing laden liquid into the skin with needles. Oh boy
BelleTower - when were you 'red pilled' into the falseness of the vaccine dogma, pre- or post-covid? just being curious as to what it takes for most to have the curtain pulled. its been 15 yrs for me. after my now-18 yr old son was dx with autism (which is multi-factorial - he also pulled a LOT of mercury from me, from amalgam dental fillings), the hardest thing for me to digest was the fact that our (US) agencies were LYING about vaccines. it was more difficult for me to accept THAT than to accept my son's developmental disability. in the intervening years, I seen nothing but MORE proof of their (CDC, FDA, HHS...) shameful shilling for pharma. MORE proof of wrongdoing, MORE proof of brainwashing propaganda. yet never in my wildest dreams did I think the whole covid debacle would happen. disheartening, yes but maybe, just maybe, it will be waking up MORE to question it all. but the 'faithful' koolaid drinkers are firmly entrenched
I have always been wary of vaccines, it never felt right holding that screaming baby while a nurse injected her with vial after vial … still I assumed I was the one in the wrong for not appreciating the marvelous tech enough to excuse the delivery methods. But then, long before most of my friends even knew there was a novel virus headed our way, I began to feel tremendous apprehension about things to come (my husband is from China and we were hearing reports from relatives). My mom senses were fully triggered and I knew there would be a “mandatory” vaccine being pushed on me and my kids … I could not have imagined at that time (January 2020) that it would come so quickly and incorporate gene therapy technology. I couldn’t sleep o was so very anxious about the future. By the time we locked down in March, I was a mess. I finally had to relinquish the problem to God. I prayed one night that He take my family on his hands and carry us through whatever was coming. Peace came to me then and over the next few months I researched everything I could get my hands on and built a very solid case for not taking any of the injections being offered. From there I was exposed to anti vax material I had not bothered to see before (this revelation re hep B vax is a good example) … I became entrenched ANTI VAX … a “never again” anti vaxxer.
BelleTower - yay on the 'mom senses'! the powers-that-be fail to take into account the very real intuitive senses of mothers (ok, parents in general. plenty of 'warrior dads' out there).
I am still struggling with the in-your-face reality of the totalitarian agenda. THAT'S what's keeping ME up at night!
us OG (old guard - I strongly identify as that though know many who have been in this fight longer than I, like Dr Brian Hooker and Polly Tommy, from 'Vaxxed' & CHD) used to be so fringe that we often flew completely under the radar (that's not to say we didn't FIGHT for more awareness). but no longer. we clearly have to choose a side of the barricades now.
I do have a tiny favor to ask (& its not in any way meant as criticism): please reconsider referring to yourself as 'anti-vax'. this is a pejorative & highly derogatory term planted on us by the opposition. (I've told friends & family that the term cringes like the N or R words to me.) I'm sure you've noticed how it has been slapped on ANYONE who veers 'off narrative' in the slightest.
several folks have offered up alternatives like "ex vaxxer" (Polly's preferred term) or 'vaccine risk aware' (Dr Lyons-Weiler). or even 'pro independent science'.
I'm not quite sure just yet how I feel about Health Freedom Movement but at least it has a positive connotation. who doesn't want to make their own health decisions, right??
I guess I am saying that using 'anti' anything kinda plays into the hands of the elites whose control we have to resist.
Okay you have a point re anti vaxxer pejorative … ex vaxxer is perfect! Also, tiny point of correction for you, warrior mom … OG is Original Gangsta obvs 😂. I have three teenagers at the moment so should not be questioned on this topic … I’ve been to school and back, mocked mercilessly on the finest points of language … ha ha ha!!
oh no! (lol) I have never heard that... Original Gangsta. (I have a 17 yr old and still never heard that.) well I guess I gotta 'school' some in the movement calling us veterans 'OG' (and they mean 'old guard') too funny. I guess I'll identify as 'old timer', lol.
yeah, ex vaxxer DOES fit for those of us who DID vax our kids, to negative results.
The world will be an immeasurably better place when humanity wakes up to the fact that there has never has been a need for vaccines - because there is no such thing as a virus.
True, there is no scientific proof that viruses exist.
"Vaccine (L. Vaccines, from vacca, a cow). Killed or modified live virus, bacteria, or rickettsiae prepared in suspension for inoculation. Used to treat certain infectious diseases.
Four classes: 1. Contains living attenuated infectious organisms 2. Contains infectious agents killed by physical or chemical means 3. Contains soluble toxins of microorganisms 4. Substances extracted from infectious agents
Function: to stimulate the development in the body of specific defensive mechanism which results in more or less permanent protection against a disease. An attack of smallpox or diphtheria leaves recovered patient permanently immune. A successful vaccine does the same thing without risk of illness."
From Tabers 1970.
I see no resemblance to the mRNA shot they've tried to sell as a "vaccine". Or apparently to several other "vaccines" currently on the market. Those have been deceptively marketed as vaccines as well..pertussis.
Yes, I'm old. But I can still spot the deception of the pharma industries. I guarantee many others learned this definition of "vaccine" and presumed this mode of action to still be the expectation.
I always appreciate your honesty, sense of humor and caring beyond your keen intellect. Thank you for your well thought out and communicative response. I want to add that I wrote to him privately about his piece. While he is hung up on the technicalities of “vaccine” he missed how the majority of people wrongly defined vaccines and how that was intentionally used to perpetrate this mass crime against humanity. I knew from watching The Highwire that these were not tested for ability to stop transmission so that is not new news but people argued with me way back then that of course they did. That is what vaccines do! Also, these were not studied to see if they could cause cancer or birth defects. I believe those are tested for with regular vaccines so I don’t believe these meet the same standards and criteria as the pre-Covid vaccines. Further, because they were first patented as gene therapy I think that should have been told and yes, they intentionally did not want that told because people would not want to take them. I hope he will follow up with a softer stance to his audience because they are helping to fund him doing very good work but he just offended the hands that feed the cause.
Aaron Siri Esq is a lawyer. He's looking at it purely from what he would be able to argue in court, what the otherside would present as rebuttal, and what he can likely win with.
He has/continues to have done great work and I'm glad for him being here and working with ICAN....BUT I do agree with your definition, on the whole and frankly if I was in court, I'd hope he would be arguing better than that.
A good judge would agree to the nuanced meaning and expanded definition you've given. And a crappy one would take the easy definition.
Agree! These are not vaccines they are LNP injectables they failed attempts at gene-BASED therapies. I love the way Jessica writes (humor and style included) and describes the essence of the reality.
Call them "covid-19 injections". It is accurate and all parties will understand the meaning without an unecessary nomenclature argument.
Furthermore, you touched on a fantastic point. We need to keep the definition of the word "vaccine". But we've discovered that no injections currently on the market (including the 110 forced into infants for profit) meet the definition of "vaccine".
So we need ensure that all "vaccines" meet the health and efficacy standards we were bamboozled into believing ever existed in the first place.
How we do that with the monumental corruption and rot in tgs FDA, NIH, and CDC is the hard part...
They simply changed the definitions so they all fit. It’s a pretty low bar. Do people know that having antibodies doesn’t equate to not spreading or becoming infected? Why are generic antibodies the definition at all for immunity? That shouldn’t be. It just makes people think they know something that they don’t. Oh, that’s why, silly me.
Yes, I agree - what is antibody generation other than our poor body screaming WTF? They admit to including aluminum, mercury, squalene etc precisely for that purpose. Fun times, eh :)