Something is wrong with the view-ability of this article. Someone is working for the wrong side and interfering with data and information dissemination from this newsletter.
I heard him say somthing of the sort before telling us we needed to invade everywhere we had not yet invaded to make sure they were not a threat to democracy.
Thank fuck he is DEAD!! Kissinger once said of Rumsfeld, "He is the most RUTHLESS man I have ever met!" - Yup let that sink in, Kissinger said that of Rummy! HOLY SHIT!! Oh and thank fuck Kissinger is DEAD too and McCain and Zbgniew. Bunch of assholes the lot of em. Cant wait for the rest of em to drop dead too.
So there are the things we know we know, the things we don't know but we know we don't know, and then there are the things we don't know we don't know... and that's the sticky wicket!
Are there really even viruses being passed around interspecies or is this just a bunch of mumbo jumbo based on infectious clone lab experiments?
Show me a paper where they isolated H5N1 from a bird, grew it up in cell culture, aerosolized it, infected an animal model with it and witnessed that animal model infect other animal models in close proximity.
They are searching for a Marek's Chicken sort of virus/disease. read up on the Wiki on the disease, because sounds about ideal for exploitation into humans.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marek's_disease
So the key here is all cases even AI says there is a probability that it can happen in a person. I guess i would like to know if the AI thinks GOF would be successful in a lab setting and could that be packaged as a bio weapon brought to market as a "vaccine"?
There are a lot of: Uncommon, extremely unlikely, extremely rare, biosafety measures, Most recombinants would be non-viable, Vaccine development includes extensive safety testing, might not be compatible, less likely due to. . ., it might be attenuated, would face intense scrutiny from regulatory bodies due to the potential biosecurity and biosafety risks, etc. We have seen all that language before withte Covid injections. Okay! Even with the best of intentions and following the best of their safety measures, when these injections are given to 100 million people, what are the chances of rare unlikely things mentioned to occur in percentages of that population? To spread to others? To permanently move through populations?
On top of all the concerns in the article, this technology looks to be a platform for enhanced bio-weapon development.
I bet some of you had mothers whom while cooking spaghetti for your dinner, would take a long strand of spaghetti out of the boiling water and throw it against the kitchen cabinet. “If it sticks, it’s DONE!” my mother would say gleefully. These scientists cats, I don’t know, but they remind me of that cooking trick- throwing stuff at a wall to see what sticks. They’ve really no idea if it’s al dente or not.
Probably a completely stupid question but when I don't understand something I always ask. As I understand it H5N1 is related to Influenza A. So neither are Coronas, right?
That being the case, why is the "spike" being used as antigen when H5N1 doesn't have spikes?
The H5N1 and similar flu viruses contain hemagglutinin, which is an antigenic glycoprotein found on the surface of the influenza viruses and is responsible for binding the virus to the cell that is being infected. Hemagglutinin forms spikes at the surface of flu viruses such as H5N1 that function to attach viruses to cells.
Many viruses feature 'spikes' which are raised functional sites on the surface of the virus. With sars-cov-2 the teerm 'spike protein' became a commonly known form of viral functional site, but not all spikes are sars-cov-2 spikes.
Thanks for the interesting response. But it is my understanding that such proteins represent the normal agonist/antagonist receptor binding process and do not represent "spikes" as such. These viruses (Influenza A and B and others) are NOT classified as "coronas" and do not demonstrate the normal appearance of coronas under EM which for a corona typically show the "halo" around the capsid which gives rise to their name?
So they call it a "pandemic" product, paid for by DARPA. And even Grok the AI is saying it might be a bad idea. And they won't tell you what the sequences for the alphavirus' are or the inserted genes so you can assess compatibility. Also they haven't assessed the LNP's for safety... This leads me to believe they are creating a bioweapon with potential for catastrophic consequences that they don't fully understand or care to.
Surfboards are in part made of resin polymers. Polyethylene glycol is also made from polymers. LNP’s is a cute misleading word for something made to sound organic from the body, but the ones in the Covid “vaccine” are not. They are synthetic; they are polymers which are toxic to the body.
I’m talking about synthetic LNP’s such as the PEG (polyethylene glycol) that is used to encapsulate the mRNA such as is used in the Covid / comirnaty “vaccine”.
Something is wrong with the view-ability of this article. Someone is working for the wrong side and interfering with data and information dissemination from this newsletter.
OK, we'll fix 'em.
Fried? Sauteed? Aperitif?
'Unexplored' is a good way of putting it, kind of like the 'unexplored' consequences of hunting blindfolded!
I see three posibilities;
they know what they are doing
they don't know what they are doing
they know they don't know what they are doing and don't care.
Have you been reading Rumsfeld?
I heard him say somthing of the sort before telling us we needed to invade everywhere we had not yet invaded to make sure they were not a threat to democracy.
Thank fuck he is DEAD!! Kissinger once said of Rumsfeld, "He is the most RUTHLESS man I have ever met!" - Yup let that sink in, Kissinger said that of Rummy! HOLY SHIT!! Oh and thank fuck Kissinger is DEAD too and McCain and Zbgniew. Bunch of assholes the lot of em. Cant wait for the rest of em to drop dead too.
So there are the things we know we know, the things we don't know but we know we don't know, and then there are the things we don't know we don't know... and that's the sticky wicket!
I keep getting the mental image of children with sharpies running around unattended in a priceless art museum. Seems of the same dynamics.
If only they saw us as priceless art.
They don't. You are the carbon needing reduction.
You don't need to screw around with vaccines, these are Rdrp viruses and can be stopped with zinc and zinc ionophores such as quercetin. That goes for RSV, too: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7255455/pdf/ijmm-46-01-0017.pdf
Are there really even viruses being passed around interspecies or is this just a bunch of mumbo jumbo based on infectious clone lab experiments?
Show me a paper where they isolated H5N1 from a bird, grew it up in cell culture, aerosolized it, infected an animal model with it and witnessed that animal model infect other animal models in close proximity.
Bet we can’t find one.
Caveat emptor with all of this shit IMHO.
I vote it is infectious clone lab experiments. They want us to be lab rats.
And a demoncracy worshipper pipes in 'voting fixes!'
Thanks for the laugh.
They are searching for a Marek's Chicken sort of virus/disease. read up on the Wiki on the disease, because sounds about ideal for exploitation into humans.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marek's_disease
So the key here is all cases even AI says there is a probability that it can happen in a person. I guess i would like to know if the AI thinks GOF would be successful in a lab setting and could that be packaged as a bio weapon brought to market as a "vaccine"?
There are a lot of: Uncommon, extremely unlikely, extremely rare, biosafety measures, Most recombinants would be non-viable, Vaccine development includes extensive safety testing, might not be compatible, less likely due to. . ., it might be attenuated, would face intense scrutiny from regulatory bodies due to the potential biosecurity and biosafety risks, etc. We have seen all that language before withte Covid injections. Okay! Even with the best of intentions and following the best of their safety measures, when these injections are given to 100 million people, what are the chances of rare unlikely things mentioned to occur in percentages of that population? To spread to others? To permanently move through populations?
On top of all the concerns in the article, this technology looks to be a platform for enhanced bio-weapon development.
Looks like a self-amplifying bioweapon to me, a bio-nano-tech weapon.
I bet some of you had mothers whom while cooking spaghetti for your dinner, would take a long strand of spaghetti out of the boiling water and throw it against the kitchen cabinet. “If it sticks, it’s DONE!” my mother would say gleefully. These scientists cats, I don’t know, but they remind me of that cooking trick- throwing stuff at a wall to see what sticks. They’ve really no idea if it’s al dente or not.
Probably a completely stupid question but when I don't understand something I always ask. As I understand it H5N1 is related to Influenza A. So neither are Coronas, right?
That being the case, why is the "spike" being used as antigen when H5N1 doesn't have spikes?
The H5N1 and similar flu viruses contain hemagglutinin, which is an antigenic glycoprotein found on the surface of the influenza viruses and is responsible for binding the virus to the cell that is being infected. Hemagglutinin forms spikes at the surface of flu viruses such as H5N1 that function to attach viruses to cells.
Many viruses feature 'spikes' which are raised functional sites on the surface of the virus. With sars-cov-2 the teerm 'spike protein' became a commonly known form of viral functional site, but not all spikes are sars-cov-2 spikes.
Thanks for the interesting response. But it is my understanding that such proteins represent the normal agonist/antagonist receptor binding process and do not represent "spikes" as such. These viruses (Influenza A and B and others) are NOT classified as "coronas" and do not demonstrate the normal appearance of coronas under EM which for a corona typically show the "halo" around the capsid which gives rise to their name?
This isn't about health.
Thank you for your magnificent efforts.
So they call it a "pandemic" product, paid for by DARPA. And even Grok the AI is saying it might be a bad idea. And they won't tell you what the sequences for the alphavirus' are or the inserted genes so you can assess compatibility. Also they haven't assessed the LNP's for safety... This leads me to believe they are creating a bioweapon with potential for catastrophic consequences that they don't fully understand or care to.
And it looks like California is their test market….
Horrifying to say the least . Thanks Jessica , this is immensely significant.
Last night Steve Kirsch talked with Dr. David Martin who said it has been known since 2018
that pseudouredine causes cancer. When injected into animals 100% of them got cancer.
And it does not stabilize the mRNA, so why is it in the jabs unless for depopulation? Or to boost sales of Pfizer's cancer drugs?
I believe that was Dr. Malone's baby look it up.. the pseudouredine was used because it doesn't break down... naturally!
Surfboards are in part made of resin polymers. Polyethylene glycol is also made from polymers. LNP’s is a cute misleading word for something made to sound organic from the body, but the ones in the Covid “vaccine” are not. They are synthetic; they are polymers which are toxic to the body.
Am I right?
From my understanding of the published research, LNPs (in pure form) are toxic primarily due to their zeta potential, not due to 'being polymers'.
I’m talking about synthetic LNP’s such as the PEG (polyethylene glycol) that is used to encapsulate the mRNA such as is used in the Covid / comirnaty “vaccine”.
What I try to comprehend is child's play for you Dr. J...