36 Comments
User's avatar
LCC's avatar

Agreed. If you are not familiar with scientific papers then this is a great introduction into manipulation of science by those in positions to influence public policy.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

Sad thing is it's nothing new either. When I was a student at university we was offered courses in how to write grant applications - that's no big deal perhaps but having courses in how to write a research proposal is, because that porcess can be laced and laden with leading key owrds and phrases, heavily influencing what research is given the go ahead in the first place.

And for some reason, it was never politically sensitive issues - the ones where you really need to know in detail all the who's and what's and so on.

I have a sibling who teaches at university, and it's the same still. Sibling is in the natural sciences and says this: "Write one single article speaking out against the big business interests and you're blacklisted for life".

Expand full comment
Jayne Doe's avatar

Excellent editorial analysis by Dr Robert Malone. I concur completetly. PS sounds like they might use it to push higher or more frequent toxins into the litle children. We have to keep trying to shut this down before April's FDA/CDC/Pfizer push, in my opinion.

Expand full comment
Alan Davis (FlyoverAlinCT)'s avatar

A-men! Thanks Jessica!

Expand full comment
southern kiwi's avatar

Agreed, one of Malone's very best articles.

Expand full comment
Jayne Doe's avatar

Their conclusion is pure propaganda/agenda b..s..! I'm sooo sick of this "chimeric" defamation of True Science and Research.

Expand full comment
Kayla Wildman's avatar

The chimeric of science and propaganda...

Expand full comment
Kayla Wildman's avatar

Just read this peer review on Malone’s substack. *Very educational*. Thank you for republishing it here!

Expand full comment
Mark Reeder's avatar

Rosenberg was also lead author of the infamous NY hospital study (May 2020) which downplayed the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine against Covid.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7215635/#__ffn_sectitle

Expand full comment
Mark Reeder's avatar

Here is a closely related NEJM article on how HCQ performed on NY hospitalized patients led by Neal Schluger. Same approach and timeframe.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2012410

Expand full comment
Mark Reeder's avatar

Recall: it was Schluger’s *editorial* which called for an end to HCQ efforts against Covid in summer of 2020.

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-5041

Expand full comment
M. Dowrick's avatar

Clear as a bell and don’t we all wish Dr Malone was a reviewer for all of these spirited, but biased studies presented for review and publication. Dr. Malone’s use of the three strikes and your out analogy seems fitting for this study. Sadly most of us do not have access to medical journals. Because if we did, he gave us a very good template to judge the quality of a study, even as a Kay person💕💕

Expand full comment
Kayla Wildman's avatar

You’ve got some access to medical journals through pre-prints and through PubMed. Do a little googling and you can learn to use these sources.

Also, *highly recommended*: The IPAK journal “Science, Public Health Policy, and Law” — Editor is James Lyons-Weiler. A small journal accessible free online including back issues. He has published two of Jessica Rose’s reports on VAERS.

The free newsletter of Children’s Health Defense is a good source for fairly easy-to-read reviews of many studies related to COVID, vaccines (COVID and others), and toxics impacting kids’ health.

I hope this is helpful to you.

Expand full comment
M. Dowrick's avatar

Thanks💕

Expand full comment
Kayla Wildman's avatar

BTW, James Lyons-Weiler has an educational project where people can take online courses taught by scientists. Not long ago he offered a course on reading and understanding scientific studies (and I think that included medical studies). I have a great deal of respect for Lyons-Weiler's work as a scientist, publisher, and educator.

Expand full comment
veggie warrior's avatar

Go to Google Scholar and you'll find lots of papers.

Expand full comment
Richard Warner's avatar

I saw this note under table 2 of the study: “Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively-

increased risk for those vaccinated.” I’d like the authors to let us know just how likely, if that’s OK. I don’t need any statistics. They could use “really, really likely,” or maybe “more likely than not.” Just ballpark it. After all, we’re just vaccinating kids.

Expand full comment
Kayla Wildman's avatar

Your sarcasm is an excellent sauce over the top of the study authors' bovine manure. Phrases like "estimator instability and/or residual confounding" are so delicious. They deserve the best topping.

Expand full comment
Barry O'Kenyan's avatar

1. There is no such thing as "independent" peer review (PR).

2. Former journal editors have said that "a PR can mean anything or nothing".

3. At least 50% of PR "studies" were bogus since they could not be replicated.

Expand full comment
Nnikk's avatar

Robert Malone has been saying many right things for a while which we are all glad to be hearing. But he has a very long history, as he points out himself, in what might be termed "the vaccine/virus game" that raise some questions, in my mind (for one), and I'm wondering to what extent, Jessica, you and others who follow your substack have examined this history with a critical eye. Would love to see Malone interviewed by a someone with indepth awareness of his career and activities over time who was also willing and capable of asking penetrating and illuminating questions. Forgive my not specifying my suspicions, i.e., questions, re Malone. But those questions are already out there for those who have been following the narratives.

Expand full comment
Lidia's avatar

I think everyone is so desperate for a hero that they are not inclined to look this gift horse(man) in the mouth.

Expand full comment
Mark Much's avatar

Sucharit Bhakti said "if you take these jabs you will go to your doom." That's all I need to know.

And Biden is urging Ukrainians to protect themselves: "Get vaccinated!"

Expand full comment
Michael Ward's avatar

More important than vaccine effectiveness results is the lesson Malone gives on how to think properly about (analyze) the paper. This seems to be where things are falling apart for many people. The fear does not help rationality. Morpheus: "This is Zion, and we are not afraid!" www.youtube.com/watch?v=CY5VqsgpENQ

Expand full comment
Kyle Young's avatar

In addition to the critique that Malone puts forth, I would add: Where is the proof that covid, omicron or any of the other variants have actually been isolated and viewed as an intact virus? Computer generated, 'cut and paste' "viruses" don't count. It seems like a paper about ghosts is unworthy right out of the gate.

Taking the time and effort to review this document lends it far too much credibility.

https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/does-the-covid-virus-exist?utm_source=url

https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/does-the-covid-virus-exist-2?utm_source=url

Expand full comment
Lidia's avatar

I agree, but Malone is developing his own non-mRNA injection, under the assumption "covid-19" is going to remain a deadly disease.. what's the phrase? .. a "Public Health Emergency of International Concern" (which definition triggers pre-determined government actions on everything from border closures to being required to buy pharma products to suspension of civil liberties).

He thinks (wants it to be that?) the emergency will go on for the foreseeable future and doesn't seem to be doing anything to dampen the idea that C-19 will be a forever issue.

Expand full comment
Roleigh Martin's avatar

Jessica, I know you examine raw data. I see the Pfizer court ordered documents for March 1, 2022, have been released. I imagine this document would be of interest to examine, but you'd have to get a utility to convert it from PDF to Word, then you can accept corrections, to see it in a form that is readable.

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M5_c4591001-T-S-final-reacto-tables-track.pdf

This document was obtained perusing and examining a host of documents dumped on this date from Pfizer. https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

Expand full comment
paolo's avatar

txs, Malone did a nice didactic job on that!

Expand full comment