There's no problem here. Look away.
A response to the question: Is SV40 promoter/enhancer DNA present in the COVID-19 product vials?
Here is the response from Peter Marks, MD, PhD to Joseph A. Lapado, MD, PhD. Peter Marks is the Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and Joseph A. Lapado is the surgeon general of Florida.
This document can be found in this Brownstone article written by Robert Malone entitled: FDA Fails to Address DNA Adulteration Concerns.
I’d say it did.
There are a few comments I would like to make and a few questions I would like to ask, if I may, and in addition to writing this piece for the public in this space, I will reach out to Dr. Lapado and ask him to add them to the inevitable response letter to Dr. Marks.
Comment 1: Dr. Marks, you claim in your response on December 14, 2023 that “no SV40 proteins are encoded by the nucleotide sequences present in the mRNA vaccines”, and that this claim has been validated by “quantitative PCR assay”.
Please respond to the following: Quantitative PCR assays likely won’t ‘pick-up’ DNA fragments or amplicons less than 100 base pairs. The SV40 enhancer is 72 bp. The SV40 enhancer, a nuclear location sequence, is an SV40 element found using various sequencing techniques by independent labs in multiple COVID-19 modified mRNA product vials with appropriate cold chain management. Therefore, perhaps the validated quantitation technique used by the FDA requires refinement in order to detect these smaller DNA fragments.
qPCR standard curves using 100% intact synthetic DNA standards will amplify more efficiently and thus undercount the total digested DNA contamination.
Phillip Buckhaults used Oxford Nanopore (ONT) for sequencing vial contents and found that at least half of all the DNA fragments were smaller than 100 base pairs.
It would be prudent in light of these findings for the FDA to reproduce the works using methodologies and protocols outlined here, here and here to confirm - or deny - the presence of the SV40 elements in the COVID-19 modified mRNA vials.
Question 1: Could DNA:RNA hybridization during modified mRNA synthesis affect DNase robustness?
Question 2: Could this be the reason for the lower %RNA integrity observed in the commercial (Process 2) versus clinical (Process 1) batches?
Question 3: Could this be the reason for the lack of ‘robustness of the DNase digestion step’ as observed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in March 2021?
At this point, this letter alone has to be sufficient proof of malice for any objective person evaluating the FDAs performance over the last 3 years. I mean, he is claiming facts that can not be supported with anything but mal intent.
1. Multiple 3rd party labs/researchers found the sv40 enhancer. His response (paraphrased), "There is no sv40 to be found in the vials " But it was found. "Not by us. " Did you try to replicate the tests that found it? "No. So quit lying about it, you bad people."
2. Cancer rates and excess deaths are drastically increased globally, as shown by multiple reputable countries, organizations, etc. His next defense, "If it was in there, we would see increased cancer rates and excess deaths. Since we are not seeing anything like that, we can safely say that it is not in there."
One does not need a medical degree to know that he is blatantly lying.
One does not need a history degree to know how this ends.
Now I gotta grab a shower and go try to bully my way in to a hospital to see a loved one who has had 6 heart attacks in the last 2 days and is now experiencing full blown sepsis. She won't make it through today. I can't even count the number of people I've lost just this year, let alone since 2020. I don't think i have it in me to visit any more dying friends after this. I guess I'll try visiting dying enemies.
They take their commitment to public safety so seriously, that they rolled out a completely different product on an unsuspecting Public, to what they tested in their clinical trials.
They take their commitment to public safety so seriously, that they lied and told pregnant women their shots were safe, despite never being tested in pregnancy.
They take their commitment to public safety so seriously, that they told everyone to just mix and match different brands and modalities, despite never having tested for interactions.
They take their commitment to public safety so seriously, that they didn't tell the Public they had actually recorded 1223 serious-as-a-heart attack adverse events, not just “a headache and a sore red arm”.
In fact they were SO committed to this commitment, they fought the Courts to keep the data buried for 75 years.
Then took their commitment to public safety even more seriously, by hiding the fact that the shot never stayed in the arm, but within hours travelled to every organ (and vaccine in your heart or your brain is a VERY bad idea).
They took their commitment to public safety so seriously, that they even hired General Dynamic to catalogue the avalanche of expected adverse events, telling them that up to 1,000 reports a day with half classed as 'serious', were anticipated, and that the COVID vaccines might generate nearly seven times as many reports as all other vaccines combined (a 600% increase). They had to reassess, refinance, and expand and upgrade their resources, 4 different times because the sheer volume swamped initial estimates.
Eventually - so committed were they - that they started fudging, burying, misclassifying and throttling their own VAERS database, lest the Public see just how safe & effective, and stunning & brave their kill shot was.