34 Comments

I have a friend who is vaccinated and subsequently had a miscarriage. I told her to report to VAERS. She went through the whole process. Submitted her vaccine lot numbers, the whole jam. She got a message that her report was incomplete and it required vaccine lot numbers which she submitted. She redid the report (I imagine many people do not) and has heard CRICKETS.

Expand full comment
author

This sounds typical.

Expand full comment

This is absolutely unconscionable. They know this is happening and aren’t doing anything about it.

If the rate is 2.7/100,000 women, that is for *all* women, not just pregnant ones, right? So the true number for pregnant women only is probably actually even more horrifying. Does the data include an indicator for pregnancy so this could be calculated?

Expand full comment

Maybe compare the rate to the women coming across the border.

Expand full comment

I guess we'll have to apologize to our local conspiracy theorist again. It was all about population control after all. If you accept the premise that the world is overpopulated, children must be eliminated. The pieces are falling into place.

Expand full comment

According to the linked article by Daniel Horowitz at The Blaze, the DMED data said there were 4,182 miscarriages reported during the first 10 months of 2021, representing a 300% rate increase compared to the five-year average. Isn't this the number that should be compared to the VAERS incident report rate in 2021?

But, wouldn't the DMED data have to be adjusted for the much larger percentage of military women who are of child-bearing age, compared to VAERS? And perhaps military women are less likely to be trying to get pregnant, compared to the general population?

What we really want to know, is whether the jabs are causing miscarriages. It seems that from the DMED data alone, the case is clear -- assuming that Renz's whistleblowers are reporting accurately.

Expand full comment
author

sure, we can compare those 2 numbers. But I wanted to establish a baseline for the previous years so i could take a crack at the URF. no COVID shit. I don't think there's any doubt about causation here.

Expand full comment

OK, I agree that this method can lead to an estimate of the URF. And I understand that you're trying to be conservative in avoiding "COVID shit". But it's interesting to see what happens if we compare VAERS 2021 to DMED 2021.

According to the Blaze article's claim that DMED saw a 300% increase from baseline to 2021, and with your correction for percentage of women under 40, we get a rate of about 915 spontaneous abortions per 100K in DMED 2021. Which would make the estimated VAERS 2021 URF jump all the way up to 120.

My proposed adjustment for "military women less likely to get pregnant" would only push the URF estimate even higher. Which of course seems nuts, but the old Harvard Pilgrim study came up with a URF over 100.

Expand full comment
Jan 28, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose

I’m presuming the DMED data set is mostly, if not all , women of child bearing years? If so, shouldn’t you be using the number of women of child bearing age times the rate of miscarriage not the total number of vaxxed women?

Expand full comment
author
Jan 28, 2022·edited Jan 28, 2022Author

right you are... hard to get my hands on that data. it will make the URF lower. gonna try.

Expand full comment

Jessica, I love your response to DM, and thanks for your input DM. This is exactly how this dialog should be going all around the world - working TOGETHER to figure out the REALITY of what we are facing.

Expand full comment

The URF (the rate of miscarriages) is based on the DOMD data. That doesn't change. Multiplying that rate by a smaller number (women of child bearing age rather than all women) will yield a smaller total number of miscarriages.

Expand full comment

This might be the data you need. I remember downloading a spreadsheet several months ago with vaccination each day for each age group in the US. I went through my links, and I think this was where I found it: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-demographics-trends

Expand full comment

This is a horrifying development.

Expand full comment

It's a crime to give these poisons to a pregnant woman. It was a crime for the FDA and CDC to promote this. While it is informative to calculate the URF it is still a crime even the URF is 1. Dr Thorp has been talking about his experience. Here is one interview. https://www.bitchute.com/video/NkHW1DwKuKK2/

Expand full comment

Terrible, just terrible. On Steve Kirsch's substack today he pushed this video link, and said that Pierre Cory texted him the photos. The news just does not get any better... Worldwide Exclusive: Embalmers Find Veins & Arteries Filled with Never Before Seen Rubbery Clots

Expand full comment

Well, all in all, we’re approaching the end of humankind, one way or another.

Expand full comment
Jan 29, 2022·edited Jan 30, 2022

My neice is vaxxed and now expecting. In my mind there is nothing I can do. I feel any info I would give would only make it worse. So one sits and waits. The messenger of warning, like thousands of years ago,now is still not welcomed. Thanks Jessica for the data . We are all in this together. Ottawa Stand. Peace.

Expand full comment

This is incredibly disturbing!

Expand full comment

"The denominator should actually be the number of women injected of child-bearing age." RELATIVE to uninjected women.

Otherwise, shouldn't the denominator be the number of PREGNANT women injected of child-bearing age? And women who become pregnant after injection?

I suppose there could be self-selection bias.

Expand full comment

Also they're fitter. I'm sure that helps too.

Expand full comment

Prior army… not sure that’s true. People aren’t as fit as you would guess. I guess the really really unfit people don’t exist.

Expand full comment

I'm trying to find where Thomas Renz got his "279% spike" numbers in Miscarriages in the DMED data:

https://renz-law.com/attorney-tom-renz-whistleblowers-dmed-defense-medical-epidemiology-database-reveals-incredibly-disturbing-spikes-in-diseases-infertility-injuries-across-the-board-after-the-military-was-forced-to/

The spreadsheets of the data he provides (https://renz-law.com/dmed-data/) show a -10% increase (negative 10% increase, aka a 10% decrease) in SA: 2404 in 2020 down to 2164 in 2021.

What am I missing? Almost all of the other categories he provides show a dramatic increase in disease / symptoms.

Expand full comment

Menopausal woman-I began bleeding after not having a period for over a year. I also developed breast cysts. Im unvaxd but dating someone who is dbl/boosted. And I know 2 other women that developed breast cysts (both vaxd) & a teenager that stopped her period after being vaxd.

Expand full comment

what you NEED is access to the V-safe data, and access to CMS beneficiaries data. I doubt you'll get either (but AFLDs vs NIH/CDC/HHS/WH will get it, if they get to trial)

Expand full comment

What the heck. How about the Vaccine Safety Datalink data also?

Expand full comment