Thanks once again, Jessica, for letting the Pharma creeps know that someone is watching. I'm appalled at the level of greed and pure evil that has allowed this medical catastrophe to develop.
C07C219/08 Compounds containing amino and esterified hydroxy groups bound to the same carbon skeleton having esterified hydroxy groups and amino groups bound to acyclic carbon atoms of the same carbon skeleton the carbon skeleton being acyclic and saturated having at least one of the hydroxy groups esterified by a carboxylic acid having the esterifying carboxyl group bound to an acyclic carbon atom of an acyclic unsaturated carbon skeleton
C07C219/08 Compounds containing amino and esterified hydroxy groups bound to the same carbon skeleton having esterified hydroxy groups and amino groups bound to acyclic carbon atoms of the same carbon skeleton the carbon skeleton being acyclic and saturated having at least one of the hydroxy groups esterified by a carboxylic acid having the esterifying carboxyl group bound to an acyclic carbon atom of an acyclic unsaturated carbon skeleton
Yes. He knew it. Knows it. But, can he say much with an NDA in place? Probably not. OTH, how does someone knowing this sleep at night? I am hopeful that the Good Lord comes for him, and he sees the light (literally) and gets a 'chastisement' from above... while still on Earth. Unlikely to happen, but when you die all bets are off... I personally believe in A God, and that he does see and reward good behavior and send you to remedial class for bad behavior. For geocidal behavior? For presuming to BE god? Yup.. busted back to the lake of fire. Of course, most of these people have no soul or morals anyway. That's how they developed what they did.. why they did it. And why they don't speak out...
Thanks for shedding so much light on these toxic LNPs, for endlessly digging and especially for the snark!
Way back when the vaccines were rolled out, I found this article from 2016 in which Moderna's Bancel and BioNTech's Kariko describe the LNPs as being toxic with dangerous side effects especially in repeat doses.
I said to my husband at they time "No one is going to take this stuff if an hour on the inter webs discloses that the manufacturer's themselves describe their products as toxic". ....Yeah, I was way wrong on that score because I didn't realize that no one would actually DO the hour's worth of research. I mean, the same Karens that scour the labels on their organic vegan lactose free ethically grown couscous did zero research on an EUA product that is designed to make their cells produce a toxin. Nope, they just lined up for their helping of toxin soup while screeching at those of us declining that WE were recklessly endangering ourselves and more importantly, them. SMH. Anyway, when Acuitas' LNP biodistribution study was leaked, well that was enough for me to take a back seat and watch how those clamouring for the front seats would do with the new wonder drug. Suffice it say got out of the car altogether a long time ago, but I can see it off in the distance, just about to careen off of the Safe and Effective Cliff with 2+ billion souls aboard.
Hope you find the answers to this mystery, Jessica. The LNPs clearly can't be found in the Karens' Organic Foods aisle whatever their grade, but if they're LAB grade, well that's just intentionally criminal, which sure could void a liability clause or two.
You were right. No one did. I still don't know why I was against it. I think the push and 'cult' behavior was what tipped me off. But bribing people, pressuring them, shaming them.. all that seemed so 'off' somehow. Then I got into reading and was like: SM102? Hoo, isn't that toxic? NLP.. hum.. could those actually be bad? mRNA that won't transcribe and change my DNA.. yeah.. kinda wonder. Maybe I should just hang out and wait a year, 2 maybe 3? So that's what I did and now, it is a GOOD thing I did. Just look at the carnage going on...
That article is incredible. I had not encountered it before. I provided links to many articles to friends and coworkers and told them moderna had never brought a product to market because all were failures. Nobody listened. The complacency and laziness of the general public is astounding
Yep. Both the article and the “laziness” astound me. TBH I have also been forced to conclude over the last three years that there are a lot of people who think themselves very intelligent because they have BA, MA of MD behind their names. But these are the very people we are speaking of. Educated, yes, but lacking a key component of true intelligence, namely an inherent drive to analyze and understand. We are quite simply surrounded by a lot of really stupid people, and and once you accept that, everything that’s happening in our world begins to make a lot of sense. (There are some very intelligent but corrupt individuals also. The two have made for a very toxic and detrimental mix)
At this point in the operation this question is akin to being in French Guyana with Jim Jones folks and checking to be sure the kool aide and cyanide is mixed with clean and sterile water.
I do so chuckle now when someone mentions the FDA.... If anything a product so "approved" by those charlatans needs extra scrutiny and perhaps a garbage bin.
I wonder if that cyanide was commercial grade or lab grade, and if the Kool Aide was mixed with fluoridated water? I went to high school with the doctor who mixed the Kool Aide poison and served it to everyone there in Jonestown, himself included. I'm sure he regrets missing out on the plandemic and jabbing thousands with a bioweapon.
Here's an article I found about the ingredients in the COVID vaccines complying with "CGMP" Current Good Manufactuering Practices. I suspect that they are using the lab grade cationic lipids, and then doing testing on a small sample batch of the final product, and saying that it is good enough to receive the CGMP.
I didn’t see the “ Covid” part? Just because they should do something, doesn’t mean they did. It was the first thing Sasha Latypova, an ex-employee of Pfizer, noticed about these vaccines. They weren’t all the same- but should’ve been. Even vials from same company we’re having completely different sequencing. More junk in one, than the other. First red flag was a problem with consistency & “ good practices” in the labs had to be the reason. She has a brilliant Substack on here.
Thanks for pointing that out. It was actually, this pro-vaccine site that mentioned that the COVID vaccine manufacturer's are required to employ Current Good Manufacturing Practices, and they linked to that FDA page. https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/sm-102-moderna-vaccine
Moderna did not care about the grade of SM-102. As Sasha Latypova has learned they were just following orders from the DOD and would be immune from liability. And the CEO of Moderna said in a discussion at Davos last month that Moderna produced 100,000 clot shots in 2019, and before the plandemic even began he asked his people if they could increase production up to a billion doses in 2020. It's almost as if he knew that a plandemic was coming!!!
btw, who thought using those LNPs would be a good idea in the first place? Those LNPs will happily merge with any cell membrane out there. Whether that cell membrane belongs to a cell found in the brain, the spinal cord, the bone marrow, the spleen, the ovaries, etc. the LNPs do not care. It will just do what it is supposed to do and release the mRNA into whatever cell it merges with. And that those LNPs can be found everywhere in the body, Pfizer told us in study 185350, found in the "Nonclinical Evaluation Report", in Table 4-2 on page 45, of the foi-2389-06.pdf found here: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf
That is exactly why they used those NLP. To merge with cells and better 'deliver' the payload.. every step of this Frankenstein 'treatment' was planned out for max impact on the body.
We can't even determine something as simple as finding out which ingredients were used. Yet, the process of making the sudden death injection, is far more complicated, involves many steps, both biological and chemical, each of which is problematic, and the quality of the product from each intermediate step is supposedly determined using technologies which themselves are problematic, and use inferior indirect measurement (like measuring your kid's shadow to determine his height, instead of measuring your actual kid.) This can work if you had properly calibrated the shadow's height vs the actual child's height, but according to data we've seen, that calibration step was never done in the manufacture of these "products," nor is it likely to be able to do so.
Most pharmaceuticals are small (molecular weight less than 500) and are simple chemicals synthesized using established chemistry synthesis protocols- these can be analyzed for purity and structure. But mRNA is a giant molecule (each nucleotide has a molecular weight of ~500) and the claimed S protein is some 3800 nucleotides which closes in on a molecular weight of 2 million. Now add in all the size variability we've seen, and it's not possible to calibrate a population of molecules which varies in size each batch due to various enzymatic and purification inefficiencies at each step. The point is it's a mess in a hundred different ways. And certainly not something to inject into a human.
Thanks to Miss Jessica for her continued analyses and discovery- has there ever been a more convoluted mystery to unravel, or at least man-made mystery?
When I was doing microscale synthetic organic synthesis as an undergrad, we always did a TLC on starting materials. If we didn't get one clean circular spot with the correct Rf value but instead a string of spots - or worst of all - a long smear, if we figured that it would be worth the trouble, then we'd purify the stuff until it gave a nice spot. Then IR, NMR, and melting point... If they aren't doing that with each batch... forget it. Of course, per PREP Act, the companies have no liability for defective or dangerous products, so they can go ahead and shove out crap if they want.
Quality control is only part of the problem and some variability may be done intentionally, the bigger problem is the horribly "flawed" design of these products. They are probably some of the most toxic "vaccines" ever created -- for a non-issue -- for colossal profit, with no consideration. I strongly suspect that these "C19" "vaccines" are biological/chemical weapons, human pesticides, in disguise, there is ample evidence which strongly suggests this.
I'd go further and suggest that many/all other vaccines are human pesticides too, only more subtle, especially all those Bill Gates was involved with.
To be quite blunt, /all/ vaccination must end, because I see no impartial evidence of scientifically proven benefit, and plenty of evidence of harm.
Always love the snark don't ever stop that.Answers are your area but here is FDA guidance for industry 18 page pdf from 2019 Wayback to minimize risk of recent changes.
"Liposome Drug Products Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls; Human Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability; and Labeling Documentation"
This industry doc for Food Grade designation seems to support the chemists claim since chemicals are evaluated based on proximity to food & intended use eg microwave plastic is different from disposable packaging etc.. (once it loads clicking the text area gets rid of the grey overlay)
"Understanding Food-Grade vs. Biocompatibility for Medical Device Materials
Just because a material is food-safe in no way implies it is also biocompatible."
Jessica, you really packed a lot of info in your 30 minute Stockholm talk. And the candle was a nice touch. At your next big talk you can have an audience sing-along of the Bee Gees' old song "How Can You Mend a Broken Heart," which was written when you were a little tot, but now sounds like it could be the theme song for the jab injured:
I can think of younger days when living for my life
At the time of EUA for Pfizer in Dec 2020, only cholesterol met pharmaceutical grade quality. Even the DSPC was considered a non-compendial excipient that was controlled "in house." This lipid is also used in Onpattro.
ALC-0315 needed more validation to ensure the impurities in them were controlled. There was a risk assessment done on elemental impurities (metals) in the lipids. They passed based on International Council for Harmonization standards. There was ethanol and tetrahydrofuran impurities as well but that has improved. So I would say, it was not at GMP standards and in fact GMP was not evaluated at the time of EUA. But there were 'controls' that needed to be met to a high level. I cant tell if the lipids meet GMP at the present time.
The actual chemical synthesis and quality control of the starting materials and intermediates weren't even clear at first to the EMA. That has improved since as this was a Specific Obligation that was fulfilled first.
What is really, really interesting is that Moderna found that impurities (mostly metals) in the raw materials of the lipids were causing problems and lipid adducts with the mRNA when formulated as LNPs. Even if the levels of elemental impurities (metals) met standards.
Thanks once again, Jessica, for letting the Pharma creeps know that someone is watching. I'm appalled at the level of greed and pure evil that has allowed this medical catastrophe to develop.
And I, too, like your snarky comments.
Great article Jessica. I love your snarky comments.
Jessica,
SM-102 is an ionizable cationic amino lipid
You should ask Malone R. W. He knows it well.
These are his inventions:
Cationic Transport Reagents.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5527928A/en
C07C219/08 Compounds containing amino and esterified hydroxy groups bound to the same carbon skeleton having esterified hydroxy groups and amino groups bound to acyclic carbon atoms of the same carbon skeleton the carbon skeleton being acyclic and saturated having at least one of the hydroxy groups esterified by a carboxylic acid having the esterifying carboxyl group bound to an acyclic carbon atom of an acyclic unsaturated carbon skeleton
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5744625A/en
C07C219/08 Compounds containing amino and esterified hydroxy groups bound to the same carbon skeleton having esterified hydroxy groups and amino groups bound to acyclic carbon atoms of the same carbon skeleton the carbon skeleton being acyclic and saturated having at least one of the hydroxy groups esterified by a carboxylic acid having the esterifying carboxyl group bound to an acyclic carbon atom of an acyclic unsaturated carbon skeleton
Sorry, the other one was:
Polyfunctional cationic cytofectins, formulations and methods for generating active cytofectin: polynucleotide transfection complexes
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5824812A/en
Yes. He knew it. Knows it. But, can he say much with an NDA in place? Probably not. OTH, how does someone knowing this sleep at night? I am hopeful that the Good Lord comes for him, and he sees the light (literally) and gets a 'chastisement' from above... while still on Earth. Unlikely to happen, but when you die all bets are off... I personally believe in A God, and that he does see and reward good behavior and send you to remedial class for bad behavior. For geocidal behavior? For presuming to BE god? Yup.. busted back to the lake of fire. Of course, most of these people have no soul or morals anyway. That's how they developed what they did.. why they did it. And why they don't speak out...
But the law is the law.
If they knew what they were doing, they would have cut off their hands not to do it.
Life after life they will have to bear the consequences for the suffering, they inflicted on others....
Oona Pilot … what a soulless mess .
כעל גמלות כעל ישלם
As the actions so the payment
🙏
"I personally believe in A God, and that he does see and reward good behavior and send you to remedial class for bad behavior"
Not back to planet earth please, they mucked it up pretty good here.
OUTRAGED HUMAN... good point ! ... lift up the skirt .... there’s more to see !
Thanks for shedding so much light on these toxic LNPs, for endlessly digging and especially for the snark!
Way back when the vaccines were rolled out, I found this article from 2016 in which Moderna's Bancel and BioNTech's Kariko describe the LNPs as being toxic with dangerous side effects especially in repeat doses.
https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/
I said to my husband at they time "No one is going to take this stuff if an hour on the inter webs discloses that the manufacturer's themselves describe their products as toxic". ....Yeah, I was way wrong on that score because I didn't realize that no one would actually DO the hour's worth of research. I mean, the same Karens that scour the labels on their organic vegan lactose free ethically grown couscous did zero research on an EUA product that is designed to make their cells produce a toxin. Nope, they just lined up for their helping of toxin soup while screeching at those of us declining that WE were recklessly endangering ourselves and more importantly, them. SMH. Anyway, when Acuitas' LNP biodistribution study was leaked, well that was enough for me to take a back seat and watch how those clamouring for the front seats would do with the new wonder drug. Suffice it say got out of the car altogether a long time ago, but I can see it off in the distance, just about to careen off of the Safe and Effective Cliff with 2+ billion souls aboard.
Hope you find the answers to this mystery, Jessica. The LNPs clearly can't be found in the Karens' Organic Foods aisle whatever their grade, but if they're LAB grade, well that's just intentionally criminal, which sure could void a liability clause or two.
You were right. No one did. I still don't know why I was against it. I think the push and 'cult' behavior was what tipped me off. But bribing people, pressuring them, shaming them.. all that seemed so 'off' somehow. Then I got into reading and was like: SM102? Hoo, isn't that toxic? NLP.. hum.. could those actually be bad? mRNA that won't transcribe and change my DNA.. yeah.. kinda wonder. Maybe I should just hang out and wait a year, 2 maybe 3? So that's what I did and now, it is a GOOD thing I did. Just look at the carnage going on...
That article is incredible. I had not encountered it before. I provided links to many articles to friends and coworkers and told them moderna had never brought a product to market because all were failures. Nobody listened. The complacency and laziness of the general public is astounding
Yep. Both the article and the “laziness” astound me. TBH I have also been forced to conclude over the last three years that there are a lot of people who think themselves very intelligent because they have BA, MA of MD behind their names. But these are the very people we are speaking of. Educated, yes, but lacking a key component of true intelligence, namely an inherent drive to analyze and understand. We are quite simply surrounded by a lot of really stupid people, and and once you accept that, everything that’s happening in our world begins to make a lot of sense. (There are some very intelligent but corrupt individuals also. The two have made for a very toxic and detrimental mix)
Supplier for Pfizer is Avanti cGMP Manufactured Lipids
also this?
https://www.avt-pharma.com/products/sm-102.html
Oooh - that one specifically references Moderna and Spikevax.
Yep. But in all fairness could be just a sales gimmick.
Call the Shanghai desk at FDA for more info.
At this point in the operation this question is akin to being in French Guyana with Jim Jones folks and checking to be sure the kool aide and cyanide is mixed with clean and sterile water.
I do so chuckle now when someone mentions the FDA.... If anything a product so "approved" by those charlatans needs extra scrutiny and perhaps a garbage bin.
I wonder if that cyanide was commercial grade or lab grade, and if the Kool Aide was mixed with fluoridated water? I went to high school with the doctor who mixed the Kool Aide poison and served it to everyone there in Jonestown, himself included. I'm sure he regrets missing out on the plandemic and jabbing thousands with a bioweapon.
Here's an article I found about the ingredients in the COVID vaccines complying with "CGMP" Current Good Manufactuering Practices. I suspect that they are using the lab grade cationic lipids, and then doing testing on a small sample batch of the final product, and saying that it is good enough to receive the CGMP.
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/pharmaceutical-quality-resources/facts-about-current-good-manufacturing-practices-cgmps
I didn’t see the “ Covid” part? Just because they should do something, doesn’t mean they did. It was the first thing Sasha Latypova, an ex-employee of Pfizer, noticed about these vaccines. They weren’t all the same- but should’ve been. Even vials from same company we’re having completely different sequencing. More junk in one, than the other. First red flag was a problem with consistency & “ good practices” in the labs had to be the reason. She has a brilliant Substack on here.
Thanks for pointing that out. It was actually, this pro-vaccine site that mentioned that the COVID vaccine manufacturer's are required to employ Current Good Manufacturing Practices, and they linked to that FDA page. https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/sm-102-moderna-vaccine
they are 'required to employ'...
and Frosted Flakes are part of your nutritious breakfast, yay!
Moderna did not care about the grade of SM-102. As Sasha Latypova has learned they were just following orders from the DOD and would be immune from liability. And the CEO of Moderna said in a discussion at Davos last month that Moderna produced 100,000 clot shots in 2019, and before the plandemic even began he asked his people if they could increase production up to a billion doses in 2020. It's almost as if he knew that a plandemic was coming!!!
yeah, knew it was coming. imagine that... (snark, snark)
Clever quips are necessary distractions from otherwise bleak information.
A spoonful of sugar as it were...
Where did Moderna and Pfizer buy the major ingredient of their mRNA jabs - Sugar?
btw, who thought using those LNPs would be a good idea in the first place? Those LNPs will happily merge with any cell membrane out there. Whether that cell membrane belongs to a cell found in the brain, the spinal cord, the bone marrow, the spleen, the ovaries, etc. the LNPs do not care. It will just do what it is supposed to do and release the mRNA into whatever cell it merges with. And that those LNPs can be found everywhere in the body, Pfizer told us in study 185350, found in the "Nonclinical Evaluation Report", in Table 4-2 on page 45, of the foi-2389-06.pdf found here: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf
That is exactly why they used those NLP. To merge with cells and better 'deliver' the payload.. every step of this Frankenstein 'treatment' was planned out for max impact on the body.
We can't even determine something as simple as finding out which ingredients were used. Yet, the process of making the sudden death injection, is far more complicated, involves many steps, both biological and chemical, each of which is problematic, and the quality of the product from each intermediate step is supposedly determined using technologies which themselves are problematic, and use inferior indirect measurement (like measuring your kid's shadow to determine his height, instead of measuring your actual kid.) This can work if you had properly calibrated the shadow's height vs the actual child's height, but according to data we've seen, that calibration step was never done in the manufacture of these "products," nor is it likely to be able to do so.
Most pharmaceuticals are small (molecular weight less than 500) and are simple chemicals synthesized using established chemistry synthesis protocols- these can be analyzed for purity and structure. But mRNA is a giant molecule (each nucleotide has a molecular weight of ~500) and the claimed S protein is some 3800 nucleotides which closes in on a molecular weight of 2 million. Now add in all the size variability we've seen, and it's not possible to calibrate a population of molecules which varies in size each batch due to various enzymatic and purification inefficiencies at each step. The point is it's a mess in a hundred different ways. And certainly not something to inject into a human.
Thanks to Miss Jessica for her continued analyses and discovery- has there ever been a more convoluted mystery to unravel, or at least man-made mystery?
When I was doing microscale synthetic organic synthesis as an undergrad, we always did a TLC on starting materials. If we didn't get one clean circular spot with the correct Rf value but instead a string of spots - or worst of all - a long smear, if we figured that it would be worth the trouble, then we'd purify the stuff until it gave a nice spot. Then IR, NMR, and melting point... If they aren't doing that with each batch... forget it. Of course, per PREP Act, the companies have no liability for defective or dangerous products, so they can go ahead and shove out crap if they want.
The more you dig the more I think a lot of the problems are quality control. Gee, poor quality on top of the questionable technology … so comforting.
Quality control is only part of the problem and some variability may be done intentionally, the bigger problem is the horribly "flawed" design of these products. They are probably some of the most toxic "vaccines" ever created -- for a non-issue -- for colossal profit, with no consideration. I strongly suspect that these "C19" "vaccines" are biological/chemical weapons, human pesticides, in disguise, there is ample evidence which strongly suggests this.
I'd go further and suggest that many/all other vaccines are human pesticides too, only more subtle, especially all those Bill Gates was involved with.
To be quite blunt, /all/ vaccination must end, because I see no impartial evidence of scientifically proven benefit, and plenty of evidence of harm.
By design.
More on SM-102 and ALC-0315 here
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/relative-lethality-of-covid-19-vaccines
Always love the snark don't ever stop that.Answers are your area but here is FDA guidance for industry 18 page pdf from 2019 Wayback to minimize risk of recent changes.
"Liposome Drug Products Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls; Human Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability; and Labeling Documentation"
https://web.archive.org/web/20190917203006/https://www.fda.gov/media/70837/download
This industry doc for Food Grade designation seems to support the chemists claim since chemicals are evaluated based on proximity to food & intended use eg microwave plastic is different from disposable packaging etc.. (once it loads clicking the text area gets rid of the grey overlay)
"Understanding Food-Grade vs. Biocompatibility for Medical Device Materials
Just because a material is food-safe in no way implies it is also biocompatible."
https://web.archive.org/web/20200924184025/https://www.mpo-mag.com/contents/view_online-exclusives/2019-08-13/understanding-food-grade-vs-biocompatibility-for-medical-device-materials/
Jessica, you really packed a lot of info in your 30 minute Stockholm talk. And the candle was a nice touch. At your next big talk you can have an audience sing-along of the Bee Gees' old song "How Can You Mend a Broken Heart," which was written when you were a little tot, but now sounds like it could be the theme song for the jab injured:
I can think of younger days when living for my life
Was everything a man could want to do.
I could never see tomorrow,
But I was never told about the sorrow.
How can you mend this broken man?
How can a loser ever win?
Please help me mend my broken heart
And let me live again.
At the time of EUA for Pfizer in Dec 2020, only cholesterol met pharmaceutical grade quality. Even the DSPC was considered a non-compendial excipient that was controlled "in house." This lipid is also used in Onpattro.
ALC-0315 needed more validation to ensure the impurities in them were controlled. There was a risk assessment done on elemental impurities (metals) in the lipids. They passed based on International Council for Harmonization standards. There was ethanol and tetrahydrofuran impurities as well but that has improved. So I would say, it was not at GMP standards and in fact GMP was not evaluated at the time of EUA. But there were 'controls' that needed to be met to a high level. I cant tell if the lipids meet GMP at the present time.
The actual chemical synthesis and quality control of the starting materials and intermediates weren't even clear at first to the EMA. That has improved since as this was a Specific Obligation that was fulfilled first.
What is really, really interesting is that Moderna found that impurities (mostly metals) in the raw materials of the lipids were causing problems and lipid adducts with the mRNA when formulated as LNPs. Even if the levels of elemental impurities (metals) met standards.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26926-0