Dec 31, 2021·edited Dec 31, 2021Liked by Jessica Rose
Thank you for writing this important information! I'm appalled by all of the blacked out sections. My first take on this is that they used a low sensitivity imaging technique to demonstrate the hepatic distribution of the mRNA-LNP, without properly determining the biodistribution to the lymph nodes, heart, lung, spleen, bone marrow, ovaries, testes, brain and other tissues. When you combine this with the very limited toxicity studies and small sample sizes of animal subjects with high variability, and everything that's blacked out, especially the metabolism section . . . to me it prevents essential connections and conclusions.
This is just an assumption, but given the distribution to the liver that we do know and the kinetics of the antibody responses. It seems there could be systemic distribution of the mRNA-LNP and systemic, uncontrolled expression of the S protein for an unknown duration that may mirror the duration of antibody titers. Maybe the metabolism section would have corroborated this idea. I'm going to spend some more time on this and compare it to other published work.
Despite the absolutely awful nature of everything you have revealed; I want to say thank you. I hope that many other women who are in scientific fields can take your gut wrenching, hard hitting truth telling as exemplary; we must stand up by the millions if we are to be free.
Dr. Rose and Dr. Carver, please realize what a support to many it is to see people with true empathy. We are humans and must stand as the kindness we have been raised with by our families. My Mother was a force of fairness and she is with us. Thank you.
Thank you for all your bravery and hard work in '21! Ending on a high note.😓 😉'22 is gonna be full of incredible opportunities to bless, to love, to forgive, to stand in truth without hatred, to fight without rancor, to live as if we are beings of light, immortal souls come to this plane to see through illusion to the profound truth of the ground of our being. Because we are.
"We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but, they are still lying."
On pages 67 and following, the clinical protocol talks about EDPs (events during pregnancy) that have to do with skin contact and inhalation with/near someone who had received the shot. The clinician is instructed to report these EDPS and and AEs and SAEs (Adverse events/series adverse events). The pregnant women aren't the ones getting the shots, but clearly the creators of this protocol have reason to believe that mere contact with someone who is vaxed can be affected.
Is this normal? It seems alarming and important to me, but maybe this is standard practice for any new drug?
Example (p 67) A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after
having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
PF-07302048 (BNT162 RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines)
Protocol C4591001
Page 68
• A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study
intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to
or around the time of conception.
The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s
awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred.
---
There is much more here. I know there were accounts of even postmenopausal women having bleeding after being near someone who had gotten the shot. I presume they knew something like this was a possibility are are simply denying it.
---
I wish you a happy new year. I am very glad to have discovered you.
The LNP ALC-0159 did not metabolize at all and was slowly eliminated within 14 days. The LNP ALC-0315 was slowly eliminated with liver retention and a variety of metabolites were detected. They did not analyze the draining lymph nodes from IV or IM injections in rats and mice.
These extremely limited studies are very concerning because that's just the lipid nanoparticle carrier characteristics and does not even get into the questions of the magnitude, duration, and location of spike protein expression. I would love to get my hands on the redacted/blacked out pages!
This parallels the DDE (a metabolite of DDT) studies where the lipophilic metabolite can move easily through cell membranes, easily into body compartments (such as the blood brain barrier), and gets stored in adipose/fats cells. If this is the case with these novel lipid nanoparticle carriers for the mRNA, there could be storage and very long term expression of the spike protein.
Honestly, if you are concerned for a family member who's taken the jab Dr. Ardis has a detox protocol to help. I would advise that losing weight and taking the apple pectin will help with biliary excretion and safe removal from the body.
I am unqualified to evaluate this report, but it seems woefully inadequate to justify approval for use in humans. Reproductive studies in rats are just not good enough. What if the toxic effects of the spike protein depend on binding to ACE2?
Thank you for writing this important information! I'm appalled by all of the blacked out sections. My first take on this is that they used a low sensitivity imaging technique to demonstrate the hepatic distribution of the mRNA-LNP, without properly determining the biodistribution to the lymph nodes, heart, lung, spleen, bone marrow, ovaries, testes, brain and other tissues. When you combine this with the very limited toxicity studies and small sample sizes of animal subjects with high variability, and everything that's blacked out, especially the metabolism section . . . to me it prevents essential connections and conclusions.
This is just an assumption, but given the distribution to the liver that we do know and the kinetics of the antibody responses. It seems there could be systemic distribution of the mRNA-LNP and systemic, uncontrolled expression of the S protein for an unknown duration that may mirror the duration of antibody titers. Maybe the metabolism section would have corroborated this idea. I'm going to spend some more time on this and compare it to other published work.
Despite the absolutely awful nature of everything you have revealed; I want to say thank you. I hope that many other women who are in scientific fields can take your gut wrenching, hard hitting truth telling as exemplary; we must stand up by the millions if we are to be free.
Another fine article Dr R ; thank you .
The three cars analogy really struck a cord .
This particular article is best enjoyed on a Big screen.
One must wonder how much was the bribe to Aussie health agency officials back then . And Happy New Year to you .
There will be a 2022 !
Dr. Rose and Dr. Carver, please realize what a support to many it is to see people with true empathy. We are humans and must stand as the kindness we have been raised with by our families. My Mother was a force of fairness and she is with us. Thank you.
Thank you for all your bravery and hard work in '21! Ending on a high note.😓 😉'22 is gonna be full of incredible opportunities to bless, to love, to forgive, to stand in truth without hatred, to fight without rancor, to live as if we are beings of light, immortal souls come to this plane to see through illusion to the profound truth of the ground of our being. Because we are.
I so appreciate your expertise in this area. Keep 'em coming! Many blessings for a new year filled with happiness, health and justice. 🤗💕
Thanks. I will send it to "my" NSW Health Minister as a "briefing".
Happy New Year!
Thank you for doing so much to help illuminate the redaction of authoritarian medicine.
Thanks Jessica! 😉
Jessica, I wish you would explain all of this more fully for us laypeople. It’s difficult to understand a lot of it.
"We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but, they are still lying."
-Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn
Dear Dr. Rose, I learned of your work in your interview with Dr. Mercola.
A few months ago, I found this: https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
On pages 67 and following, the clinical protocol talks about EDPs (events during pregnancy) that have to do with skin contact and inhalation with/near someone who had received the shot. The clinician is instructed to report these EDPS and and AEs and SAEs (Adverse events/series adverse events). The pregnant women aren't the ones getting the shots, but clearly the creators of this protocol have reason to believe that mere contact with someone who is vaxed can be affected.
Is this normal? It seems alarming and important to me, but maybe this is standard practice for any new drug?
Example (p 67) A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after
having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
PF-07302048 (BNT162 RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines)
Protocol C4591001
Page 68
• A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study
intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to
or around the time of conception.
The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s
awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred.
---
There is much more here. I know there were accounts of even postmenopausal women having bleeding after being near someone who had gotten the shot. I presume they knew something like this was a possibility are are simply denying it.
---
I wish you a happy new year. I am very glad to have discovered you.
Fertility in male rats is not even a consideration?
The LNP ALC-0159 did not metabolize at all and was slowly eliminated within 14 days. The LNP ALC-0315 was slowly eliminated with liver retention and a variety of metabolites were detected. They did not analyze the draining lymph nodes from IV or IM injections in rats and mice.
These extremely limited studies are very concerning because that's just the lipid nanoparticle carrier characteristics and does not even get into the questions of the magnitude, duration, and location of spike protein expression. I would love to get my hands on the redacted/blacked out pages!
This parallels the DDE (a metabolite of DDT) studies where the lipophilic metabolite can move easily through cell membranes, easily into body compartments (such as the blood brain barrier), and gets stored in adipose/fats cells. If this is the case with these novel lipid nanoparticle carriers for the mRNA, there could be storage and very long term expression of the spike protein.
Honestly, if you are concerned for a family member who's taken the jab Dr. Ardis has a detox protocol to help. I would advise that losing weight and taking the apple pectin will help with biliary excretion and safe removal from the body.
I am unqualified to evaluate this report, but it seems woefully inadequate to justify approval for use in humans. Reproductive studies in rats are just not good enough. What if the toxic effects of the spike protein depend on binding to ACE2?
We need to turn those words against them! Ask them to explain their decisions on HCQ and Ivermection in light of their own words.