The persistence of the people showing the persistence of modmRNA/spike in people
Another study with evidence of bio-distribution and accumulation in humans
Please refer to the publication hot-off-the-presses entitled: “Duration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine persistence and factors associated with cardiac involvement in recently vaccinated patients”.1 It was published yesterday (September 27, 2023) in NPJ Vaccines (Nature).
The gist of this article is that the group sampled various organs/locations including the proximal and distal lymph nodes, the heart, the liver, and the spleen, in autopsied human bodies - 20 injected; 5 uninjected - (6 → 1 dose :12 → 2 doses : 2 → 3 doses). None of them had a recorded history of SARS-CoV-2. Would have been nice if they had sampled the brain. They keep leaving this out. They used reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays to determine the presence of each of the Moderna and Pfizer injectable products and also SARS-CoV-2 (7 got - Moderna : 13 got - Pfizer). (They also looked for spike using immunohistochemistry.) They found modmRNA persisting up to 30 days in the bilateral axillary lymph nodes (ALN) (the ones in your armpit - proximal) and the left and right ventricles (LV and RV) of the heart.
They looked harder at the people with modmRNA in their heart. They found ‘healing myocardial injury’ (dense scar formation) in 3/3 of the people where they found modmRNA in the heart, but in only 2/9 of the people where they didn’t find modmRNA in the heart. They tied this scarring to macrophage infiltration, but not to other wound healing factors, which I find… ‘interesting’.
Those patients with vaccine in the heart had more macrophages in the myocardium than those patients dying within 30 days of vaccination without vaccine in the heart.
I wonder what would have happened if they’d thrown some Congo Red in there? I have written extensively on cardiac amyloidosis and they say themselves that “upon evaluating the histologic slides, none of the patients had myocarditis”.
I don't think it's Myocarditis, I think it's injection-induced Cardiac Amyloidosis
Cardiac Amyloidosis or Stiff Heart Syndrome is caused by deposits of abnormal proteins in the heart tissue. This results in the heart ceasing to function properly due to the replacement of normal heart muscle tissue with amyloids. Cardiac Amyloidosis is associated with thick heart walls and large atria. It can affect electrical conductivity resulting in…
Add on from comment below from Jonathan Engler: If you examine Figure 3b from the paper, you will see that of the 12 people who died (that would be 24 ventricles 7 + 17) within 30 days of (presumably) their last injection, 0/17 of the ventricles were without myocardial injury in the absence of modmRNA. However, 4/7 of the ventricles were with myocardial injury in the presence of modmRNA. Sounds like modmRNA = myocardial injury.
How did the modmRNA get to the myocardium? They propose three options: 1. macrophages brought it there, 2. myocardial injury inducing increased microvascular permeability allowing it get there and 3. transcytosis involving endothelial cells. I vote for #3 since as they point out, the LNPs circulate in the blood2 and the livers didn’t reveal any signs of this ‘healing’.
They point out many limitations of their study including the tiny numbers of study participants. It is difficult to obtain bodies so this will always be a limitation. The samples from the organs only represent that place in the organ where the modmRNA was found (or spike when they used anti-spike staining) so who knows what was happening on the grand scale of the whole organ. And importantly, they acknowledge potential differences in modmRNA observations/detection based on post mortem variations in modmRNA degradation in different organs.
Ultimately, they found the injection material in the heart. It was associated with scarring (healing). Myocarditis ruled out. They attribute final heart blow to priors.
…the myocardial injury in these patients was most likely due to the patients’ underlying diseases and not a result of the vaccine itself.
They could be right, but as they state, they only looked at 3 people. Let’s look at more people. I think the unanimous cause of death when we examine more bodies, more thoroughly, will be the injections.
Here’s the thing, however one examines this data, without the injections playing their ‘role’, I would bet my bottom dollar that the deaths would not have ensued when they did. The effects from SARS-CoV-2 are NOT the same as the effects from the injections and this is based on the fact that the LNPs have the ability to traffic everywhere in the human body. What cells get transfected will be the Russian Roulette part the gamble. Endothelial cells? Heart? Liver? Brain?
It is also based on the wildly large differences in magnitudes of the numbers of foreign antigens associated with each → natural infection ««« unnatural injection. Clearly, the durabilities of both the modmRNA, and the foreign proteins produced from the modmRNA templates, pose a problem in terms of sticking around the human body.
Think ‘continued production of foreign antigens’ as well, as being a potential problem.
Krauson, A.J., Casimero, F.V.C., Siddiquee, Z. et al. Duration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine persistence and factors associated with cardiac involvement in recently vaccinated patients. npj Vaccines 8, 141 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-023-00742-7
Fertig TE, Chitoiu L, Marta DS, Ionescu VS, Cismasiu VB, Radu E, Angheluta G, Dobre M, Serbanescu A, Hinescu ME, Gherghiceanu M. Vaccine mRNA Can Be Detected in Blood at 15 Days Post-Vaccination. Biomedicines. 2022 Jun 28;10(7):1538. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10071538. PMID: 35884842; PMCID: PMC9313234.
Amyloids seem to be a shared factor between varying vaccine front, side, back and future effects.
The clotting issues are possibly due, if not contribute to, to the deposits of amyloids from the significant destruction of haemoglobin in the blood stream from the cytotoxic nature of SP.
Amyloids form fibrins, fibrins form blood clots.
Localised amyloidosis often looks like regular organ dysfunction.
Go the nattokinease!
"Both vaccines produce the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for gain of immunity and have greatly reduced mortality and morbidity from SARS-CoV-2 infection."
Notice how this boilerplate appears at the beginning of all these papers? Even if this one supports our case I'm not inclined to read it because it presents a completely false narrative, i.e. that there was ever a serious threat posed by CV19. Those that did succumb were at death's door to begin with, so anything could have pushed them over, especially when you're poisoning them with Remdesivir. As for the rest, the government was actually paying hospitals for reporting CV19 deaths. The old rule that when you encourage something you get more of it applies here, so who cares what they died of if we can get a positive PCR off them? Money in the bank.
But wait! Intensive care units were overflowing! Of course they were. ICUs are small to begin with, so it doesn't take much for them to overflow when you're stuffing them full of old people with symptoms and a positive PCR test. Symptoms which could have been successfully treated with... do I even have to go there? That was the biggest lie of all, that there was no available treatment, except of course Remdesivir. Money in the bank. Who ordered that, because that person should be on trial for their life.
Somewhere in the middle of this travesty I watched a video taken by a hospital worker which showed that the hospital in question was a ghost town, the only thing missing being tumbleweeds blowing by. Tell me that was a one-off situation. Yet another lie. So take untreated conditions for over two years running and add those to the death toll.
At every turn we've been lied to, so why not lie about the death toll as well? Most here have seen the recently published excess death charts. They don't trend up until the 'vaccines' are introduced. Maybe a small prior uptick, comparable to past bad flu seasons, but that's about it.
Look, we're long past the point where science has validated our concerns, and where criminal cases can be brought for the way this was handled. The evidence, for anyone who cares to look is that this was done intentionally. What the motive was is unclear, but you don't need that to establish cause. Depraved Indifference is the legal term. Here's the definition:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depraved-heart_murder