As always great work. You have so much more patience than I do these days. I hate them all. And I cry for those who suffer because of these monsters. Thank you for continuing to fight.
A coworker that had moved onto a dream job committed suicide a few days ago. It got me to thinking, how many people are silently suffering these neurological issues, with nobody believing them? What if they don’t have someone like you to turn to? It may not be this person’s situation, we may never know, but it makes one wonder.
As if the problems aren’t bad enough. Then they have to deal with the gaslighting. (I do not like that term but it fits in this case.) I have tried various people and various ways - trying to change their minds. Almost made progress a couple times. Only for them to dig in harder next time. Propaganda does work for many. Unfortunately. I’ll stick with skepticism!
What gets me is that people who are quite or mostly aware of Purdue, and have forgotten that Pfizer is a serial felon did not lead to some initial skepticism. Not only that, but are familiar with regulatory capture. None of that mattered. When they were eligible to get vaccinated, there was no hesitation. One of my relatives insisted it was part of the "society's social contract" and informed consent would only be tolerated if you are not permitted to be in society.
Once someone is infected with mass psychosis, rational thought is no where to be found.
Beneath the photo in the post Jessica wrote "Bonus points for anyone who knows why I posted this photo." I got the bonus points for identifying the fleam for bloodletting!
If my husband read this then he would say that a few, 1% or less of the serious AE's of the total 300,000,000 injections is the acceptable price to be paid for saving a lot of other lives. I always ask, what is the limit for you? How many kids have to die or become disabled, before it is problem? But, since the WAPO doesn't discuss injuries it isn't even happening in his head. Or, if that was your kid wouldn't you feel differently? Science!
and he would not understand that this represents a fraction of the actual. and we're not even considering the long-term effects. which we have no data for. yet.
Well, it's pretty obvious that if "only" 1.3% of adverse events are fatal and "only" 6.6% are serious, "most" adverse events are not serious. Duh! That's like saying we shouldn't teach water safety because most people who swim don't drown, or that people shouldn't wear seat belts because most auto crashes are not fatal.
Mar 9, 2022·edited Mar 9, 2022Liked by Jessica Rose
It is wonderful that I am following someone that can still do the humane thing and help a person out that is hurting. I see story after story of Dr's saying it is all in your head, it wasn't the jab. I wouldn't expect you to sit back and do nothing but it's nice to see in writing that you are who you seem to be. It's so hard to trust anyone nowadays. I don't understand and I never want to know how anyone could do something to make it look normal that so many people suffered and died. What is the motivation of the people at the NY Times to buy into the propaganda? It is sad but unfortunately not surprising anymore to see this behavior. Jessica I thank God that I found your blog. Thank you for all your hard work and dedication.
Another attempt to sugar coat the suffering of people who were threatened to lose their livelihood if they didn't comply with being an unwilling part of a scientific experiment. This is so disgusting. I have a few children at school who were already living a more difficult life due to CP who are in real bad condition now that they've been jabbed. Is there help for them?
The probability of 1/66,666 to die from the shot is huge, especially when you consider that people with a probability of 1/300,000,000 to win the Powerball still line-up at the lottery booth with their pension or their pay check. Total madness.
You query VAERS probably many weeks later than the study. But because of the huge backlog even now they are still adding reports for the first half of 2021.
Secondly, when you query by a specific date (of death, vaccine, or submit, or entry) the date (especially for deaths) is frequently missing, and therefore you may have a lot of missing death records. They also frequently do not populate the Event Category for death (but in comments it's very clear). So, they have many, many tricks to hide bad reports.
It’s okay, I just filled out the form to Surgeon General Murthy who has asked the public to rat on misinformed. He would like the names of all those who misinformed, or spread “misinformation” which may have caused injury to the public. So I sent him those I felt were possibly the worst misinformed out of so many candidates. They include the CDC, FDA, NIH, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Rochelle Walkensky, Tony Fauci and his sidekick Deborah, msm and of course our wonderful big pharma who told us how efficacious their product was.
I made a first, cursory read of this Lancet article. My take on it as a whole is that it is first and foremost meant to decertify any usefulness of VAERS; the reliance on the V-safe data is disingenuous, since it is incomplete, and no real rigorous pharmacovigilance system was ever arranged before m RNA inocula rollout started,....by design. Using VAERS as a difficult-to-prove system was a feature, and by design. The pivot to V-safe is absurd.
This is similar to the purpose of "Covid 19-Alert #2" sent out March 24,2020 by CDC subsidiary National Vital Statistics Network, to all states, and hence to all physicians( I still have my copy). This was the seminal device used to corrupt the USA mortality data, forevermore making it impossible to use Infection or Case-fatality data to assess risk of the pathogen in the first place.
The Lancet is thoroughly corrupt. Even when it published a few months ago yet another study definitively negating any utility of Remdesivir, it corrupts the facts with editorial doublespeak.
I have had similar in-person experiences to yours', with people looking for help, any help, with rna-inocula adverse events. The worst episodes have to do with the unscrupulous and uncaring approach to hospital admitted pts with viral pneumonia. The families are isolated from the patient, not allowed contact, even as wrongheaded therapeutic measures further debilitate the ill person, leading often towards death. Remdesivir or Olumiant is started, even if medical staff have been specifically informed by pt or family that it is not to be administered. That way, HHS can be billed a 20% uptick on the ENTIRE bill (for each agent) even if the infusion is stopped when it is discovered by a family member. Any repurposed drugs are expressly prohibited (HHS will not reimburse admissions at all if this is done). Sedative hypnotics are also administered that often further depress respiratory drive as the patient ineluctably progresses to death. There remain no govt agency or university medical center protocols readily available to the public for early treatment, of 48 hrs of respiratory symptoms, before the situation becomes perilous.
My letters to chief of medical staff and CMO of the hospital system I worked at for 30 years for copies of their protocols for early treatment and for hippa-compliant data on the outcomes from 2 years of their Remdesivir use in the ICU , go unanswered. - M Robert Weiss, MD
I thought the VAERS data was able to be used. Although it is underreported by a factor of 30-40 it can still be used to look for signals to problems with the shots. I believe that when you can look and see the people that die or have a SAE within 3 days of the jab that is a pretty good signal that something is wrong. Isn't this the purpose of VAERS so intelligent people like Jessica that know how to extract data and read the signals can do just that?
Of course we are using vaers. The cdc employees that penned the Lancet paper have chosen to ignore it. And do some subtle bs thst Robett Malone has discussed in this morning’s post along with using only first 6 mos of available data etc. The paper reports what traditionally would be considered unacceptable death and other serious adverse events and merely says they’re not. To them all myocarditides are “mild” and recovered from And all other cardiac deaths are secondary to natural or ither causes. Go figure
No competing interests, but $3 billion from a bill that included a billion-dollar budget for media propaganda to back the vaccines, and $6.5 billion for supply-chain costs that pad Pharma profits. Um...
8 months of suffering sounds insane! Thank you so much for helping this man and I hope he makes a full recovery.
send good healing thoughts :)
I am praying for your family. I am constantly worried that something like this will happen to my mom and dad.
As always great work. You have so much more patience than I do these days. I hate them all. And I cry for those who suffer because of these monsters. Thank you for continuing to fight.
A coworker that had moved onto a dream job committed suicide a few days ago. It got me to thinking, how many people are silently suffering these neurological issues, with nobody believing them? What if they don’t have someone like you to turn to? It may not be this person’s situation, we may never know, but it makes one wonder.
oh god. yeah. it's the thing that many people don't talk about...
As if the problems aren’t bad enough. Then they have to deal with the gaslighting. (I do not like that term but it fits in this case.) I have tried various people and various ways - trying to change their minds. Almost made progress a couple times. Only for them to dig in harder next time. Propaganda does work for many. Unfortunately. I’ll stick with skepticism!
What gets me is that people who are quite or mostly aware of Purdue, and have forgotten that Pfizer is a serial felon did not lead to some initial skepticism. Not only that, but are familiar with regulatory capture. None of that mattered. When they were eligible to get vaccinated, there was no hesitation. One of my relatives insisted it was part of the "society's social contract" and informed consent would only be tolerated if you are not permitted to be in society.
Once someone is infected with mass psychosis, rational thought is no where to be found.
100 percent.
Big time fan of antique tools and scientific instruments.. antique fleam for bloodletting. :~)
bonus points!
w00t w00t bonus points are second only to marzipan in favorites! :~)
Alright I am slower than slow, but I have no idea what this means?
Beneath the photo in the post Jessica wrote "Bonus points for anyone who knows why I posted this photo." I got the bonus points for identifying the fleam for bloodletting!
Thank you. I missed that the first time through the article. Good for you. Was the point of the photo--let the blood letting begin?
awww. that's so nice!
Creative thinkers, curious free spirits living outside the pedantic cookie cutter mold!:~)
If my husband read this then he would say that a few, 1% or less of the serious AE's of the total 300,000,000 injections is the acceptable price to be paid for saving a lot of other lives. I always ask, what is the limit for you? How many kids have to die or become disabled, before it is problem? But, since the WAPO doesn't discuss injuries it isn't even happening in his head. Or, if that was your kid wouldn't you feel differently? Science!
and he would not understand that this represents a fraction of the actual. and we're not even considering the long-term effects. which we have no data for. yet.
My husband thinks this way too. But no lives are being saved anyways, so that argument is moot.
Husbands, wives, sons, uncles, cousins......................................................
Well, it's pretty obvious that if "only" 1.3% of adverse events are fatal and "only" 6.6% are serious, "most" adverse events are not serious. Duh! That's like saying we shouldn't teach water safety because most people who swim don't drown, or that people shouldn't wear seat belts because most auto crashes are not fatal.
It is wonderful that I am following someone that can still do the humane thing and help a person out that is hurting. I see story after story of Dr's saying it is all in your head, it wasn't the jab. I wouldn't expect you to sit back and do nothing but it's nice to see in writing that you are who you seem to be. It's so hard to trust anyone nowadays. I don't understand and I never want to know how anyone could do something to make it look normal that so many people suffered and died. What is the motivation of the people at the NY Times to buy into the propaganda? It is sad but unfortunately not surprising anymore to see this behavior. Jessica I thank God that I found your blog. Thank you for all your hard work and dedication.
Another attempt to sugar coat the suffering of people who were threatened to lose their livelihood if they didn't comply with being an unwilling part of a scientific experiment. This is so disgusting. I have a few children at school who were already living a more difficult life due to CP who are in real bad condition now that they've been jabbed. Is there help for them?
I admire your work, Thank you, new subscriber..
The probability of 1/66,666 to die from the shot is huge, especially when you consider that people with a probability of 1/300,000,000 to win the Powerball still line-up at the lottery booth with their pension or their pay check. Total madness.
yeah
That's a knife for bloodletting.
bonus points!
Is that point good for a reduction of my subscription fee?
Jessica, a few things:
You query VAERS probably many weeks later than the study. But because of the huge backlog even now they are still adding reports for the first half of 2021.
Secondly, when you query by a specific date (of death, vaccine, or submit, or entry) the date (especially for deaths) is frequently missing, and therefore you may have a lot of missing death records. They also frequently do not populate the Event Category for death (but in comments it's very clear). So, they have many, many tricks to hide bad reports.
i have a fancy algorithm to pull out deaths...
Against the download into Excel?
i don't use excel. i use R
It’s okay, I just filled out the form to Surgeon General Murthy who has asked the public to rat on misinformed. He would like the names of all those who misinformed, or spread “misinformation” which may have caused injury to the public. So I sent him those I felt were possibly the worst misinformed out of so many candidates. They include the CDC, FDA, NIH, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Rochelle Walkensky, Tony Fauci and his sidekick Deborah, msm and of course our wonderful big pharma who told us how efficacious their product was.
I made a first, cursory read of this Lancet article. My take on it as a whole is that it is first and foremost meant to decertify any usefulness of VAERS; the reliance on the V-safe data is disingenuous, since it is incomplete, and no real rigorous pharmacovigilance system was ever arranged before m RNA inocula rollout started,....by design. Using VAERS as a difficult-to-prove system was a feature, and by design. The pivot to V-safe is absurd.
This is similar to the purpose of "Covid 19-Alert #2" sent out March 24,2020 by CDC subsidiary National Vital Statistics Network, to all states, and hence to all physicians( I still have my copy). This was the seminal device used to corrupt the USA mortality data, forevermore making it impossible to use Infection or Case-fatality data to assess risk of the pathogen in the first place.
The Lancet is thoroughly corrupt. Even when it published a few months ago yet another study definitively negating any utility of Remdesivir, it corrupts the facts with editorial doublespeak.
I have had similar in-person experiences to yours', with people looking for help, any help, with rna-inocula adverse events. The worst episodes have to do with the unscrupulous and uncaring approach to hospital admitted pts with viral pneumonia. The families are isolated from the patient, not allowed contact, even as wrongheaded therapeutic measures further debilitate the ill person, leading often towards death. Remdesivir or Olumiant is started, even if medical staff have been specifically informed by pt or family that it is not to be administered. That way, HHS can be billed a 20% uptick on the ENTIRE bill (for each agent) even if the infusion is stopped when it is discovered by a family member. Any repurposed drugs are expressly prohibited (HHS will not reimburse admissions at all if this is done). Sedative hypnotics are also administered that often further depress respiratory drive as the patient ineluctably progresses to death. There remain no govt agency or university medical center protocols readily available to the public for early treatment, of 48 hrs of respiratory symptoms, before the situation becomes perilous.
My letters to chief of medical staff and CMO of the hospital system I worked at for 30 years for copies of their protocols for early treatment and for hippa-compliant data on the outcomes from 2 years of their Remdesivir use in the ICU , go unanswered. - M Robert Weiss, MD
I thought the VAERS data was able to be used. Although it is underreported by a factor of 30-40 it can still be used to look for signals to problems with the shots. I believe that when you can look and see the people that die or have a SAE within 3 days of the jab that is a pretty good signal that something is wrong. Isn't this the purpose of VAERS so intelligent people like Jessica that know how to extract data and read the signals can do just that?
Of course we are using vaers. The cdc employees that penned the Lancet paper have chosen to ignore it. And do some subtle bs thst Robett Malone has discussed in this morning’s post along with using only first 6 mos of available data etc. The paper reports what traditionally would be considered unacceptable death and other serious adverse events and merely says they’re not. To them all myocarditides are “mild” and recovered from And all other cardiac deaths are secondary to natural or ither causes. Go figure
No competing interests, but $3 billion from a bill that included a billion-dollar budget for media propaganda to back the vaccines, and $6.5 billion for supply-chain costs that pad Pharma profits. Um...
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/government-sponsored-vaccine-propaganda?s=w
Thanks for the bloodletting tools photo. I learned something in my searches.