It really bothers me that the huge third dose myocarditis safety signal (in the foreign database) was completely removed by erasing the free text columns. I wonder if there is a corresponding safety signal in the domestic database? It really bothers me that it may be the case that more women than men suffer myocardial lesions after the third dose, which is obviously going to greatly contribute to the total and really amplify the original safety signal seen in young males following the second dose.
Your comment has me wondering about something else IтАЩve read. The following surprised me as I was led to believe males were disproportionately affected by adverse events and covid itself.
Report by a group of Australian Actuaries indicates more excess deaths in women:
тАЬIn 2021, females had higher excess mortality than males, but this disparity mostly disappeared after removing COVID-19 deaths.тАЭ
By the third dose, most haccine-injured men were already dead or wouldn't take a 3rd, so you'd have a bias towards women. You shouldn't divide by all doses, but by doses for each sex.
Now this is more urgent: the 2024 Pandemic Treaty and CBDCs. They mean the end of freedom.
I guess that could be an explanation, but excess deaths in many countries are positively correlated with booster doses and many so called 'sudden deaths' are in fact due to myocardial scarring of heart tissue, which often goes unnoticed.
it is ENTIRELY confusing. i need some people who are experts in these things to help me to understand.
It really bothers me that the huge third dose myocarditis safety signal (in the foreign database) was completely removed by erasing the free text columns. I wonder if there is a corresponding safety signal in the domestic database? It really bothers me that it may be the case that more women than men suffer myocardial lesions after the third dose, which is obviously going to greatly contribute to the total and really amplify the original safety signal seen in young males following the second dose.
https://palexander.substack.com/p/stunning-development-more-women-than?
Your comment has me wondering about something else IтАЩve read. The following surprised me as I was led to believe males were disproportionately affected by adverse events and covid itself.
Report by a group of Australian Actuaries indicates more excess deaths in women:
тАЬIn 2021, females had higher excess mortality than males, but this disparity mostly disappeared after removing COVID-19 deaths.тАЭ
Full report here:
https://www.actuaries.digital/2022/12/07/covid-19-mortality-working-group-excess-mortality-continues-in-august-2022/
By the third dose, most haccine-injured men were already dead or wouldn't take a 3rd, so you'd have a bias towards women. You shouldn't divide by all doses, but by doses for each sex.
Now this is more urgent: the 2024 Pandemic Treaty and CBDCs. They mean the end of freedom.
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-covid-timeline
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-the-international-plandemic
I guess that could be an explanation, but excess deaths in many countries are positively correlated with booster doses and many so called 'sudden deaths' are in fact due to myocardial scarring of heart tissue, which often goes unnoticed.
Maybe Dr. Campell /UK had an idea /contacts ?