28 Comments

Why isn't the PCR test under more scrutiny? The true elephant in the room.

Expand full comment

Evil never scrutinizes its own lies.

Expand full comment

Its just another part of the Big Lie

Expand full comment

Agreed! however it is the source of this whole charade. The PCR test is the "proof" that

you are infected. Kary Mullis, the PCR inventor, stated that PCR is NOT a diagnostic tool.

And yet... we still say folks are Covid positive from the results of this and similar tests.

Expand full comment

Interesting related comment ---- I was not only PCR tested multiple times but also had my antibody levels tested. When I was dismayed that I had no antibody response whatsoever from the shots, I talked to a doctor in the group, he actually told me that the test for antibody response didn’t mean anything at all. He said that antibody result had no direct relation whatsoever to how I would respond when I ever contracted Covid.

Expand full comment

The doctor was right, and you may have been lucky: If there were no detectable antibodies, you had not suffered any damage from the shots. Count your blessings.

Expand full comment

No one has been able to do anything about it - zilch; cf. Reiner Fuellmich´s original intent to break through the legal walls by means of proving the test fraud. After more than two years - nada.

Expand full comment

It's military, that's why. Big pharma and the clinical trials are theater. US military made it and distributed it. We can't even get our hands on a used syringe. That's because it's a top secret US military biowarfare "Counter Measure." Moderna is made by a military contractor called Resilience outside Mississauga Ontario.

Operation Warp Speed was created to shield the jabs under Other Transaction authority, a US military experimental products requisition law. See sashalatypova.substack, bailiwicknews substack and secularheretic.substack.

They can get away with anything under "National Security." Plus, Trump, Congress and the Senate created laws and regulations and funded it all. Now they let peons point at Fauci.

Expand full comment
Jan 28, 2023·edited Jan 28, 2023

No proof necessary. Just people with a large audience continually

stating facts. This will eventually trickle down to the majority.

If we continue to act like the PCR is legit, the farce

will continue.

Expand full comment

Oh, wait. Is this substack full of virusesdon'texisters?

They know they have shortcomings. That's why for every 10 positive tests they take one test to the lab and do genetic sequencing. This way they can calibrate the accuracy (via the cycle threshold, I suppose). This sequencing takes time and costs more.

I to thought it was nonsense until I lost my job for refusing. Six months later we had an arbitration hearing and the arbitrator concluded the PCR test is the gold standard but is not used anymore so we have the RAT (Rapid Antigen Test) which takes a couple days after becoming symptomatic before testing positive. Plus, we spew out viral particles prior to becoming symptomatic, so everyone needs to be jabbed to protect their coworkers. But, Omicron came so you get your jobs back.

I nearly lost my job, retirement benefits and the unvested portion of my pension over this. I was wondering why those idiots got rid of that wonderful PCR test in the first place.

Yes it was used to ramp up the plandemic but let's not forget about all the rest of the nonsense including the 96% of the population going along with everything, even today. Nothing makes sense as far as the eye can see.

Expand full comment

OK, nothing makes sense. Look up the morgellons video by Harald Kautz Vella, and start with the last half-hour. Otherwise you might be lulled to sleep with the delivery, but that is the only drawback.

Expand full comment

I'm so glad I waited to hear this before I ran out and took clot shots and boosters! I think I'll wait a few more years. Thanks, Jess.

Expand full comment

In a perfect world - the degradation of the vials at different times and different temperatures say, (in the freezer after 6 months, 3 months, one week, then the fridge after 48 hours, 28 hours and 3 hours) as part of the finishing process - then, out of the fridge at different room temperatures for 4 hours, 2 hours, one our) - maybe under agitation during transportation by road, air and hand delivery.

all very tedious. i doubt anyone has the time, the money, the facilities and the patience to do this - and what would be argued by the manufacturers as "not out fault - they were fine when they left the finishing plants".

maybe easier to do - an examination of the amount of degradation for a sample of a box of vials - from each manufacturer - cartons/boxes with lot numbers that are marked for immediate administration into the arms of people.

it might be great news that the vials are degraded - but, as you say "we don't know". on the one hand the vials could essentially be useless for the purpose intended - but, OTOH, the degraded vials might trigger outcomes that are even worse than the doses that are not degraded.

keep up the great work. would love to hear your take on mixing IgG3 + IgG1 with whatever makes IVM and HCQ protocols - since it might be that either the undegraded or degraded doses seem to be leaving only IgG4 active - which I understand is the wrong way round. IgG3 and IgG1 = good, IgG4 not so much.

Expand full comment

Ryan helped maintain my sanity throughout.

Expand full comment

Finally able to listen. Very easy to understand and to understand why 'perfect results' are suspect.

Expand full comment

The speculations are out of control no?

Expand full comment

The cookie analogy drove the point home.

Expand full comment

No foreign mRNA can produce proteins and express them locked in the cell membrane ( this is weak).

I have never seen evidence for this... I'm just a quantum biologist....

Expand full comment

last thought.

is there any reason why (aside from being a giant pain!) that the VAERSanalysis team could not perform the Bayesian analysis of safety signals that the FDA is withholding (CDC does PRR - FDA does Bayesian?)

all the best

Expand full comment

because they are playing a role in perpetuating this mass genocide.

Expand full comment

The injections are causing the deaths, NOT a virus. It is proven, this is how we know:

First, lets look at the death numbers. Look at the excess deaths by age cohort and time. There was a jump in working age deaths 25 to 44 when the mandates rolled out. Not older people, not younger people, just the working group. So unless a virus knows to target a certain age of people, 25 to 44 years old, and knows exactly WHEN to target them (exactly when the mandates roll out), It can't be a virus.

See this information by Ed Dowd:

https://twitter.com/DowdEdward/status/1614018706383966210

But wait, there's more!!

Dr Ryan Cole (Mayo clinic trained pathologist) explains in the following video how tissue samples can be stained and analyzed to determine if the spike proteins in the tissue are a result of infection or injection. From this, one can determine the sudden deaths are a result of the INJECTIONS. Injection caused spikes (not virus caused) are overwhelming the tissues in organs.

See the 26 minute mark in this video:

https://rumble.com/v1y4u78-foot-long-blood-clots-from-mrna-says-pathologist-dr.-ryan-cole-w-dr-kelly-v.html

So by putting these pieces of information together now we have a population wide impact and can measure it by age group and time. We also know the specific mechanism of action via tissue samples and can differentiate mechanism between virus cause and injection cause.

It is conclusive the injections ARE causing the deaths. Maybe not all of them but clearly a huge number.

Expand full comment

Everyone must watch the interview by The First American Vagabond with Stefanie Seneff and Denis Rancourt.

From Denis' analysis of stats from American States and Canada, there was never, ever a new more virulent pathogen. Denis's main claim, which can be easily confirmed, is that once the RT-PCR testing began and all seasonal upper respiratory infections were contributed to covid-19, doctors were forbidden to prescribe antibiotics for what used to be seasonal bacterial pneumonias now presented as covid-19 pneumonias.

Many people had to threaten doctors to prescribe antibiotics when their elderly loved ones had the same seasonal pneumonias but now also had a positive covid-19 test result.

Denis provides clear stats on how excess mortality, minimal to none in Canada, can be easily explained in the USA by such factors, as poverty, obesity, lockdowns and the prohibition of the early treatments, such as with antibiotics.

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/stephanie-seneff-denis-rancourt-roundtable-glyphosate-mrna-spike-proteins-destroying-your-body/

Expand full comment

Two questions:

#1-- Is there anywhere currently for researchers to publish rejected studies? A sort of repository of the 'unapproved'?

and

#2--You mentioned adenines as being involved in 'stabilizing' the spike proteins. And I previously had heard about prolines 'stabilizing' the spike proteins. I would be ecstatic if you could explain how these two relate, in terms of what type of spike the modRNA instructions are supposedly manufacturing and how it is different than 'wild type' SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins. And what is the basis for this and how easily verifiable is it by an objective scientific investigator?

Expand full comment

Excellent interview on The Last American Vagabond!

I agree with you Jessica that the likelihood of serious damage is less with mRNA not being intact. In my view, misfolded proteins, even if at all possible to be made out of the mRNA found in those vaccines, should not be causing problems as our cells produce misfolded proteins all the time. The only thing we don't know is what happens when the cells are flooded with misfolded proteins.

Another possible issue I have been exploring are mRNA alternative splicing but I have seen little research on it.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-50738-4

Expand full comment

Excellent discussion. Your explanations were clear and made easy enough to comprehend. Thanks much for this. Looking forward to hearing more from the conference in Sweden.

Expand full comment

Jessica Where did this Sasha come from

In my opinion she is just a spoon??

Expand full comment
deletedJan 28, 2023·edited Jan 28, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Another bad moment happened: a quarrel instead of a calm debate. In his day, Dr. Noack pointed out that identifying the graphene particles calls for a particular approach in microscopy, and that regular medical researchers would not find it.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Well worth a read; the top comment sums up the situation nicely. Quote:

I'm a biologist. Dr Cole definitely made an error in not using an electron microscope if he was trying to find nanoparticles. What I would like to see is scientists gathering TOGETHER at a sterile facility to work on identifying the contents of these vials.

Expand full comment