Just a brief word on the RCT. I am hard pressed to find the value in them. Vaccines are like "Chemotherapy" -- they either work or they don't. NO ONE can fake a fever. NO ONE can fake a viral load. NOR can anyone fake death or myo/pericarditits or the myriad clinically demonstrable adverse effects from the mRNA stuff. The RCT is simply a dodge.
Just a brief word on the RCT. I am hard pressed to find the value in them. Vaccines are like "Chemotherapy" -- they either work or they don't. NO ONE can fake a fever. NO ONE can fake a viral load. NOR can anyone fake death or myo/pericarditits or the myriad clinically demonstrable adverse effects from the mRNA stuff. The RCT is simply a dodge.
Yes i agree observational trials are important to get detailed clinical data.
And indeed the mRNA RCTs were fudged as well as underpowered. They relied on voluntary reporting of symptoms and the trick of categorizing those who got the jabs as "unvaccinated" in the first two weeks. Among numerous other problems.
However placebo and health subject bias effects are well proven in general, and could be significant when IFRs are as low as they were for SARS-CoV-2. Why did they unblind the control group and inject 90% of them after only two months, if the "RC" component of the RCTs was not going to embarrass them?
Just a brief word on the RCT. I am hard pressed to find the value in them. Vaccines are like "Chemotherapy" -- they either work or they don't. NO ONE can fake a fever. NO ONE can fake a viral load. NOR can anyone fake death or myo/pericarditits or the myriad clinically demonstrable adverse effects from the mRNA stuff. The RCT is simply a dodge.
Yes i agree observational trials are important to get detailed clinical data.
And indeed the mRNA RCTs were fudged as well as underpowered. They relied on voluntary reporting of symptoms and the trick of categorizing those who got the jabs as "unvaccinated" in the first two weeks. Among numerous other problems.
However placebo and health subject bias effects are well proven in general, and could be significant when IFRs are as low as they were for SARS-CoV-2. Why did they unblind the control group and inject 90% of them after only two months, if the "RC" component of the RCTs was not going to embarrass them?
One cannot fake clinical findings.
Not sure what you mean. One doesnt face the findings, one reads them and criticizes them or tries to replicate them.
typo --- "fake" not "face". I have made the correction. Thank you.