One of the most important things in scientific research is factoring in your biases.
That is, what do you want to find? What don't you want to find?
This one is obvious, has been since the rollout. You have a massive conflict of interest against finding any damage made by the genetic panacea that has been administered through lies and coer…
One of the most important things in scientific research is factoring in your biases.
That is, what do you want to find? What don't you want to find?
This one is obvious, has been since the rollout. You have a massive conflict of interest against finding any damage made by the genetic panacea that has been administered through lies and coercion to a huge portion of the population.
There is no way that the people involved will want to find anything other than "safe and effective, and makes you better looking", nevermind "caused AIDS, cancer, dementia, heart inflammation, autoimmune disorders, amyloidosis, etc..".
That is without mentioning any ongoing coercion for silence, there is enough denial in the psyche of the collaborators and the victims.
One of the most important things in scientific research is factoring in your biases.
That is, what do you want to find? What don't you want to find?
This one is obvious, has been since the rollout. You have a massive conflict of interest against finding any damage made by the genetic panacea that has been administered through lies and coercion to a huge portion of the population.
There is no way that the people involved will want to find anything other than "safe and effective, and makes you better looking", nevermind "caused AIDS, cancer, dementia, heart inflammation, autoimmune disorders, amyloidosis, etc..".
That is without mentioning any ongoing coercion for silence, there is enough denial in the psyche of the collaborators and the victims.