Sajid Javid is being ill-advised by the JCVI

and the JCVI have a major Conflict of Interest

Sajid Javid delivering the inexplicable ‘advice’ from the U.K. government’s independent ‘expert advisors’ on vaccinations. (The JCVI’s Chair happens to be involved in the development of a SARS-nCoV-2 injectable product at Oxford. No. Really.)

Sajid Javid is a British politician. He’s not a doctor. He’s not a scientist. He’s clearly not ‘accepted this advice in full’ from people with backgrounds in immunology or virology, or anyone, for that matter, who knows ANYTHING about dynamical systems. In case you don’t know, humans co-existing with billions and trillions of other life forms on a living planet is a dynamical system - constantly changing with the ebbs and flows of the inherent mechanisms of living things. The people that he is getting his information from are severely conflicted. Please read on to find out how.

Guess what, he’s also a banker.

Before being first elected in 2010, he worked in business and finance. Aged 25, he became a Vice President at Chase Manhattan Bank. He later moved to Deutsche Bank in London to help build its business in emerging market countries. Sajid left Deutsche Bank as a senior Managing Director in the summer of 2009 to give something back through politics.

Well, he sure is giving back isn’t he? Propagating nonsense about a pathogen that is virtually innocuous in the healthy and making such grand statements as “Vaccines are our best weapon against the virus.”

I beg to differ Mr. Javid. And by the way, if you actually do believe this, can you explain to me fine sir, what a vaccine is? Or a booster, for that matter? And why are you preying on the young? They are not affected by COVID-19 and have innate immune system weaponry that is kicking, and always will kick, the ass of coronavirus. At least, for now. If unqualified people like you keep pushing these unsafe and ineffective products into children, we could actually have a true pandemic on our hands. In which case, I thank you for your role in destroying true herd immunity.

I AM an immunologist and I have been studying viruses and bacteria using combined computational techniques and bench work for almost 30 years. In a bunch of places around the world. It’s my meat. I don’t do it for money. I don’t do it for fame. I don’t do it to fear-monger and I definitely don’t do it to potentially hurt children. I do it because I love it. I love that we can answer basic questions in biology using experiments. I love the exchange of ideas with other people who love viruses too. I love having a realm to explore my curiosity about living things. I have no conflicts of interest and never have. And, like most people (well, except our politician chum Javid), I do not like being told what do to and I loathe liars.

I very confidently state that everything this person says in this video is utter fear-mongering crap designed to instill paranoid delusions about new dangers. Well my friends, we ARE facing new dangers and they are not variants, they are people.

Let’s go point by point.

1. They had already been planning 6,000,000 booster jabs?

The entire concept of a booster in this context is NONSENSE. They are injecting people with the same product that was derived using the original variant sequence - IT’S USELESS. As was proven beyond a shadow of a doubt with the Delta variant.

BUT, now that we have the terrifying new variant, they want to move further and faster? The Omicron variant is ONLY more transmissible which is a good thing! Everyone who is not injected will be exposed and get over it because they have durable and long-lasting immunity from previous exposure to COVID-19, or will be exposed anew and get over it because they have immune systems. Everyone injected might not stand as good a chance, but they will still be fine - if they stop injecting themselves. Every time you inject yourselves with these ineffective and unproven-to-be-safe products, the potential damage is CUMULATIVE. It has been shown that it can take more than a year for the spike protein to clear.¹

2. The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI)? The government’s independent expert advisors on vaccinations?

Check this out:

Conflict of interests

Any conflict of interests declared by members of JCVI are now published as an annex to the minutes of each JCVI meeting. The JCVI code of practice provides information on how conflicts of interest are managed.

In order to prevent any perceived conflict of interest it was agreed that the JCVI Chair (Professor Andrew Pollard), who is involved in the development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at Oxford, would recuse himself from all JCVI COVID-19 meetings.

I mean. COME. ON. They solve the problem that the Chair of the JCVI is making these bloody products by not inviting him to the meetings? Really? Is that how it works? These are the COIed clowns responsible for our bodies? Really??

3. Expand the program?

Yeah because 3 shots per person isn’t profitable enough.

4. Reduce the gap between second dose and boosters?

So, these non-experts are absolutely sure that giving more of this same product (literally the same) will eventually solve the COVID-19 problem. I suppose then that they also believe that kicking a dead horse WILL eventually bring the horse back to life. Just kick it one. More. Time. Just because you keep throwing shit at a wall does not mean the wall will ever crumble.

5. Minimum dose interval between booster jabs should be halved?

Halved? Booster? What? Ok back up the bus byes. Boosters are NOT meant to be a recurring thing. They have been used in the past in certain contexts such as for Tetanus to provide a ‘boost’ to our immune systems, to promote the enduring immunity. They are NOT meant to be used as a treatment in the context of a viral pathogen. I mean. What in the actual f? At this point in the 2-years-to-fatten-the wallets, everybody should be more than suspicious of individuals who stand to profit from your being constantly mainlined their products. Seriously people. If they changed from pushing this shit into everyone from every 6 months to every 3 months within a few months, then what will they demand next? Every day? And remember, THERE’S NO SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR THIS. Prove me wrong.

6. Booster program expanded to include all people >18?

Ah, all of you lucky blokes! If you’re the age of consent (18), you can inject yourself as many times as you like! Congratulations! You’ve become a human pincushion to satisfy some stranger’s impersonal demands of you.

What do YOU want? I mean, what do you ACTUALLY want?

7. Listen to this one: Boosters offered by age group in a descending order to protect those who are most vulnerable to the virus - priority will be given to older people (over >16)?!

First of all, since when are 16-year-olds considered ‘older people’? It is an out-and-out LIE that children are in the vulnerable group. THEY ARE NOT.²³

I repeat, children are NOT affected by COVID-19⁴, and for those who have pre-existing co-morbidities, they have the option of safe and effective therapeutics to help them through the experience with minimal disease and symptomology.

8. Severely immunosuppressed >16 who got 3 doses should get another one?!

These are precisely the individuals who SHOULD NOT get these injections. THEY WERE ON THE EXCLUSION CRITERIA LIST FOR THE CLINICAL TRIALS.

Individuals at high risk for severe COVID-19, including those with any of the following risk factors:

• Hypertension

• Diabetes mellitus

• Chronic pulmonary disease

• Asthma

• Current vaping or smoking

• History of chronic smoking within the prior year

• BMI >30 kg/m2

• Anticipating the need for immunosuppressive treatment within the next 6 months

1. Phase 1 only: Individuals currently working in occupations with high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 (eg, healthcare worker, emergency response personnel).

2. Immunocompromised individuals with known or suspected immunodeficiency, as determined by history and/or laboratory/physical examination.

3. Phase 1 only: Individuals with a history of autoimmune disease or an active autoimmune disease requiring therapeutic intervention.

9. Children 12-15 should be given a second dose 12 weeks from first dose.

So this is a lawyer’s way of saying, we plan on injecting your babies regularly with no safety data collected in between and a maintained insistence based on no evidence that these products will be efficacious forever.

Mr. Javid accepted this advice in full. Proudly.

1. Bruce K. Patterson, Edgar B. Francisco, Ram Yogendra, Emily Long, Amruta Pise, Hallison Rodrigues, Eric Hall, Monica Herrara, Purvi Parikh, Jose Guevara-Coto, Xaiolan Chang, Jonah B Sacha, Rodrigo A Mora-Rodríguez, Javier Mora. Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Up to 15 Months Post-Infection. bioRxiv 2021.06.25.449905; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.25.449905

2. Sunil S Bhopal, Jayshree Bagaria, Bayanne Olabi, Raj Bhopal. Children and young people remain at low risk of COVID-19 mortality. The Lancet/Child and Adolescent Health. Correspondence| Volume 5, ISSUE 5, e12-e13, May 01, 2021. Published:March 10, 2021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00066-3.

3. Pierce CA, Sy S, Galen B, Goldstein DY, Orner E, Keller MJ, Herold KC, Herold BC. Natural mucosal barriers and COVID-19 in children. JCI Insight. 2021 May 10;6(9):e148694. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.148694. PMID: 33822777; PMCID: PMC8262299.

4. O’Driscoll, M., Ribeiro Dos Santos, G., Wang, L. et al. Age-specific mortality and immunity patterns of SARS-CoV-2. Nature 590, 140–145 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2918-0