It’s not the specific of who did what. This isn’t an egotistical leader hero sort of movement. Or shouldn’t be.
It’s like I’m saying the name of the messenger is NOT important. It’s the message. And if it matters that much to a researcher that they get their name held up as first in line revealing evidence, then they are also an enemy of Truth. Aka the laurels are what’s important to them. Wrong attitude with what we’re up against.
So when Some father is holding his dying child’s hands because he believed the narrative, he doesn’t care WHO revealed the people that are responsible. He wants to know who allowed or approved the Rx that’s caused his child’s death.
If 'it doesn't matter', then why does it matter to you what Malone is doing?
It’s not the specific of who did what. This isn’t an egotistical leader hero sort of movement. Or shouldn’t be.
It’s like I’m saying the name of the messenger is NOT important. It’s the message. And if it matters that much to a researcher that they get their name held up as first in line revealing evidence, then they are also an enemy of Truth. Aka the laurels are what’s important to them. Wrong attitude with what we’re up against.
So when Some father is holding his dying child’s hands because he believed the narrative, he doesn’t care WHO revealed the people that are responsible. He wants to know who allowed or approved the Rx that’s caused his child’s death.
Does it matter that Lara Logan herself is telling me the NZ history of Ukraine and the West? Or the facts themselves? (conservative review podcast https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/conservative-review-with-daniel-horowitz/id1065050908?i=1000590418829)
If Malone informs me or someone else their name doesn’t matter to me. I won’t remember them, I recall primarily the relevant info.