25 Comments

This is awful, but even if trials were required the drug companies would just run fraudulent trials as usual, and the FDA would approve any "vaccine" 21-0, no matter how many people died in the trials.

Expand full comment

At least it would take a little longer to get the poison out there...

The good news => Even the New York Times seems a bit squeamish about the FDA's proposed "Future Framework. Great article by Toby Rogers with a non-paywalled link to the NYT article:

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/cracks-develop-in-the-fdas-future

Expand full comment

CHD has a form that will register your disapproval of this and send it to the president, the vice president, and your congressional representatives. For whatever good it will do, send it ASAP – they're voting today. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/take-action/urgent-tell-the-fda-vote-no-to-future-framework/

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Jun 28, 2022·edited Jun 28, 2022

What’s self-amplifying RNA? Scares me that “they” will start jabbing people with crap that spreads to others!

Whoops - now I see you’ve attached your article about it…

Expand full comment

I came across these spectacular informed consent documents from Solari. Don’t miss them! https://home.solari.com/forms/

Expand full comment

Thank you Big E!!

Expand full comment

My pleasure. I love sharing people's great work!

Expand full comment

Thank you. This tells me that they're running out of stooges to do their dirty work, with the amateur hour. I hope professionals and experts keep waking up. It's too much to ask that they speak up, but not go with the flow has to be good enough.

Expand full comment

Something that hijacks cellular processes to self-replicate without an off switch... where have I heard of that before?

Expand full comment
Jul 2, 2022·edited Jul 2, 2022

isnt that called a virus or a cancer?

Expand full comment

Jessica, I watched your entire interview with the saRNA researcher. I was a little disappointed that details about this self amplifying stuff weren't explained more. It certainly doesn't sound like a good idea at first blush.

Expand full comment
Jun 28, 2022·edited Jun 28, 2022

If the FDA's position is now that "anything goes", they should just resign, as there is no regulation needed anymore. They should just be dismantled.

Expand full comment

Fig leaf. Pharma needs the FDC HHS fig leaf for cover and indemnification.

Expand full comment

Just Say No. Until Further Notice.

WHEN a semblance of sanity returns to the testing process, THEN we can talk.

Expand full comment

Assuming they succeed with achieving their fait accompli, then what should we do? Is there any mechanism left to hold off the release of the self amplifying mRNA jabs until the Republicans take back the House and hopefully the Senate to at least get some investigations and removals to occur.

Expand full comment

Don't expect help from the republicans. Trump signed this into existence and President Brandon implements it. No help from them.

Except for Ron Johnson

Expand full comment

I expect the chance to be greater than zero when they take control. Ron is no longer entirely alone. Not ‘all’ republicans are as bad as Gov. Kemp & Baker, most 🤔...🤷‍♂️? I pointed Congressman Jim Cooper to Ron Johnson’s letter here which lists those who might right the ship...

https://nickkottenstette.substack.com/p/questions-for-jim-mcgovern?r=pbkzb&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=direct

Expand full comment

So who do you think will be the next republican president?

Expand full comment

Article #2 reminds me of the Alberta data that was up on their site showing spikes in covid cases in the 2 weeks after the vaccine. When they include that immediate post-vaccine data with the unvaccinated, it hides a lot of important data. The data was scrubbed from the Alberta health web site but was still available on the Wayback machine. Probable VIE. Please post "Unacceptable Jessica" information everywhere. I think sanity is losing but we need to keep trying to inform people.

Expand full comment

This means war.

Expand full comment

Thank you for the reminders...Before we open an envelope or read a letter, we see who it's from. Before we read a scientific study, we must read who the authors are and their Conflicts of Interest and Financial Funding etc. We must always consider the source before ingesting the content. Dr. Malone wrote a great autopsy/how to review scientific studies https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/peer-review-example-effectiveness

P.S. WOW thank you for the trip down memory lane, I must have played the Go-Gos millions of times! Now every time I hear the news or someone regurgitating the CDC/FDA Imma gonna start singing "Can see them? See right through them?..." We Got the Beat!

Expand full comment

90% of the population aren't going to kill themselves to save the rich... so the FDA will not stand on ceremony.

Expand full comment

saRNA! I do bodywork and so many of my clients are boosted as many times as one can be at this point. Shedding? Can I absorb this saRNA?!

Thank you for all you do JR

Expand full comment

Off topic but linking this for any scientists that might find it of interest:

"Rich is now wrapping up his PhD on industry influence in medicine, but his main concern is how he can get his software in the hands of more researchers to help them spot patterns in corporate payments to physicians. He notes, with some irony, that academic doctors never hide their ties to prestigious universities, so why conceal financial affiliations to companies?"

Link: https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/can-new-software-spotlight-hidden?r=xb893&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment