This is awful, but even if trials were required the drug companies would just run fraudulent trials as usual, and the FDA would approve any "vaccine" 21-0, no matter how many people died in the trials.
Thank you. This tells me that they're running out of stooges to do their dirty work, with the amateur hour. I hope professionals and experts keep waking up. It's too much to ask that they speak up, but not go with the flow has to be good enough.
Jessica, I watched your entire interview with the saRNA researcher. I was a little disappointed that details about this self amplifying stuff weren't explained more. It certainly doesn't sound like a good idea at first blush.
Assuming they succeed with achieving their fait accompli, then what should we do? Is there any mechanism left to hold off the release of the self amplifying mRNA jabs until the Republicans take back the House and hopefully the Senate to at least get some investigations and removals to occur.
Article #2 reminds me of the Alberta data that was up on their site showing spikes in covid cases in the 2 weeks after the vaccine. When they include that immediate post-vaccine data with the unvaccinated, it hides a lot of important data. The data was scrubbed from the Alberta health web site but was still available on the Wayback machine. Probable VIE. Please post "Unacceptable Jessica" information everywhere. I think sanity is losing but we need to keep trying to inform people.
Thank you for the reminders...Before we open an envelope or read a letter, we see who it's from. Before we read a scientific study, we must read who the authors are and their Conflicts of Interest and Financial Funding etc. We must always consider the source before ingesting the content. Dr. Malone wrote a great autopsy/how to review scientific studies https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/peer-review-example-effectiveness
P.S. WOW thank you for the trip down memory lane, I must have played the Go-Gos millions of times! Now every time I hear the news or someone regurgitating the CDC/FDA Imma gonna start singing "Can see them? See right through them?..." We Got the Beat!
Off topic but linking this for any scientists that might find it of interest:
"Rich is now wrapping up his PhD on industry influence in medicine, but his main concern is how he can get his software in the hands of more researchers to help them spot patterns in corporate payments to physicians. He notes, with some irony, that academic doctors never hide their ties to prestigious universities, so why conceal financial affiliations to companies?"
This is awful, but even if trials were required the drug companies would just run fraudulent trials as usual, and the FDA would approve any "vaccine" 21-0, no matter how many people died in the trials.
CHD has a form that will register your disapproval of this and send it to the president, the vice president, and your congressional representatives. For whatever good it will do, send it ASAP – they're voting today. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/take-action/urgent-tell-the-fda-vote-no-to-future-framework/
What’s self-amplifying RNA? Scares me that “they” will start jabbing people with crap that spreads to others!
Whoops - now I see you’ve attached your article about it…
I came across these spectacular informed consent documents from Solari. Don’t miss them! https://home.solari.com/forms/
Thank you. This tells me that they're running out of stooges to do their dirty work, with the amateur hour. I hope professionals and experts keep waking up. It's too much to ask that they speak up, but not go with the flow has to be good enough.
Something that hijacks cellular processes to self-replicate without an off switch... where have I heard of that before?
Jessica, I watched your entire interview with the saRNA researcher. I was a little disappointed that details about this self amplifying stuff weren't explained more. It certainly doesn't sound like a good idea at first blush.
If the FDA's position is now that "anything goes", they should just resign, as there is no regulation needed anymore. They should just be dismantled.
Just Say No. Until Further Notice.
WHEN a semblance of sanity returns to the testing process, THEN we can talk.
Assuming they succeed with achieving their fait accompli, then what should we do? Is there any mechanism left to hold off the release of the self amplifying mRNA jabs until the Republicans take back the House and hopefully the Senate to at least get some investigations and removals to occur.
Article #2 reminds me of the Alberta data that was up on their site showing spikes in covid cases in the 2 weeks after the vaccine. When they include that immediate post-vaccine data with the unvaccinated, it hides a lot of important data. The data was scrubbed from the Alberta health web site but was still available on the Wayback machine. Probable VIE. Please post "Unacceptable Jessica" information everywhere. I think sanity is losing but we need to keep trying to inform people.
This means war.
Thank you for the reminders...Before we open an envelope or read a letter, we see who it's from. Before we read a scientific study, we must read who the authors are and their Conflicts of Interest and Financial Funding etc. We must always consider the source before ingesting the content. Dr. Malone wrote a great autopsy/how to review scientific studies https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/peer-review-example-effectiveness
P.S. WOW thank you for the trip down memory lane, I must have played the Go-Gos millions of times! Now every time I hear the news or someone regurgitating the CDC/FDA Imma gonna start singing "Can see them? See right through them?..." We Got the Beat!
90% of the population aren't going to kill themselves to save the rich... so the FDA will not stand on ceremony.
saRNA! I do bodywork and so many of my clients are boosted as many times as one can be at this point. Shedding? Can I absorb this saRNA?!
Thank you for all you do JR
Off topic but linking this for any scientists that might find it of interest:
"Rich is now wrapping up his PhD on industry influence in medicine, but his main concern is how he can get his software in the hands of more researchers to help them spot patterns in corporate payments to physicians. He notes, with some irony, that academic doctors never hide their ties to prestigious universities, so why conceal financial affiliations to companies?"
Link: https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/can-new-software-spotlight-hidden?r=xb893&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web