The tragic irony here is that the following 2016 article promoting Moderna actually warned about the dangers of repeated exposure to lipid nanoparticles:
> Lipid nanoparticles "can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years".
> "Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck and Roche."
> “I would say that mRNA is better suited for diseases where treatment for short duration is sufficiently curative, so the toxicities caused by delivery materials are less likely to occur,” said Katalin Karikó, a pioneer in the field who serves as a vice president at BioNTech.
And then Katalin Karikó was granted a Noble price for creating the mRNA "vaccines" that require long term use and repeated boosters . . . .
(Also note that Katalin described the mRNA technology as a "treatment", in contrast to a preventative measure like a "vaccine".)
@Carolyn ~ Actually I think the primary reason they described these injectable products as "vaccines" is that this designation allowed them to circumvent all the rigorous clinical trial and testing requirements that are mandated for gene therapies (which is what these products actually are):
Calling it a “vaccine” made them immune to lawsuits under the 1986 law signed by President Reagan. Also, the injectable they tested is not the same one that went to market.
So true. Biologically, these products are transfections (calling them vaccinations was simply obscuring reality to foister them on the public) :
'Transfection is the process of deliberately introducing naked or purified nucleic acids into eukaryotic cells. It may also refer to other methods and cell types, although other terms are often preferred: "transformation" is typically used to describe non-viral DNA transfer in bacteria and non-animal eukaryotic cells, including plant cells.'
Yup, or go around the safety testing required for new drug that will introduce a completely new chemical compound* to human bodies. These had at least one completely new compound that was used in LNPs ("ALS-015" or similar).
So when the pharma was greenlighted to run Speed of Science(tm) under the trojan horse word 'vaccine', they knew safety and acceptance concerns were over and by [deceivingly] marketing them as "vaccines", injecting an expensive modRNA-plasmid gene therapy with unknown long-term effects also into the arms of healthy population of all ages, could also be justified.
A "vaccine" is always marketed also by the lie of "protect the most vulnerable", and now the pharma complex even mandated these through the corrupt and/or ignorant govts with no proof that they would protect anyone from anything else than a healthy T-cell immunity. There's no mechanism for how an IM-injection could even in theory prevent infection, but the pharma-complex still claim that their Juice does this, thus the mandates in health care sector around the world (minus the UK, well done NHS nurses!).
Compare vaccine mass rollout to a business model that is based on supporting the immune system and treating only those (early, to prevent secondary pneumonia) that got ill and needed help (with general drugs that have a well-established safety profile). Nothing new this time but the scale as vaccines have been their sacred cash cow for decades. Recent Highwire had Mrs. Fischer as a guest and she provided new insight for the Childhood vax act of 1986 that gave the pharma the freedom to cause harm with no risk of economic liability.
> CTRL+K will allow you to find anything anywhere in the library (This search option is much more user friendly than the search box.)
Also, would you be willing for me to add your feedback (either with or without a link to your comment here) on the top of the front page of the library? Every bit of positive feedback is genuinely appreciated! :-)
It should be noted however that, even though not mandated as you correctly say, the majority of NHS employees were nevertheless injected: and I know doctors who are 'fully up to date' with all the 'seasonal' boosters......
Never forget that in the beginning of the pandemic, Bret Weinstein said that if the vaccine works (whatever "works" may mean), he was in favor of making it mandatory for everyone. And even in this talk with Tucker, Weinstein praised vaccines in general.
Don't trust any of these people, neither Tedros nor Weinstein.
And it should be emphasized Tucker himself can NEVER be trusted to expose the INNER TRUTHS behind C-19 and the shots either.
Daniel Horowitz--one of the few truly INDEPENDENT conservative activist/journalist left in existence--NAILED DOWN Tucker perfectly starting at the 15:30 mark in the podcast linked below.
Correct - Weinstein can't be trusted to get to the bottom of who--WITHIN the US gov't--is really responsible for the fake pandemic and the bioweapon shots.
SAGE HANA, for nearly 2 years, has skillfully used his substack to expose all the supposedly "acceptable narratives" & "good guys" behind the "pandemic" and mRNA shots. And recently, he wrote 2 articles that thoroughly reveals Weinstein's role in all this.
I listen carefully to these people, but a key thing for me is that I don't trust any one source to be 100% correct about 100% of topics 100% of the time. And one of the great things about these four people is that each of them has *learned* over the course of the COVID "era" and has consistently *shared* their learnings and changing opinions.
In the comment section of the last article I posted, "Sage Hana" reveals the reason he writes articles on the "pandemic" and the shots. It's ALL worth the time to read!!
Thanks. Will read. Did my own deep dive of the Evergreen college incident recently and solidly came to the conclusion that he created a false flag. As a retired professor I understand the corporate invasion of our universities however i NEVER would have handled the situation as he did. Besides a no fault by university settlement of $500 million he used it to create the elitist IDW.
Why does Heather never speak alone? She speaks in language all can understand
Hope everyone has seen Taylor Hudak’s 2yr project with pathologist Arne B. TheLastAmericanVagbond.com also on Rumble.
Tucker is also adopting the “George Floyd died of Fentanyl” narrative in an interview with the police officer’s lawyer who obviously wants to appeal his conviction, when in fact he was alert and talking until he kept saying “I can’t breathe”, with a foot on his neck. Dr. Pierre Kory was an expert on the case and refutes this. If I had to choose between the medical opinion of Tucker vs. Dr. Kory, who is a Pulmonologist and Critical Care doctor, there’s no question as to whom I am listening to.
Apparently she missed the initial reporting of Floyd dying of an overdose and doesn't know that Kory is controlled by the same PR machine as Malone, McCullough, Kirsch, DNC, RFK Jr.
See Maryam Heimein Substack. Tucker stole “part” of her work. It was a govt psyop with all involved intended to inflame people in a month where 3 other incidents occurred & during lockdowns. Many of the riots had agitators just like J6. They gained more police powers while many just wanted reform & accountability. She made a film prior to anything Tucker did of the real time line
Yes, he kept saying vaccines were “elegant”, but did not seem to know that none of them have had safety studies or that there was no real need for them anyway. Going back to 1900 in this country, the top 2 infectious diseases were TB and diarrhea. With sanitation, refrigerators, handwashing and eventually the antibiotic that works on Shigella, the curve on the graph dropped significantly. By the 1960’s it flattened out; it was not until then that Dr. Salk came out with the polio vaccine. His first batch actually caused polio.
In the same way a highly qualified engineer can appreciate the design and manufacture of an automatic sub machine gun without condoning its use to kill innocent people, so Dr Weinstein, as a trained professional biologist, should be allowed to appreciate the elegant science and technology that went into making the vaccine.
It’s dangerous, and unedifying, to confuse the job with the Man.
Yes, believe Bret was referring to the "elegant" engineering theory of the "vaccine like technology", and not to the actual vaccines. He pointed out that the vaccines have a "terrible safety flaw . . . there's no targeting fo the lipid nanoparticles".
In addition to "no targeting", we know the "vaccines" have many problems (DNA fragment contamination, SV40 promoter/enhancer sequence, frameshifting).
The interview was only an hour long, but I thought it was a very good given the limited amount of time.
I don't know that many people in this forum have faith, but I hope you will develop it soon as God continues to reveal Himself. He does this by showing us our failures, our willingness to allow or commit evil, and helping us to repent. We are alive now – at the end of this age – because we need to see more directly that He exists and is sovereign. And He is showing us His nature by allowing the consequences of our innate flaws to create a disaster from which only He can save. Please do not look to your fellows for rescue, but to the God who sent us Jesus to show us that to live, we must be willing to die rather than do what is evil.
"...we must be willing to die rather than do what is evil."
That is an elegant statement of the challenge we face.
I hope that when the critical challenge comes, it's clear what evil is...and that death, if death is required, comes swiftly. But I know that evil has many disguises and tricks, and torturous ways of making death come slowly.
Not that you would know me from Adam, but death is not bad, and what is beyond it is glorious. (for those that earnestly strive to do well, there is a great darkness for those who have not).
Having experienced what I have, it gives a LOT more freedom to me, as I don't fear death any longer. And I suspect that for those who have died and come back, they feel similarly, and it has changed them in most ways to being much more positive.
That freedom from the fear of death is what literally scares governments because if they have nothing to hold over you in terms of fear, then they lose their supposed power.
He buried a 2021 interview with RFKj whom stated they’ve done fake pandemics before. Believe Sage Hana found the clip. Watch Bret’s reaction versus saying tell me more....I wrote more a few posts down. He’s part of a psyop imho going back to Evergreen
Bret and Heather claim they were on a plane back from the amazon when the vaxx was rolled out. Admit they spoke out before they knew what was actually going on. Same with John Campbell. At least we have some people willing to admit they were wrong.
The problem I have is with the elimination of individual civil liberties that comes with vaccine mandates. And Bret had zero problem with that 3 1/2 years ago. That problem is irrespective of the spike protein being super cytotoxic, which makes this vaccine particularly unhealthy. So, attacking WHO and Tedros for getting authorized to limit civil liberties broadly is a weird argument hearing it from Bret.
And, yes, Campbell, Bean, and others were huge vaccine supporters for a very long time.
Yes, I watched Campbell early on because a friend recommended him. I watched a few minutes and fired back at my friend that this guy is a complete vaccine supporter and not to trust him.
I later was pointed to his videos over time and watched the realization unfold in his face, his countenance, his data and reporting (as best as he could on a censor-happy YT platform, even being kicked off a time or two). I saw him transform to professional outrage (against the medical industry for pushing it and being uncritical of the data), not only for being fooled but also towards those who did and continued to fool people into taking a poison shot.
Campbell's interview with Kyle Warner, the mountain biker, who got severely vaccine injured, changed everything, for himself as this changed his view on things, and for his audience as he regained full credibility.
In August 2022 Bret claimed he was right about lockdowns and they should have been harder with more tests (u will not get my DNA). See substacks & notes by Sasha Latyapova, Conspiracy Sarah, Outraged Human, & Sage Hana
Yet Bret failed to correctly state this was a military operation run by DOD (Deborah Birx with her scarf fooled me--she’s military officer). Our government was at war with its people & pharma just the beneficiary; far more than their usual shenanigans. DOD created the poison & *solution.*. Eff these closed door hearings
it's ironic that i would likely not see this and many other interviews without Twitter. not sure how to interpret it from a bird's eye view, but for now, it's too important to get the public informed
Weinstein was advocating for totalitarian measures in 2020 and even as late as 2022 thought he was right about this. Do you endorse that?
“Lockdowns I think I got right. Which was, there was a place for lockdowns, but they needed to be more intense than they were. They needed to be short duration and they needed to be paired with excellent-quality testing, which frankly we still don’t have. Which, I don’t know, I can’t imagine why we still don’t have it. I think it’s a problem money would solve, and the fact that we haven’t dedicated enough money to have tests that are worth anything is conspicuous to me.
But I would have had, let’s say – yes, painful–six week, very intense lockdown. And the reason for that is that gives it enough time –most of the transmission was at home. So, six weeks gives it enough time to burn through, you know, places where we were corralled together, such that at the point you lift that six-week mandate, you have a small number of places where active COVID still exists.
And you had good testing, you could figure out where they were and you apply some very local solutions that we – the rest of us could have gone back to life. Given that we never had good tests, I would not favor that plan. But, were I in charge, I would’ve invested very heavily–
Shellenberger: Then the Asian, East Asian approach. Korea, Hong Kong.
Weinstein: Well, yes and no. Good tests would be key, and then an epidemiologically sensible lockdown in which the virus was given a chance to be not contagious in any given group. So that, you know, you would have hotspots but you could find them and the rest of us wouldn’t be infecting each other. So I think I had that right, but we don’t know, because we didn’t do that.”
Unbelievable that people are going gaga over this tepid interview.
Not only does Weinstein not tell the "whole truth" about anything he inserts multiple a-priori assumptions that support the official government narrative that there was an actual pandemic. Carlson does the same.
I think more and more people are starting to see through this alt-sideshow put on by alt-Covid "dissident" celebrities who magically showed up out of nowhere and are telling everyone "how to think about what happened in 2020" as they omit massive amounts of details and evidence that contradict their nonsensical postulations about some unique viral pathogen, GoF "virus", "lab leak" etc.
The entire interview was orchestrated and designed to manipulate people.
Yes, JJ and Mark would agree. I wonder if Weinstein is also represented by the same PR machine as Malone, Kory, McCullough, Kirsch, RFK Jr. and the DNC....
Here's the "heroic" Brett Weinstein from August 4, 2022:
“Lockdowns I think I got right. Which was, there was a place for lockdowns, but they needed to be more intense than they were. They needed to be short duration and they needed to be paired with excellent-quality testing, which frankly we still don’t have. Which, I don’t know, I can’t imagine why we still don’t have it. I think it’s a problem money would solve, and the fact that we haven’t dedicated enough money to have tests that are worth anything is conspicuous to me.
But I would have had, let’s say – yes, painful–six week, very intense lockdown. And the reason for that is that gives it enough time –most of the transmission was at home. So, six weeks gives it enough time to burn through, you know, places where we were corralled together, such that at the point you lift that six-week mandate, you have a small number of places where active COVID still exists.
And you had good testing, you could figure out where they were and you apply some very local solutions that we – the rest of us could have gone back to life. Given that we never had good tests, I would not favor that plan. But, were I in charge, I would’ve invested very heavily–
Shellenberger: Then the Asian, East Asian approach. Korea, Hong Kong.
Weinstein: Well, yes and no. Good tests would be key, and then an epidemiologically sensible lockdown in which the virus was given a chance to be not contagious in any given group. So that, you know, you would have hotspots but you could find them and the rest of us wouldn’t be infecting each other. So I think I had that right, but we don’t know, because we didn’t do that.”
I watched both interviews (Bret's and Jessica's (with Pierre Kory)) and they are both excellent! I wish Bret's was "dumbed down" juuuuust a bit for the typical viewers of Tucker. I've followed Bret for years, and he's very measured and precise, which is a good thing, but his interview I think will be in some ways flying over the heads of many. But hopefully these interviews wake up MORE people! And THANK YOU Tucker for injecting statements of support, because if I had watched this as a complete newbie, I would have thought this was a bunch of crackpot conspiracy theories! It's HARD to conceive of or believe in a global effort to enslave us. It's too abstract. Too hard to imagine.
But it's so very real!! This *IS* our fight for liberty and freedom...the survival or slavery/surrender of humanity.
We know there is nefarious intent due to the fact that the ACOG still recommends the jab to pregnant women. Then add the babies and children…wake up ⬆️ stand up ⬆️
Despite the data they continue to promote it , money is one thing , lives are another and the narrative “for the greater good “ violates the pillars of medical ethics. This whole things leads me to believe there is nefarious intent.
Imagine talking about this mRNA technology as if it wasn’t a bioweapon intended on exterminating human beings. This guy is pussy-footing around with his words glamorizing this crap. Every “scientist” involved with this “technology” needs to be locked in a cage for the rest of their lives along with those that pushed it. THE END.
Congratulations, Jessica, on being one of the bright lights shining on our "Dream Team"! 😊👍🏼
"We greatly out number those we are pitted against. They are ferociously powerful ~ but I would also point out this interesting error. I call the force we are up against 'Goliath', just so I can remember what the battle is. Goliath made a terrible mistake, and it made it most egregiously during COVID, which is it took all of the competent people, it took all of the courageous people and it shoved them out of the institutions where they were hanging on ~ and it created, in so doing, a "dream team". It created every player you could possibly want on your team to fight some historic battle against a terrible evil. All of those people are now, at least, somewhat awake, they've now been picked on by the same enemy ~ and yeah, alright, we're out gunned, it has a tremendous amount of power, but we've got all of the people who know how to think ~ so I hate to say it, or maybe I like to say it . . . it's not a slam dunk, but I like our odds." ~ Bret Weinstein
After I read ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’, my life and practice of medicine changed. We always knew Big Pharma was just out for the money, but the facts of the pure, unadulterated evil in our Pharmaceutical companies, the CDC, FDA and NIH was something I was unaware of. Also, how tentacles attached to our journals, medical schools, licensing boards, and teaching institutions manipulated the entire medical system was very disheartening. When it comes to knowingly and intentionally harming people for the sake of money and power, once you cross the line, there is no coming back. You have lost your moral compass.
Bret Weinstein has succinctly voiced ALL the public health and political issues surrounding how covid was dealt with, why and where this may be headed. It is very poignant as Bret initially was in favour of mandatory jabs. Even if this is Bret's "mea culpa", I can only hope this interview goes viral world wide. Please pass on to everyone you know.
It would be even better if Weinstein acknowledged that this was never a pharmaceutical project, but a DOD operation. The jabs were never vaccines, but bioweapons. When Carlson says that 17 million deaths is what you would see in a global war, he is correct because this IS a global war. The banksters against the people.
The tragic irony here is that the following 2016 article promoting Moderna actually warned about the dangers of repeated exposure to lipid nanoparticles:
https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/
> Lipid nanoparticles "can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years".
> "Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck and Roche."
> “I would say that mRNA is better suited for diseases where treatment for short duration is sufficiently curative, so the toxicities caused by delivery materials are less likely to occur,” said Katalin Karikó, a pioneer in the field who serves as a vice president at BioNTech.
And then Katalin Karikó was granted a Noble price for creating the mRNA "vaccines" that require long term use and repeated boosters . . . .
(Also note that Katalin described the mRNA technology as a "treatment", in contrast to a preventative measure like a "vaccine".)
Learn more:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/a7a40be37107
they knew that repeated exposure to the platform was dangerous and settled on vaccines because you only take them once or twice.
today i read that AARP is advising seniors to line up for their 8th covid shot!!!!
@Carolyn ~ Actually I think the primary reason they described these injectable products as "vaccines" is that this designation allowed them to circumvent all the rigorous clinical trial and testing requirements that are mandated for gene therapies (which is what these products actually are):
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/43291b6941f5
"Safe and effective vaccines" are also much easier to foist onto a frightened population than "drugs" or "gene therapies":
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/e05a1ac3de41
Calling it a “vaccine” made them immune to lawsuits under the 1986 law signed by President Reagan. Also, the injectable they tested is not the same one that went to market.
Exactly.
well, getting them on the childhood schedule is what transferred their temporary EUA immunity over to the permanent 1986 immunity
So true. Biologically, these products are transfections (calling them vaccinations was simply obscuring reality to foister them on the public) :
'Transfection is the process of deliberately introducing naked or purified nucleic acids into eukaryotic cells. It may also refer to other methods and cell types, although other terms are often preferred: "transformation" is typically used to describe non-viral DNA transfer in bacteria and non-animal eukaryotic cells, including plant cells.'
Yup, or go around the safety testing required for new drug that will introduce a completely new chemical compound* to human bodies. These had at least one completely new compound that was used in LNPs ("ALS-015" or similar).
So when the pharma was greenlighted to run Speed of Science(tm) under the trojan horse word 'vaccine', they knew safety and acceptance concerns were over and by [deceivingly] marketing them as "vaccines", injecting an expensive modRNA-plasmid gene therapy with unknown long-term effects also into the arms of healthy population of all ages, could also be justified.
A "vaccine" is always marketed also by the lie of "protect the most vulnerable", and now the pharma complex even mandated these through the corrupt and/or ignorant govts with no proof that they would protect anyone from anything else than a healthy T-cell immunity. There's no mechanism for how an IM-injection could even in theory prevent infection, but the pharma-complex still claim that their Juice does this, thus the mandates in health care sector around the world (minus the UK, well done NHS nurses!).
Compare vaccine mass rollout to a business model that is based on supporting the immune system and treating only those (early, to prevent secondary pneumonia) that got ill and needed help (with general drugs that have a well-established safety profile). Nothing new this time but the scale as vaccines have been their sacred cash cow for decades. Recent Highwire had Mrs. Fischer as a guest and she provided new insight for the Childhood vax act of 1986 that gave the pharma the freedom to cause harm with no risk of economic liability.
Thanks, Antonius, for the mention of Fischer's interview. I'll see if I can find it and add it into my "red pill" library:
> Library: BeyondC19.org
> 1986 Indemnity: https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/1eea2a442dc5
Wow! Thank you for your work on the "red pill" library. I often find myself searching for references. This is quite impressive. :) I will be sharing.
Many thanks, Lori! I hope the library will be helpful in the days ahead, and I'm glad if you feel it is worth sharing.
In the meantime, if you are interested, you can also access the library within your own private account. Instructions are provided here:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/e48e374b7a41
Search Tip:
> CTRL+K will allow you to find anything anywhere in the library (This search option is much more user friendly than the search box.)
Also, would you be willing for me to add your feedback (either with or without a link to your comment here) on the top of the front page of the library? Every bit of positive feedback is genuinely appreciated! :-)
Just now found a great summary, compiled by Fischer, of the "Myths and Facts" associated with the 1986 legislation:
> https://www.nvic.org/newsletter/jan-2024/1986-myths-vs-facts
Thanks again, Antonius, for the heads up about this valuable info!
on a recent Highwire episode, Del interviewed Barbara Loe Fisher about the 1986 act
It should be noted however that, even though not mandated as you correctly say, the majority of NHS employees were nevertheless injected: and I know doctors who are 'fully up to date' with all the 'seasonal' boosters......
and also made people feel comfortable taking something "familiar"
Exactly! Very good point.
AARP is very left wing Democratic. I left them years ago and joined AMAC. They will never tell you to take the vaccine.
Great! Thanks for the heads up about AMAC, Mary. Much appreciated!
And these wretched products are still being mandated for school children . . . .
There was this show called "A Thousand Ways to Die", it seems this vaccine has more than a thousand.
Indeed! Here are just a few:
> Lipid Nanoparticle Dangers: https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/9b168f26897e
> Spike Protein: https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/42d5dfc283c3
> Vaccine Consequences: https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/c82e11e6e811
Never forget that in the beginning of the pandemic, Bret Weinstein said that if the vaccine works (whatever "works" may mean), he was in favor of making it mandatory for everyone. And even in this talk with Tucker, Weinstein praised vaccines in general.
Don't trust any of these people, neither Tedros nor Weinstein.
And it should be emphasized Tucker himself can NEVER be trusted to expose the INNER TRUTHS behind C-19 and the shots either.
Daniel Horowitz--one of the few truly INDEPENDENT conservative activist/journalist left in existence--NAILED DOWN Tucker perfectly starting at the 15:30 mark in the podcast linked below.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/republicans-use-symbolism-as-a-loin-cloth-for/id1065050908?i=1000640462335
Correct - Weinstein can't be trusted to get to the bottom of who--WITHIN the US gov't--is really responsible for the fake pandemic and the bioweapon shots.
SAGE HANA, for nearly 2 years, has skillfully used his substack to expose all the supposedly "acceptable narratives" & "good guys" behind the "pandemic" and mRNA shots. And recently, he wrote 2 articles that thoroughly reveals Weinstein's role in all this.
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/the-strange-rise-of-bret-weinstein?utm_source=%2Finbox&utm_medium=reader2
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/what-would-it-look-like-if-a-fiery?utm_source=%2Finbox&utm_medium=reader2
When it comes to the pandemic, the only people I trust implicitly are Dr. McCullough, Dr. Marik, Dr. Kory and Dr. Rose.
I listen carefully to these people, but a key thing for me is that I don't trust any one source to be 100% correct about 100% of topics 100% of the time. And one of the great things about these four people is that each of them has *learned* over the course of the COVID "era" and has consistently *shared* their learnings and changing opinions.
In the comment section of the last article I posted, "Sage Hana" reveals the reason he writes articles on the "pandemic" and the shots. It's ALL worth the time to read!!
Thanks. Will read. Did my own deep dive of the Evergreen college incident recently and solidly came to the conclusion that he created a false flag. As a retired professor I understand the corporate invasion of our universities however i NEVER would have handled the situation as he did. Besides a no fault by university settlement of $500 million he used it to create the elitist IDW.
Why does Heather never speak alone? She speaks in language all can understand
Hope everyone has seen Taylor Hudak’s 2yr project with pathologist Arne B. TheLastAmericanVagbond.com also on Rumble.
He's said it?
Tucker is also adopting the “George Floyd died of Fentanyl” narrative in an interview with the police officer’s lawyer who obviously wants to appeal his conviction, when in fact he was alert and talking until he kept saying “I can’t breathe”, with a foot on his neck. Dr. Pierre Kory was an expert on the case and refutes this. If I had to choose between the medical opinion of Tucker vs. Dr. Kory, who is a Pulmonologist and Critical Care doctor, there’s no question as to whom I am listening to.
Mary did you watch The Fall of Minneapolis?
Apparently she missed the initial reporting of Floyd dying of an overdose and doesn't know that Kory is controlled by the same PR machine as Malone, McCullough, Kirsch, DNC, RFK Jr.
See Maryam Heimein Substack. Tucker stole “part” of her work. It was a govt psyop with all involved intended to inflame people in a month where 3 other incidents occurred & during lockdowns. Many of the riots had agitators just like J6. They gained more police powers while many just wanted reform & accountability. She made a film prior to anything Tucker did of the real time line
Yes, he kept saying vaccines were “elegant”, but did not seem to know that none of them have had safety studies or that there was no real need for them anyway. Going back to 1900 in this country, the top 2 infectious diseases were TB and diarrhea. With sanitation, refrigerators, handwashing and eventually the antibiotic that works on Shigella, the curve on the graph dropped significantly. By the 1960’s it flattened out; it was not until then that Dr. Salk came out with the polio vaccine. His first batch actually caused polio.
In the same way a highly qualified engineer can appreciate the design and manufacture of an automatic sub machine gun without condoning its use to kill innocent people, so Dr Weinstein, as a trained professional biologist, should be allowed to appreciate the elegant science and technology that went into making the vaccine.
It’s dangerous, and unedifying, to confuse the job with the Man.
Yes, believe Bret was referring to the "elegant" engineering theory of the "vaccine like technology", and not to the actual vaccines. He pointed out that the vaccines have a "terrible safety flaw . . . there's no targeting fo the lipid nanoparticles".
In addition to "no targeting", we know the "vaccines" have many problems (DNA fragment contamination, SV40 promoter/enhancer sequence, frameshifting).
The interview was only an hour long, but I thought it was a very good given the limited amount of time.
Put your trust in God, not man.
I don't know that many people in this forum have faith, but I hope you will develop it soon as God continues to reveal Himself. He does this by showing us our failures, our willingness to allow or commit evil, and helping us to repent. We are alive now – at the end of this age – because we need to see more directly that He exists and is sovereign. And He is showing us His nature by allowing the consequences of our innate flaws to create a disaster from which only He can save. Please do not look to your fellows for rescue, but to the God who sent us Jesus to show us that to live, we must be willing to die rather than do what is evil.
"...we must be willing to die rather than do what is evil."
That is an elegant statement of the challenge we face.
I hope that when the critical challenge comes, it's clear what evil is...and that death, if death is required, comes swiftly. But I know that evil has many disguises and tricks, and torturous ways of making death come slowly.
Not that you would know me from Adam, but death is not bad, and what is beyond it is glorious. (for those that earnestly strive to do well, there is a great darkness for those who have not).
Having experienced what I have, it gives a LOT more freedom to me, as I don't fear death any longer. And I suspect that for those who have died and come back, they feel similarly, and it has changed them in most ways to being much more positive.
That freedom from the fear of death is what literally scares governments because if they have nothing to hold over you in terms of fear, then they lose their supposed power.
FWIW
Amen!
Yep. I do not trust Weinstein. At all.
???
He buried a 2021 interview with RFKj whom stated they’ve done fake pandemics before. Believe Sage Hana found the clip. Watch Bret’s reaction versus saying tell me more....I wrote more a few posts down. He’s part of a psyop imho going back to Evergreen
Jessica Hockett RIPS APART that Tucker/Brett interview in this twitter thread -
https://twitter.com/Wood_House76/status/1743493341369561430
Bret and Heather claim they were on a plane back from the amazon when the vaxx was rolled out. Admit they spoke out before they knew what was actually going on. Same with John Campbell. At least we have some people willing to admit they were wrong.
The problem I have is with the elimination of individual civil liberties that comes with vaccine mandates. And Bret had zero problem with that 3 1/2 years ago. That problem is irrespective of the spike protein being super cytotoxic, which makes this vaccine particularly unhealthy. So, attacking WHO and Tedros for getting authorized to limit civil liberties broadly is a weird argument hearing it from Bret.
And, yes, Campbell, Bean, and others were huge vaccine supporters for a very long time.
Yes, I watched Campbell early on because a friend recommended him. I watched a few minutes and fired back at my friend that this guy is a complete vaccine supporter and not to trust him.
I later was pointed to his videos over time and watched the realization unfold in his face, his countenance, his data and reporting (as best as he could on a censor-happy YT platform, even being kicked off a time or two). I saw him transform to professional outrage (against the medical industry for pushing it and being uncritical of the data), not only for being fooled but also towards those who did and continued to fool people into taking a poison shot.
Campbell's interview with Kyle Warner, the mountain biker, who got severely vaccine injured, changed everything, for himself as this changed his view on things, and for his audience as he regained full credibility.
!!!
In August 2022 Bret claimed he was right about lockdowns and they should have been harder with more tests (u will not get my DNA). See substacks & notes by Sasha Latyapova, Conspiracy Sarah, Outraged Human, & Sage Hana
With this exception, Weinstein is coming clean & explaining his original position. Tedros is a scissorbill POS🖕🏿
Yet Bret failed to correctly state this was a military operation run by DOD (Deborah Birx with her scarf fooled me--she’s military officer). Our government was at war with its people & pharma just the beneficiary; far more than their usual shenanigans. DOD created the poison & *solution.*. Eff these closed door hearings
Non-Twatter link:
https://rumble.com/v45cot3-bret-weinstein-exposes-the-world-health-organizations-dark-agenda.html
it's ironic that i would likely not see this and many other interviews without Twitter. not sure how to interpret it from a bird's eye view, but for now, it's too important to get the public informed
Why did he take so long to come out when we have been getting all this info a long time ago
My 2 siblings are on their 6th shot while so many are dying but MSM still are not informing these people who only listen to MSM
His DarkHorse podcast is on both Rumble and Odysee. Odysee also has a separate channel of his clips.
I really appreciate them.
This was his clarification AFTER his Tucker interview.
https://rumble.com/v468kli-the-207th-evolutionary-lens-with-bret-weinstein-and-heather-heying.html
https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/the-207th-evolutionary-lens-with-bret:2
(Starts at 18.40 mins. Second half is about different topic).
Weinstein was advocating for totalitarian measures in 2020 and even as late as 2022 thought he was right about this. Do you endorse that?
“Lockdowns I think I got right. Which was, there was a place for lockdowns, but they needed to be more intense than they were. They needed to be short duration and they needed to be paired with excellent-quality testing, which frankly we still don’t have. Which, I don’t know, I can’t imagine why we still don’t have it. I think it’s a problem money would solve, and the fact that we haven’t dedicated enough money to have tests that are worth anything is conspicuous to me.
But I would have had, let’s say – yes, painful–six week, very intense lockdown. And the reason for that is that gives it enough time –most of the transmission was at home. So, six weeks gives it enough time to burn through, you know, places where we were corralled together, such that at the point you lift that six-week mandate, you have a small number of places where active COVID still exists.
And you had good testing, you could figure out where they were and you apply some very local solutions that we – the rest of us could have gone back to life. Given that we never had good tests, I would not favor that plan. But, were I in charge, I would’ve invested very heavily–
Shellenberger: Then the Asian, East Asian approach. Korea, Hong Kong.
Weinstein: Well, yes and no. Good tests would be key, and then an epidemiologically sensible lockdown in which the virus was given a chance to be not contagious in any given group. So that, you know, you would have hotspots but you could find them and the rest of us wouldn’t be infecting each other. So I think I had that right, but we don’t know, because we didn’t do that.”
https://twitter.com/Wood_House76/status/1744017290633359655
thanks :)
Full interview: https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-bret-weinstein/
Unbelievable that people are going gaga over this tepid interview.
Not only does Weinstein not tell the "whole truth" about anything he inserts multiple a-priori assumptions that support the official government narrative that there was an actual pandemic. Carlson does the same.
I think more and more people are starting to see through this alt-sideshow put on by alt-Covid "dissident" celebrities who magically showed up out of nowhere and are telling everyone "how to think about what happened in 2020" as they omit massive amounts of details and evidence that contradict their nonsensical postulations about some unique viral pathogen, GoF "virus", "lab leak" etc.
The entire interview was orchestrated and designed to manipulate people.
Yes, JJ and Mark would agree. I wonder if Weinstein is also represented by the same PR machine as Malone, Kory, McCullough, Kirsch, RFK Jr. and the DNC....
Here's the "heroic" Brett Weinstein from August 4, 2022:
“Lockdowns I think I got right. Which was, there was a place for lockdowns, but they needed to be more intense than they were. They needed to be short duration and they needed to be paired with excellent-quality testing, which frankly we still don’t have. Which, I don’t know, I can’t imagine why we still don’t have it. I think it’s a problem money would solve, and the fact that we haven’t dedicated enough money to have tests that are worth anything is conspicuous to me.
But I would have had, let’s say – yes, painful–six week, very intense lockdown. And the reason for that is that gives it enough time –most of the transmission was at home. So, six weeks gives it enough time to burn through, you know, places where we were corralled together, such that at the point you lift that six-week mandate, you have a small number of places where active COVID still exists.
And you had good testing, you could figure out where they were and you apply some very local solutions that we – the rest of us could have gone back to life. Given that we never had good tests, I would not favor that plan. But, were I in charge, I would’ve invested very heavily–
Shellenberger: Then the Asian, East Asian approach. Korea, Hong Kong.
Weinstein: Well, yes and no. Good tests would be key, and then an epidemiologically sensible lockdown in which the virus was given a chance to be not contagious in any given group. So that, you know, you would have hotspots but you could find them and the rest of us wouldn’t be infecting each other. So I think I had that right, but we don’t know, because we didn’t do that.”
https://twitter.com/Wood_House76/status/1744017290633359655
I can't wait for Tucker to interview Jessica Rose, Mike Yeadon, Sucharit Bhakdi, and Naomi Wolf.
I want him to interview Denis Rancourt on his ACM data findings.
Not sure the world is ready for that. ;(
I have not seen that. Tell us more.
Denis Rancourt
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/99130c391ef0
Recent video of Denis explaining his ACM findings: https://www.bitchute.com/video/MdCixSHVlWd9/
His full article on the topic: https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=130&name=2023_06_22_there_was_no_pandemic_essay
He's been interviewed on many podcasts. If you are on a podcast app search for him and you can listen to many different interviews.
Thanks. Now I have a new hero.
He has already interviewed Naomi Wolf
Thanks.
Tucker has interviews Naomi at least twice. I’d like to see another one, though!
It's waayy overdue.
I never liked him much but he seems to be doing good work lately.
Tucker has been on point for years after a long time of being misdirected, by his own admission.
I watched both interviews (Bret's and Jessica's (with Pierre Kory)) and they are both excellent! I wish Bret's was "dumbed down" juuuuust a bit for the typical viewers of Tucker. I've followed Bret for years, and he's very measured and precise, which is a good thing, but his interview I think will be in some ways flying over the heads of many. But hopefully these interviews wake up MORE people! And THANK YOU Tucker for injecting statements of support, because if I had watched this as a complete newbie, I would have thought this was a bunch of crackpot conspiracy theories! It's HARD to conceive of or believe in a global effort to enslave us. It's too abstract. Too hard to imagine.
But it's so very real!! This *IS* our fight for liberty and freedom...the survival or slavery/surrender of humanity.
True, the average Tucker watcher is not ready for the "Intellectual Dark Web."
Gotta be one to know one right, a Tucker watcher that is.
Brilliant. As was your interview on TNT radio watt Ehret.
We know there is nefarious intent due to the fact that the ACOG still recommends the jab to pregnant women. Then add the babies and children…wake up ⬆️ stand up ⬆️
A friends 8wk old baby has eczema... wth. They are HUGE vax fans and only allowed those with a recent TDAP to see their child. The madness won't end.
Sad , fear porn is very powerful.
Despite the massive increase in miscarriages and stillborn babies.
Despite the data they continue to promote it , money is one thing , lives are another and the narrative “for the greater good “ violates the pillars of medical ethics. This whole things leads me to believe there is nefarious intent.
@Brandon is not your bro ~ If I'm not speaking out of turn here, Jessica has shared a similar sentiment about nefarious intent:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/3b75206d5aca
After all, Big Pharma & Big Government knew:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/e0134d830a75
It’s for those who feel there is no nefarious intent or depopulation effort. , sorry if it didn’t come out right Metta Zetta
Understood. Agree with you completely. I just intended to expand on what you said. ;-)
🤗😉
Weinstein estimates 17mil will die from being vaxxed
Actually, Bret is referring to the work of Denis Rancourt:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/99130c391ef0
TY
Most important interview ever. A most listen.
i agree
Imagine talking about this mRNA technology as if it wasn’t a bioweapon intended on exterminating human beings. This guy is pussy-footing around with his words glamorizing this crap. Every “scientist” involved with this “technology” needs to be locked in a cage for the rest of their lives along with those that pushed it. THE END.
He did say the mRNA platform was basically flawed.
Congratulations, Jessica, on being one of the bright lights shining on our "Dream Team"! 😊👍🏼
"We greatly out number those we are pitted against. They are ferociously powerful ~ but I would also point out this interesting error. I call the force we are up against 'Goliath', just so I can remember what the battle is. Goliath made a terrible mistake, and it made it most egregiously during COVID, which is it took all of the competent people, it took all of the courageous people and it shoved them out of the institutions where they were hanging on ~ and it created, in so doing, a "dream team". It created every player you could possibly want on your team to fight some historic battle against a terrible evil. All of those people are now, at least, somewhat awake, they've now been picked on by the same enemy ~ and yeah, alright, we're out gunned, it has a tremendous amount of power, but we've got all of the people who know how to think ~ so I hate to say it, or maybe I like to say it . . . it's not a slam dunk, but I like our odds." ~ Bret Weinstein
Another great video from our Jessica Rose :-)
https://rumble.com/v44tlli-connecting-the-dots-1-navigating-through-scientific-misinformation-with-dr-.html
Reading RF Kennedy's 'The Real Anthony Fauchi' I now believe that the West's 'medical authorities' are corrupt, malevolent psychopaths.
Besides COVID, the AIDS poisons they mercilessly forced onto innocent people is beyond belief.
Then there's the lies about all the other vaccines, including the deadly Gardasil 'HPV' poison.
I will never believe anything they say until it has been verified by honest, independent sources.
Thanks for this share, another honest person courageously speaking out.
After I read ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’, my life and practice of medicine changed. We always knew Big Pharma was just out for the money, but the facts of the pure, unadulterated evil in our Pharmaceutical companies, the CDC, FDA and NIH was something I was unaware of. Also, how tentacles attached to our journals, medical schools, licensing boards, and teaching institutions manipulated the entire medical system was very disheartening. When it comes to knowingly and intentionally harming people for the sake of money and power, once you cross the line, there is no coming back. You have lost your moral compass.
We can add to your list, the corrupt bought 'lawmakers' who gave pharma immunity for harm caused by the toxic poisons sold as 'medicine/vaccines'.
One more reason for term limits for politicians!
Brilliant talk, I love how they end on a positive, optimistic note.
Until they discuss DoD/MoDarpa using PREP/PHE/EUA as a legal killbox this is mostly calm the marks BS
Bret Weinstein has succinctly voiced ALL the public health and political issues surrounding how covid was dealt with, why and where this may be headed. It is very poignant as Bret initially was in favour of mandatory jabs. Even if this is Bret's "mea culpa", I can only hope this interview goes viral world wide. Please pass on to everyone you know.
Great discussion! Thanks!
It would be even better if Weinstein acknowledged that this was never a pharmaceutical project, but a DOD operation. The jabs were never vaccines, but bioweapons. When Carlson says that 17 million deaths is what you would see in a global war, he is correct because this IS a global war. The banksters against the people.