The "lack of evidence of adverse events" people are only slightly less annoying than the "mRNA vaccines do not change DNA" folks who are only slightly less annoying (and only slightly less stupid, frankly) than the "masks STILL work" folks. There is so much rank stupidity flying around that it almost makes an evil bastard like Bill Gates look smart by comparison. Almost.
The "lack of evidence of adverse events" people are only slightly less annoying than the "mRNA vaccines do not change DNA" folks who are only slightly less annoying (and only slightly less stupid, frankly) than the "masks STILL work" folks. There is so much rank stupidity flying around that it almost makes an evil bastard like Bill Gates look smart by comparison. Almost.
On John Campbell's YouTube channel I heard discussion of a survey which stated that 16 million or so have died from the shot so far. I'm no expert, but even if that number were halved we are still facing a catastrophe. How much longer these liars can keep their nonsense going is the question.
Short Answer: A long time. A very long time. Maybe forever.
Longer Answer: Let me repeat a story that I think sort of gets at the answer. Probably 3+ years ago now, when the FDA was still ostensibly considering approving and/or recommending the vaccine in a booster format, the committee of doctors that provides the FDA with technical recommendations for such matters, led by (vaccine witchdoctor) Paul Offit, met to review the existing data. At the end of that meeting, they decided to recommend that no heathy person under 60 needed a booster. Sounds like a victory, right? In the subsequent days, Rochelle Walensky, then CDC Director, publicly stated, "the CDC recommends that everyone get a booster." Or words to that effect. Basically, she ignored the recommendation, which makes sense, given that the CDC was then, and has almost always been, a vaccine promotion PR organization. IIRC, over the next few weeks is when those two docs who worked for the FDA resigned in disgust. (If anyone can correct my recollection or provide better context or corrections, please do so.)
Lady you donтАЩt get itтАж I agree with the author completely. IтАЩd never take one of those experimental shots that never went through the clinical trial process. Masks are for fools. Gates and Fauci are nasty people. I do take umbrage with the use of Vaccine vs Voluntary to accurately describe the database in question. I guess lay people only know it as vaccine so itтАЩs easier to not confuse them moreтАж whateverтАж Merry Christmas and have a great life ! :-)
Sorry Mike. I guess I misunderstood your statement. Im Still a bit confused by your comment because if you go on the website it does say on VAers.hhs.gov itтАЩs vaccine adverse event reporting. I guess your point is that itтАЩs voluntary which may be true even though doctors are supposed to report any adverse events on that sight but they donтАЩt always do it! What has been reported thus far is seriously under reported as we all know but what is there is valuable info about these vaccines and itтАЩs being completely ignored. Again. Im Sorry I totally misread your statement as you didnтАЩt believe any of the reporting on there as real. My bad!
The "lack of evidence of adverse events" people are only slightly less annoying than the "mRNA vaccines do not change DNA" folks who are only slightly less annoying (and only slightly less stupid, frankly) than the "masks STILL work" folks. There is so much rank stupidity flying around that it almost makes an evil bastard like Bill Gates look smart by comparison. Almost.
On John Campbell's YouTube channel I heard discussion of a survey which stated that 16 million or so have died from the shot so far. I'm no expert, but even if that number were halved we are still facing a catastrophe. How much longer these liars can keep their nonsense going is the question.
Short Answer: A long time. A very long time. Maybe forever.
Longer Answer: Let me repeat a story that I think sort of gets at the answer. Probably 3+ years ago now, when the FDA was still ostensibly considering approving and/or recommending the vaccine in a booster format, the committee of doctors that provides the FDA with technical recommendations for such matters, led by (vaccine witchdoctor) Paul Offit, met to review the existing data. At the end of that meeting, they decided to recommend that no heathy person under 60 needed a booster. Sounds like a victory, right? In the subsequent days, Rochelle Walensky, then CDC Director, publicly stated, "the CDC recommends that everyone get a booster." Or words to that effect. Basically, she ignored the recommendation, which makes sense, given that the CDC was then, and has almost always been, a vaccine promotion PR organization. IIRC, over the next few weeks is when those two docs who worked for the FDA resigned in disgust. (If anyone can correct my recollection or provide better context or corrections, please do so.)
Lady you donтАЩt get itтАж I agree with the author completely. IтАЩd never take one of those experimental shots that never went through the clinical trial process. Masks are for fools. Gates and Fauci are nasty people. I do take umbrage with the use of Vaccine vs Voluntary to accurately describe the database in question. I guess lay people only know it as vaccine so itтАЩs easier to not confuse them moreтАж whateverтАж Merry Christmas and have a great life ! :-)
Sorry Mike. I guess I misunderstood your statement. Im Still a bit confused by your comment because if you go on the website it does say on VAers.hhs.gov itтАЩs vaccine adverse event reporting. I guess your point is that itтАЩs voluntary which may be true even though doctors are supposed to report any adverse events on that sight but they donтАЩt always do it! What has been reported thus far is seriously under reported as we all know but what is there is valuable info about these vaccines and itтАЩs being completely ignored. Again. Im Sorry I totally misread your statement as you didnтАЩt believe any of the reporting on there as real. My bad!