Opinion/recommendation: the modified mRNA-LNP platform needs to have a moratorium slapped on it, and all existing vials should be confiscated and protected for testing
I completely agree with Jessica. These bastards cannot get away with simply doing some proper cleaning-up and QC on the end product. As she states correctly: "The problems associated with the modified mRNA COVID-19 injectable products is not only a problem of DNA contamination. This is yet an additional problem associated with the modified mRNA products". Of course, there is the toxicity of the LNPs too, but there is another huge, immunological concern. All the immunological and molecular epidemiology data collected from populations that are vaccinated with mRNA-based C-19 vaccines clearly indicate that these vaccines lead to immune refocusing. This is because mRNA-based C-19 vaccines generate ow-affinity antibodies against spike (S) protein that is expressed on the surface of the transfected host cell (this is something which clearly does not occur during natural infection of host cells with SARS-CoV-2 as I extensively explain in my book: "The inescapable immune escape pandemic"). Induction of low-affinity Abs towards a foreign Ag that is expressed on the surface of the body's own cells (outside of antigen-presenting molecules!) inevitably triggers immune pathology (e.g., Ab-dependent cell cytotoxicity; ADCC). Because these low affinity Abs mask the immunodominant domains on S protein, they force the immune system to concentrate on other - more conserved - antigenic domains. However, as the latter are immune subdominant (i.e., have lower intrinsic immunogenicity), the elicited (cross-neutralizing) Abs rapidly reach suboptimal concentrations. Large-scale presence of suboptimal concentrations of neutralizing Abs generates population-level immune selection pressure, which drives immune escape. In other words, even the 'cleanest' mRNA-based C-19 vaccines will always promote immune pathology and drive disastrous viral immune escape. As a seasoned vaccinologist, I am therefore of the opinion that no mRNA-based injectable product should ever be used for immunization purposes. After all, the purpose of vaccines is to generate immune protection, not immune pathology nor enhancement of viral infectiousness or virulence!
"we need to test injected people’s stem cells and germ line cells for integration of any of this DNA."
Excellent point, Jessica. Is anyone working on this study? I'm sure many injectees would like to know—at least the ones who aren't clinging to their denial.
The studies that you propose should be simple to do and the age stratified population already exists. Age stratification is an important element. Having said that, from a public health policy perspective we have more than enough information to pull this stuff off the market -- permanently and to never allow a mRNA preparation to be used again.
How do I go about testing myself, I'll pay for it?
I understand professionals see live blood analysis as not relevant but Jess things are showing up that the people doing the process had bever seen in over 25 years of doing it.
"Inhalation or skin contact" was the exact wording in Pfizer's clinical trial protocol document (linked below). Pfizer *anticipated* that people coming into contact with the study participants (the ones receiving the Pfizer "vaccines") either via “inhalation or skin contact” might exhibit SAEs (serious adverse events) or AEs (adverse events). read section 10.4.1, (pages 132 to 133), where it states, and I quote: "Male participants are eligible to participate [in the study, where they would receive the Pfizer Covid "vaccines"] if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention [the "vaccines"], which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s)." Read that part and what follows, as men receiving the jabs are then told to REFRAIN from having sex with a "female of childbearing potential." How many men taking the Covid jab have been warned not to have sex "for at least 28 days" after their 2nd Covid jab? According to this Pfizer document, anyone not knowing about that warning has potential to cause "reproductive safety risk”.
Also be sure to read sections 8.3.5.1 to 8.3.5.3 (pages 67 to 69) -- Pfizer anticipated what is now being referred to as "shedding" of the vaccine contents from the vaxxed to the unvaxxed.
Thank you. Great post. And thank you for the time you are giving break the whole thing down. So we know what’s what. What damage all this caused. How to treat it if possible. The more we all understand and know. Won’t be as easy for another virus to come creeping in and rampaging through the world While we are all sitting around dumb as stumps. Because there is no way possible to access any information that could help.
I so appreciate your article and work
Thank you!
Also please
Excuse all spelling and typos. I’m not editing . too tired.
I’d rather find out that the dna had got into peoples stem and germ line cells. How else are we going to get the pharma bio security state off our backs?
I am so proud of our Canadian scientists shedding light on this massive problem. I am hopeful that you, Bridle, Speicher will be supported within the community. Kevin has been amazing. Alex Berenson on his Substack quoted from the FDA findings that young children had a significantly elevated risk of seizures and convulsions after receiving mRNA jabs. The FDA researchers quietly released the finding. I don’t understand why governments are not even putting a pause on these until further investigation. I worry so much about the children. As a vaccine injured victim, I am shocked that causality or coincidence is a thing. There hasn’t been any diagnostic tests invented. Nobody seems to know anything so how can this be weighed?
Early on in my injury, I wondered if this had anything to do with changing gene expression. The summer of 21 was a terrifying nightmare. I kept notes as awful things were happening to me. I have notes and dates. I have alerted some of my doctors to this impressive work. I hope this opens the door. doctors don’t have a clue how to help and have received no guidance. I have looked to see if there was a way of getting my stem cells tested but the doctor at Sunnybrook said he wasn’t aware of any although he works with stem cells. I wish there was something I could do to help other than alerting doctors. Thank you so much for this vitally important work.
Excellent points. All of this should have been determined prior to releasing any product to the public. Additionally, this is further evidence of how broken the system is. New and significant checks and balances need to be created with enforced penalties that will ensure that we do not see a repeat of the numerous incidents of malfeasance again regardless of level or industry. This also needs to be taken as a lesson to be far more careful about "playing" God. Advancement in science is fantastic but also very dangerous and due regard needs to be taken before we, or a few mad, careless, &/or greedy individuals, destroy everything.
Amen Jessica! Blows my mind how all the dangers are simply ignored by the mainstream and buffoons like Medscape etc. And the vast majority of regular doctors.
Thanks for your persistence in shining the light to the many dangers of these experimental jabs.
In light of DNA discovered in commercial vials as per the precautionary principle...
I completely agree with Jessica. These bastards cannot get away with simply doing some proper cleaning-up and QC on the end product. As she states correctly: "The problems associated with the modified mRNA COVID-19 injectable products is not only a problem of DNA contamination. This is yet an additional problem associated with the modified mRNA products". Of course, there is the toxicity of the LNPs too, but there is another huge, immunological concern. All the immunological and molecular epidemiology data collected from populations that are vaccinated with mRNA-based C-19 vaccines clearly indicate that these vaccines lead to immune refocusing. This is because mRNA-based C-19 vaccines generate ow-affinity antibodies against spike (S) protein that is expressed on the surface of the transfected host cell (this is something which clearly does not occur during natural infection of host cells with SARS-CoV-2 as I extensively explain in my book: "The inescapable immune escape pandemic"). Induction of low-affinity Abs towards a foreign Ag that is expressed on the surface of the body's own cells (outside of antigen-presenting molecules!) inevitably triggers immune pathology (e.g., Ab-dependent cell cytotoxicity; ADCC). Because these low affinity Abs mask the immunodominant domains on S protein, they force the immune system to concentrate on other - more conserved - antigenic domains. However, as the latter are immune subdominant (i.e., have lower intrinsic immunogenicity), the elicited (cross-neutralizing) Abs rapidly reach suboptimal concentrations. Large-scale presence of suboptimal concentrations of neutralizing Abs generates population-level immune selection pressure, which drives immune escape. In other words, even the 'cleanest' mRNA-based C-19 vaccines will always promote immune pathology and drive disastrous viral immune escape. As a seasoned vaccinologist, I am therefore of the opinion that no mRNA-based injectable product should ever be used for immunization purposes. After all, the purpose of vaccines is to generate immune protection, not immune pathology nor enhancement of viral infectiousness or virulence!
"we need to test injected people’s stem cells and germ line cells for integration of any of this DNA."
Excellent point, Jessica. Is anyone working on this study? I'm sure many injectees would like to know—at least the ones who aren't clinging to their denial.
Jessica, I included a shoutout for your presentation and the WCH hearing on this topic in the updates section of my last post (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/what-caused-david-mirandas-death):
• https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/i/138044525/dr-jessica-rose-princess-of-scientific-rigor
County sheriffs should simply sieze the vials. The rest of government is utterly useless anymore.
Thank you for your voice Jessica. It is very much appreciated.
The studies that you propose should be simple to do and the age stratified population already exists. Age stratification is an important element. Having said that, from a public health policy perspective we have more than enough information to pull this stuff off the market -- permanently and to never allow a mRNA preparation to be used again.
Like the moratorium on gain of function research?
How do I go about testing myself, I'll pay for it?
I understand professionals see live blood analysis as not relevant but Jess things are showing up that the people doing the process had bever seen in over 25 years of doing it.
i.e.
https://rumble.com/v2e2nls-unknown-moving-structure-within-the-blood.html
On shedding
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
"Inhalation or skin contact" was the exact wording in Pfizer's clinical trial protocol document (linked below). Pfizer *anticipated* that people coming into contact with the study participants (the ones receiving the Pfizer "vaccines") either via “inhalation or skin contact” might exhibit SAEs (serious adverse events) or AEs (adverse events). read section 10.4.1, (pages 132 to 133), where it states, and I quote: "Male participants are eligible to participate [in the study, where they would receive the Pfizer Covid "vaccines"] if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention [the "vaccines"], which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s)." Read that part and what follows, as men receiving the jabs are then told to REFRAIN from having sex with a "female of childbearing potential." How many men taking the Covid jab have been warned not to have sex "for at least 28 days" after their 2nd Covid jab? According to this Pfizer document, anyone not knowing about that warning has potential to cause "reproductive safety risk”.
Also be sure to read sections 8.3.5.1 to 8.3.5.3 (pages 67 to 69) -- Pfizer anticipated what is now being referred to as "shedding" of the vaccine contents from the vaxxed to the unvaxxed.
Absobloodylutely!! 👊🏻🙏🏻
Thank you. Great post. And thank you for the time you are giving break the whole thing down. So we know what’s what. What damage all this caused. How to treat it if possible. The more we all understand and know. Won’t be as easy for another virus to come creeping in and rampaging through the world While we are all sitting around dumb as stumps. Because there is no way possible to access any information that could help.
I so appreciate your article and work
Thank you!
Also please
Excuse all spelling and typos. I’m not editing . too tired.
I’d rather find out that the dna had got into peoples stem and germ line cells. How else are we going to get the pharma bio security state off our backs?
I am so proud of our Canadian scientists shedding light on this massive problem. I am hopeful that you, Bridle, Speicher will be supported within the community. Kevin has been amazing. Alex Berenson on his Substack quoted from the FDA findings that young children had a significantly elevated risk of seizures and convulsions after receiving mRNA jabs. The FDA researchers quietly released the finding. I don’t understand why governments are not even putting a pause on these until further investigation. I worry so much about the children. As a vaccine injured victim, I am shocked that causality or coincidence is a thing. There hasn’t been any diagnostic tests invented. Nobody seems to know anything so how can this be weighed?
Early on in my injury, I wondered if this had anything to do with changing gene expression. The summer of 21 was a terrifying nightmare. I kept notes as awful things were happening to me. I have notes and dates. I have alerted some of my doctors to this impressive work. I hope this opens the door. doctors don’t have a clue how to help and have received no guidance. I have looked to see if there was a way of getting my stem cells tested but the doctor at Sunnybrook said he wasn’t aware of any although he works with stem cells. I wish there was something I could do to help other than alerting doctors. Thank you so much for this vitally important work.
Printed. Saved. Shared. Thanks.
Excellent points. All of this should have been determined prior to releasing any product to the public. Additionally, this is further evidence of how broken the system is. New and significant checks and balances need to be created with enforced penalties that will ensure that we do not see a repeat of the numerous incidents of malfeasance again regardless of level or industry. This also needs to be taken as a lesson to be far more careful about "playing" God. Advancement in science is fantastic but also very dangerous and due regard needs to be taken before we, or a few mad, careless, &/or greedy individuals, destroy everything.
As ever, a true, intelligent voice of reason, common sense and strong scientific thinking , thank you
Amen Jessica! Blows my mind how all the dangers are simply ignored by the mainstream and buffoons like Medscape etc. And the vast majority of regular doctors.
Thanks for your persistence in shining the light to the many dangers of these experimental jabs.
This is it, this is the Hill that the flag gets planted on.
The QAQC, out of spec argument is the best fight to get these viles stopped.
After this, the truth will no longer be hard to obfuscate.