GFNs caused inflammation and remained in the lung on day 90 after a single intratracheal instillation, and even translocated to lung lymph nodes by a nose-only inhalation.
A high dose of GO that forms aggregations can block pulmonary blood vessels and result in dyspnea, and platelet thrombi were observed at high concentrations, GO reportedly disrupted the alveolar-capillary barrier, allowing inflammatory cells to infiltrate into the lungs and stimulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Fibrosis and inflammation could be verified in the lungs.
Numerous results have shown that graphene materials cause dose-dependent toxicity in animals and cells, such as liver and kidney injury, lung granuloma formation, decreased cell viability and cell apoptosis.
Protein corona effect
Because of the high free surface charge, nanomaterials can easily form “coronas” with proteins in biological systems.
Possible toxicity mechanisms of GFNs
Physical destruction
ROS production leading to oxidative stress
Mitochondrial damage
DNA damage
Inflammatory response
Apoptosis (the self-destruction of a cell)
Autophagy (self-degradation of cellular components)
Necrosis (an alternate form of cell death induced by inflammatory responses or cellular injury)
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.
Highlights
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
Translocation is size dependent, with ultrasmall nanometric sheets translocating the most
Kinetics of graphene oxide accumulation are time dependent and brain-region-specific
Brain-accumulated graphene oxide undergoes changes consistent with biodegradation
After 24 h, besides being present in the olfactory bulbs, trace quantities of us-GO translocated to more distant structures, such as the cortex, striatum, hippocampus, midbrain, cerebellum, and the pons and medulla.
In this previous study, splenic macrophages sequestered GO sheets and mediated their structural degradation over a 9-month period.
And we are forced to inhale it for the 3rd year! No wonder so many are sick!
And it's inserted via PCR test into the brain!
5G infrastructure, street lighting with 5G, laser, UV, etc. should be banned. They pose a real threat to humanity, which has been poisoned by this technology!
It is a potential lethal weapon system
I studied the toxicity of graphene and realized that Covid has 100% overlap with the toxicity of graphene poisoning. I realized that people do not die from the virus. At least not more than usual, every year gentle people can die from it. But if they have low saturation, they die because they have been poisoned by graphene in chemtrails, masks, food, flu vaccines, PCR tests - and any other way these toxic substances have been delivered. On top of that, they don't get proper treatment, and instead get protocols that kill them.
They should be given antioxidants.
KNOW THE MECHANISMS OF GRAPHEN TOXICITY - Oxidative stress is the key word. It needs to be addressed. Free radicals and oxy-radicals do this damage in people's bodies because of the toxicity of these undeclared ingredients in these vials.
This is really what Covid is - It is oxidative stress.
Covid is a misdiagnosed disease. It is graphene toxicity poisoning with all the results that come with toxicity, such as physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis. These cause blood clots, organ failure, strokes and many other damages, including death. Graphene can cause acute inflammatory response and chronic injury by interfering with the normal physiological functions of vital organs. Studies on the risks of graphene in the brain show that graphene application leads to harmful effects on the development of brain tissue, and abnormal ultrastructure has been observed in the brain. Graphene shows toxicity in the central nervous system and toxicity in the reproductive and developmental systems. In animal studies, pregnant mice had miscarriages at all doses, and most pregnant mice died when given a high dose late in pregnancy, and offspring development was delayed during lactation. The high dose reduces milk production and delays offspring development. Developmental toxicity of graphene causes structural abnormalities, growth retardation, behavioral and functional abnormalities and even death. Graphene causes lung damage with infiltration of inflammatory cells, pulmonary edema and formation of granulomas in the lungs. Graphene causes cytotoxic effects and mitochondrial damage, leads to inflammation, induces DNA damage, reduces cell adhesion and induces apoptosis - cell death. Graphene inserts itself between the base pairs of double-stranded DNA and disrupts the flow of genetic information at the molecular level, which is the main reason for its mutagenic effect. It is hemotoxic, cytotoxic, cardiotoxic, neurotoxic, harmful to the reproductive system. The sharpened edges of graphene cause physical destruction.... Graphene oxide causes oxidative stress, and acute oxidative stress causes blood clots, and acute oxidative stress (free radicals) causes organ failure, autoimmune diseases, rashes and allergies, immune system mess, etc.
So, antioxidants help. NAC dissolves blood clots, but also amyloid plaques. It is a precursor to Glutathione, and Glutathione is the MAIN of all antioxidants. Basically, all others will work when Glutathione is in place. (Zinc, quercetin, vitamin C, Ivermectin as a zinc ionophore, and others: Q10, K2MK7, Vit E, Resveratrol, Vit D, Vit B, Beta Carotene, Nigella Sativa, Turmeric, MSM, Aronia berry, etc.).
From my other reply:
Here is such a video circulating: Human Bodies Scanned At Airports
Sadly, it has been simply UNLEASHED ON HUMANITY - it is needed for CBDC, for "carbon footprint", biometrics, mind control, it is a weapon, infrastructure such as 5G/laser/UV can excite and explode injected fullerenes, etc.
Just returned from a holiday party( Melbourne AUS - most attendees ~ age 30) and heard story after story about them being sick and unable to do anything. ALL were banking on the next booster to allow them to return to their previous 'life' of self-indulgence-that's all that mattered! I tried to begin a dialog about the possible 'reasons' why the declining health, but no takers. All were convinced the pangolin(Chinese wet market) was the source of all the horror. Looking back now, it seems an advanced life form- ( with intimate understanding of how cells behave and react) , has brought this to us to end our species. They are succeeding it seems- but for how long?
You're obviously mixing in the wrong circles. For my part, ALL the young people I have spoken to are adamant they will not get the booster. Melbournites are maybe exceptional. After all, they re-elected Andrews.
The day before yesterday I spoke with a doctor from the intensive care unit. I was told that the situation is dramatic. They wanted to know about the possible problem and treatment, because they have no idea. They immediately started thinking about higher doses of NAC. In the intensive care unit, they can do much higher than 2-3000mg, in more critical cases.
All the anti-oxidant enzymes would be helpful. Especially super oxide dismutase as well as methionine reductase, and catalase. It seems that the mitochondria are greatly effected and using ubiquinol and ubuqinone along with PPQ and GG and K2 would be good. A good overall formula is Rainbow Light Counter Attack with an excellent herbal base. Of course high amounts of vitamin D, A, C, and minerals- magnesium orotate and zinc orotate.
"I am very glad that Jessica brought up this topic". You think she was not aware of what you and I have been aware of for yonks? Flattery will get you nowhere. She has not even bothered to reply to you. Guess she's out surfing.
I’ve come to the conclusion it has something to do with energy. This is woo woo, obviously. There’s an imbalance of energy that manifests itself as power. I picture it visually; power looks like little dots flowing, and the morons of the world think they should be amassing all these dots for various reasons, mostly because of hubris. But the very nature of reality is one of balance. Nature does not like or tolerate imbalance for too long
Any one here remember the Stew Peters show with Karen Kingston, that included screen shots of the publicly available Biologicals licensing application showing the redacted method of manufacture (Trade secret / commercial sensitivity) for the vaxxine ?/.
The vaxxine Lipid Nano Particle technology (LNP) is built on a Graphene backbone as per Chinese Medical firm manufacturer Xiamen Sinopeg Biotech Co Ltd with the Patent submitted by Shanghai National Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology Co Ltd (Patent application CN112220919A China ).
US and Global Pharma and Biotech leaders had a meet and greet at the Shanghai Research Centre in early 2020 to collaborate on Global COVID Vaxxines. (Of which my user profile is a badly sized screen shot of the meeting and Patent Application).
Typical gaslighting media and fact checkers can all opine 'there is no graphene listed as an ingredient in the vaxxine'. Because A - It is not a vaxxine ingredient (it is what the LNP's are attached too) and B - it is simply not listed (Trade secret).
I gave it a thought when they approved Comirnaty (btw., they still give EAU product instead) and they said it's the same formula as Pfizer BioNTech which holds EAU.
So yes, maybe the formula is the same, but the PLATFORM OF DELIVERY is different.
Graphene is listed on the same site, which lists ALC-0159 and ALC-0315:
ALC-0315 is a cationic lipid that can be used to form lipid nanoparticles (LNP, non-viral gene delivery system).
Product name
ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4
Catalog no. 000117
English name ALC-0315
Molecular weight 766.27
CAS 2036272-55-4
Molecular formula C48H95NO5
Product name]: ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4
【Transportation Instructions】.
Ultra-low temperature products: Products with very low temperature are transported with dry ice during transportation.
Low-temperature products: low-temperature products are transported with ice packs.
Ambient temperature products: ambient temperature products are transported without ice or special packaging.
Delta supplies ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 only for scientific research and not for human treatment, drug development or other commercial use. If any purchaser or third party purchases our ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 for treatment, drug development or commercial use, the purchaser or third party will assume all legal responsibility and be held liable. ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 is in stock and can be ordered with confidence.
Delta is a brand name of Xi'an Qiyue Biotechnology Co, Ltd. Currently, Delta's products include synthetic phospholipids, PEG derivatives, block copolymers, nano gold, magnetic nanoparticles, mesoporous silica, reactive fluorescent dyes, fluorescent quantum dots, click chemistry and macrocyclic ligands, etc. These products are supplied to hundreds of university laboratories and dozens of Chinese research institutes and pharmaceutical companies in China. These products have been supplied to hundreds of university laboratories and dozens of research institutes and pharmaceutical companies in China for a long time. In the next 3-5 years, the company expects to establish a large-scale comprehensive laboratory that will not only provide a full range of nanotargeted drug research products and custom outsourcing services, but also undertake research products and custom outsourcing services in other research fields, and it is expected, that the laboratory will collaborate with dozens of large domestic pharmaceutical companies in initial drug research and development, provide research products and technical services to pharmaceutical companies, help pharmaceutical companies develop new anti-cancer drugs in the research and development phase, and after successful development of new drugs, the high-end excipients accumulated in the research and development phase will be used to develop new drugs. After the successful development of a new drug, the high-end excipients and R&D experience accumulated during the R&D phase will support us in establishing an excipient production line to provide high-end excipients for a new cancer drug for a long time. In the field of research in universities and research institutes, the company will not only capture the domestic market, but also develop the international market, the international business began in early 2018, some products have been exported to Europe and the continental United States, the company plans to capture a large number of international markets in the next 3-5 years with its products fist to make the Delta brand develop into an international brand.
Delta's product range includes: synthetic phospholipids, polymeric polyethylene glycol derivatives, block copolymers, magnetic nanoparticles, nano-gold and nano-gold rods, near-infrared fluorescent dyes, reactive fluorescent dyes, fluorescently labeled dextran BSA and streptavidin, protein cross-linking agents, small-molecule PEG derivatives, dot-meter chemicals, dendrimers, cyclodextrin derivatives, oncology APIs, macrocyclic ligands and other products. Top oncology APIs, macrocyclic ligands, fluorescent quantum dots, hyaluronic acid derivatives, graphene or graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, silica and mesoporous silica, polymer microspheres, NIR fluorescent dyes, polystyrene microspheres, upconversion nanoparticles, MRI NMR products, fluorescent proteins and fluorescent probes, etc
Ah yes, almost forgot about those. Simply put, the vaxxine formula may be the same however the delivery platform might be any number of different various biolab concocted derivation's.
Dr. Ryan Cole recently gave a presentation where he discussed the topic of the graphene in the vaccines claim by some. Stated no go.
I do remember at the beginning of the vaccine rollout watching a video from a gentleman very versed in graphene making claims that it was in the vaccines and the dangers it presented. Never breaks down, “sharp” microscopic sized edges.
But he’s dead now.
I deeply admire your brilliant mind and tenacity!
I’m viewing this info you’ve presented with an open mind.
The thing that bugged me most about Dr. Cole's interview with Del is that he made such an authoritative statement about graphene not being present in the vaccines. He used mass spec and EDX to confirm no graphene? Unlikely. Those techniques can only tell you which elements are present, not their form. Of course they saw lots of carbon everywhere they looked but they wrote it off as cholesterol. It's sloppy science. Raman spectroscopy is the best tool I'm aware of to use for graphene identification. That's what Dr. Campra used when he reported finding graphene in the vaccines.
Good point. In terms of Raman analysis, it is difficult to distinguish graphene from GO, or even GO from GO-PEG. If the characteristic spectral peaks are present, the graphene could really be in any of those forms.
It was Dr. Andreas Noack, Europe's carbon expert with a PhD thesis on graphene, confirmed Dr. Campra's graphene finding, but fine-tuned that it was graphene hydroxide, not graphene oxide.
Dr Noack did, right? The activated form or so. Activated by frequencies? - My only problem Re Dr Noack was that in 2 videos that I saw of his girlfriend after his death, to me she somehow looked unauthentic. I don't even know why, her demeanor... But it does seem that this Dr Noack was quite specialized in that field and my perception of the girlfriend is maybe not that decisive.
This is what discernment is all about ... the mind detects something is “off” and acknowledges it and places a value on it (that second part is the discernment, the first part is intuition or simple observation) ... I will try to find the video you mention ... I am also a discerning individual, a gift and a curse ... it is the best warming system I have but serves to separate and isolate me from people without discernment
Yes, she looked real to me and another scientist that knew both him and her verified his death. Dr Andreas Noack was his name. She has likely given birth by now unless she miscarried....
I found the video of the girlfriend, Anna, linked from telegram in this article or from a link in this article … I am sorry I don’t know how to copy a link in telegram … she is obviously pregnant in the video and seems ti me to be in shock … she made it really quite close to the day Dr Noak died. I think her demeanor is about what I would expect in that situation. No forced tears or hysterical voice etc … that would have certainly been a part of a fake, no? Just my own take. She was no stranger to the darker things he hunted in and around … he was a “conspiracy theorist” whatever that means these days. She was brave to come out directly like this given the strange circumstances of his demise. I am guessing an associate of his convinced her it would be safer for her and her child if she made this video … I trust they are doing well 🙏🙏
Dr. Kevin McCairn also found no graphene in his analysis of vials. In fact, when he did the mass spec. he found "no signals of life." No carbon, no phosphorus, no nitrogen.
Thank you for posting this. I am deeply concerned about the complicit nature of the "mainstream resistance" to deliberately cover this issue up, shut downs all scientific conversations about Graphene and Hydrogel amongst physicians, and negate our research findings - it puts people at further risk for grave harm due to not allowing conversations about the appropriate treatments. I have linked your article in my post. https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/self-assembly-microtechnology-pfizer. Also, since people unfortunately believed the absolute nonsense Ryan Cole recently put forth, here is my rebuttal: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/you-cant-find-what-you-are-not-looking
The science papers have images of their Graphene Oxide vaccine in the paper. Just click on the link. They all look black. And they are very visible under the microscope too.
Addtion One atom thickness can still make things visible by size. And reflection (soap bubbles). Butterfly wings have different colors by different size of scales. You can even use different colors of light to figure out the size of the particles.
A thought of occurred to me....did you watch “Died Suddenly,” the recent piece put out by Stew Peters?
In it, there was footage of an embalmer flushing a body of its blood. They explained that in addition to the rubbery clots, the embalmers have noticed the blood looks dirty, almost like it has little flecks in it....dark flecks.
I saw that. I did not see much research on it. It needs to be researched in a lab to detect what is happening.
At first sight, the dark flecks are not graphene (very small paper-like flakes), but part of a clotting mechanism. They certainly should be investigated further. There is a lot of toxic reactions possible in these injections. Maybe the Lipid Nano Particles are breaking cells apart? Maybe the spike proteins or mRNA cause platelets to burst? Or the beta-potential is breaking them apart? (Jessica just wrote an article about that).
Platelets are like small biological bombs containing fibers to stop blood flow. That is to safe the body from losing blood. But they can be triggered by other stuff as well.
The long white sticky clots are likely caused by the spike-proteins. It is full with it. There is a paper on that, but I suspect some other mechanisms too.
The spike proteins are continuously produced by cells in the artery lining. These cells get invaded first by the mRNA. This can happen when the mRNA injection reaches the blood via the lymph system or direct injection into the veins.
So many options. I worked on safety of machinery and more, where you have to track each possible harm. And make sure that they never happen. Even nearly impossible ones. That is why planes do not fall out of the sky each day. It just amazes me that the medicine industry is not doing that.
The first image shows a greyish liquid. There is another article https://www.esencalabs.com/transparent-graphene-suspensions that shows that you can make graphene flakes so small that they become invisible for normal light. But they still become very visible in ultraviolet. As black.
All this should be easily verifiable if you look with ultraviolet under a microscope (with eye protection). The flakes should be dark. And it should be full with them, like in the GO-vaccine article (link under picture in Jessica's article). It also has billions of these particles. What a nurse claims instead, is that these serums light up under ultraviolet. Probably due to anti-freeze.
A practical problem is that these invisible (or greyish) graphene liquids are no longer "vaccines". Not those in the GO-vaccine article. These flakes need to follow a certain chemical process to get the spike-protein added to it. This means that there is some practical limit. Probably also limited to size in the chemical process and how it functions in the body.
Note: technically these GO flakes are incapable of any technology features. There is no machine that can make invisible nano technology on graphene flakes. At that scale we only have atomic scanners and they do not work with thin layers. The scanners (or strong electron-beams) that are necessary to write something small on the graphene will just blow it apart. And even on hard silicon, it is extremely slow.
Nevertheless what I said is correct. I cannot remember the source otherwise I would share it with you. But if you do some digging you will probably be able to find it as it seems to be quite well known.
Great finding. They reduced the size of the graphene until it was below the spectrum of normal light. It is not the same substance, and not graphene oxide, but it is possible in this form.
These substances can be made very visible in a different way. There is even an image that shows how it looks. Ultraviolet light may make it visible too as black. With this knowledge it would be easy to make a test if this type of graphene is really in one of these injections. Currently ultraviolet light was reported to give of fluoresce light from the serums, which is a different substance. Probably the anti-freeze.
But ... this does not seem not related to the microscopic objects that were claimed to be graphene-oxide. Is it? If it is invisible, it is not visible under the microscope either. It would be an interesting test to use far ultraviolet on the samples and look under the microscope. (With eye-protection).
Both forms show wide absorption bands in the UV range, which suggests this may be a good technique to use for identifying graphene/GO in the vaccines. However, as you pointed out, the analysis may be complicated if there are other components in the vaccines that absorb UV light. Other techniques mentioned in the paper cited above include XRD, NMR and XPS. These methods are not well-suited for small quantities of analyte, however.
I think there is far too little effort in investigating the graphene oxide angle. A proper humanitarian scientist would want to investigate all angles, not try to put people off doing so.
"The graphene oxide solution is clearly black..." I believe Dr Ana mentioned this in one of links she provided above and said this has been debunked, with reference (I think).
Dr Mihalcea - grateful if you could find the time to respond to The Science Analyst. I recall people claiming GO "is clearly black" - so of course, you'd see it in the vials, wouldn't you? In particular, I remember the rising star Whitney Webb on TLAV early this year mocking the work of Dr Campra along with Ryan Christian (for which she copped a lot of flak). I am not a scientist, nor is WW, but The Science Analyst probably is. Can you please explain to us why the vials don't appear black (if they contain GO). I can assure you, I would prefer this to be science fiction as The Science Analyst suggests.
Give the other researchers time to make their case. But I never got replies from people who were looking at the real world application of these things. They keep it all very theoretical.
Maybe, because in the real world their theories fall apart?
Note that I wrote two articles about how bad these injections are. With scientific references and with tests that can be performed to proof harm. These articles can be shown to a doctor or a judge, and be used in court.
When someone suggests that they hope to make you laugh a little bit but then immediately types the words “Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity” you need to be a little bit sceptical.
Hey, skeptical as i am, i chuckled more than once. And that made up for sentences like that one. Agreed, fine writing.. hope to see more like it, Jessica!
Come back down the rabbit hole. Quantum dots, super paramagnetic crystals. And 300 other substrates to go with graphene oxide. All comprising with the medical industry calls lipid nanoparticles. “$500 billion a year industry”.
Quantum dots are just the "storage" of an electric wave in a hexagon cell of graphene or graphite. Just think about what machine you would need to even read something from it. It is better to store stable data in DNA instead.
But our machines are not good with such small stuff. To "read" the DNA we first break it apart in small bits that can be detected with biochemical molecules. This is a slow process. And then we try to compute the original sequence.
The writing and readong on a hexagon cell in graphene is extremely hard. You can only store a wave, which is like a sound. And it would be very very hard to read the data from it. With our machines we do not even know what cell we would be writing or reading. The high detailed images of molecules is from millions of molecules that have been treated the same way. Usually by bombarding it with electrons or protons. And then we averaged out the collision patterns to create a high detail pattern. Which is then calculated back to an image.
What if it is a planetary battle involving extraterrestrial entities? The plane may be even higher - it could be assumed Satan is a great scientist, only with clipped wings.
Thank you Dr Rose for writing on this subject. Dr Ryan Cole has choice words about GO not being in the vials (alluded to those who have bought into a tin foil hat conspiracy and that researchers cannot tell the difference between GO and crystals of cholesturol). From my reading, Dr Peter McCollugh and Dr Malone may have also signed off on this no GO thesis. We are at a fork in the road. Are some scientific members of the covid truth movement misinterpretting data? or are they ignorantly being misled down into a blind alley? Or is it intentional disinformation to either protect careers or to protect the nasty truth from coming out? I will pray that the truth does come out.
in better days, it would the responsibility of the FDA, CDC, and the global WHO to blow the whistle on toxic substances like GO being found in various lots or various manufacturers. But they are not, but rather its full steam ahead. But rather its a closing down of discussion leading to the conclusion that all of these medical and regulatory institutions are onboard with this global poisoning and depopulation agenda.
Poornima Wagh has been totally discredited since her 1st interview with Regis Tremblay & 2nd with Dr Lee Meritt. She does not hold a PhD, let alone a double PhD. See follow-up interview with Tremblay, interview with Eric Coppolino, and articles by Coppolino and Mike Stone.
if you have examined what she says and you don't believe it then give your arguments. Don't attack the person herself, which has nothing to do with science and seems to me to be some kind of propaganda.
I have no doubt that much of the information she presented is factual. However, she is, unfortunately a fraud. When challenged to provide proof of any of her claims - her involvement in the analysis of the vials with 18 other independent scientists, her double PhD in virology/Immunology from London college of infectious diseases (she actually holds a qualification in business administration), her thesis on HIV (she couldn't even recall the title) - she was unable. You need to check out subsequent interviews she gave which I listed in my previous comment. This is an old story. As a "fact super-checker", you're really not on the ball here.
Jessica, what is your adjuvant of choice: Mercury, aluminum, or graphene oxide? 4 out of 5 dentists recommend mercury. I start each day with a quarter teaspoon of activated charcoal mixed in a glass of water with Bragg's vinegar, organic beet powder, and a gram of ascorbic acid. Haven't had a cold in 12 years or flu in 18 years.
I read that activated charcoal also binds minerals whereas chlorella is supposed to be the only toxin binder that doesn't bind minerals, which is better, so it was recommended to always alternate strong binders like charcoal with chlorella - a few days this, then a few days that.
I saw one of her videos where she was explaining how some phospholipid attaches to the cell membranes, failing to explain why would a phospholipid attach to cell membranes which are made of phospholipid bilayer of course. I had the feeling that she does not know much cell biology unless I missed something.
These will really bring you into the rabbit hole of rabbit holes. Like you l make no other comment but .... you judge. All l know is that there is much more that l don’t know.
in the old days, one could just communicate with the author directly and ask for a copy of the paper. in the dark ages, we did this by sending a postcard in the mail. "please send me a copy of the paper to this <not my home> address". :)
One of my theories that I have explored is whether the arrest and subsequent conviction of Charles Lieber was a cover for the potential use of graphene oxide in some of the vaccines used under the EUA.
Hear me out….when I investigated his line of research after his arrest (and I have other reasons for looking more closely at him), his website for his research lab at Harvard highlighted his work relative to nano wires and developing a means for delivery by injectables.
I had noticed in looking at and tracking the fin/tech elite (players and parts of their agenda) that the years 2010 and 2014 figured prominently. Looking at Lieber’s research and who he was collaborating with proved to be enlightening.
Harvard had a joint nanokey lab with the Wuhan Untivwrsity of Technology. It was founded I believe in 2009. At this time Lieber’s research appears to have been focused on using nano wires outside a cell to detect and record electrical activity within the cell. The next step in the research was to try and get the nanowires within the cell without causing the cell demise. It appears that it was in 2014 that Lieber and his Chinese counterparts met with success. I also believe that the partnership between Harvard and WUT was dissolved. Or at the very least, Harvard’s name was no longer attached to the name of the lab. Or at least not that I could find. Next up, it would appear that Lieber was working with Langer’s lab at MIT relative to the interface between human tissues and this new biotechnology and its application.
Interestingly, Moderna was founded @2010 and Langer was one of its founders. It was funded by Noubar Afayen’s private equity venture. In 2014 Afayen was the chair of the WEF Global Council on Emerging Technologies. His report that he issued that year about the top 10 emerging technologies included within the top 10 list….brain/computer interface and also, RNA technology. You can find the report he authored online.
After reading your substack (you’ll notice I asked a question about who and where the Chinese researchers were from), I poked around a bit.
What should come up….but some information relative to the further development of the line of research Lieber and his WUT buddies had been exploring….the date, July 2019.
Isn’t it interesting that Lieber is arrested in late 2019 (I believe it was December) just before the pandemic happens in January 2020. Oh, and let’s not forget Gates and John Hopkins little war game exercise took place in October 2019. Wonder if they began planning that event after the researcher relative to Nanowires, etc. came out in July 2019?
After the pandemic got underway….as the lab origin vs natural origin was debated…some people speculated or wanted to know if Lieber had anything to do with the virus. That is, had he created it…after all, he was arrested for not disclosing associations with China and having taken the monies from the Chinese.
At some point (again, there is other research I can share with you…but am not going to put it all here) I began to wonder if Lieber was arrested when he was and as cover because they were going to use the technology in the vaccine,
So while everyone is busy chasing down whether this virus was engineered, released by accident or on purpose…what we may have or I wonder about is the government (or whoever is ultimately responsible for the vaccine nightmare) using the new technology of Lieber and the Chinese researchers in the vaccines.
By pushing for global vaccination and having different formulations under the EUA, as well as production on that scale….well, it makes me think that that was purposeful to muddy the waters a bit.
Consider….Yeadon has said that 95 % of the adverse reactions have been in 5% of the lots. Hmmmm
We have different researchers claiming that there seems to be in some vials self assembling particles. Hmmm
We know from Dr. Malone’s inquiries and substack that our military is very interested and is developing research relative to creating cyborgs. Hmmmm
mRNA vaccines were pushed in the US and despite our public health officials being concerned about vaccine hesitancy—no real attention or effort was given to developing a traditional vaccine. That makes no sense. Meanwhile, in China….no mRNA vaccines were used. Yet they have the technology and capability. In fact, weren’t some of the mRNA vaccines manufactured in China. Hmmmm
I could go on….but you get the point.
The other thing that has bothered me from the outset….Harvard claimed to not have knowledge of Lieber’s suspect ties or suspect earnings. I find that hard to believe. Again, there was a joint lab venture until 2014.
(And again, I have other research that makes me think they knew). Hmmm
Then we have the whole Epstein affair and his association with Harvard and fascination with transhumanism.
There is lots of research around the bogus Covid narrative, the toxic vaccines, and the NWO. People do not spend as much time on the underlying transhumanism agenda, but I believe it to be the underpinning of all three of these. It is the next market the fin/tech elite are driving towards and are anxious to realize it’s full potential for lining their pockets, acquiring more power, influence and control.
Anyhow, have a look….and maybe we should talk further about the trail I have been on and where it has led me so far….
Like you….making zero claims here….just following the money, some of the players and investigating things that don’t make sense given the narrative that has unfolded in the past three years.
Transhumanism figured prominently in whatever the hell is going on….or at least it seems that way to me based on Theo pieces of the puzzle I keep finding.
A quick review of the studies cited in the footnotes has me anxious to look at the actual papers and see just how far along they were before the pandemic hit.
James Corbett once theorized that they already have the technology….the challenge is getting people to accept it and how do you implement its application and use. I suspect these guys know that they needed a cover story for their grand experiment because people would be upset with them using this technology to play God.
No, but you question is perfect....causes me to reflect on some other pieces of the puzzle/picture I am putting together on my end. Things that make you go hmmm. I had hit a bit of a roadblock and you might have just boosted me over it. I wish there was a way to communicate more privately and securely with some that are on here.
Many other scientists worldwide have been talking about this, esp. possibility of GO being in the vaccines, since at least mid-2021, after publication of a provisional report on the subject, around June 2021, by Dr Campra, inviting comments, followed by final version in November last. For at least 18 months, their work has been ignored or derided.
Probably just another conspiracy theory that won't be true. Like all the others over the last few years. Oh wait.
Yeah... sadly is not
GRAPHENE masks - Google Search - images:
https://today.uconn.edu/2021/05/are-graphene-coated-face-masks-a-covid-19-miracle-or-another-health-risk-2/
https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/health-canada-authorizes-sale-of-face-masks-containing-graphene-following-recall-1.5509268
GFNs caused inflammation and remained in the lung on day 90 after a single intratracheal instillation, and even translocated to lung lymph nodes by a nose-only inhalation.
A high dose of GO that forms aggregations can block pulmonary blood vessels and result in dyspnea, and platelet thrombi were observed at high concentrations, GO reportedly disrupted the alveolar-capillary barrier, allowing inflammatory cells to infiltrate into the lungs and stimulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Fibrosis and inflammation could be verified in the lungs.
Numerous results have shown that graphene materials cause dose-dependent toxicity in animals and cells, such as liver and kidney injury, lung granuloma formation, decreased cell viability and cell apoptosis.
Protein corona effect
Because of the high free surface charge, nanomaterials can easily form “coronas” with proteins in biological systems.
Possible toxicity mechanisms of GFNs
Physical destruction
ROS production leading to oxidative stress
Mitochondrial damage
DNA damage
Inflammatory response
Apoptosis (the self-destruction of a cell)
Autophagy (self-degradation of cellular components)
Necrosis (an alternate form of cell death induced by inflammatory responses or cellular injury)
Epigenetic changes (DNA methylation, genomic imprinting, maternal effects, gene silencing, and RNA editing)
Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets - ScienceDirect https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879
The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals.
Highlights
Thin graphene oxide sheets can translocate from the nasal cavity to the brain
Translocation is size dependent, with ultrasmall nanometric sheets translocating the most
Kinetics of graphene oxide accumulation are time dependent and brain-region-specific
Brain-accumulated graphene oxide undergoes changes consistent with biodegradation
After 24 h, besides being present in the olfactory bulbs, trace quantities of us-GO translocated to more distant structures, such as the cortex, striatum, hippocampus, midbrain, cerebellum, and the pons and medulla.
In this previous study, splenic macrophages sequestered GO sheets and mediated their structural degradation over a 9-month period.
And we are forced to inhale it for the 3rd year! No wonder so many are sick!
And it's inserted via PCR test into the brain!
5G infrastructure, street lighting with 5G, laser, UV, etc. should be banned. They pose a real threat to humanity, which has been poisoned by this technology!
It is a potential lethal weapon system
I studied the toxicity of graphene and realized that Covid has 100% overlap with the toxicity of graphene poisoning. I realized that people do not die from the virus. At least not more than usual, every year gentle people can die from it. But if they have low saturation, they die because they have been poisoned by graphene in chemtrails, masks, food, flu vaccines, PCR tests - and any other way these toxic substances have been delivered. On top of that, they don't get proper treatment, and instead get protocols that kill them.
They should be given antioxidants.
KNOW THE MECHANISMS OF GRAPHEN TOXICITY - Oxidative stress is the key word. It needs to be addressed. Free radicals and oxy-radicals do this damage in people's bodies because of the toxicity of these undeclared ingredients in these vials.
This is really what Covid is - It is oxidative stress.
This is also demonstrated here:
https://expose-news.com/2022/06/27/deadly-virus-bioweapon-or-damp-squib/
Covid is a misdiagnosed disease. It is graphene toxicity poisoning with all the results that come with toxicity, such as physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis. These cause blood clots, organ failure, strokes and many other damages, including death. Graphene can cause acute inflammatory response and chronic injury by interfering with the normal physiological functions of vital organs. Studies on the risks of graphene in the brain show that graphene application leads to harmful effects on the development of brain tissue, and abnormal ultrastructure has been observed in the brain. Graphene shows toxicity in the central nervous system and toxicity in the reproductive and developmental systems. In animal studies, pregnant mice had miscarriages at all doses, and most pregnant mice died when given a high dose late in pregnancy, and offspring development was delayed during lactation. The high dose reduces milk production and delays offspring development. Developmental toxicity of graphene causes structural abnormalities, growth retardation, behavioral and functional abnormalities and even death. Graphene causes lung damage with infiltration of inflammatory cells, pulmonary edema and formation of granulomas in the lungs. Graphene causes cytotoxic effects and mitochondrial damage, leads to inflammation, induces DNA damage, reduces cell adhesion and induces apoptosis - cell death. Graphene inserts itself between the base pairs of double-stranded DNA and disrupts the flow of genetic information at the molecular level, which is the main reason for its mutagenic effect. It is hemotoxic, cytotoxic, cardiotoxic, neurotoxic, harmful to the reproductive system. The sharpened edges of graphene cause physical destruction.... Graphene oxide causes oxidative stress, and acute oxidative stress causes blood clots, and acute oxidative stress (free radicals) causes organ failure, autoimmune diseases, rashes and allergies, immune system mess, etc.
So, antioxidants help. NAC dissolves blood clots, but also amyloid plaques. It is a precursor to Glutathione, and Glutathione is the MAIN of all antioxidants. Basically, all others will work when Glutathione is in place. (Zinc, quercetin, vitamin C, Ivermectin as a zinc ionophore, and others: Q10, K2MK7, Vit E, Resveratrol, Vit D, Vit B, Beta Carotene, Nigella Sativa, Turmeric, MSM, Aronia berry, etc.).
From my other reply:
Here is such a video circulating: Human Bodies Scanned At Airports
https://rumble.com/v1u1h88-human-bodies-scanned-at-airports-for-luciferase-proof-of-vaccination-covid-.html
Graphene is fluorescent: http://web.archive.org/web/20160630193905/https://www.news-medical.net/whitepaper/20160628/In-VivoIn-Vitro-Fluorescent-Imaging-for-Monitoring-Biodistribution-of-GoldGraphene-Nanocomposites-in-PPTT-Mouse-Model.aspx
THIS IS GRAPHENE TOXICITY PANDEMIC
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577996/ Carbon nanotubes in COVID-19: A critical review and prospects
Sadly, it has been simply UNLEASHED ON HUMANITY - it is needed for CBDC, for "carbon footprint", biometrics, mind control, it is a weapon, infrastructure such as 5G/laser/UV can excite and explode injected fullerenes, etc.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/buckybombs-is-the-next-pandemic-of Buckybombs. IS THE NEXT PANDEMIC OF HEMORHAGE FEVER?
I wish this will be just another conspiracy theory...
https://outraged.substack.com/p/shedding
https://outraged.substack.com/p/whats-in-those-injections-we-must
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphenenanotechnology-in-masks-and
https://outraged.substack.com/p/can-toxic-substances-be-mandated
https://outraged.substack.com/p/problem-and-solution
THIS POISONING WITH GRAPHENE AND OTHER NANOTECHNOLOGIES MUST STOP!
Thank you for information Outraged.
Superb post-many thanks!
Just returned from a holiday party( Melbourne AUS - most attendees ~ age 30) and heard story after story about them being sick and unable to do anything. ALL were banking on the next booster to allow them to return to their previous 'life' of self-indulgence-that's all that mattered! I tried to begin a dialog about the possible 'reasons' why the declining health, but no takers. All were convinced the pangolin(Chinese wet market) was the source of all the horror. Looking back now, it seems an advanced life form- ( with intimate understanding of how cells behave and react) , has brought this to us to end our species. They are succeeding it seems- but for how long?
You're obviously mixing in the wrong circles. For my part, ALL the young people I have spoken to are adamant they will not get the booster. Melbournites are maybe exceptional. After all, they re-elected Andrews.
I'm very glad that Jessica brought up this topic!
I wrote more about the treatment here:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/problem-and-solution
https://outraged.substack.com/p/treatment-in-practice
https://outraged.substack.com/p/i-v-e-r-m-e-c-t-i-n
As for NAC - higher doses are needed.
The day before yesterday I spoke with a doctor from the intensive care unit. I was told that the situation is dramatic. They wanted to know about the possible problem and treatment, because they have no idea. They immediately started thinking about higher doses of NAC. In the intensive care unit, they can do much higher than 2-3000mg, in more critical cases.
All the anti-oxidant enzymes would be helpful. Especially super oxide dismutase as well as methionine reductase, and catalase. It seems that the mitochondria are greatly effected and using ubiquinol and ubuqinone along with PPQ and GG and K2 would be good. A good overall formula is Rainbow Light Counter Attack with an excellent herbal base. Of course high amounts of vitamin D, A, C, and minerals- magnesium orotate and zinc orotate.
Keep in mind that with NAC, there is a risk of allergic reaction. At hospital, they should know about it; there are studies.
"I am very glad that Jessica brought up this topic". You think she was not aware of what you and I have been aware of for yonks? Flattery will get you nowhere. She has not even bothered to reply to you. Guess she's out surfing.
I’ve come to the conclusion it has something to do with energy. This is woo woo, obviously. There’s an imbalance of energy that manifests itself as power. I picture it visually; power looks like little dots flowing, and the morons of the world think they should be amassing all these dots for various reasons, mostly because of hubris. But the very nature of reality is one of balance. Nature does not like or tolerate imbalance for too long
This is definitely correct, and love your imagery.
Any one here remember the Stew Peters show with Karen Kingston, that included screen shots of the publicly available Biologicals licensing application showing the redacted method of manufacture (Trade secret / commercial sensitivity) for the vaxxine ?/.
The vaxxine Lipid Nano Particle technology (LNP) is built on a Graphene backbone as per Chinese Medical firm manufacturer Xiamen Sinopeg Biotech Co Ltd with the Patent submitted by Shanghai National Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology Co Ltd (Patent application CN112220919A China ).
US and Global Pharma and Biotech leaders had a meet and greet at the Shanghai Research Centre in early 2020 to collaborate on Global COVID Vaxxines. (Of which my user profile is a badly sized screen shot of the meeting and Patent Application).
Typical gaslighting media and fact checkers can all opine 'there is no graphene listed as an ingredient in the vaxxine'. Because A - It is not a vaxxine ingredient (it is what the LNP's are attached too) and B - it is simply not listed (Trade secret).
I gave it a thought when they approved Comirnaty (btw., they still give EAU product instead) and they said it's the same formula as Pfizer BioNTech which holds EAU.
So yes, maybe the formula is the same, but the PLATFORM OF DELIVERY is different.
Graphene is listed on the same site, which lists ALC-0159 and ALC-0315:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/so-those-criminals-just-added-this
http://www.delta-f.com/details/894778 ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4
Date：2022-09-08 Author：Delta Bio
【Product Description】.
ALC-0315 is a cationic lipid that can be used to form lipid nanoparticles (LNP, non-viral gene delivery system).
Product name
ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4
Catalog no. 000117
English name ALC-0315
Molecular weight 766.27
CAS 2036272-55-4
Molecular formula C48H95NO5
Product name]: ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4
【Transportation Instructions】.
Ultra-low temperature products: Products with very low temperature are transported with dry ice during transportation.
Low-temperature products: low-temperature products are transported with ice packs.
Ambient temperature products: ambient temperature products are transported without ice or special packaging.
Delta supplies ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 only for scientific research and not for human treatment, drug development or other commercial use. If any purchaser or third party purchases our ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 for treatment, drug development or commercial use, the purchaser or third party will assume all legal responsibility and be held liable. ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 is in stock and can be ordered with confidence.
Delta is a brand name of Xi'an Qiyue Biotechnology Co, Ltd. Currently, Delta's products include synthetic phospholipids, PEG derivatives, block copolymers, nano gold, magnetic nanoparticles, mesoporous silica, reactive fluorescent dyes, fluorescent quantum dots, click chemistry and macrocyclic ligands, etc. These products are supplied to hundreds of university laboratories and dozens of Chinese research institutes and pharmaceutical companies in China. These products have been supplied to hundreds of university laboratories and dozens of research institutes and pharmaceutical companies in China for a long time. In the next 3-5 years, the company expects to establish a large-scale comprehensive laboratory that will not only provide a full range of nanotargeted drug research products and custom outsourcing services, but also undertake research products and custom outsourcing services in other research fields, and it is expected, that the laboratory will collaborate with dozens of large domestic pharmaceutical companies in initial drug research and development, provide research products and technical services to pharmaceutical companies, help pharmaceutical companies develop new anti-cancer drugs in the research and development phase, and after successful development of new drugs, the high-end excipients accumulated in the research and development phase will be used to develop new drugs. After the successful development of a new drug, the high-end excipients and R&D experience accumulated during the R&D phase will support us in establishing an excipient production line to provide high-end excipients for a new cancer drug for a long time. In the field of research in universities and research institutes, the company will not only capture the domestic market, but also develop the international market, the international business began in early 2018, some products have been exported to Europe and the continental United States, the company plans to capture a large number of international markets in the next 3-5 years with its products fist to make the Delta brand develop into an international brand.
Delta's product range includes: synthetic phospholipids, polymeric polyethylene glycol derivatives, block copolymers, magnetic nanoparticles, nano-gold and nano-gold rods, near-infrared fluorescent dyes, reactive fluorescent dyes, fluorescently labeled dextran BSA and streptavidin, protein cross-linking agents, small-molecule PEG derivatives, dot-meter chemicals, dendrimers, cyclodextrin derivatives, oncology APIs, macrocyclic ligands and other products. Top oncology APIs, macrocyclic ligands, fluorescent quantum dots, hyaluronic acid derivatives, graphene or graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, silica and mesoporous silica, polymer microspheres, NIR fluorescent dyes, polystyrene microspheres, upconversion nanoparticles, MRI NMR products, fluorescent proteins and fluorescent probes, etc
Ah yes, almost forgot about those. Simply put, the vaxxine formula may be the same however the delivery platform might be any number of different various biolab concocted derivation's.
Doh!
If Jessica is still looking for full article she mentioned - Graphene based gene transfection - I've got it in pdf.
Dr. Ryan Cole recently gave a presentation where he discussed the topic of the graphene in the vaccines claim by some. Stated no go.
I do remember at the beginning of the vaccine rollout watching a video from a gentleman very versed in graphene making claims that it was in the vaccines and the dangers it presented. Never breaks down, “sharp” microscopic sized edges.
But he’s dead now.
I deeply admire your brilliant mind and tenacity!
I’m viewing this info you’ve presented with an open mind.
I hope you can get access to these papers!
The thing that bugged me most about Dr. Cole's interview with Del is that he made such an authoritative statement about graphene not being present in the vaccines. He used mass spec and EDX to confirm no graphene? Unlikely. Those techniques can only tell you which elements are present, not their form. Of course they saw lots of carbon everywhere they looked but they wrote it off as cholesterol. It's sloppy science. Raman spectroscopy is the best tool I'm aware of to use for graphene identification. That's what Dr. Campra used when he reported finding graphene in the vaccines.
careful with "dr cole"...
Why should we be suspicious of Dr. Cole? I must have missed something...
Wasn’t he one of the main proponents of the snake venom claims, along with Ardis?
don't think so
Did Dr.Campra also do an analysis on the proteins and enzymes in the jabs, or take a look of the gene sequences in it?
Exactly the question I had, was he using the same techniques and the samples were obviously not the same
No one talks about the manufacturing plants - in China ?! Billions of doses - Yeah, end of discussion.....
Graphene vs graphene oxide: 2 very different things. This may cause confusion.
Good point. In terms of Raman analysis, it is difficult to distinguish graphene from GO, or even GO from GO-PEG. If the characteristic spectral peaks are present, the graphene could really be in any of those forms.
Thanks, I’m learning!
Also the EU have a Graphene Flagship project.
Very important point. He talked about shards of it that caused the endothelial lining of blood vessels to be damaged. His claim was that it is GOH.
It was Dr. Andreas Noack, Europe's carbon expert with a PhD thesis on graphene, confirmed Dr. Campra's graphene finding, but fine-tuned that it was graphene hydroxide, not graphene oxide.
Dr Noack did, right? The activated form or so. Activated by frequencies? - My only problem Re Dr Noack was that in 2 videos that I saw of his girlfriend after his death, to me she somehow looked unauthentic. I don't even know why, her demeanor... But it does seem that this Dr Noack was quite specialized in that field and my perception of the girlfriend is maybe not that decisive.
This is what discernment is all about ... the mind detects something is “off” and acknowledges it and places a value on it (that second part is the discernment, the first part is intuition or simple observation) ... I will try to find the video you mention ... I am also a discerning individual, a gift and a curse ... it is the best warming system I have but serves to separate and isolate me from people without discernment
I saw that video too and thought she seemed oddly calm but who knows how I would behave
I remember that video too! Very odd
Yes, I agree there was something off about her.
I saw her as authentic - given the situation she said
they knew it was a risk (that he might be assasinated) but he wanted it out there to warn other people and she was very pregnant with their child.
Yes, she looked real to me and another scientist that knew both him and her verified his death. Dr Andreas Noack was his name. She has likely given birth by now unless she miscarried....
Could someone post the link to that video? I’m very curious to see what I think
This is a "debunking" article that I just found, maybe you can go from there, I think there are links to videos further down in the article.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/11/fact-check-there-is-no-evidence-german-chemist-dr-andreas-noack-died-from-unnatural-causes.html
I found the video of the girlfriend, Anna, linked from telegram in this article or from a link in this article … I am sorry I don’t know how to copy a link in telegram … she is obviously pregnant in the video and seems ti me to be in shock … she made it really quite close to the day Dr Noak died. I think her demeanor is about what I would expect in that situation. No forced tears or hysterical voice etc … that would have certainly been a part of a fake, no? Just my own take. She was no stranger to the darker things he hunted in and around … he was a “conspiracy theorist” whatever that means these days. She was brave to come out directly like this given the strange circumstances of his demise. I am guessing an associate of his convinced her it would be safer for her and her child if she made this video … I trust they are doing well 🙏🙏
When I saw the videos, I had not yet read any "fact check", it was my own subjective perception.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WDz1vBH6YPWH/
it disappeared - saved a copy on my computer and it disappeared
Gone from local storage?
That would be very curious, right?
Search on Bitchute for Dr Noack...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/X9oMvf6dbhCi/
Yes - that was the doctor I saw in the video - he was assasinated after the zoom video and video disappeared from bitchute and everywhere else
https://odysee.com/@True_World:f/Dangerous-Graphene-Oxide-In-Vaccines-by-Dr-Andreas-Noack-Killed-Nebezpecny-Grafen-ve-Vakcinach-podle-Dr-Noack-zabili-jej-spot:1
A German doctor, Dr. Noack I think.
Dr. Kevin McCairn also found no graphene in his analysis of vials. In fact, when he did the mass spec. he found "no signals of life." No carbon, no phosphorus, no nitrogen.
Interesting. Dr. Richard Fleming did not see any graphene in the (four?) vials he had analyzed. He only mentioned admixtures of "junk", loads of it.
I think it was McCairn that analysed Dr Fleming's vials.
Possible. I did not bother remembering the names, just the findings.
Yes...Andreas Novak, one of the best specialists in graphene...found dead.
Noack, not Novak
Thank you for posting this. I am deeply concerned about the complicit nature of the "mainstream resistance" to deliberately cover this issue up, shut downs all scientific conversations about Graphene and Hydrogel amongst physicians, and negate our research findings - it puts people at further risk for grave harm due to not allowing conversations about the appropriate treatments. I have linked your article in my post. https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/self-assembly-microtechnology-pfizer. Also, since people unfortunately believed the absolute nonsense Ryan Cole recently put forth, here is my rebuttal: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/you-cant-find-what-you-are-not-looking
I think the opposite. There is too much effort in pushing the grapheneoxide story. And link it to impossible science fiction.
The graphene oxide solution is clearly black as you can see in the paper. And it is full with paper-like flakes. So it is not being used.
I am always trying to explain all this in clear words, try to go back to basic and clear science, but people choose to believe anyway.
GO nanoparticles are invisible suspended in liquid because they are only one atom in thickness.
The science papers have images of their Graphene Oxide vaccine in the paper. Just click on the link. They all look black. And they are very visible under the microscope too.
Addtion One atom thickness can still make things visible by size. And reflection (soap bubbles). Butterfly wings have different colors by different size of scales. You can even use different colors of light to figure out the size of the particles.
A thought of occurred to me....did you watch “Died Suddenly,” the recent piece put out by Stew Peters?
In it, there was footage of an embalmer flushing a body of its blood. They explained that in addition to the rubbery clots, the embalmers have noticed the blood looks dirty, almost like it has little flecks in it....dark flecks.
I saw that. I did not see much research on it. It needs to be researched in a lab to detect what is happening.
At first sight, the dark flecks are not graphene (very small paper-like flakes), but part of a clotting mechanism. They certainly should be investigated further. There is a lot of toxic reactions possible in these injections. Maybe the Lipid Nano Particles are breaking cells apart? Maybe the spike proteins or mRNA cause platelets to burst? Or the beta-potential is breaking them apart? (Jessica just wrote an article about that).
Platelets are like small biological bombs containing fibers to stop blood flow. That is to safe the body from losing blood. But they can be triggered by other stuff as well.
The long white sticky clots are likely caused by the spike-proteins. It is full with it. There is a paper on that, but I suspect some other mechanisms too.
The spike proteins are continuously produced by cells in the artery lining. These cells get invaded first by the mRNA. This can happen when the mRNA injection reaches the blood via the lymph system or direct injection into the veins.
So many options. I worked on safety of machinery and more, where you have to track each possible harm. And make sure that they never happen. Even nearly impossible ones. That is why planes do not fall out of the sky each day. It just amazes me that the medicine industry is not doing that.
Here is a source of the information that graphene oxide nanoparticles are transparent when suspended in liquid https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Reduction-of-a-clear-graphene-oxide-solution-using-sodium-dithionite-Graphene-flakes_fig10_322932856
The first image shows a greyish liquid. There is another article https://www.esencalabs.com/transparent-graphene-suspensions that shows that you can make graphene flakes so small that they become invisible for normal light. But they still become very visible in ultraviolet. As black.
All this should be easily verifiable if you look with ultraviolet under a microscope (with eye protection). The flakes should be dark. And it should be full with them, like in the GO-vaccine article (link under picture in Jessica's article). It also has billions of these particles. What a nurse claims instead, is that these serums light up under ultraviolet. Probably due to anti-freeze.
A practical problem is that these invisible (or greyish) graphene liquids are no longer "vaccines". Not those in the GO-vaccine article. These flakes need to follow a certain chemical process to get the spike-protein added to it. This means that there is some practical limit. Probably also limited to size in the chemical process and how it functions in the body.
Note: technically these GO flakes are incapable of any technology features. There is no machine that can make invisible nano technology on graphene flakes. At that scale we only have atomic scanners and they do not work with thin layers. The scanners (or strong electron-beams) that are necessary to write something small on the graphene will just blow it apart. And even on hard silicon, it is extremely slow.
Nevertheless what I said is correct. I cannot remember the source otherwise I would share it with you. But if you do some digging you will probably be able to find it as it seems to be quite well known.
Lead crystal glasses look super clear even though lead isn’t. Can GO be similar to our eyes?
The science papers have images of their Graphene Oxide vaccine in the paper. Just click on the link. They all look black.
Transparent graphene dispersions for sale here:
https://www.esencalabs.com/transparent-graphene-suspensions
Great finding. They reduced the size of the graphene until it was below the spectrum of normal light. It is not the same substance, and not graphene oxide, but it is possible in this form.
These substances can be made very visible in a different way. There is even an image that shows how it looks. Ultraviolet light may make it visible too as black. With this knowledge it would be easy to make a test if this type of graphene is really in one of these injections. Currently ultraviolet light was reported to give of fluoresce light from the serums, which is a different substance. Probably the anti-freeze.
But ... this does not seem not related to the microscopic objects that were claimed to be graphene-oxide. Is it? If it is invisible, it is not visible under the microscope either. It would be an interesting test to use far ultraviolet on the samples and look under the microscope. (With eye-protection).
Good observation. The UV-Vis spectra of graphene and GO are shown here:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263509024_Facile_and_safe_graphene_preparation_on_solution_based_platform
Both forms show wide absorption bands in the UV range, which suggests this may be a good technique to use for identifying graphene/GO in the vaccines. However, as you pointed out, the analysis may be complicated if there are other components in the vaccines that absorb UV light. Other techniques mentioned in the paper cited above include XRD, NMR and XPS. These methods are not well-suited for small quantities of analyte, however.
I think there is far too little effort in investigating the graphene oxide angle. A proper humanitarian scientist would want to investigate all angles, not try to put people off doing so.
"The graphene oxide solution is clearly black..." I believe Dr Ana mentioned this in one of links she provided above and said this has been debunked, with reference (I think).
Dr Mihalcea - grateful if you could find the time to respond to The Science Analyst. I recall people claiming GO "is clearly black" - so of course, you'd see it in the vials, wouldn't you? In particular, I remember the rising star Whitney Webb on TLAV early this year mocking the work of Dr Campra along with Ryan Christian (for which she copped a lot of flak). I am not a scientist, nor is WW, but The Science Analyst probably is. Can you please explain to us why the vials don't appear black (if they contain GO). I can assure you, I would prefer this to be science fiction as The Science Analyst suggests.
Give the other researchers time to make their case. But I never got replies from people who were looking at the real world application of these things. They keep it all very theoretical.
Maybe, because in the real world their theories fall apart?
They're not theorizing, but observing and their observations look pretty convincing to me.
Convincing of what exactly?
The "what" is where I clearly disagree. And where we all could have friendly discussions on.
Oh yeah, let's all have friendly discussions while our kids are dropping like flies. We need to get to the bottom of this fast.
Note that I wrote two articles about how bad these injections are. With scientific references and with tests that can be performed to proof harm. These articles can be shown to a doctor or a judge, and be used in court.
The experimental injections are not safe and not effective (lots of references) - https://thescienceanalyst.substack.com/p/the-experimental-injections-are-not
Are we witnessing a depopulation? (>50% of people may have life-shortening injuries) - https://thescienceanalyst.substack.com/p/are-we-witnessing-a-depopulation
When someone suggests that they hope to make you laugh a little bit but then immediately types the words “Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity” you need to be a little bit sceptical.
Superb writing as usual UJ.
Hey, skeptical as i am, i chuckled more than once. And that made up for sentences like that one. Agreed, fine writing.. hope to see more like it, Jessica!
no laughing matter
Come back down the rabbit hole. Quantum dots, super paramagnetic crystals. And 300 other substrates to go with graphene oxide. All comprising with the medical industry calls lipid nanoparticles. “$500 billion a year industry”.
yeah those quantum dots are pretty fascinating. all materials science is!
https://odysee.com/@True_World:f/Dangerous-Graphene-Oxide-In-Vaccines-by-Dr-Andreas-Noack-Killed-Nebezpecny-Grafen-ve-Vakcinach-podle-Dr-Noack-zabili-jej-spot:1
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700176/
Fodder for the rabbit hole, especially the German and Chinese science reports listed at the end.
Quantum dots are just the "storage" of an electric wave in a hexagon cell of graphene or graphite. Just think about what machine you would need to even read something from it. It is better to store stable data in DNA instead.
But our machines are not good with such small stuff. To "read" the DNA we first break it apart in small bits that can be detected with biochemical molecules. This is a slow process. And then we try to compute the original sequence.
The writing and readong on a hexagon cell in graphene is extremely hard. You can only store a wave, which is like a sound. And it would be very very hard to read the data from it. With our machines we do not even know what cell we would be writing or reading. The high detailed images of molecules is from millions of molecules that have been treated the same way. Usually by bombarding it with electrons or protons. And then we averaged out the collision patterns to create a high detail pattern. Which is then calculated back to an image.
What if it is a planetary battle involving extraterrestrial entities? The plane may be even higher - it could be assumed Satan is a great scientist, only with clipped wings.
Thank you Dr Rose for writing on this subject. Dr Ryan Cole has choice words about GO not being in the vials (alluded to those who have bought into a tin foil hat conspiracy and that researchers cannot tell the difference between GO and crystals of cholesturol). From my reading, Dr Peter McCollugh and Dr Malone may have also signed off on this no GO thesis. We are at a fork in the road. Are some scientific members of the covid truth movement misinterpretting data? or are they ignorantly being misled down into a blind alley? Or is it intentional disinformation to either protect careers or to protect the nasty truth from coming out? I will pray that the truth does come out.
Or are the vials widely, perhaps wildly, divergent in composition?
in better days, it would the responsibility of the FDA, CDC, and the global WHO to blow the whistle on toxic substances like GO being found in various lots or various manufacturers. But they are not, but rather its full steam ahead. But rather its a closing down of discussion leading to the conclusion that all of these medical and regulatory institutions are onboard with this global poisoning and depopulation agenda.
The corruption runs deep. Rabbit hole? More like a goddam nuke silo. Canada is no more, and some other countries seem the same.
Yes, that's the first thought my simple clinician's mind came up with too.
Analysis of 2,000 vax vials by Dr. Poornima Wagh and 18 other researchers. https://rumble.com/v1gybwv-poornima-wagh-colleagues-analyzed-contents-of-2300-vaxx-vials.-found-toxins.html.
Poornima Wagh has been totally discredited since her 1st interview with Regis Tremblay & 2nd with Dr Lee Meritt. She does not hold a PhD, let alone a double PhD. See follow-up interview with Tremblay, interview with Eric Coppolino, and articles by Coppolino and Mike Stone.
Nor are the credentials she has in the sciences!
if you have examined what she says and you don't believe it then give your arguments. Don't attack the person herself, which has nothing to do with science and seems to me to be some kind of propaganda.
I have no doubt that much of the information she presented is factual. However, she is, unfortunately a fraud. When challenged to provide proof of any of her claims - her involvement in the analysis of the vials with 18 other independent scientists, her double PhD in virology/Immunology from London college of infectious diseases (she actually holds a qualification in business administration), her thesis on HIV (she couldn't even recall the title) - she was unable. You need to check out subsequent interviews she gave which I listed in my previous comment. This is an old story. As a "fact super-checker", you're really not on the ball here.
There's some fact-checking here:
https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/charlatans-web
Nothing to see here:
Transhumanism, Nanotechnology, and Cybernetics
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/transhumanism-nanotechnology-and
SHOCKING - Here is What Really is in the Vaccines
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/shocking-here-is-what-really-is-in
Coming Soon to a Hospital Near You: Curing Anxiety by Injecting Your Brain With Graphene Oxide
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/coming-soon-to-a-hospital-near-you
The html version of the paper may be viewed without registration: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2011/nr/c0nr00680g?page=search
Thank you!
Many thanks for your much needed pro bono service.
Have a happy Christmas and best for 2023!
We need you to be match-fit for 2023 :)
Sydney, Australia
You can also request the article from the author on ResearchGate at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49788940_Graphene_based_gene_transfection
wicked!!!
Jessica, what is your adjuvant of choice: Mercury, aluminum, or graphene oxide? 4 out of 5 dentists recommend mercury. I start each day with a quarter teaspoon of activated charcoal mixed in a glass of water with Bragg's vinegar, organic beet powder, and a gram of ascorbic acid. Haven't had a cold in 12 years or flu in 18 years.
I read that activated charcoal also binds minerals whereas chlorella is supposed to be the only toxin binder that doesn't bind minerals, which is better, so it was recommended to always alternate strong binders like charcoal with chlorella - a few days this, then a few days that.
I appreciate this. I've been trying to determine what to use to detox without stripping out needed minerals. Any info on EDTA pills (and what form)?
Mercury? Sorry, wrong.
Thimerosal is an organomercury compound?
Great digging! You need to check out Karen Kingston's substacks. She shows how PEGylated lipid nanoparticles are IN the patents.
Agreed! I find her work amazing.
I saw one of her videos where she was explaining how some phospholipid attaches to the cell membranes, failing to explain why would a phospholipid attach to cell membranes which are made of phospholipid bilayer of course. I had the feeling that she does not know much cell biology unless I missed something.
fyi, she's done a recent substack explaining this in detail. Btw, she is not a biologist, but much smarter than average biologist I would say.
Check out Dr. Ana Marie Mihalcea to see her posts on GO and self assembling nanoparticles and check this link.
https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/the-film-died-suddenly-lacks-scientific?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=email
These will really bring you into the rabbit hole of rabbit holes. Like you l make no other comment but .... you judge. All l know is that there is much more that l don’t know.
in the old days, one could just communicate with the author directly and ask for a copy of the paper. in the dark ages, we did this by sending a postcard in the mail. "please send me a copy of the paper to this <not my home> address". :)
Jessica…
One of my theories that I have explored is whether the arrest and subsequent conviction of Charles Lieber was a cover for the potential use of graphene oxide in some of the vaccines used under the EUA.
Hear me out….when I investigated his line of research after his arrest (and I have other reasons for looking more closely at him), his website for his research lab at Harvard highlighted his work relative to nano wires and developing a means for delivery by injectables.
I had noticed in looking at and tracking the fin/tech elite (players and parts of their agenda) that the years 2010 and 2014 figured prominently. Looking at Lieber’s research and who he was collaborating with proved to be enlightening.
Harvard had a joint nanokey lab with the Wuhan Untivwrsity of Technology. It was founded I believe in 2009. At this time Lieber’s research appears to have been focused on using nano wires outside a cell to detect and record electrical activity within the cell. The next step in the research was to try and get the nanowires within the cell without causing the cell demise. It appears that it was in 2014 that Lieber and his Chinese counterparts met with success. I also believe that the partnership between Harvard and WUT was dissolved. Or at the very least, Harvard’s name was no longer attached to the name of the lab. Or at least not that I could find. Next up, it would appear that Lieber was working with Langer’s lab at MIT relative to the interface between human tissues and this new biotechnology and its application.
Interestingly, Moderna was founded @2010 and Langer was one of its founders. It was funded by Noubar Afayen’s private equity venture. In 2014 Afayen was the chair of the WEF Global Council on Emerging Technologies. His report that he issued that year about the top 10 emerging technologies included within the top 10 list….brain/computer interface and also, RNA technology. You can find the report he authored online.
After reading your substack (you’ll notice I asked a question about who and where the Chinese researchers were from), I poked around a bit.
What should come up….but some information relative to the further development of the line of research Lieber and his WUT buddies had been exploring….the date, July 2019.
Isn’t it interesting that Lieber is arrested in late 2019 (I believe it was December) just before the pandemic happens in January 2020. Oh, and let’s not forget Gates and John Hopkins little war game exercise took place in October 2019. Wonder if they began planning that event after the researcher relative to Nanowires, etc. came out in July 2019?
(Will continue my comment on a reply to this)
After the pandemic got underway….as the lab origin vs natural origin was debated…some people speculated or wanted to know if Lieber had anything to do with the virus. That is, had he created it…after all, he was arrested for not disclosing associations with China and having taken the monies from the Chinese.
At some point (again, there is other research I can share with you…but am not going to put it all here) I began to wonder if Lieber was arrested when he was and as cover because they were going to use the technology in the vaccine,
So while everyone is busy chasing down whether this virus was engineered, released by accident or on purpose…what we may have or I wonder about is the government (or whoever is ultimately responsible for the vaccine nightmare) using the new technology of Lieber and the Chinese researchers in the vaccines.
By pushing for global vaccination and having different formulations under the EUA, as well as production on that scale….well, it makes me think that that was purposeful to muddy the waters a bit.
Consider….Yeadon has said that 95 % of the adverse reactions have been in 5% of the lots. Hmmmm
We have different researchers claiming that there seems to be in some vials self assembling particles. Hmmm
We know from Dr. Malone’s inquiries and substack that our military is very interested and is developing research relative to creating cyborgs. Hmmmm
mRNA vaccines were pushed in the US and despite our public health officials being concerned about vaccine hesitancy—no real attention or effort was given to developing a traditional vaccine. That makes no sense. Meanwhile, in China….no mRNA vaccines were used. Yet they have the technology and capability. In fact, weren’t some of the mRNA vaccines manufactured in China. Hmmmm
I could go on….but you get the point.
The other thing that has bothered me from the outset….Harvard claimed to not have knowledge of Lieber’s suspect ties or suspect earnings. I find that hard to believe. Again, there was a joint lab venture until 2014.
(And again, I have other research that makes me think they knew). Hmmm
Then we have the whole Epstein affair and his association with Harvard and fascination with transhumanism.
There is lots of research around the bogus Covid narrative, the toxic vaccines, and the NWO. People do not spend as much time on the underlying transhumanism agenda, but I believe it to be the underpinning of all three of these. It is the next market the fin/tech elite are driving towards and are anxious to realize it’s full potential for lining their pockets, acquiring more power, influence and control.
Anyhow, have a look….and maybe we should talk further about the trail I have been on and where it has led me so far….
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0020455
Like you….making zero claims here….just following the money, some of the players and investigating things that don’t make sense given the narrative that has unfolded in the past three years.
Transhumanism figured prominently in whatever the hell is going on….or at least it seems that way to me based on Theo pieces of the puzzle I keep finding.
A quick review of the studies cited in the footnotes has me anxious to look at the actual papers and see just how far along they were before the pandemic hit.
James Corbett once theorized that they already have the technology….the challenge is getting people to accept it and how do you implement its application and use. I suspect these guys know that they needed a cover story for their grand experiment because people would be upset with them using this technology to play God.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8657785/
Laura, do you know who is behind the A.I.M. project, that funded the research you've linked?
No, but you question is perfect....causes me to reflect on some other pieces of the puzzle/picture I am putting together on my end. Things that make you go hmmm. I had hit a bit of a roadblock and you might have just boosted me over it. I wish there was a way to communicate more privately and securely with some that are on here.
It would be great, but sharing contact info on the web is not safe.
Yeah, I know.
fyi, John Lukach's list of a number of Lieber's patents some of which may be relevant here? :
USPTO (patent office) records.
Here’s a partial list of patents from Dr. Charles Lieber, starting with the USPTO patent number, then the title for each patent:
10,436,747 Nanopore sensing by local electrical potential measurement
10,435,817 Controlled growth of nanoscale wires
10,369,255 Scaffolds comprising nanoelectronic components for cells, tissues, and other applications
10,355,229 Methods and systems for scaffolds comprising nanoelectronic components
10,119,955 High-resolution molecular sensor
10,049,871 Anisotropic deposition in nanoscale wires
9,903,862 Nanosensors and related technologies
9,786,850 Methods and systems for scaffolds comprising nanoelectronic components
9,702,849 Nanopore sensing by local electrical potential measurement
9,638,717 Nanoscale sensors for intracellular and other applications
9,595,685 Nanoscale wires, nanoscale wire FET devices, and nanotube-electronic hybrid devices for sensing and other applications
9,541,522 Nanoscale field-effect transistors for biomolecular sensors and other applications
9,535,063 High-sensitivity nanoscale wire sensors
9,457,128 Scaffolds comprising nanoelectronic components for cells, tissues, and other applications
9,297,796 Bent nanowires and related probing of species
9,252,214 Apparatus, method and computer program product providing radial addressing of nanowires
9,102,521 Nanosensors and related technologies
9,029,836 Controlled synthesis of monolithically-integrated graphene structure
8,883,568 Method providing radial addressing of nanowires
8,698,481 High-resolution molecular sensor
8,586,131 Liquid films containing nanostructured materials
8,575,663 High-sensitivity nanoscale wire sensors
8,471,298 Nanoscopic wire-based devices and arrays
8,399,339 Nanosensors
8,232,584 Nanoscale sensors
8,178,907 Nanoscopic wire-based electrical crossbar memory-devices and arrays
8,154,002 Nanoscale wire-based data storage
8,153,470 Doped elongated semiconductors, growing such semiconductors, devices including such
semiconductors, and fabricating such devices
8,072,005 Apparatus, method and computer program product providing radial addressing of nanowires
8,058,640 Branched nanoscale wires
7,956,427 Nanosensors
7,918,935 Transition metal oxide nanowires
7,915,151 Doped elongated semiconductors, growing such semiconductors, devices including such semiconductors and fabricating such devices
7,911,009 Nanosensors
7,858,965 Nanowire heterostructures
7,772,543 System and method for processing nanowires with holographic optical tweezers
7,666,708 Doped elongated semiconductors, growing such semiconductors, devices including such semiconductors, and fabricating such devices
7,619,290 Nanosensors
7,595,260 Doped elongated semiconductors, growing such semiconductors, devices including such semiconductors, and fabricating such devices
7,500,213 Array-based architecture for molecular electronics
7,476,596 Doped elongated semiconductors, growing such semiconductors, devices including such semiconductors, and fabricating such devices
7,399,691 Methods of forming nanoscopic wire-based devices and arrays
7,385,267 Nanosensors
7,301,199 Nanoscale wires and related devices
7,274,208 Nanoscale wire-based sub-lithographic programmable logic arrays
7,256,466 Nanosensors
7,254,151 Nanoscale coherent optical components
7,211,464 Doped elongated semiconductors, growing such semiconductors, devices including such semiconductors and fabricating such devices
7,172,953 Methods of forming nanoscopic wire-based devices and arrays [show less]
This could be the most important substack piece Jessica has ever written. Brava!
Many other scientists worldwide have been talking about this, esp. possibility of GO being in the vaccines, since at least mid-2021, after publication of a provisional report on the subject, around June 2021, by Dr Campra, inviting comments, followed by final version in November last. For at least 18 months, their work has been ignored or derided.